I shouldn't have given 0-6 and 1-5 as options because it gave pussies a chance to cop out
From poll superiority guy: polls suck here because retards guffaw about abundance or janet reno or joke results or simply don't vote ( @GrundleStiltzkin ) and no actual brain energy is used. Otherwise this would be a fun poll to look back on and laugh at.
I shouldn't have given 0-6 and 1-5 as options because it gave pussies a chance to cop out
From poll superiority guy: polls suck here because retards guffaw about abundance or janet reno or joke results or simply don't vote ( @GrundleStiltzkin ) and no actual brain energy is used. Otherwise this would be a fun poll to look back on and laugh at.
Huh?
But yeah, I guess I'm usually pole-adverse. Thanks for reading ;-)
I shouldn't have given 0-6 and 1-5 as options because it gave pussies a chance to cop out
From poll superiority guy: polls suck here because retards guffaw about abundance or janet reno or joke results or simply don't vote ( @GrundleStiltzkin ) and no actual brain energy is used. Otherwise this would be a fun poll to look back on and laugh at.
Huh?
But yeah, I guess I'm usually pole-adverse. Thanks for reading ;-)
So the road trip up to the Acrop after the Oregon game is off???
I think we run the table at home without too much difficulty include Stanford.
If we start out 6-0, we're primed for a CFP run. I just don't have enough faith yet to believe we are going to run the table, however. If we beat Auburn I will reassess. If that happens it means we're back officially as an Alpha ready to push in Pac shit early 90's style.
Expected Value equals 4.698 which rounded is 5-1. One standard deviation still gives the same rounded value so this outcome is highly likely assuming given probabilities (which are admittedly only projections).
The same values would suggest that there's a slightly better than 60% chance we are either 5-1 or 6-0 by week 6.
Something tells me we don't lose to year 1 chip, but then again, Hitler was pretty good in year 1 (and we always lose at UCLA) so maybe we do. Don't think we lose to those Utah fags either, but Auburn is going to shove Browning in a shit filled locker.
Something tells me we don't lose to year 1 chip, but then again, Hitler was pretty good in year 1 (and we always lose at UCLA) so maybe we do. Don't think we lose to those Utah fags either, but Auburn is going to shove Browning in a shit filled locker.
same thread that gets made every few months or so
maybe we can debate locker's legacy and skillset into eternity
Something tells me we don't lose to year 1 chip, but then again, Hitler was pretty good in year 1 (and we always lose at UCLA) so maybe we do. Don't think we lose to those Utah fags either, but Auburn is going to shove Browning in a shit filled locker.
We'll be so drunk after the big pre game party at @CirrhosisDawg mansion that we won't care that Chip goes in dry
Something tells me we don't lose to year 1 chip, but then again, Hitler was pretty good in year 1 (and we always lose at UCLA) so maybe we do. Don't think we lose to those Utah fags either, but Auburn is going to shove Browning in a shit filled locker.
We'll be so drunk after the big pre game party at @CirrhosisDawg mansion that we won't care that Chip goes in dry
Comments
But yeah, I guess I'm usually pole-adverse. Thanks for reading ;-)
If we start out 6-0, we're primed for a CFP run. I just don't have enough faith yet to believe we are going to run the table, however. If we beat Auburn I will reassess. If that happens it means we're back officially as an Alpha ready to push in Pac shit early 90's style.
Expected Value equals 4.698 which rounded is 5-1. One standard deviation still gives the same rounded value so this outcome is highly likely assuming given probabilities (which are admittedly only projections).
The same values would suggest that there's a slightly better than 60% chance we are either 5-1 or 6-0 by week 6.
[Insert Iwastoldtherewouldbenomath.gif]
maybe we can debate locker's legacy and skillset into eternity
can't wait