Stars don't matter Twat of the day
Comments
-
I agree. If Texas offers 25 kids 20 of them say yes on the spot. If they slow play a kid OU, aTm, LSU, or someone else will get him.RoadDawg55 said:I've always thought Texas cares too much about stars. The fan pressure and hype of getting certain in state guys hurts their program.
That said, the real problem has been coaching and developing the players. I bet a lot of those guys are overrated though. -
I hear the only reason SC won the pac was because Oregon is down.YellowSnow said:
Yeah winning the Pac once since 2008 is really special.WeakarmCobra said:
USC won the pac-12YellowSnow said:
I poasted this tongue in cheek. Of, course, stars matter greatly BUT only with good coaches. USC and Texas are laughing stocks.kirkland88 said:Nice little cherry picked stat. Went out and found a program that underachieved and a program that overachieved and threw that one together. Another attempt at trying to temper expectations. Just because UW does not offer or get a commitment from a recruit doesn't make them a bad prospect. The whole OKG thing is just an excuse for missing on talent repeatedly. Why offer if they aren't OKG anyway? You fuckin leg lifters are delusional as all hell. Out here trying to say your talent evaluators are so good that you are just going to pass on guys the rest of the country and recruiting world have put their stamp on. SMH. They really broke the mold with you idiots.
-
engrish?creepycoug said:
I hear the only reason I see one the pack was because Oregon is down.YellowSnow said:
Yeah winning the Pac once since 2008 is really special.WeakarmCobra said:
USC won the pac-12YellowSnow said:
I poasted this tongue in cheek. Of, course, stars matter greatly BUT only with good coaches. USC and Texas are laughing stocks.kirkland88 said:Nice little cherry picked stat. Went out and found a program that underachieved and a program that overachieved and threw that one together. Another attempt at trying to temper expectations. Just because UW does not offer or get a commitment from a recruit doesn't make them a bad prospect. The whole OKG thing is just an excuse for missing on talent repeatedly. Why offer if they aren't OKG anyway? You fuckin leg lifters are delusional as all hell. Out here trying to say your talent evaluators are so good that you are just going to pass on guys the rest of the country and recruiting world have put their stamp on. SMH. They really broke the mold with you idiots.
-
Indeed.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Texas only having 11 draftees in a five year period is absolutely bonkers.YellowSnow said: -
quick draw mcgrawdnc said:
engrish?creepycoug said:
I hear the only reason I see one the pack was because Oregon is down.YellowSnow said:
Yeah winning the Pac once since 2008 is really special.WeakarmCobra said:
USC won the pac-12YellowSnow said:
I poasted this tongue in cheek. Of, course, stars matter greatly BUT only with good coaches. USC and Texas are laughing stocks.kirkland88 said:Nice little cherry picked stat. Went out and found a program that underachieved and a program that overachieved and threw that one together. Another attempt at trying to temper expectations. Just because UW does not offer or get a commitment from a recruit doesn't make them a bad prospect. The whole OKG thing is just an excuse for missing on talent repeatedly. Why offer if they aren't OKG anyway? You fuckin leg lifters are delusional as all hell. Out here trying to say your talent evaluators are so good that you are just going to pass on guys the rest of the country and recruiting world have put their stamp on. SMH. They really broke the mold with you idiots.
-
Flex Friday!!!
