Why would anyone think donations to a “charity” that took in $140+MM (and lied about taking foreign donations) in one year and spent a whopping $6MM in direct aid and $60+MM in salaries to family friends and private airplanes and 1st class tickets to travel for the Clintons themselves, not to mention expensing most of their fancy dinners and such was anything but an effort to help those poor kids in Haiti.
Why would anyone think donations to a “charity” that took in $140+MM (and lying about taking foreign donations) in one year and spending a whopping $6MM in direct aid and $60+MM in salaries to family friends and private airplanes and 1st class tickets to travel for the Clintons themselves, not to mention expensing most of their fancy dinners and such was anything but an effort to help those poor kids in Haiti.
I posted the audit reports back to 1998. Read through them, you'll see how your news source is lying to you.
Why would anyone think donations to a “charity” that took in $140+MM (and lying about taking foreign donations) in one year and spending a whopping $6MM in direct aid and $60+MM in salaries to family friends and private airplanes and 1st class tickets to travel for the Clintons themselves, not to mention expensing most of their fancy dinners and such was anything but an effort to help those poor kids in Haiti.
I posted the audit reports back to 1998. Read through them, you'll see how your news source is lying to you.
The sky is blue too...any other irrelevant facts you want to bring to the discussion? My post and your post can both be true.
Or, as someone who is not HondoFS might realize those numbers I quoted are pulled straight from the audited records of the Clinton Foundation...so thanks for validating that they are true.
Why would anyone think donations to a “charity” that took in $140+MM (and lying about taking foreign donations) in one year and spending a whopping $6MM in direct aid and $60+MM in salaries to family friends and private airplanes and 1st class tickets to travel for the Clintons themselves, not to mention expensing most of their fancy dinners and such was anything but an effort to help those poor kids in Haiti.
I posted the audit reports back to 1998. Read through them, you'll see how your news source is lying to you.
Or the book cooker is lying. Works both ways. Any IRS audits? Any charity delivering a whopping 6% of donations to the people being helped is obviously highly efficient.
Why would anyone think donations to a “charity” that took in $140+MM (and lying about taking foreign donations) in one year and spending a whopping $6MM in direct aid and $60+MM in salaries to family friends and private airplanes and 1st class tickets to travel for the Clintons themselves, not to mention expensing most of their fancy dinners and such was anything but an effort to help those poor kids in Haiti.
I posted the audit reports back to 1998. Read through them, you'll see how your news source is lying to you.
Or the book cooker is lying. Works both ways. Any IRS audits? Any charity delivering a whopping 6% of donations to the people being helped is obviously highly efficient.
Again your news source is lying to you.
Don't get me wrong, the Clinton foundation is about enriching the Clinton's. But the shit you say is just fucktarded.
Why would anyone think donations to a “charity” that took in $140+MM (and lying about taking foreign donations) in one year and spending a whopping $6MM in direct aid and $60+MM in salaries to family friends and private airplanes and 1st class tickets to travel for the Clintons themselves, not to mention expensing most of their fancy dinners and such was anything but an effort to help those poor kids in Haiti.
I posted the audit reports back to 1998. Read through them, you'll see how your news source is lying to you.
Or the book cooker is lying. Works both ways. Any IRS audits? Any charity delivering a whopping 6% of donations to the people being helped is obviously highly efficient.
Again your news source is lying to you.
Don't get me wrong, the Clinton foundation is about enriching the Clinton's. But the shit you say is just fucktarded.
If it weren't so fucking pathetic, it would be amusing that you try to play the middle road. You can't unmake your bed now.
We already know they dumped 120 to 140 million into the Clinton Criminal Foundation. HTH
What did they give the other 8 federal directors for their approval?
The Clinton foundation is the money launderer. They pay the others. A lot of this stuff is distraction. The foundation doesn't seem to track extenders well. Soon as they peel that onion we'll unfortunately see how dirty Washington really is.
Where does Soros fit in all of this? Who's higher up in the shadowy globalist hierarchy Clinton or Soros? Does Soros funnel through the Clinton crime foundation or vice versa?
Why would anyone think donations to a “charity” that took in $140+MM (and lying about taking foreign donations) in one year and spending a whopping $6MM in direct aid and $60+MM in salaries to family friends and private airplanes and 1st class tickets to travel for the Clintons themselves, not to mention expensing most of their fancy dinners and such was anything but an effort to help those poor kids in Haiti.
I posted the audit reports back to 1998. Read through them, you'll see how your news source is lying to you.
Or the book cooker is lying. Works both ways. Any IRS audits? Any charity delivering a whopping 6% of donations to the people being helped is obviously highly efficient.
Again your news source is lying to you.
Don't get me wrong, the Clinton foundation is about enriching the Clinton's. But the shit you say is just fucktarded.
If it weren't so fucking pathetic, it would be amusing that you try to play the middle road. You can't unmake your bed now.
#aclockworkshill
There's plenty of things to bag on the Clinton's and Clinton foundation. You don't have to make sure up.
As an aside. Sledogs newsmax shitpost got me thinking. They actually fired the auditor (PWC) after the 2015 audit. 2016 was the first year Cohn did the audit. It's very rare huge organizations like that change auditors from the big 4 firms.
Why would anyone think donations to a “charity” that took in $140+MM (and lying about taking foreign donations) in one year and spending a whopping $6MM in direct aid and $60+MM in salaries to family friends and private airplanes and 1st class tickets to travel for the Clintons themselves, not to mention expensing most of their fancy dinners and such was anything but an effort to help those poor kids in Haiti.
I posted the audit reports back to 1998. Read through them, you'll see how your news source is lying to you.
Or the book cooker is lying. Works both ways. Any IRS audits? Any charity delivering a whopping 6% of donations to the people being helped is obviously highly efficient.
Again your news source is lying to you.
Don't get me wrong, the Clinton foundation is about enriching the Clinton's. But the shit you say is just fucktarded.
You really need to familiarize yourself with the content of an audit opinion letter.
Read it again. Very.carefully. Especially the part on the effectiveness of internal controls.
Don’t make me go down this path.
Go there. What are you getting at?
Audits are not designed to detect fraud or provide opinions on internal control effectiveness. The purpose is to express an opinion on the financial statements which are the responsibility of management.
Just because there’s an audit opinion issued doesn’t mean hanky panky and illegal activities aren’t taking place. Lots of ways to circumvent controls - especially if there’s collusion between upper management.
You’d shit your pants at the things I’ve seen in my career - including several prison terms. Most went undiscovered for years.
You really need to familiarize yourself with the content of an audit opinion letter.
Read it again. Very.carefully. Especially the part on the effectiveness of internal controls.
Don’t make me go down this path.
Go there. What are you getting at?
Audits are not designed to detect fraud or provide opinions on internal control effectiveness. The purpose is to express an opinion on the financial statements which are the responsibility of management.
Just because there’s an audit opinion issued doesn’t mean hanky panky and illegal activities aren’t taking place. Lots of ways to circumvent controls - especially if there’s collusion between upper management.
You’d shit your pants at the things I’ve seen in my career - including several prison terms. Most went undiscovered for years.
Yes I know what an opinion means and I'm a CPA lol. So yes I know the shit that goes on and is undetected. I've seen $600k casino thefts. I was actually involved in this (although that had nothing to do with the audit).
That being said, you missed the word material.... Before fraud. I've seen auditors found guilty or pay out in a claim for missing both immaterial and material fraud.
And yes most fraud goes on for years. And most is immaterial in each individual year and grows to become material.
That being said, if the Clinton's were actually laundering money through the foundation, it would be known. Never mind they fact the people that say that have zero idea what money laundering is. They should read some title 31 first.
$600k ain’t shit. I’ve seen into the many millions.
The Clintons are smart - they don’t launder through their foundation. That’s the good guy front. They have shells companies upon shells upon offshore accounts upon offshore accounts.
And do you know for certain that perhaps the Throbber might possibly have passed that same exam at some point? And then some?
Hell, maybe the Throbber is even helping them with the guns and religion compound as a front.
$600k ain’t shit. I’ve seen into the many millions.
The Clintons are smart - they don’t launder through their foundation. That’s the good guy front. They have shells companies upon shells upon offshore accounts upon offshore accounts.
And do you know for certain that perhaps the Throbber might possibly have passed that same exam at some point? And then some?
Hell, maybe the Throbber is even helping them with the guns and religion compound as a front.
Now we are getting somewhere. What money are the Clinton's laundering? I mean what is the underlying funds they are laundering and the purpose of laundering it?
Comments
You knew dumbfuck would resort to Newsmax if pressed.
And he can't even link that.
lol
Holy fuck.
Or, as someone who is not HondoFS might realize those numbers I quoted are pulled straight from the audited records of the Clinton Foundation...so thanks for validating that they are true.
HondoFS...
Don't get me wrong, the Clinton foundation is about enriching the Clinton's. But the shit you say is just fucktarded.
#aclockworkshill
As an aside. Sledogs newsmax shitpost got me thinking. They actually fired the auditor (PWC) after the 2015 audit. 2016 was the first year Cohn did the audit. It's very rare huge organizations like that change auditors from the big 4 firms.
Read it again. Very.carefully. Especially the part on the effectiveness of internal controls.
Don’t make me go down this path.
Just because there’s an audit opinion issued doesn’t mean hanky panky and illegal activities aren’t taking place. Lots of ways to circumvent controls - especially if there’s collusion between upper management.
You’d shit your pants at the things I’ve seen in my career - including several prison terms. Most went undiscovered for years.
https://www.ocregister.com/2007/08/14/soboba-casino-heist-suspect-says-cocaine-made-him-do-it/
That being said, you missed the word material.... Before fraud. I've seen auditors found guilty or pay out in a claim for missing both immaterial and material fraud.
And yes most fraud goes on for years. And most is immaterial in each individual year and grows to become material.
That being said, if the Clinton's were actually laundering money through the foundation, it would be known. Never mind they fact the people that say that have zero idea what money laundering is. They should read some title 31 first.
The Clintons are smart - they don’t launder through their foundation. That’s the good guy front. They have shells companies upon shells upon offshore accounts upon offshore accounts.
And do you know for certain that perhaps the Throbber might possibly have passed that same exam at some point? And then some?
Hell, maybe the Throbber is even helping them with the guns and religion compound as a front.
I'm genuinely curious.
Go find your own money to wash.