Google is RIGGED!!
Comments
-
Reagan did lose the Senate on the first mid termsTurdBuffer said:There's a lot I don't like about Trump, like his EPA appointees, his favoritism toward Wall Street and large corporations, and some of his biases that come across as racist, sexist or unnecessarily divisive. I'll give the nod to his critics on that stuff. But I've seen this movie before, back in 1983, when people had "had enough" of Reagan and Mondale chose the first woman running mate.
Then came the 1984 Elections, which Reagan won by 48 states, putting an exclamation point on his first election victory, and after which the Democratic Party looked like the Gettysburg Battlefield.
I was in HS at the time, but I remember very well the arrogance of the Democratic Party throughout 1983 and 1984, prior to that election, still believing Reagan's first victory was stolen or a mistake. We could see that again, very easily.
Quite normal really. Lots of Presidents have a loss in the first mid terms in their desk drawer
If the GOP keeps both houses it will cause massive panic among the dems and they will turn to a Cortez the Killer type candidate for 2020.
McConnell and Ryan act like they want to lose because losers lose -
I try to stay on top of my investments, that's true. And I also know a lot of Mexicans and Central Americans who might benefit a lot, whether working here or at home, from better trade and immigration policies that will be bolstered by the goodwill that can come from improved trading relationships. These are good things, which liberals will hate on, because they involve money, which Liberals suck at. And they'll cite Cuba, Puerto Rico or Haiti as proof the US is racist, imperialist and colonialist, despite the better lives lived in those places when the US has a healthy, mutually beneficial relationship with them.dflea said:
I'm sure that's it.TurdBuffer said:Most of the media is rigged, and it's only going to get worse as all the graduates of liberal, marxist humanities departments throughout the country join the workforce and start paying off those giant heaps of student loans. When they come home from their job at Geico, which they could have gotten without a college degree, they want to watch something that confirms all that schooling they did was worthwhile and they are truly a "better person" than the average guy. So they tune into channels and read articles from other uber liberals like themselves all through their 20s and 30s. Then, at 40 or so, they wake the fuck up and turn conservative. This is why the dominant concern from media is the 18-34 demographic, which is for college age kids through their first divorce or second kid, when people finally start to wake up and start worrying about real priorities.
Daily market watch is the liberals' domain.TurdBuffer said:All three automakers stock prices went up today after the announcement of the Mexican deal. I'll take Mexican labor and more jobs in Mexico over back-stabbing, throat-slitting China any day of the week. Those who decry the anti-immigrant bias and policies should be jumping for joy at the solid just done for them. But they won't, and CNN will tell stories about the "exploitation" of Mexico when they never said a peep about China.
But it works for you, too, I guess. -
Huh? Iraq and Afghanistan were wound down under Obama.RaceBannon said:
The two wars that continued every day under Obama along with the worst recovery in history?UWhuskytskeet said:
Yeah had nothing to do with his shitty wars and the worst economy since the Great Depression. It's the left-wing media!RaceBannon said:
And he was at 30% when he leftYellowSnow said:
Well, Dubya, in spite of the biggest foreign policy debacle since Vietnam actually managed to crack 50% of the popular vote and get reelected. There's no mutual exclusivity whatsoever between displaying a bit of class and confidence as a leader and fighting back against political advisories.RaceBannon said:
You mean like George W Bush?YellowSnow said:
Shit, if he just STFU, tried to act "Presidential" and quit with the twitter wars, he might be able to crack 50%. Trump has SOME intuitive political genius, but a REAL stable genius could easily have much higher approval ratings.RaceBannon said:He's right and the way the media slants his coverage leaves twitter as a great pulpit
No doubt many would love to see that stop
Bull shit. You don't sit there and take it from the most hate filled lying pieces of shit this country has ever seen.
You fight back
Fuck your polls. The Black voters are liking him more and more because they aren't pussies like white boys
See anything on Mexico trade this week? The stock market reaction?
NO you say CNN lying again about a story that Lanny Davis admitted he was lying about
Keep tweeting. Never take the advice of those trying to destroy you
He was trashed mercilessly. That's why JEB! got his ass kicked by a shit talking New Yorker who was going to fight back not pretend this is classy or something
Where is the class and confidence among the opposition? That's what I thought
Fucking Brennan called Trump a traitor. Should Trump invite him for some fucking tea?
Was Obama at 30%? Did he get covered differently?
You've been a big help here today making my points for me
You hated this AWESOME economy 18 months ago. HTH. -
Big fucking deal. Car company execs get richer. Neat. Typical Trump is looking out for his wallet and his cronies wallets and ignoring what is BEST FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. Lap it up trumptards. Your mfring jerb aint coming back.TurdBuffer said:All three automakers stock prices went up today after the announcement of the Mexican deal. I'll take Mexican labor and more jobs in Mexico over back-stabbing, throat-slitting China any day of the week. Those who decry the anti-immigrant bias and policies should be jumping for joy at the solid just done for them. But they won't, and CNN will tell stories about the "exploitation" of Mexico when they never said a peep about China.
-
Yeah, so, why'd you have to bring that up? 2020 is going to be the ultimate Cult-Of-Personality, Thumbs-Up or Thumbs-Down on Trump election, much like Reagan in '84.RaceBannon said:
Reagan did lose the Senate on the first mid termsTurdBuffer said:There's a lot I don't like about Trump, like his EPA appointees, his favoritism toward Wall Street and large corporations, and some of his biases that come across as racist, sexist or unnecessarily divisive. I'll give the nod to his critics on that stuff. But I've seen this movie before, back in 1983, when people had "had enough" of Reagan and Mondale chose the first woman running mate.
Then came the 1984 Elections, which Reagan won by 48 states, putting an exclamation point on his first election victory, and after which the Democratic Party looked like the Gettysburg Battlefield.
I was in HS at the time, but I remember very well the arrogance of the Democratic Party throughout 1983 and 1984, prior to that election, still believing Reagan's first victory was stolen or a mistake. We could see that again, very easily.
Quite normal really. Lots of Presidents have a loss in the first mid terms in their desk drawer
If the GOP keeps both houses it will cause massive panic among the dems and they will turn to a Cortez the Killer type candidate for 2020.
McConnell and Ryan act like they want to lose because losers lose -
He left at 30% because the stupid war proved to be unwinnable and the people that shouldn't have been lent money stopped making their mortgage payments, not because he wasn't enough of an "asshole" to the left. He also got 44% of the Messican vote in 2004.RaceBannon said:
And he was at 30% when he leftYellowSnow said:
Well, Dubya, in spite of the biggest foreign policy debacle since Vietnam actually managed to crack 50% of the popular vote and get reelected. There's no mutual exclusivity whatsoever between displaying a bit of class and confidence as a leader and fighting back against political advisories.RaceBannon said:
You mean like George W Bush?YellowSnow said:
Shit, if he just STFU, tried to act "Presidential" and quit with the twitter wars, he might be able to crack 50%. Trump has SOME intuitive political genius, but a REAL stable genius could easily have much higher approval ratings.RaceBannon said:He's right and the way the media slants his coverage leaves twitter as a great pulpit
No doubt many would love to see that stop
Bull shit. You don't sit there and take it from the most hate filled lying pieces of shit this country has ever seen.
You fight back
Fuck your polls. The Black voters are liking him more and more because they aren't pussies like white boys
See anything on Mexico trade this week? The stock market reaction?
NO you say CNN lying again about a story that Lanny Davis admitted he was lying about
Keep tweeting. Never take the advice of those trying to destroy you
He was trashed mercilessly. That's why JEB! got his ass kicked by a shit talking New Yorker who was going to fight back not pretend this is classy or something
Where is the class and confidence among the opposition? That's what I thought
Fucking Brennan called Trump a traitor. Should Trump invite him for some fucking tea?
Again, to my earlier point, if your position is that Trump is winning BIGLY, imagine how much BIGGLIER he could be winning by toning down the bombast and attacks on everyone. The left thought Reagan was the anti-Christ and was going to start WWIII and he kicked the left's ass all over the field without being a total cock. Reagan got some significant trade concessions from the Japanese in the 1980s without all the nonsense.
-
Wound down? That must be why they are still going. He lost Iraq and we had to take it backUWhuskytskeet said:
Huh? Iraq and Afghanistan were wound down under Obama.RaceBannon said:
The two wars that continued every day under Obama along with the worst recovery in history?UWhuskytskeet said:
Yeah had nothing to do with his shitty wars and the worst economy since the Great Depression. It's the left-wing media!RaceBannon said:
And he was at 30% when he leftYellowSnow said:
Well, Dubya, in spite of the biggest foreign policy debacle since Vietnam actually managed to crack 50% of the popular vote and get reelected. There's no mutual exclusivity whatsoever between displaying a bit of class and confidence as a leader and fighting back against political advisories.RaceBannon said:
You mean like George W Bush?YellowSnow said:
Shit, if he just STFU, tried to act "Presidential" and quit with the twitter wars, he might be able to crack 50%. Trump has SOME intuitive political genius, but a REAL stable genius could easily have much higher approval ratings.RaceBannon said:He's right and the way the media slants his coverage leaves twitter as a great pulpit
No doubt many would love to see that stop
Bull shit. You don't sit there and take it from the most hate filled lying pieces of shit this country has ever seen.
You fight back
Fuck your polls. The Black voters are liking him more and more because they aren't pussies like white boys
See anything on Mexico trade this week? The stock market reaction?
NO you say CNN lying again about a story that Lanny Davis admitted he was lying about
Keep tweeting. Never take the advice of those trying to destroy you
He was trashed mercilessly. That's why JEB! got his ass kicked by a shit talking New Yorker who was going to fight back not pretend this is classy or something
Where is the class and confidence among the opposition? That's what I thought
Fucking Brennan called Trump a traitor. Should Trump invite him for some fucking tea?
Was Obama at 30%? Did he get covered differently?
You've been a big help here today making my points for me
You hated this AWESOME economy 18 months ago. HTH.
This isn't the same economy as 18 months ago
Keep going please
While Obama was "winding down" Afghanistan he managed to get more troops killed than Bush. I guess you missed the daily body counts that stopped when the Nobel Prize winner took over -
I agree on this but the Congress is hated and faded and the GOP is in control which could cost themTurdBuffer said:
Yeah, so, why'd you have to bring that up? 2020 is going to be the ultimate Cult-Of-Personality, Thumbs-Up or Thumbs-Down on Trump election, much like Reagan in '84.RaceBannon said:
Reagan did lose the Senate on the first mid termsTurdBuffer said:There's a lot I don't like about Trump, like his EPA appointees, his favoritism toward Wall Street and large corporations, and some of his biases that come across as racist, sexist or unnecessarily divisive. I'll give the nod to his critics on that stuff. But I've seen this movie before, back in 1983, when people had "had enough" of Reagan and Mondale chose the first woman running mate.
Then came the 1984 Elections, which Reagan won by 48 states, putting an exclamation point on his first election victory, and after which the Democratic Party looked like the Gettysburg Battlefield.
I was in HS at the time, but I remember very well the arrogance of the Democratic Party throughout 1983 and 1984, prior to that election, still believing Reagan's first victory was stolen or a mistake. We could see that again, very easily.
Quite normal really. Lots of Presidents have a loss in the first mid terms in their desk drawer
If the GOP keeps both houses it will cause massive panic among the dems and they will turn to a Cortez the Killer type candidate for 2020.
McConnell and Ryan act like they want to lose because losers lose -
What alternate reality are you living in? The US pulled out of Iraq in 2011, Afghanistan hit it's low number of troops in 2015. Trump is ramping up the number of troops because reasons. Guess he wants to go lower than GWB.RaceBannon said:
Wound down? That must be why they are still going. He lost Iraq and we had to take it backUWhuskytskeet said:
Huh? Iraq and Afghanistan were wound down under Obama.RaceBannon said:
The two wars that continued every day under Obama along with the worst recovery in history?UWhuskytskeet said:
Yeah had nothing to do with his shitty wars and the worst economy since the Great Depression. It's the left-wing media!RaceBannon said:
And he was at 30% when he leftYellowSnow said:
Well, Dubya, in spite of the biggest foreign policy debacle since Vietnam actually managed to crack 50% of the popular vote and get reelected. There's no mutual exclusivity whatsoever between displaying a bit of class and confidence as a leader and fighting back against political advisories.RaceBannon said:
You mean like George W Bush?YellowSnow said:
Shit, if he just STFU, tried to act "Presidential" and quit with the twitter wars, he might be able to crack 50%. Trump has SOME intuitive political genius, but a REAL stable genius could easily have much higher approval ratings.RaceBannon said:He's right and the way the media slants his coverage leaves twitter as a great pulpit
No doubt many would love to see that stop
Bull shit. You don't sit there and take it from the most hate filled lying pieces of shit this country has ever seen.
You fight back
Fuck your polls. The Black voters are liking him more and more because they aren't pussies like white boys
See anything on Mexico trade this week? The stock market reaction?
NO you say CNN lying again about a story that Lanny Davis admitted he was lying about
Keep tweeting. Never take the advice of those trying to destroy you
He was trashed mercilessly. That's why JEB! got his ass kicked by a shit talking New Yorker who was going to fight back not pretend this is classy or something
Where is the class and confidence among the opposition? That's what I thought
Fucking Brennan called Trump a traitor. Should Trump invite him for some fucking tea?
Was Obama at 30%? Did he get covered differently?
You've been a big help here today making my points for me
You hated this AWESOME economy 18 months ago. HTH.
This isn't the same economy as 18 months ago
Keep going please
While Obama was "winding down" Afghanistan he managed to get more troops killed than Bush. I guess you missed the daily body counts that stopped when the Nobel Prize winner took over
The economy is the same as 18 months ago. Trump was handed the best economy for a new president in decades.
The black unemployment rate you love to quote?
That's all Trump, right? Definitely no trend there. -
Yes Obama announced to the world a withdrawal date which ISIS really appreciated which is why we had to go back in to kick them out. Obama got more troops killed in Afghanistan. Fact
Sure the economy is just the same. Jesus -
GW and Obama both did immeasurable harm to our national security interests abroad.RaceBannon said:Yes Obama announced to the world a withdrawal date which ISIS really appreciated which is why we had to go back in to kick them out. Obama got more troops killed in Afghanistan. Fact
Sure the economy is just the same. Jesus -
Going after Google. I love Trump.
-
What's different about the economy?RaceBannon said:Yes Obama announced to the world a withdrawal date which ISIS really appreciated which is why we had to go back in to kick them out. Obama got more troops killed in Afghanistan. Fact
Sure the economy is just the same. Jesus
Your shock is the result of years of Fox News brainwashing. Hard to admit it's the same when you were told the recovery never happened. -
NoRaceBannon said:
And he was at 30% when he leftYellowSnow said:
Well, Dubya, in spite of the biggest foreign policy debacle since Vietnam actually managed to crack 50% of the popular vote and get reelected. There's no mutual exclusivity whatsoever between displaying a bit of class and confidence as a leader and fighting back against political advisories.RaceBannon said:
You mean like George W Bush?YellowSnow said:
Shit, if he just STFU, tried to act "Presidential" and quit with the twitter wars, he might be able to crack 50%. Trump has SOME intuitive political genius, but a REAL stable genius could easily have much higher approval ratings.RaceBannon said:He's right and the way the media slants his coverage leaves twitter as a great pulpit
No doubt many would love to see that stop
Bull shit. You don't sit there and take it from the most hate filled lying pieces of shit this country has ever seen.
You fight back
Fuck your polls. The Black voters are liking him more and more because they aren't pussies like white boys
See anything on Mexico trade this week? The stock market reaction?
NO you say CNN lying again about a story that Lanny Davis admitted he was lying about
Keep tweeting. Never take the advice of those trying to destroy you
He was trashed mercilessly. That's why JEB! got his ass kicked by a shit talking New Yorker who was going to fight back not pretend this is classy or something
Where is the class and confidence among the opposition? That's what I thought
Fucking Brennan called Trump a traitor. Should Trump invite him for some fucking tea?
-
Bush announced the withdrawal date.RaceBannon said:Yes Obama announced to the world a withdrawal date which ISIS really appreciated which is why we had to go back in to kick them out. Obama got more troops killed in Afghanistan. Fact
Sure the economy is just the same. Jesus
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S.–Iraq_Status_of_Forces_Agreement
Yes the economy is the same. Trump now brags about the stock market as evidence. It almost tripled under Obama. Call me when the Dow gets to 60,000 -
"Silicon Valley is Bowing Down to Chinese Totalitarianism"
Google left China in 2010, claiming it was uncomfortable with the increasing censorship being implemented on the Chinese web. But now Google is planning to come back, and it has been developing a censored China-friendly version of their search engine in secret. The prospect of American tech giants moving into China sets a new precedent to the world, that cooperating with oppressive, authoritarian regimes is acceptable when it carries massive profit potential.
Apple also used to be principled when it came to privacy and encryption. In 2015 they famously declined to help the FBI unlock the encrypted iPhone involved in the San Bernadino shooting, further exemplifying their stance on privacy. However this focus on privacy only seems to apply to the West, as Apple has recently given in to Chinese regulation by handing over all their iCloud data and encryption keys. This gives the Chinese government complete access to Chinese users’ information.
A couple of weeks later, Apple further helped the Chinese government by taking down VPN apps from the Chinese app store, which were allowing users to bypass the country’s stringent censorship system.
Tech giants like Apple and Google have come a long way from their humble beginnings, and in turn, so have their morals and principles. In potentially deciding to expand into China, these companies will be openly admitting that they no longer value freedom and privacy.
Profit seems to be at the heart of these companies’ decisions, and ignoring all ethical ramifications, moving into China would indeed be a very profitable move. The question is whether we should accept this.
https://medium.com/@richardhaas1999/silicon-valley-is-bowing-down-to-chinese-totalitarianism-f1b145eb0017
If they're willing to do that kind of shit over there, do you really think they would not do it here? That they are not already engaging in censorship in cooperation with the American left? -
Is it difficult for you to imagine that a public company is profit driven? China's the biggest market and the smart move is to enter that market and play by their rules. Just like every other company that does business over there.oregonblitzkrieg said:"Silicon Valley is Bowing Down to Chinese Totalitarianism"
Google left China in 2010, claiming it was uncomfortable with the increasing censorship being implemented on the Chinese web. But now Google is planning to come back, and it has been developing a censored China-friendly version of their search engine in secret. The prospect of American tech giants moving into China sets a new precedent to the world, that cooperating with oppressive, authoritarian regimes is acceptable when it carries massive profit potential.
Apple also used to be principled when it came to privacy and encryption. In 2015 they famously declined to help the FBI unlock the encrypted iPhone involved in the San Bernadino shooting, further exemplifying their stance on privacy. However this focus on privacy only seems to apply to the West, as Apple has recently given in to Chinese regulation by handing over all their iCloud data and encryption keys. This gives the Chinese government complete access to Chinese users’ information.
A couple of weeks later, Apple further helped the Chinese government by taking down VPN apps from the Chinese app store, which were allowing users to bypass the country’s stringent censorship system.
Tech giants like Apple and Google have come a long way from their humble beginnings, and in turn, so have their morals and principles. In potentially deciding to expand into China, these companies will be openly admitting that they no longer value freedom and privacy.
Profit seems to be at the heart of these companies’ decisions, and ignoring all ethical ramifications, moving into China would indeed be a very profitable move. The question is whether we should accept this.
https://medium.com/@richardhaas1999/silicon-valley-is-bowing-down-to-chinese-totalitarianism-f1b145eb0017
If they're willing to do that kind of shit over there, do you really think they would not do it here? That they are not already engaging in censorship in cooperation with the American left?
You seem to think these tech companies are out to stifle your brand of politics, right? But in reality, the marketplace ideas will win. Your buds (Alex, Milo) that were de-platformed can find another platform can't they? Bootstrap it like a good ol' American. There is no right to be on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Stitcher, Spotify, etc., and those businesses chose to set the rules based upon how they can maximize profit. I'm sure normal, rational Conservative thinkers can agree with that. But if these tools lose their platform it's a giant CONSPIRACY!!!111!!!!one!!!111 Nope, just survival of the fittest, and the market has determined the winners and losers.
If a sizable market wanted to hear your crackpot ideas, you'd get to paid to share them on those platforms. Fortunately, no one but a few angry cranks in the Tug want to read/hear your stuff.
I'd like to give TIA for the incoming downvotes, wtfs, flags from the usual suspects of small minded, mouth-breathers. Cheers! -
oregonblitzkrieg said:
"Silicon Valley is Bowing Down to Chinese Totalitarianism"
Google left China in 2010, claiming it was uncomfortable with the increasing censorship being implemented on the Chinese web. But now Google is planning to come back, and it has been developing a censored China-friendly version of their search engine in secret. The prospect of American tech giants moving into China sets a new precedent to the world, that cooperating with oppressive, authoritarian regimes is acceptable when it carries massive profit potential.
Apple also used to be principled when it came to privacy and encryption. In 2015 they famously declined to help the FBI unlock the encrypted iPhone involved in the San Bernadino shooting, further exemplifying their stance on privacy. However this focus on privacy only seems to apply to the West, as Apple has recently given in to Chinese regulation by handing over all their iCloud data and encryption keys. This gives the Chinese government complete access to Chinese users’ information.
A couple of weeks later, Apple further helped the Chinese government by taking down VPN apps from the Chinese app store, which were allowing users to bypass the country’s stringent censorship system.
Tech giants like Apple and Google have come a long way from their humble beginnings, and in turn, so have their morals and principles. In potentially deciding to expand into China, these companies will be openly admitting that they no longer value freedom and privacy.
Profit seems to be at the heart of these companies’ decisions, and ignoring all ethical ramifications, moving into China would indeed be a very profitable move. The question is whether we should accept this.
https://medium.com/@richardhaas1999/silicon-valley-is-bowing-down-to-chinese-totalitarianism-f1b145eb0017
If they're willing to do that kind of shit over there, do you really think they would not do it here? That they are not already engaging in censorship in cooperation with the American left?
-
The HondoFS schtick isn't working for you. At all.BennyBeaver said:
#clockworkshillRaceBannon said:Black approval in the 20's or low 30's after two years of calling him a racist daily
Most GOP hit the ceiling at 10
Nice illustration of under or no reporting of positive news
Its like you were trying to make my point for me
Oh and no big deal to make an agreement with Mexico by a guy who hates Mexicans and wants to kick the all out. Especially after the hysteria when NAFTA was scrapped
Canada is slinking back to the table now too. Oh but its just a waste of time. For fucks sake
You guys were wrong so many fucking times. Man up and own it -
Half my family was from Nebraska you old fucker.RaceBannon said:
Keep it classy around here pleasedflea said:
I'm sure that's it.TurdBuffer said:Most of the media is rigged, and it's only going to get worse as all the graduates of liberal, marxist humanities departments throughout the country join the workforce and start paying off those giant heaps of student loans. When they come home from their job at Geico, which they could have gotten without a college degree, they want to watch something that confirms all that schooling they did was worthwhile and they are truly a "better person" than the average guy. So they tune into channels and read articles from other uber liberals like themselves all through their 20s and 30s. Then, at 40 or so, they wake the fuck up and turn conservative. This is why the dominant concern from media is the 18-34 demographic, which is for college age kids through their first divorce or second kid, when people finally start to wake up and start worrying about real priorities.
Daily market watch is the liberals' domain.TurdBuffer said:All three automakers stock prices went up today after the announcement of the Mexican deal. I'll take Mexican labor and more jobs in Mexico over back-stabbing, throat-slitting China any day of the week. Those who decry the anti-immigrant bias and policies should be jumping for joy at the solid just done for them. But they won't, and CNN will tell stories about the "exploitation" of Mexico when they never said a peep about China.
But it works for you, too, I guess. -
Substitute China for Nazi Germany and you would squeal like a pig and backpedal like a motherfucker. But because it's commies, socialists and Google doing it, it's ok.BennyBeaver said:
Is it difficult for you to imagine that a public company is profit driven?oregonblitzkrieg said:"Silicon Valley is Bowing Down to Chinese Totalitarianism"
Google left China in 2010, claiming it was uncomfortable with the increasing censorship being implemented on the Chinese web. But now Google is planning to come back, and it has been developing a censored China-friendly version of their search engine in secret. The prospect of American tech giants moving into China sets a new precedent to the world, that cooperating with oppressive, authoritarian regimes is acceptable when it carries massive profit potential.
Apple also used to be principled when it came to privacy and encryption. In 2015 they famously declined to help the FBI unlock the encrypted iPhone involved in the San Bernadino shooting, further exemplifying their stance on privacy. However this focus on privacy only seems to apply to the West, as Apple has recently given in to Chinese regulation by handing over all their iCloud data and encryption keys. This gives the Chinese government complete access to Chinese users’ information.
A couple of weeks later, Apple further helped the Chinese government by taking down VPN apps from the Chinese app store, which were allowing users to bypass the country’s stringent censorship system.
Tech giants like Apple and Google have come a long way from their humble beginnings, and in turn, so have their morals and principles. In potentially deciding to expand into China, these companies will be openly admitting that they no longer value freedom and privacy.
Profit seems to be at the heart of these companies’ decisions, and ignoring all ethical ramifications, moving into China would indeed be a very profitable move. The question is whether we should accept this.
https://medium.com/@richardhaas1999/silicon-valley-is-bowing-down-to-chinese-totalitarianism-f1b145eb0017
If they're willing to do that kind of shit over there, do you really think they would not do it here? That they are not already engaging in censorship in cooperation with the American left?China'sNazi Germany's the biggest market and the smart move is to enter that market and play by their rules. Just like every other company that does business over there. -
Now you get it! Just think about all those guns, tanks, ammo, and planes we could have sold them.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Substitute China for Nazi Germany and you would squeal like a pig and backpedal like a motherfucker. But because it's commies, socialists and Google doing it, it's ok.BennyBeaver said:
Is it difficult for you to imagine that a public company is profit driven?oregonblitzkrieg said:"Silicon Valley is Bowing Down to Chinese Totalitarianism"
Google left China in 2010, claiming it was uncomfortable with the increasing censorship being implemented on the Chinese web. But now Google is planning to come back, and it has been developing a censored China-friendly version of their search engine in secret. The prospect of American tech giants moving into China sets a new precedent to the world, that cooperating with oppressive, authoritarian regimes is acceptable when it carries massive profit potential.
Apple also used to be principled when it came to privacy and encryption. In 2015 they famously declined to help the FBI unlock the encrypted iPhone involved in the San Bernadino shooting, further exemplifying their stance on privacy. However this focus on privacy only seems to apply to the West, as Apple has recently given in to Chinese regulation by handing over all their iCloud data and encryption keys. This gives the Chinese government complete access to Chinese users’ information.
A couple of weeks later, Apple further helped the Chinese government by taking down VPN apps from the Chinese app store, which were allowing users to bypass the country’s stringent censorship system.
Tech giants like Apple and Google have come a long way from their humble beginnings, and in turn, so have their morals and principles. In potentially deciding to expand into China, these companies will be openly admitting that they no longer value freedom and privacy.
Profit seems to be at the heart of these companies’ decisions, and ignoring all ethical ramifications, moving into China would indeed be a very profitable move. The question is whether we should accept this.
https://medium.com/@richardhaas1999/silicon-valley-is-bowing-down-to-chinese-totalitarianism-f1b145eb0017
If they're willing to do that kind of shit over there, do you really think they would not do it here? That they are not already engaging in censorship in cooperation with the American left?China'sNazi Germany's the biggest market and the smart move is to enter that market and play by their rules. Just like every other company that does business over there. -
You're struggling. Your only redeeming value is your avatar. You seem pretty worthless as a human.BennyBeaver said:
Now you get it! Just think about all those guns, tanks, ammo, and planes we could have sold them.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Substitute China for Nazi Germany and you would squeal like a pig and backpedal like a motherfucker. But because it's commies, socialists and Google doing it, it's ok.BennyBeaver said:
Is it difficult for you to imagine that a public company is profit driven?oregonblitzkrieg said:"Silicon Valley is Bowing Down to Chinese Totalitarianism"
Google left China in 2010, claiming it was uncomfortable with the increasing censorship being implemented on the Chinese web. But now Google is planning to come back, and it has been developing a censored China-friendly version of their search engine in secret. The prospect of American tech giants moving into China sets a new precedent to the world, that cooperating with oppressive, authoritarian regimes is acceptable when it carries massive profit potential.
Apple also used to be principled when it came to privacy and encryption. In 2015 they famously declined to help the FBI unlock the encrypted iPhone involved in the San Bernadino shooting, further exemplifying their stance on privacy. However this focus on privacy only seems to apply to the West, as Apple has recently given in to Chinese regulation by handing over all their iCloud data and encryption keys. This gives the Chinese government complete access to Chinese users’ information.
A couple of weeks later, Apple further helped the Chinese government by taking down VPN apps from the Chinese app store, which were allowing users to bypass the country’s stringent censorship system.
Tech giants like Apple and Google have come a long way from their humble beginnings, and in turn, so have their morals and principles. In potentially deciding to expand into China, these companies will be openly admitting that they no longer value freedom and privacy.
Profit seems to be at the heart of these companies’ decisions, and ignoring all ethical ramifications, moving into China would indeed be a very profitable move. The question is whether we should accept this.
https://medium.com/@richardhaas1999/silicon-valley-is-bowing-down-to-chinese-totalitarianism-f1b145eb0017
If they're willing to do that kind of shit over there, do you really think they would not do it here? That they are not already engaging in censorship in cooperation with the American left?China'sNazi Germany's the biggest market and the smart move is to enter that market and play by their rules. Just like every other company that does business over there. -
Ironic.oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're struggling. Your only redeeming value is your avatar. You seem pretty worthless as a human.BennyBeaver said:
Now you get it! Just think about all those guns, tanks, ammo, and planes we could have sold them.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Substitute China for Nazi Germany and you would squeal like a pig and backpedal like a motherfucker. But because it's commies, socialists and Google doing it, it's ok.BennyBeaver said:
Is it difficult for you to imagine that a public company is profit driven?oregonblitzkrieg said:"Silicon Valley is Bowing Down to Chinese Totalitarianism"
Google left China in 2010, claiming it was uncomfortable with the increasing censorship being implemented on the Chinese web. But now Google is planning to come back, and it has been developing a censored China-friendly version of their search engine in secret. The prospect of American tech giants moving into China sets a new precedent to the world, that cooperating with oppressive, authoritarian regimes is acceptable when it carries massive profit potential.
Apple also used to be principled when it came to privacy and encryption. In 2015 they famously declined to help the FBI unlock the encrypted iPhone involved in the San Bernadino shooting, further exemplifying their stance on privacy. However this focus on privacy only seems to apply to the West, as Apple has recently given in to Chinese regulation by handing over all their iCloud data and encryption keys. This gives the Chinese government complete access to Chinese users’ information.
A couple of weeks later, Apple further helped the Chinese government by taking down VPN apps from the Chinese app store, which were allowing users to bypass the country’s stringent censorship system.
Tech giants like Apple and Google have come a long way from their humble beginnings, and in turn, so have their morals and principles. In potentially deciding to expand into China, these companies will be openly admitting that they no longer value freedom and privacy.
Profit seems to be at the heart of these companies’ decisions, and ignoring all ethical ramifications, moving into China would indeed be a very profitable move. The question is whether we should accept this.
https://medium.com/@richardhaas1999/silicon-valley-is-bowing-down-to-chinese-totalitarianism-f1b145eb0017
If they're willing to do that kind of shit over there, do you really think they would not do it here? That they are not already engaging in censorship in cooperation with the American left?China'sNazi Germany's the biggest market and the smart move is to enter that market and play by their rules. Just like every other company that does business over there. -
The GOP won’t keep the house and probably will have a slight minority in the Senate as well. Standard fare for a newcomer President. If the Socialists win more than 4 or 5 seats, the DNC will go their way anyway. They don’t have any establishment rainmakers. Inslee has been traveling the country under the guise of being the head of the democratic governors association. But He’s temperature taking to see how much support that He would have as Presidential nominee. Rumor is that Jeff Merkely D-OR is doing the same. Not looking good for the Dems for 2020 at this point.RaceBannon said:
Reagan did lose the Senate on the first mid termsTurdBuffer said:There's a lot I don't like about Trump, like his EPA appointees, his favoritism toward Wall Street and large corporations, and some of his biases that come across as racist, sexist or unnecessarily divisive. I'll give the nod to his critics on that stuff. But I've seen this movie before, back in 1983, when people had "had enough" of Reagan and Mondale chose the first woman running mate.
Then came the 1984 Elections, which Reagan won by 48 states, putting an exclamation point on his first election victory, and after which the Democratic Party looked like the Gettysburg Battlefield.
I was in HS at the time, but I remember very well the arrogance of the Democratic Party throughout 1983 and 1984, prior to that election, still believing Reagan's first victory was stolen or a mistake. We could see that again, very easily.
Quite normal really. Lots of Presidents have a loss in the first mid terms in their desk drawer
If the GOP keeps both houses it will cause massive panic among the dems and they will turn to a Cortez the Killer type candidate for 2020.
McConnell and Ryan act like they want to lose because losers lose -
Trump is probably gonna end up getting my vote based off Races posts alone.
-
Low tweak.oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're struggling. Your only redeeming value is your avatar. You seem pretty worthless as a human.BennyBeaver said:
Now you get it! Just think about all those guns, tanks, ammo, and planes we could have sold them.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Substitute China for Nazi Germany and you would squeal like a pig and backpedal like a motherfucker. But because it's commies, socialists and Google doing it, it's ok.BennyBeaver said:
Is it difficult for you to imagine that a public company is profit driven?oregonblitzkrieg said:"Silicon Valley is Bowing Down to Chinese Totalitarianism"
Google left China in 2010, claiming it was uncomfortable with the increasing censorship being implemented on the Chinese web. But now Google is planning to come back, and it has been developing a censored China-friendly version of their search engine in secret. The prospect of American tech giants moving into China sets a new precedent to the world, that cooperating with oppressive, authoritarian regimes is acceptable when it carries massive profit potential.
Apple also used to be principled when it came to privacy and encryption. In 2015 they famously declined to help the FBI unlock the encrypted iPhone involved in the San Bernadino shooting, further exemplifying their stance on privacy. However this focus on privacy only seems to apply to the West, as Apple has recently given in to Chinese regulation by handing over all their iCloud data and encryption keys. This gives the Chinese government complete access to Chinese users’ information.
A couple of weeks later, Apple further helped the Chinese government by taking down VPN apps from the Chinese app store, which were allowing users to bypass the country’s stringent censorship system.
Tech giants like Apple and Google have come a long way from their humble beginnings, and in turn, so have their morals and principles. In potentially deciding to expand into China, these companies will be openly admitting that they no longer value freedom and privacy.
Profit seems to be at the heart of these companies’ decisions, and ignoring all ethical ramifications, moving into China would indeed be a very profitable move. The question is whether we should accept this.
https://medium.com/@richardhaas1999/silicon-valley-is-bowing-down-to-chinese-totalitarianism-f1b145eb0017
If they're willing to do that kind of shit over there, do you really think they would not do it here? That they are not already engaging in censorship in cooperation with the American left?China'sNazi Germany's the biggest market and the smart move is to enter that market and play by their rules. Just like every other company that does business over there. -
So why was Obama so shitty on black employment for his first three years?
And if Trump is so racist and oppressive against blacks, why hasn't the trend reversed?
Hint: The latter question is the point. HTH. -
You changed since you changed the avatar. At least you've grown some balls.BennyBeaver said:
Low tweak.oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're struggling. Your only redeeming value is your avatar. You seem pretty worthless as a human.BennyBeaver said:
Now you get it! Just think about all those guns, tanks, ammo, and planes we could have sold them.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Substitute China for Nazi Germany and you would squeal like a pig and backpedal like a motherfucker. But because it's commies, socialists and Google doing it, it's ok.BennyBeaver said:
Is it difficult for you to imagine that a public company is profit driven?oregonblitzkrieg said:"Silicon Valley is Bowing Down to Chinese Totalitarianism"
Google left China in 2010, claiming it was uncomfortable with the increasing censorship being implemented on the Chinese web. But now Google is planning to come back, and it has been developing a censored China-friendly version of their search engine in secret. The prospect of American tech giants moving into China sets a new precedent to the world, that cooperating with oppressive, authoritarian regimes is acceptable when it carries massive profit potential.
Apple also used to be principled when it came to privacy and encryption. In 2015 they famously declined to help the FBI unlock the encrypted iPhone involved in the San Bernadino shooting, further exemplifying their stance on privacy. However this focus on privacy only seems to apply to the West, as Apple has recently given in to Chinese regulation by handing over all their iCloud data and encryption keys. This gives the Chinese government complete access to Chinese users’ information.
A couple of weeks later, Apple further helped the Chinese government by taking down VPN apps from the Chinese app store, which were allowing users to bypass the country’s stringent censorship system.
Tech giants like Apple and Google have come a long way from their humble beginnings, and in turn, so have their morals and principles. In potentially deciding to expand into China, these companies will be openly admitting that they no longer value freedom and privacy.
Profit seems to be at the heart of these companies’ decisions, and ignoring all ethical ramifications, moving into China would indeed be a very profitable move. The question is whether we should accept this.
https://medium.com/@richardhaas1999/silicon-valley-is-bowing-down-to-chinese-totalitarianism-f1b145eb0017
If they're willing to do that kind of shit over there, do you really think they would not do it here? That they are not already engaging in censorship in cooperation with the American left?China'sNazi Germany's the biggest market and the smart move is to enter that market and play by their rules. Just like every other company that does business over there. -
Yeah what was going on in the US economy during those first few years?TurdBuffer said:
So why was Obama so shitty on black employment for his first three years?
And if Trump is so racist and oppressive against blacks, why hasn't the trend reversed?
Hint: The latter question is the point. HTH.
