Home› College Football Forum

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Stars don't matter Twat of the day

YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,440 Founders Club
in College Football Forum
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,749
    It's a blackeye for @AIRWOLF, IMO
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    Texas underachieves POTY.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • kirkland88kirkland88 Member Posts: 28
    Nice little cherry picked stat. Went out and found a program that underachieved and a program that overachieved and threw that one together. Another attempt at trying to temper expectations. Just because UW does not offer or get a commitment from a recruit doesn't make them a bad prospect. The whole OKG thing is just an excuse for missing on talent repeatedly. Why offer if they aren't OKG anyway? You fuckin leg lifters are delusional as all hell. Out here trying to say your talent evaluators are so good that you are just going to pass on guys the rest of the country and recruiting world have put their stamp on. SMH. They really broke the mold with you idiots.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,440 Founders Club
    kirkland88 said:

    Nice little cherry picked stat. Went out and found a program that underachieved and a program that overachieved and threw that one together. Another attempt at trying to temper expectations. Just because UW does not offer or get a commitment from a recruit doesn't make them a bad prospect. The whole OKG thing is just an excuse for missing on talent repeatedly. Why offer if they aren't OKG anyway? You fuckin leg lifters are delusional as all hell. Out here trying to say your talent evaluators are so good that you are just going to pass on guys the rest of the country and recruiting world have put their stamp on. SMH. They really broke the mold with you idiots.

    I poasted this tongue in cheek. Of, course, stars matter greatly BUT only with good coaches. USC and Texas are laughing stocks.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,437
    YellowSnow said:

    kirkland88 said:

    Nice little cherry picked stat. Went out and found a program that underachieved and a program that overachieved and threw that one together. Another attempt at trying to temper expectations. Just because UW does not offer or get a commitment from a recruit doesn't make them a bad prospect. The whole OKG thing is just an excuse for missing on talent repeatedly. Why offer if they aren't OKG anyway? You fuckin leg lifters are delusional as all hell. Out here trying to say your talent evaluators are so good that you are just going to pass on guys the rest of the country and recruiting world have put their stamp on. SMH. They really broke the mold with you idiots.

    I poasted this tongue in cheek. Of, course, stars matter greatly BUT only with good coaches. USC and Texas are laughing stocks.
    http://www.espn.com/college-football/matchup?gameId=400869157
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,975
    AIRWOLF said:

    dnc said:

    It's a blackeye for @AIRWOLF, IMO

    Yeah, this is a very "on brand" Tweet for me, in multiple ways.

    Mack Brown retired on the job after the '05 title and almost coasted his way to another in '09. The Longhorns program has been an embarrassment since Colt McCoy went out of the Rose Bowl with that injury, but even if he hadn't the foundation had rotted BADLY.

    And recruiting rankings are very predictive overall, but they are certainly imperfect, and there is no shortage of outliers at both the player and program level.


    Oh, and Jimbo Fisher is a slightly more astute Mack Brown.
    All Mack brown had to do was not be unastute
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    edited August 2018
    YellowSnow said:

    WeakarmCobra said:

    YellowSnow said:

    kirkland88 said:

    Nice little cherry picked stat. Went out and found a program that underachieved and a program that overachieved and threw that one together. Another attempt at trying to temper expectations. Just because UW does not offer or get a commitment from a recruit doesn't make them a bad prospect. The whole OKG thing is just an excuse for missing on talent repeatedly. Why offer if they aren't OKG anyway? You fuckin leg lifters are delusional as all hell. Out here trying to say your talent evaluators are so good that you are just going to pass on guys the rest of the country and recruiting world have put their stamp on. SMH. They really broke the mold with you idiots.

    I poasted this tongue in cheek. Of, course, stars matter greatly BUT only with good coaches. USC and Texas are laughing stocks.
    USC won the pac-12
    Yeah winning the Pac once since 2008 is really special.
    Outside 2016 last time we won was in 2001.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,440 Founders Club
    WeakarmCobra said:

    YellowSnow said:

    WeakarmCobra said:

    YellowSnow said:

    kirkland88 said:

    Nice little cherry picked stat. Went out and found a program that underachieved and a program that overachieved and threw that one together. Another attempt at trying to temper expectations. Just because UW does not offer or get a commitment from a recruit doesn't make them a bad prospect. The whole OKG thing is just an excuse for missing on talent repeatedly. Why offer if they aren't OKG anyway? You fuckin leg lifters are delusional as all hell. Out here trying to say your talent evaluators are so good that you are just going to pass on guys the rest of the country and recruiting world have put their stamp on. SMH. They really broke the mold with you idiots.

    I poasted this tongue in cheek. Of, course, stars matter greatly BUT only with good coaches. USC and Texas are laughing stocks.
    USC won the pac-12
    Yeah winning the Pac once since 2008 is really special.
    Outside 2016 last time we won was in 2001.
    This thread is not about us. It's about schools with riches of talent that still manage to suck.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,885
    greenblood said:

    YellowSnow said:

    kirkland88 said:

    Nice little cherry picked stat. Went out and found a program that underachieved and a program that overachieved and threw that one together. Another attempt at trying to temper expectations. Just because UW does not offer or get a commitment from a recruit doesn't make them a bad prospect. The whole OKG thing is just an excuse for missing on talent repeatedly. Why offer if they aren't OKG anyway? You fuckin leg lifters are delusional as all hell. Out here trying to say your talent evaluators are so good that you are just going to pass on guys the rest of the country and recruiting world have put their stamp on. SMH. They really broke the mold with you idiots.

    I poasted this tongue in cheek. Of, course, stars matter greatly BUT only with good coaches. USC and Texas are laughing stocks.
    http://www.espn.com/college-football/matchup?gameId=400869157
    They won it last year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    YellowSnow said:

    WeakarmCobra said:

    YellowSnow said:

    WeakarmCobra said:

    YellowSnow said:

    kirkland88 said:

    Nice little cherry picked stat. Went out and found a program that underachieved and a program that overachieved and threw that one together. Another attempt at trying to temper expectations. Just because UW does not offer or get a commitment from a recruit doesn't make them a bad prospect. The whole OKG thing is just an excuse for missing on talent repeatedly. Why offer if they aren't OKG anyway? You fuckin leg lifters are delusional as all hell. Out here trying to say your talent evaluators are so good that you are just going to pass on guys the rest of the country and recruiting world have put their stamp on. SMH. They really broke the mold with you idiots.

    I poasted this tongue in cheek. Of, course, stars matter greatly BUT only with good coaches. USC and Texas are laughing stocks.
    USC won the pac-12
    Yeah winning the Pac once since 2008 is really special.
    Outside 2016 last time we won was in 2001.
    This thread is not about us. It's about schools with riches of talent that still manage to suck.
    we sucked last year, even though we had more than enough talent to run the table on the division. So last year we pissed a good year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,861


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    YellowSnow said:

    WeakarmCobra said:

    YellowSnow said:

    kirkland88 said:

    Nice little cherry picked stat. Went out and found a program that underachieved and a program that overachieved and threw that one together. Another attempt at trying to temper expectations. Just because UW does not offer or get a commitment from a recruit doesn't make them a bad prospect. The whole OKG thing is just an excuse for missing on talent repeatedly. Why offer if they aren't OKG anyway? You fuckin leg lifters are delusional as all hell. Out here trying to say your talent evaluators are so good that you are just going to pass on guys the rest of the country and recruiting world have put their stamp on. SMH. They really broke the mold with you idiots.

    I poasted this tongue in cheek. Of, course, stars matter greatly BUT only with good coaches. USC and Texas are laughing stocks.
    USC won the pac-12
    Yeah winning the Pac once since 2008 is really special.
    That's the same number as UW....
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.