Ty looked good yesterday. He might just make a run at WR. He's bigger, but looked quick. Worse case is a perkins role. But perkins was still basically a possession WR ,.just had a TE after his name. I think he's going to make a good run next year. Good for him. As I said Osborne is a guy we've been missing for 2 decades. Just watch...
Ty looked good yesterday. He might just make a run at WR. He's bigger, but looked quick. Worse case is a perkins role. But perkins was still basically a possession WR ,.just had a TE after his name. I think he's going to make a good run next year. Good for him. As I said Osborne is a guy we've been missing for 2 decades. Just watch...
Ty looked good yesterday. He might just make a run at WR. He's bigger, but looked quick. Worse case is a perkins role. But perkins was still basically a possession WR ,.just had a TE after his name. I think he's going to make a good run next year. Good for him. As I said Osborne is a guy we've been missing for 2 decades. Just watch...
ISAFRNC.
Fudgee, I'm about to run your ass... take it from the many many others who fucked with Pup. You will be rebuilding your board cred at cougfarm very soon you little piss ant. And I got a few peeps over there who'll run your tight-shaven cunt on down to fresnodawg freeboard.
Educate yourself just a little down in the minors..then come on back to kimmy's for a tryout. Prolly wont end well
Please stop with the lengthy acronyms too...just like every fucking thing else, millennials too lazy to type too. Say what you mean motherfuckers ...is that like a microaggression or hate speech? Not used to that in the dorms huh?
Please stop with the lengthy acronyms too...just like every fucking thing else, millennials too lazy to type too. Say what you mean motherfuckers ...is that like a microaggression or hate speech? Not used to that in the dorms huh?
Ty looked good yesterday. He might just make a run at WR. He's bigger, but looked quick. Worse case is a perkins role. But perkins was still basically a possession WR ,.just had a TE after his name. I think he's going to make a good run next year. Good for him. As I said Osborne is a guy we've been missing for 2 decades. Just watch...
ISAFRNC.
Fudgee, I'm about to run your ass... take it from the many many others who fucked with Pup. You will be rebuilding your board cred at cougfarm very soon you little piss ant. And I got a few peeps over there who'll run your tight-shaven cunt on down to fresnodawg freeboard.
Educate yourself just a little down in the minors..then come on back to kimmy's for a tryout. Prolly wont end well
Ty looked good yesterday. He might just make a run at WR. He's bigger, but looked quick. Worse case is a perkins role. But perkins was still basically a possession WR ,.just had a TE after his name. I think he's going to make a good run next year. Good for him. As I said Osborne is a guy we've been missing for 2 decades. Just watch...
Dumbfuck, ty Jones is a wet noodle. Who told you this shit? Possession receiver at best. Dude couldn't block a 175lb corner. If he moves to TE like Perkins did, give him 2 more years to get to 225 like said Perkins as a jr.
Hold your head up Uzi , you might be right by accident. Like Perkins, I dont think he's explosive enough for a big timer. Osborne might pass him up on depth as our 'possession" guy...pushing him into Perkins role
As I said Osborne is a guy we've been missing for 2 decades. Just watch...
What makes you believe he will be better than Spiker?
Maybe because he got a head start in spring, he's got great hands and actually uses them how ones' taught,, he's fast, quick out break, great route runner, good leaper, 6-3, fights for football, can run after catch for a whitey...and he's a try hard white guy...satisfied? Been waiting for 1 since 1998-99... but most of you have no idea what that means.
Who said he is or has to be better than Spiker. If both are good both will play. Jordan Chin is my bet for WR who makes biggest jump next year, ty Jones I was more impressed with than I thought I'd be after watching spring game. He's quicker than he was last year, and much bigger. He's a WR for sure, a red zone guy. He was good at that in high school. Possession guy ot appears
Chin gets open, wide open. Good get by Pete. Nobody else saw that in him. Funny my favorite guy from that big WR class last year was Bynum. I know he's injured, but he's falling behind. He was a pure WR. Hope he gets healthy soon before he gets stampeded...tick tock
As I've said for awhile now, pete needs a burner. Chin might be the closest thing to that cause he gets good separation , but he ain't a burner. Be interesting to watch next year. Last year we were horrible at WR, hence Jake's 19 tds..as opposed to 43 the year before. Even Base ot packthebackside can figure out why, although doubtful.
Comments
Educate yourself just a little down in the minors..then come on back to kimmy's for a tryout. Prolly wont end well
Hold your head up Uzi , you might be right by accident. Like Perkins, I dont think he's explosive enough for a big timer. Osborne might pass him up on depth as our 'possession" guy...pushing him into Perkins role
Who said he is or has to be better than Spiker. If both are good both will play. Jordan Chin is my bet for WR who makes biggest jump next year, ty Jones I was more impressed with than I thought I'd be after watching spring game. He's quicker than he was last year, and much bigger. He's a WR for sure, a red zone guy. He was good at that in high school. Possession guy ot appears
Chin gets open, wide open. Good get by Pete. Nobody else saw that in him. Funny my favorite guy from that big WR class last year was Bynum. I know he's injured, but he's falling behind. He was a pure WR. Hope he gets healthy soon before he gets stampeded...tick tock
As I've said for awhile now, pete needs a burner. Chin might be the closest thing to that cause he gets good separation , but he ain't a burner. Be interesting to watch next year. Last year we were horrible at WR, hence Jake's 19 tds..as opposed to 43 the year before. Even Base ot packthebackside can figure out why, although doubtful.