Everyone is smart except Trump
Comments
-
Just wait until Trump hands you over to Putin for an interview.Edwin_Bambino said:
I would never tell!!!!!!dflea said:E_B probably works for the deep state.
-
As Race likes to say, I’m a huge pussy so I’d spill the beans in 4 seconds.Squirt said:
Just wait until Trump hands you over to Putin for an interview.Edwin_Bambino said:
I would never tell!!!!!!dflea said:E_B probably works for the deep state.
-
None of this bullshit explains why the DNC never turned over the physical servers themselves. Backup servers can be easily manipulated by the DNC's IT infrastructure. Images can be manipulated.
None of these bullshit replies account for the fact that the file transfer speed was too fast for it to have been hackers in Russia. Hackers also do not leave any trace of where they are from - there is no way to trace where the hacks originated (proxies are a thing).
The DNC is full of shit, the leaks came from within their own organization, Russia probably does hack or attempt to hack shit all the time (China is a lot more successful), and Trump is not an idiot.
HTH -
PUTIN: Tell me how the FBI knew we hacked the DNC servers!Edwin_Bambino said:
I would never tell!!!!!!dflea said:E_B probably works for the deep state.
@Edwin_Bambino: I’m not super technology literate myself, I’ll have to ask one of my buddies. -
Images or no, that is weird.PostGameOrangeSlices said:None of this bullshit explains why the DNC never turned over the physical servers themselves. Backup servers can be easily manipulated by the DNC's IT infrastructure. Images can be manipulated.
I thought that VIPS report was chinteresting shit. However, while I'm no ForBro, categorically stating that it must be internal because of transfer speeds seemed like a stretch.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
None of these bullshit replies account for the fact that the file transfer speed was too fast for it to have been hackers in Russia. Hackers also do not leave any trace of where they are from - there is no way to trace where the hacks originated (proxies are a thing).
-
I’m hearing we have a treaty covering that.Squirt said:
Just wait until Trump hands you over to Putin for an interview.Edwin_Bambino said:
I would never tell!!!!!!dflea said:E_B probably works for the deep state.
-
The DNC didn’t do the imaging of the machines themselves. An independent third party did. You can gripe about that being weird instead of the FBI doing it, but it’s pretty common practice at least in the corporate world to operate that way when handing stuff over to the SEC. I’m not gonna sit here and pretend to know exactly how the FBI operates regarding data collection.PostGameOrangeSlices said:None of this bullshit explains why the DNC never turned over the physical servers themselves. Backup servers can be easily manipulated by the DNC's IT infrastructure. Images can be manipulated.
None of these bullshit replies account for the fact that the file transfer speed was too fast for it to have been hackers in Russia. Hackers also do not leave any trace of where they are from - there is no way to trace where the hacks originated (proxies are a thing).
The DNC is full of shit, the leaks came from within their own organization, Russia probably does hack or attempt to hack shit all the time (China is a lot more successful), and Trump is not an idiot.
HTH
Also your comment on hackers leaving no trace is just wrong but I’m too lazy to actually provide any information to debunk it. -
I thought that VIPS report was chinteresting shit. However, while I'm no ForBro, categorically stating that it must be internal because of transfer speeds seemed like a stretch.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
None of these bullshit replies account for the fact that the file transfer speed was too fast for it to have been hackers in Russia. Hackers also do not leave any trace of where they are from - there is no way to trace where the hacks originated (proxies are a thing).
I don't think it's too big of a stretch but I don't know a ton about this stuff either. -
Edwin_Bambino said:
The DNC didn’t do the imaging of the machines themselves. An independent third party did. You can gripe about that being weird instead of the FBI doing it, but it’s pretty common practice at least in the corporate world to operate that way when handing stuff over to the SEC. I’m not gonna sit here and pretend to know exactly how the FBI operates regarding data collection.PostGameOrangeSlices said:None of this bullshit explains why the DNC never turned over the physical servers themselves. Backup servers can be easily manipulated by the DNC's IT infrastructure. Images can be manipulated.
None of these bullshit replies account for the fact that the file transfer speed was too fast for it to have been hackers in Russia. Hackers also do not leave any trace of where they are from - there is no way to trace where the hacks originated (proxies are a thing).
The DNC is full of shit, the leaks came from within their own organization, Russia probably does hack or attempt to hack shit all the time (China is a lot more successful), and Trump is not an idiot.
HTH
You're right, it was an IT security outfit that was a vendor for the DNC. A totally nonpartisan, unbiased outfit that definitely wouldn't be bribed or influenced.
Christ.
-
I don't think it's too big of a stretch but I don't know a ton about this stuff either.PostGameOrangeSlices said:You're right, it was an IT security outfit that was a vendor for the DNC. A totally nonpartisan, unbiased outfit that definitely wouldn't be bribed or influenced.
Christ.
