Trigger warning crackers
Comments
-
You didn't understand what he wrote2001400ex said:
Are you sure that doesn't belong to the dude who thinks Vietnamese people in Vietnam are minorites?RaceBannon said:
Pretty obvious you are the least self aware poster here2001400ex said:
No. I don't wonder. I consider my audience.RaceBannon said:
Ever wonder why you have to continually post that someone doesn't understand what your wrote?2001400ex said:
No. That's not what we are saying. HTHUW_Doog_Bot said:But really, are you guys going to hang it up on the technicality that child slave labor in China isn't technically using "minority" labor? Because that makes it alright I guess...
Glad we dropped Nike and can quietly go about our football business.
Maybe you should stop writing nonsense and bullshit and problem solved. -
The first time Doog bot wrote it or when OBK doubled down that they are minorities?RaceBannon said:
You didn't understand what he wrote2001400ex said:
Are you sure that doesn't belong to the dude who thinks Vietnamese people in Vietnam are minorites?RaceBannon said:
Pretty obvious you are the least self aware poster here2001400ex said:
No. I don't wonder. I consider my audience.RaceBannon said:
Ever wonder why you have to continually post that someone doesn't understand what your wrote?2001400ex said:
No. That's not what we are saying. HTHUW_Doog_Bot said:But really, are you guys going to hang it up on the technicality that child slave labor in China isn't technically using "minority" labor? Because that makes it alright I guess...
Glad we dropped Nike and can quietly go about our football business.
Maybe you should stop writing nonsense and bullshit and problem solved. -
UW_Doog_Bot said:
But really, are you guys going to hang it up on the technicality that child slave labor in China isn't technically using "minority" labor? Because that makes it alright I guess...
Glad we dropped Nike and can quietly go about our football business.
Can someone please establish that Nike uses child labor today let alone child slave labor?
Where’s the evidence?
-
Isn’t the onus on you to establish that Nike is using child labor in the first place?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nike doesn't operate under American law in other countries so innocent until proven guilty doesn't always apply. You prove that they don't use minority children in third world country sweatshops.BennyBeaver said:
China was used as an example. Could have been Vietnam, Bangledesh, wherever. The poont still stands, but you keep attacking that strawman.oregonblitzkrieg said:
He never mentioned China, you did. Nike has factories in more than 45 different countries, so the chances are high that they use minority children in third world country sweatshops in some cases. Critical reading comprehension failure.BennyBeaver said:
Are the Chinese in China that make Nike shoes minorities? JFC. Criticial thinking failure.greenblood said:I still can't get over Nike's hypocrisy
We stand with Kaepernick, but yet our merchandise is still made off the backs of minority children in third world country sweatshops. You can't have it both ways.
edit: just noticed Hondo made this valid point already and some mouthbreather WTF'd his post. Tug's gonna Tug I guess.
edit: just noticed Benny Beaver seems to care about WTFs. What a mouthbreather. Tug's gonna Tug I guess.
"chances are high" they are? prove it.
"in some cases" nice (cunt) waffling.
greenblood thanks you for coming to try and rescue his shitpost with a shitpost of your own. way to stick together. -
You should read for comprehension2001400ex said:
The first time Doog bot wrote it or when OBK doubled down that they are minorities?RaceBannon said:
You didn't understand what he wrote2001400ex said:
Are you sure that doesn't belong to the dude who thinks Vietnamese people in Vietnam are minorites?RaceBannon said:
Pretty obvious you are the least self aware poster here2001400ex said:
No. I don't wonder. I consider my audience.RaceBannon said:
Ever wonder why you have to continually post that someone doesn't understand what your wrote?2001400ex said:
No. That's not what we are saying. HTHUW_Doog_Bot said:But really, are you guys going to hang it up on the technicality that child slave labor in China isn't technically using "minority" labor? Because that makes it alright I guess...
Glad we dropped Nike and can quietly go about our football business.
Maybe you should stop writing nonsense and bullshit and problem solved. -
Answer the question.RaceBannon said:
You should read for comprehension2001400ex said:
The first time Doog bot wrote it or when OBK doubled down that they are minorities?RaceBannon said:
You didn't understand what he wrote2001400ex said:
Are you sure that doesn't belong to the dude who thinks Vietnamese people in Vietnam are minorites?RaceBannon said:
Pretty obvious you are the least self aware poster here2001400ex said:
No. I don't wonder. I consider my audience.RaceBannon said:
Ever wonder why you have to continually post that someone doesn't understand what your wrote?2001400ex said:
No. That's not what we are saying. HTHUW_Doog_Bot said:But really, are you guys going to hang it up on the technicality that child slave labor in China isn't technically using "minority" labor? Because that makes it alright I guess...
Glad we dropped Nike and can quietly go about our football business.
Maybe you should stop writing nonsense and bullshit and problem solved. -
No, I'm operating from a banana republic standpoint here. The sorta standpoint the left is increasingly fond of copping. Nike operates in banana republics where it's guilty until proven innocent. When in Rome... So no, the onus isn't on me to prove guilt. The onus is on Benny Beaver to prove innocence.SFGbob said:
Isn’t the onus on you to establish that Nike is using child labor in the first place?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nike doesn't operate under American law in other countries so innocent until proven guilty doesn't always apply. You prove that they don't use minority children in third world country sweatshops.BennyBeaver said:
China was used as an example. Could have been Vietnam, Bangledesh, wherever. The poont still stands, but you keep attacking that strawman.oregonblitzkrieg said:
He never mentioned China, you did. Nike has factories in more than 45 different countries, so the chances are high that they use minority children in third world country sweatshops in some cases. Critical reading comprehension failure.BennyBeaver said:
Are the Chinese in China that make Nike shoes minorities? JFC. Criticial thinking failure.greenblood said:I still can't get over Nike's hypocrisy
We stand with Kaepernick, but yet our merchandise is still made off the backs of minority children in third world country sweatshops. You can't have it both ways.
edit: just noticed Hondo made this valid point already and some mouthbreather WTF'd his post. Tug's gonna Tug I guess.
edit: just noticed Benny Beaver seems to care about WTFs. What a mouthbreather. Tug's gonna Tug I guess.
"chances are high" they are? prove it.
"in some cases" nice (cunt) waffling.
greenblood thanks you for coming to try and rescue his shitpost with a shitpost of your own. way to stick together. -
Understood, maybe we can also get him to tell us how the country is oppressing black people.oregonblitzkrieg said:
No, I'm operating from a banana republic standpoint here. The sorta standpoint the left is increasingly fond of copping. Nike operates in banana republics where it's guilty until proven innocent. When in Rome... So no, the onus isn't on me to prove guilt. The onus is on Benny Beaver to prove innocence.SFGbob said:
Isn’t the onus on you to establish that Nike is using child labor in the first place?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nike doesn't operate under American law in other countries so innocent until proven guilty doesn't always apply. You prove that they don't use minority children in third world country sweatshops.BennyBeaver said:
China was used as an example. Could have been Vietnam, Bangledesh, wherever. The poont still stands, but you keep attacking that strawman.oregonblitzkrieg said:
He never mentioned China, you did. Nike has factories in more than 45 different countries, so the chances are high that they use minority children in third world country sweatshops in some cases. Critical reading comprehension failure.BennyBeaver said:
Are the Chinese in China that make Nike shoes minorities? JFC. Criticial thinking failure.greenblood said:I still can't get over Nike's hypocrisy
We stand with Kaepernick, but yet our merchandise is still made off the backs of minority children in third world country sweatshops. You can't have it both ways.
edit: just noticed Hondo made this valid point already and some mouthbreather WTF'd his post. Tug's gonna Tug I guess.
edit: just noticed Benny Beaver seems to care about WTFs. What a mouthbreather. Tug's gonna Tug I guess.
"chances are high" they are? prove it.
"in some cases" nice (cunt) waffling.
greenblood thanks you for coming to try and rescue his shitpost with a shitpost of your own. way to stick together. -
Maybe you can talk when our president doesn't have to brag about black unemployment at 7%, that's almost double overall unemployment, is an achievement.SFGbob said:
Understood, maybe we can also get him to tell us how the country is oppressing black people.oregonblitzkrieg said:
No, I'm operating from a banana republic standpoint here. The sorta standpoint the left is increasingly fond of copping. Nike operates in banana republics where it's guilty until proven innocent. When in Rome... So no, the onus isn't on me to prove guilt. The onus is on Benny Beaver to prove innocence.SFGbob said:
Isn’t the onus on you to establish that Nike is using child labor in the first place?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nike doesn't operate under American law in other countries so innocent until proven guilty doesn't always apply. You prove that they don't use minority children in third world country sweatshops.BennyBeaver said:
China was used as an example. Could have been Vietnam, Bangledesh, wherever. The poont still stands, but you keep attacking that strawman.oregonblitzkrieg said:
He never mentioned China, you did. Nike has factories in more than 45 different countries, so the chances are high that they use minority children in third world country sweatshops in some cases. Critical reading comprehension failure.BennyBeaver said:
Are the Chinese in China that make Nike shoes minorities? JFC. Criticial thinking failure.greenblood said:I still can't get over Nike's hypocrisy
We stand with Kaepernick, but yet our merchandise is still made off the backs of minority children in third world country sweatshops. You can't have it both ways.
edit: just noticed Hondo made this valid point already and some mouthbreather WTF'd his post. Tug's gonna Tug I guess.
edit: just noticed Benny Beaver seems to care about WTFs. What a mouthbreather. Tug's gonna Tug I guess.
"chances are high" they are? prove it.
"in some cases" nice (cunt) waffling.
greenblood thanks you for coming to try and rescue his shitpost with a shitpost of your own. way to stick together. -
Nike knows that they are purposefully preying on the unprecedented division and polarity of Americans to sell some more apparel and sneakers. If they truly cared about social issues, they would start paying the SE Asian children that make their shoes $15 per hour tomorrow.
My stance on this issue is well documented here. I’ll spare a recap. However I’ll never understand people burning their shit. Nor do I understand people suddenly deciding that they are gonna go out and lace up their family with Nike because of this ad campaign either.




