What position group are you most comfortable with heading into the 2018 season?

Gladstone

Neighbor2972

RB

If Dissly was a RS Senior I'd be tempted to say TE, but this is easy

LebamDawg

RB

easy pick but thinking it thru how do we? get to be 7 in early preseason rankings

RaceBannon

QB

Should hold every record when he's done

Pitchfork51

QB

nothings changed with me

BearsWiin

Reverse cowgirl

PurpleBaze

Center

NEsnake12

RB

RB is the easy answer, but could also argue DBs as a whole as well as TE. All those positions have elite starters as well as reliable depth.

OL and DL have amazing starting units but a lot of unproven depth.

QB is comfortably mediocre.

LB (both inside and outside) is where all the question marks are.

YellowSnow

CB

RaceBannon said:

Should hold every record when he's done

Records are for losers.

RaccoonHarry

Long snapper, hello?

Gladstone

CB

Pitchfork51 said:

nothings changed with me

Still makes me laugh. I imagine every ASU fan out there uses memories of Browning to block out the horrors of Edwards.

puppylove_sugarsteel

Afro-american cheerleader group...

Mad_Son

RB

NEsnake12 said:

RB is the easy answer, but could also argue DBs as a whole as well as TE. All those positions have elite starters as well as reliable depth.

OL and DL have amazing starting units but a lot of unproven depth.

QB is comfortably mediocre.

LB (both inside and outside) is where all the question marks are.

You severely overrate Browning.

Pitchfork51

QB

Gladstone said:

Pitchfork51 said:

nothings changed with me

Still makes me laugh. I imagine every ASU fan out there uses memories of Browning to block out the horrors of Edwards.

Gladstone said:

Pitchfork51 said:

nothings changed with me

Still makes me laugh. I imagine every ASU fan out there uses memories of Browning to block out the horrors of Edwards.

Get on board

Edwin_Bambino

LB

Ben Burr Kirven. Stat machine. Nuff said about that.

puppylove_sugarsteel

Edwin_Bambino said:

Ben Burr Kirven. Stat machine. Nuff said about that.

BBK a baller. He cant help if he has hoffman feet, which incidentally were fast enough to be an all american. But 70% of yous here never saw hoff play so i give up.

NEsnake12

RB

Mad_Son said:

NEsnake12 said:

RB is the easy answer, but could also argue DBs as a whole as well as TE. All those positions have elite starters as well as reliable depth.

OL and DL have amazing starting units but a lot of unproven depth.

QB is comfortably mediocre.

LB (both inside and outside) is where all the question marks are.

You severely overrate Browning.

He is what he is at this point. I say "comfortably mediocre" because he won't win us games, but also won't be erratic to the point of being a complete and utter trainwreck at times like a lot of bad QBs tend to do.

Basically, I'm comfortable that he won't go full Luke Falk vs. Cal or vs. UW. Comfortable that if the run game and defense play to their potential that UW has another 10 win season at the absolute worst.

RoadDawg55

CB

Neighbor2972 said:

If Dissly was a RS Senior I'd be tempted to say TE, but this is easy

We’ll always have the goal line tackle against Cal.

Gwad

LB

BBK bout to star in his own horror movie.

Gladstone

CB

only 1 vote for TE? shameful

@juhsoon FTW

Doogles

RB

If you're being honest, it's RB easily. Gaskin is amazing and Salvon is more explosive with a higher ceiling and not a bust.

You have an NFL RB and a guy who seems to move at a different speed than everyone else a la John Ross.

chuck

WR

WR should be the easiest position, and there will be five really good young prospects on the roster to go with the experienced try hards.

Good but still a bit thin at a lot of other spots like RB, S, DL, CB...

Dennis_DeYoung

RB

QB - We are fucking awful. This is a throwaway season as long as Jake is QB.
RB - Epically good talent here. As good as it's ever been. Hopefully Bush isn't as much of a stupid fuck as Boosh and actually runs the ball.
WR - Thanks to Brent Pease we have literally no one good with any experience.
TE - Great idea playing Will Dissly. One tackle against Cal was really worth it!
OL - Thanks to Straußer, our interior OL is total shit. Good teams have 5 players at the level of Adams/McGary.
DL - Thanks to great recruiting by Malloe, we have a total of 3 decent players with experience here. We rotate 6 guys regularly so this should go well.
OLB - Tevis Bartlett is our number one pass rusher. Nuff said on that.
LB - BBK is our top returning starter. Nuff said on that.
CB - Whoa, weird, we recruited well and have a great position coach: this position is stacked.
S - Pretty good if you only want 1 safety who can play in space!

DawgWagonDan

TE

chuck said:

WR should be the easiest position, and there will be five really good young prospects on the roster to go with the experienced try hards.

Good but still a bit thin at a lot of other spots like RB, S, DL, CB...

Not sure how WR is "easiest position" when the only guy you can pencil in as a starter (McClatcher) is coming off a major injury. Yes, lots of young unproven talent (Chin, Jones, Bynum, Cook, Spiker, Ozzy, Lowe) and several low-output upperclassmen (Pounds, Fuller, Baccellia).

Hopefully the cream rises. But still, no sure fire lock for a clear-cut and proven #1 option whereas TE and RB you absolutely know where your bread will be buttered.

Also with Miller back off injury; and Murphy, Joyner, Bryant, Molden and Taylor returning with experience; plus the additions of Gordon, Hampton, and Irvin, it appears CB will be pretty solid in 18.

NorwegianHusky

QB

I hear it's 4th best in the Pac-12.

chuck

WR

DawgWagonDan said:

chuck said:

WR should be the easiest position, and there will be five really good young prospects on the roster to go with the experienced try hards.

Good but still a bit thin at a lot of other spots like RB, S, DL, CB...

Not sure how WR is "easiest position" when the only guy you can pencil in as a starter (McClatcher) is coming off a major injury. Yes, lots of young unproven talent (Chin, Jones, Bynum, Cook, Spiker, Ozzy, Lowe) and several low-output upperclassmen (Pounds, Fuller, Baccellia).

Hopefully the cream rises. But still, no sure fire lock for a clear-cut and proven #1 option whereas TE and RB you absolutely know where your bread will be buttered.

Also with Miller back off injury; and Murphy, Joyner, Bryant, Molden and Taylor returning with experience; plus the additions of Gordon, Hampton, and Irvin, it appears CB will be pretty solid in 18.

I couldn't find the words to explain why WR is the easiest position without it turning into a Tequila esque editorial. I'll just fall back on it being my opinion...though it's correct (faggy wink).

I hope Chico isn't considered a starter at WR.

Miller hasn't played a down since his injury so he's unproven. Joyner isn't a good cover corner. Bryant isn't either and is a smurf. Molden and Taylor are completely unproven. Cornerback play killed uw against decent passing offenses in 2017, and will again in 2018 if either Miller or Murphy go down and someone new doesn't step up.

I love the two headed monster at RB, but still consider that a bit thin. Both of them better stay healthy because there's shit behind them.

DawgWagonDan

TE

chuck said:

DawgWagonDan said:

chuck said:

WR should be the easiest position, and there will be five really good young prospects on the roster to go with the experienced try hards.

Good but still a bit thin at a lot of other spots like RB, S, DL, CB...

Not sure how WR is "easiest position" when the only guy you can pencil in as a starter (McClatcher) is coming off a major injury. Yes, lots of young unproven talent (Chin, Jones, Bynum, Cook, Spiker, Ozzy, Lowe) and several low-output upperclassmen (Pounds, Fuller, Baccellia).

Hopefully the cream rises. But still, no sure fire lock for a clear-cut and proven #1 option whereas TE and RB you absolutely know where your bread will be buttered.

Also with Miller back off injury; and Murphy, Joyner, Bryant, Molden and Taylor returning with experience; plus the additions of Gordon, Hampton, and Irvin, it appears CB will be pretty solid in 18.

I couldn't find the words to explain why WR is the easiest position without it turning into a Tequila esque editorial. I'll just fall back on it being my opinion...though it's correct (faggy wink).

I hope Chico isn't considered a starter at WR.

Miller hasn't played a down since his injury so he's unproven. Joyner isn't a good cover corner. Bryant isn't either and is a smurf. Molden and Taylor are completely unproven. Cornerback play killed uw against decent passing offenses in 2017, and will again in 2018 if either Miller or Murphy go down and someone new doesn't step up.

I love the two headed monster at RB, but still consider that a bit thin. Both of them better stay healthy because there's shit behind them.

Bummer, I like blow-hard editorials.

Fair points. But was it CB play that killed us? Or was it a lack of pressure/pass-rush against solid O-line play (Stanford & PSU)? Probably a combo of both...

Anyway, I think coverage was usually descent but size tended to be an issue against bigger WR's when Murphy and Miller were out. Note that bad coverage is never an issue against the famed "air-raid" because we dominate the kewgs in the trenches, apply pressure with 3 and 4 men, and destroy their quarterbacks on an annul basis. People forget about that.

chuck

WR

DawgWagonDan said:

chuck said:

DawgWagonDan said:

chuck said:

WR should be the easiest position, and there will be five really good young prospects on the roster to go with the experienced try hards.

Good but still a bit thin at a lot of other spots like RB, S, DL, CB...

Not sure how WR is "easiest position" when the only guy you can pencil in as a starter (McClatcher) is coming off a major injury. Yes, lots of young unproven talent (Chin, Jones, Bynum, Cook, Spiker, Ozzy, Lowe) and several low-output upperclassmen (Pounds, Fuller, Baccellia).

Hopefully the cream rises. But still, no sure fire lock for a clear-cut and proven #1 option whereas TE and RB you absolutely know where your bread will be buttered.

Also with Miller back off injury; and Murphy, Joyner, Bryant, Molden and Taylor returning with experience; plus the additions of Gordon, Hampton, and Irvin, it appears CB will be pretty solid in 18.

I couldn't find the words to explain why WR is the easiest position without it turning into a Tequila esque editorial. I'll just fall back on it being my opinion...though it's correct (faggy wink).

I hope Chico isn't considered a starter at WR.

Miller hasn't played a down since his injury so he's unproven. Joyner isn't a good cover corner. Bryant isn't either and is a smurf. Molden and Taylor are completely unproven. Cornerback play killed uw against decent passing offenses in 2017, and will again in 2018 if either Miller or Murphy go down and someone new doesn't step up.

I love the two headed monster at RB, but still consider that a bit thin. Both of them better stay healthy because there's shit behind them.

Bummer, I like blow-hard editorials.

Fair points. But was it CB play that killed us? Or was it a lack of pressure/pass-rush against solid O-line play (Stanford & PSU)? Probably a combo of both...

Anyway, I think coverage was usually descent but size tended to be an issue against bigger WR's when Murphy and Miller were out. Note that bad coverage is never an issue against the famed "air-raid" because we dominate the kewgs in the trenches, apply pressure with 3 and 4 men, and destroy their quarterbacks on an annul basis. People forget about that.

I wish more schools were running the air raid with talent that they raided Eastern's recruiting base for. UW D definitely has that dialed in.

Gladstone

CB

GREAT STUFF THANKS TO EVERYONE WHO PARTICIPATED IN THE POLL

HUSKYFANATIC

OL

OL fucktards

dnc

RB

BUCK imo