N. Korea is not giving up its nukes. If by some miracle they feigned it, you could bet your stupid asses that others were hidden elsewhere. It's pretty much the only thing that shit of a country has going for it.
Disagree! Did you see those cheeerleaders?
No. But thanks for the pic
You better turn that WTF into a chin.
Wood wood wood wood not wood wood wood wood wood not wood wood wood not wood wood wood wood wood not wood wood wood not wood wood wood not wood wood wood wood wood wood not wood wood wood wood wood not wood wood wood not wood wood wood wood wood not wood wood wood not wood wood wood not wood wood wood wood not wood wood wood not wood wood wood
Because all the brilliant people who got us here say so
Fuck. Don't be afraid to win
Nobody said that. But running a victory lap over a travel itinerary is fucking retarded, and I suspect you would agree when you're not in contrarian mode. If Obummer were making that trip, and hondo & co. were ringing the bell, I suspect I know how Doogie and the Retards would react.
That's the only counterpoint anyone can make. Of course it's a good thing he's making the trip. But frat boy "winning" talk over booking a ticket? It's like Hee Haw and the Fuck Around Gang around here.
Yeah, an Nk dictator going to SK for the first time ever and meeting the the SK pm and POTUS is just a fucking vacation. Obama totally couldve done the same with his if if if if if if okie doke foriegn policy
what the fuck are you even talking about?
i liked you better when you were trying to convince everyone here you were a tuff coke dealer ... albeit in the U district, because you're too much of a Sally to do it in the CD.
Because all the brilliant people who got us here say so
Fuck. Don't be afraid to win
... said the neocons about Iraq in 2003.
Containment has been working. Deterrence has been working. People like to think that difficult problems can be solved, while most of the folks who have been specializing in IR and diplomacy understnad that many difficult issues can only be managed. If you try to solve certain problems, then you make things worse by creating new problems.
And nuclear weapons aren't fucking sixguns. It's not about shooting first; it's about being able to take the first shot and still punish the guy who shoots first, to the poont that he doesn't ever want to shoot first. You use any kind of gunslinger analogy, it just shows that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
N. Korea is not giving up its nukes. If by some miracle they feigned it, you could bet your stupid asses that others were hidden elsewhere. It's pretty much the only thing that shit of a country has going for it.
Disagree! Did you see those cheeerleaders?
No. But thanks for the pic
You better turn that WTF into a chin.
Wood wood wood wood not wood wood wood wood wood not wood wood wood not wood wood wood wood wood not wood wood wood not wood wood wood not wood wood wood wood wood wood not wood wood wood wood wood not wood wood wood not wood wood wood wood wood not wood wood wood not wood wood wood not wood wood wood wood not wood wood wood not wood wood wood
N. Korea is not giving up its nukes. If by some miracle they feigned it, you could bet your stupid asses that others were hidden elsewhere. It's pretty much the only thing that shit of a country has going for it.
Disagree! Did you see those cheeerleaders?
No. But thanks for the pic
You better turn that WTF into a chin.
Wood wood wood wood not wood wood wood wood wood not wood wood wood not wood wood wood wood wood not wood wood wood not wood wood wood not wood wood wood wood wood wood not wood wood wood wood wood not wood wood wood not wood wood wood wood wood not wood wood wood not wood wood wood not wood wood wood wood not wood wood wood not wood wood wood
Because all the brilliant people who got us here say so
Fuck. Don't be afraid to win
... said the neocons about Iraq in 2003.
Containment has been working. Deterrence has been working. People like to think that difficult problems can be solved, while most of the folks who have been specializing in IR and diplomacy understnad that many difficult issues can only be managed. If you try to solve certain problems, then you make things worse by creating new problems.
And nuclear weapons aren't fucking sixguns. It's not about shooting first; it's about being able to take the first shot and still punish the guy who shoots first, to the poont that he doesn't ever want to shoot first. You use any kind of gunslinger analogy, it just shows that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
Because all the brilliant people who got us here say so
Fuck. Don't be afraid to win
... said the neocons about Iraq in 2003.
Containment has been working. Deterrence has been working. People like to think that difficult problems can be solved, while most of the folks who have been specializing in IR and diplomacy understnad that many difficult issues can only be managed. If you try to solve certain problems, then you make things worse by creating new problems.
And nuclear weapons aren't fucking sixguns. It's not about shooting first; it's about being able to take the first shot and still punish the guy who shoots first, to the poont that he doesn't ever want to shoot first. You use any kind of gunslinger analogy, it just shows that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
But six guns are so TUFF!!
Production handgun maybe, but even by the late 1950's Casull had developed a wildcat .454 cartridge and five-shooters to shoot it with. Supposedly 75% more muzzle energy than the .44 magnum. Finally made it into production in 1983 with the Freedom Arms Model 83. Worked with a teamster on Encino Man who did competition shoots with one. As he was one of three dealers on the crew, they'd all bring their toys in and we'd drool over them. That was a Big Gun, something special. Pretty sure the IMI Desert Eagle .50cal is also more powerful, but I don't think that had been developed by Dirty Harry's time.
Because all the brilliant people who got us here say so
Fuck. Don't be afraid to win
... said the neocons about Iraq in 2003.
Containment has been working. Deterrence has been working. People like to think that difficult problems can be solved, while most of the folks who have been specializing in IR and diplomacy understnad that many difficult issues can only be managed. If you try to solve certain problems, then you make things worse by creating new problems.
And nuclear weapons aren't fucking sixguns. It's not about shooting first; it's about being able to take the first shot and still punish the guy who shoots first, to the poont that he doesn't ever want to shoot first. You use any kind of gunslinger analogy, it just shows that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
But six guns are so TUFF!!
Production handgun maybe, but even by the late 1950's Casull had developed a wildcat .454 cartridge and five-shooters to shoot it with. Supposedly 75% more muzzle energy than the .44 magnum. Finally made it into production in 1983 with the Freedom Arms Model 83. Worked with a teamster on Encino Man who did competition shoots with one. As he was one of three dealers on the crew, they'd all bring their toys in and we'd drool over them. That was a Big Gun, something special. Pretty sure the IMI Desert Eagle .50cal is also more powerful, but I don't think that had been developed by Dirty Harry's time.
Christ. Don't let facts get in the way of a well played GIF.
Yes, S&W .500 is newer than when Dirty Harry stared. Someone also makes a revolver that shoots buffalos (sorry @Swaye ) with .45-70 Guvmint.
Because all the brilliant people who got us here say so
Fuck. Don't be afraid to win
... said the neocons about Iraq in 2003.
Containment has been working. Deterrence has been working. People like to think that difficult problems can be solved, while most of the folks who have been specializing in IR and diplomacy understnad that many difficult issues can only be managed. If you try to solve certain problems, then you make things worse by creating new problems.
And nuclear weapons aren't fucking sixguns. It's not about shooting first; it's about being able to take the first shot and still punish the guy who shoots first, to the poont that he doesn't ever want to shoot first. You use any kind of gunslinger analogy, it just shows that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
But six guns are so TUFF!!
Production handgun maybe, but even by the late 1950's Casull had developed a wildcat .454 cartridge and five-shooters to shoot it with. Supposedly 75% more muzzle energy than the .44 magnum. Finally made it into production in 1983 with the Freedom Arms Model 83. Worked with a teamster on Encino Man who did competition shoots with one. As he was one of three dealers on the crew, they'd all bring their toys in and we'd drool over them. That was a Big Gun, something special. Pretty sure the IMI Desert Eagle .50cal is also more powerful, but I don't think that had been developed by Dirty Harry's time.
Christ. Don't let facts get in the way of a well played GIF.
Yes, S&W .500 is newer than when Dirty Harry stared. Someone also makes a revolver that shoots buffalos (sorry @Swaye ) with .45-70 Guvmint.
You're just prostituting yourself for a fucking chin from me. Your not getting one for a post that talks about six guns, but then the gif only shows one
Because all the brilliant people who got us here say so
Fuck. Don't be afraid to win
... said the neocons about Iraq in 2003.
Containment has been working. Deterrence has been working. People like to think that difficult problems can be solved, while most of the folks who have been specializing in IR and diplomacy understnad that many difficult issues can only be managed. If you try to solve certain problems, then you make things worse by creating new problems.
And nuclear weapons aren't fucking sixguns. It's not about shooting first; it's about being able to take the first shot and still punish the guy who shoots first, to the poont that he doesn't ever want to shoot first. You use any kind of gunslinger analogy, it just shows that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
Shooting ICBM's towards Japan and Hawaii isn't containment.
Because all the brilliant people who got us here say so
Fuck. Don't be afraid to win
... said the neocons about Iraq in 2003.
Containment has been working. Deterrence has been working. People like to think that difficult problems can be solved, while most of the folks who have been specializing in IR and diplomacy understnad that many difficult issues can only be managed. If you try to solve certain problems, then you make things worse by creating new problems.
And nuclear weapons aren't fucking sixguns. It's not about shooting first; it's about being able to take the first shot and still punish the guy who shoots first, to the poont that he doesn't ever want to shoot first. You use any kind of gunslinger analogy, it just shows that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
But six guns are so TUFF!!
Production handgun maybe, but even by the late 1950's Casull had developed a wildcat .454 cartridge and five-shooters to shoot it with. Supposedly 75% more muzzle energy than the .44 magnum. Finally made it into production in 1983 with the Freedom Arms Model 83. Worked with a teamster on Encino Man who did competition shoots with one. As he was one of three dealers on the crew, they'd all bring their toys in and we'd drool over them. That was a Big Gun, something special. Pretty sure the IMI Desert Eagle .50cal is also more powerful, but I don't think that had been developed by Dirty Harry's time.
Christ. Don't let facts get in the way of a well played GIF.
Yes, S&W .500 is newer than when Dirty Harry stared. Someone also makes a revolver that shoots buffalos (sorry @Swaye ) with .45-70 Guvmint.
You're just prostituting yourself for a fucking chin from me. Your not getting one for a post that talks about six guns, but then the gif only shows one
you weren't getting one anyway
I don't walk the streets for chins where there are none to be had.
If you were better at math, you'd also notice I posted a about a five gun in response to a comment about six guns.
Comments
Learn how to read
i liked you better when you were trying to convince everyone here you were a tuff coke dealer ... albeit in the U district, because you're too much of a Sally to do it in the CD.
Pretty much like this:
It's nap time; you're boring.
Containment has been working. Deterrence has been working. People like to think that difficult problems can be solved, while most of the folks who have been specializing in IR and diplomacy understnad that many difficult issues can only be managed. If you try to solve certain problems, then you make things worse by creating new problems.
And nuclear weapons aren't fucking sixguns. It's not about shooting first; it's about being able to take the first shot and still punish the guy who shoots first, to the poont that he doesn't ever want to shoot first. You use any kind of gunslinger analogy, it just shows that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
pinkyellow on the inside.Yes, S&W .500 is newer than when Dirty Harry stared. Someone also makes a revolver that shoots buffalos (sorry @Swaye ) with .45-70 Guvmint.
Must be fun being on the White House press secretary staff, like the guy with the shit scoop following the elephant in the parade
you weren't getting one anyway
Something will have to give eventually.
If you were better at math, you'd also notice I posted a about a five gun in response to a comment about six guns.