Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Capitalism versus socialism

2456

Comments

  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    edited September 2018


    Someone once said, “Drill baby, drill. Someone once said, “We can’t drill our way to lower energy prices”. One was a very smart politician and the other was an economic moron. For all you leftards that don’t do capitalism – there is a real world economic laboratory out there and this thing called history.



    https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/



    BUT ALL THE BEST PEOPLE* TOLD ME THAT WE COULDN’T DRILL OUR WAY TO ENERGY EFFICIENCY: North Dakota Is Producing As Much Oil As The Entire Country Of Venezuela.

    The answer is always ABUNDANCE.

    PIIHB



  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    2001400ex said:

    Natural gas should be there as an alternative. But the oil companies won't allow it. Imagine retrofitting every house for a connection to your car.

    Then develop some actual renewable resource in the mean time.

    And to the OP. When a large percentage of the market is speculators. Oil prices don't necessarily follow normal supply and demand principles.

    Given the connection between the two during the drilling process, arent pretty much all oil companies also in the natural gas business?
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,570 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Natural gas should be there as an alternative. But the oil companies won't allow it. Imagine retrofitting every house for a connection to your car.

    Then develop some actual renewable resource in the mean time.

    And to the OP. When a large percentage of the market is speculators. Oil prices don't necessarily follow normal supply and demand principles.

    Given the connection between the two during the drilling process, arent pretty much all oil companies also in the natural gas business?
    Generally.

    Just depends on the infrastructure available to carry the gas to market. In lots of places, the gas is just flared off and burned.

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Natural gas should be there as an alternative. But the oil companies won't allow it. Imagine retrofitting every house for a connection to your car.

    Then develop some actual renewable resource in the mean time.

    And to the OP. When a large percentage of the market is speculators. Oil prices don't necessarily follow normal supply and demand principles.

    Given the connection between the two during the drilling process, arent pretty much all oil companies also in the natural gas business?
    No. But I'd expect you to think that. Why else don't we really have natural gas cars here while other countries have them all over?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    edited September 2018
    I can’t think of any reason why an oil company that is also in the NG business wouldn’t allow NG to be used as an alternative
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,559 Founders Club
    FYI UW already built this prototype and is building a larger scale one and/or putting funds together last I read.

    UW fusion reactor concept could be cheaper than coal

    I think I will probably live to see fossil fuels no longer be the dominant industry in the energy market but that's only one market of many that oil is an input for.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,570 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    I can’t think of any reason why an oil company that is also in the NG business wouldn’t allow NG to be used as an alternative

    The margin on NG is tiny.

    There was a phase back in 2010 where NG was around $11/mcf but it has hovered between $2 and $4.50/mcf for the last 7 years or so.

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    I can’t think of any reason why an oil company that is also in the NG business wouldn’t allow NG to be used as an alternative

    Because they can't control delivery. That's handled by utility companies. I've already stated that.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    SFGbob said:

    I can’t think of any reason why an oil company that is also in the NG business wouldn’t allow NG to be used as an alternative

    The margin on NG is tiny.

    There was a phase back in 2010 where NG was around $11/mcf but it has hovered between $2 and $4.50/mcf for the last 7 years or so.

    I'm hearing that supply and demand forces would cause the price to increase if there were several million CNG cars on the road.
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,559 Founders Club

    SFGbob said:

    I can’t think of any reason why an oil company that is also in the NG business wouldn’t allow NG to be used as an alternative

    The margin on NG is tiny.

    There was a phase back in 2010 where NG was around $11/mcf but it has hovered between $2 and $4.50/mcf for the last 7 years or so.

    More than anything while people think that the energy and oil markets are a set of oligopolies they really aren't.



    It's a fabrication of the Left and a mythos from the days of Standard Oil to think there's some kind of cabal capable of controlling the market like that.