For our defense I would put him below Tuli and Togiai. Above Taki.
He may end up on offense, though. The pic of him with Huff and some “inside info” that is actually inside info but, for all intents and purposes, is just the photo of him with Huff—says we are looking at him as a G.
However, I have to think that he’s somewhat of a swing guy. If we get a bunch of great OLs I think we might stick him on DL.
It seems like we are about to be eliminated from consideration for Tuitele, so there’s that, too.
For our defense I would put him below Tuli and Togiai. Above Taki.
He may end up on offense, though. The pic of him with Huff and some “inside info” that is actually inside info but, for all intents and purposes, is just the photo of him with Huff—says we are looking at him as a G.
However, I have to think that he’s somewhat of a swing guy. If we get a bunch of great OLs I think we might stick him on DL.
It seems like we are about to be eliminated from consideration for Tuitele, so there’s that, too.
I like Taki so if he is sort of in between those guys above then this is a helluva pick up, no matter where he ends up.
For our defense I would put him below Tuli and Togiai. Above Taki.
He may end up on offense, though. The pic of him with Huff and some “inside info” that is actually inside info but, for all intents and purposes, is just the photo of him with Huff—says we are looking at him as a G.
However, I have to think that he’s somewhat of a swing guy. If we get a bunch of great OLs I think we might stick him on DL.
It seems like we are about to be eliminated from consideration for Tuitele, so there’s that, too.
Eliminated for Tuitlele? Already?!?! Any reason why?
For our defense I would put him below Tuli and Togiai. Above Taki.
He may end up on offense, though. The pic of him with Huff and some “inside info” that is actually inside info but, for all intents and purposes, is just the photo of him with Huff—says we are looking at him as a G.
However, I have to think that he’s somewhat of a swing guy. If we get a bunch of great OLs I think we might stick him on DL.
It seems like we are about to be eliminated from consideration for Tuitele, so there’s that, too.
Eliminated for Tuitlele? Already?!?! Any reason why?
He's announcing his top 5 soon and Dennis would rather end all hope now than get a hat on the table.
For our defense I would put him below Tuli and Togiai. Above Taki.
He may end up on offense, though. The pic of him with Huff and some “inside info” that is actually inside info but, for all intents and purposes, is just the photo of him with Huff—says we are looking at him as a G.
However, I have to think that he’s somewhat of a swing guy. If we get a bunch of great OLs I think we might stick him on DL.
It seems like we are about to be eliminated from consideration for Tuitele, so there’s that, too.
Eliminated for Tuitlele? Already?!?! Any reason why?
He's announcing his top 5 soon and Dennis would rather end all hope now than get a hat on the table.
For our defense I would put him below Tuli and Togiai. Above Taki.
He may end up on offense, though. The pic of him with Huff and some “inside info” that is actually inside info but, for all intents and purposes, is just the photo of him with Huff—says we are looking at him as a G.
However, I have to think that he’s somewhat of a swing guy. If we get a bunch of great OLs I think we might stick him on DL.
It seems like we are about to be eliminated from consideration for Tuitele, so there’s that, too.
Eliminated for Tuitlele? Already?!?! Any reason why?
I don't know ... but my thinking is this:
- Tuitele likes UW - he's getting the love from all the major programs - we just took paama and will probably take 1 more? 2? that means the other guys like ika, jernigan, pola-mao (probably usc) and bandes ... among others. - i'm thinking our system doesn't traditionally appeal to d-line tackle recruits because of the "hold the gaps, soak up double teams etc ..." a guy like Tuitele with that rare combo of power and mobility may think twice and buy what the likes of Alabama are selling.
wild card: Vea gets drafted in the first 12 picks ... that's a big deal to recruits, especially Poly recruits.
But, if we get Tuitele to visit then we have a legit shot imo.
Our DT play on the inside is as good as bama what we lack is fucking edge play, but our DT play is on that fuckin level. Not sure about 2018, only two really proven players are gains and Johnson
Our DT play on the inside is as good as bama what we lack is fucking edge play, but our DT play is on that fuckin level. Not sure about 2018, only two really proven players are gains and Johnson
Comments
He may end up on offense, though. The pic of him with Huff and some “inside info” that is actually inside info but, for all intents and purposes, is just the photo of him with Huff—says we are looking at him as a G.
However, I have to think that he’s somewhat of a swing guy. If we get a bunch of great OLs I think we might stick him on DL.
It seems like we are about to be eliminated from consideration for Tuitele, so there’s that, too.
We're getting a hat on the table.
PITY HAT!!!!
In before anybody else does.
Pete just needs more time to get his own IATOE’s in here.
I don't know ... but my thinking is this:
- Tuitele likes UW
- he's getting the love from all the major programs
- we just took paama and will probably take 1 more? 2? that means the other guys like ika, jernigan, pola-mao (probably usc) and bandes ... among others.
- i'm thinking our system doesn't traditionally appeal to d-line tackle recruits because of the "hold the gaps, soak up double teams etc ..." a guy like Tuitele with that rare combo of power and mobility may think twice and buy what the likes of Alabama are selling.
wild card: Vea gets drafted in the first 12 picks ... that's a big deal to recruits, especially Poly recruits.
But, if we get Tuitele to visit then we have a legit shot imo.
He even retweeted sama paama's commitment.
His interview in LA he said he loved malloe.
https://247sports.com/Video/Faatui-Tuitele-Interview-at-The-Opening-Los-Angeles-7416074?View=Full
So, we have a chance
So does Brian Kelly.