Great SEC quarterbacks in the last 20 years
Comments
-
Tebow was a better college quarterback than any Pac-10/12 quarterback in the past 20 years.
Fuck off. -
FIREMARSHALL, STOp.
Besides Tebow (who was arguably the best CFB player of the past twenty years), post Peyton you still have Newton, Stafford and Eli who sucked so badly they all became #1 picks, and have an MVP and a couple Super Rings to show for themselves.
QB's far from the SEC's strongest pisition of the past 20 years but it's not a wasteland either. -
Win nattys without being completely QB-centric might the be single redeeming characteristic of the SEC
-
I left out Dak Prescott. Self ISAFNRC
-
Although a dip shit, Johny Football was a Heisman award winner for whatever that's worth.
-
Cam.
-
And let us review the Pac 12 QB's from the last 20 years. There's not many that have accomplished what those guys have in the league.dnc said:FIREMARSHALL, STOp.
Besides Tebow (who was arguably the best CFB player of the past twenty years), post Peyton you still have Newton, Stafford and Eli who sucked so badly they all became #1 picks, and have an MVP and a couple Super Rings to show for themselves.
QB's far from the SEC's strongest pisition of the past 20 years but it's not a wasteland either.
WSU- Nope
UW- Nope
Cal- Rodgers and Goff has potential
Stanford- Nope
OS- Nope
Oregon- Nope... Mariota has had one good playoff game, And his stats suck.
USC- Palmer... maybe
UCLA- Nope
Utah- Nope
CU- Nope
UA- Nope
ASU- Nope
So once again the PAC 12 hangs it hat on Cal to save the day. -
I give Luck a pass. He would be considered having potential IF his shoulder gets fixed.salemcoog said:
And let us review the Pac 12 QB's from the last 20 years. There's not many that have accomplished what those guys have in the league.dnc said:FIREMARSHALL, STOp.
Besides Tebow (who was arguably the best CFB player of the past twenty years), post Peyton you still have Newton, Stafford and Eli who sucked so badly they all became #1 picks, and have an MVP and a couple Super Rings to show for themselves.
QB's far from the SEC's strongest pisition of the past 20 years but it's not a wasteland either.
WSU- Nope
UW- Nope
Cal- Rodgers and Goff has potential
Stanford- Nope
OS- Nope
Oregon- Nope... Mariota has had one good playoff game, And his stats suck.
USC- Palmer... maybe
UCLA- Nope
Utah- Nope
CU- Nope
UA- Nope
ASU- Nope
So once again the PAC 12 hangs it hat on Cal to save the day.
Mariota has to be put in the potential category. The kid has talent, he just doesn't have great weapons on the outside.
You also have Alex Smith, who I would say is below Newton and Eli, but has had about the same on field success as Stafford.
Kordell Stewart is just outside of 20 years as he was drafted in 1995, but he had a decent run in Pittsburgh.
Also, Foles has more Super Bowl titles than both Newton and Stafford. He looked pretty good to me.
Edit: Just looked back at Kordell's history. He had one phenominal year with 21 td passes and 11 rushing tds, other than that he was actually pretty shitty. The Steelers were successful despite Kordell. -
I agree with Foles but he needs mor tim. Luck as well. I don't agree with Smith. He's held back some decent teams from winning anything. And if we're being technical neither Smith nor Stewart were Pac 10/12 QB's anyway.greenblood said:
I give Luck a pass. He would be considered having potential IF his shoulder gets fixed.salemcoog said:
And let us review the Pac 12 QB's from the last 20 years. There's not many that have accomplished what those guys have in the league.dnc said:FIREMARSHALL, STOp.
Besides Tebow (who was arguably the best CFB player of the past twenty years), post Peyton you still have Newton, Stafford and Eli who sucked so badly they all became #1 picks, and have an MVP and a couple Super Rings to show for themselves.
QB's far from the SEC's strongest pisition of the past 20 years but it's not a wasteland either.
WSU- Nope
UW- Nope
Cal- Rodgers and Goff has potential
Stanford- Nope
OS- Nope
Oregon- Nope... Mariota has had one good playoff game, And his stats suck.
USC- Palmer... maybe
UCLA- Nope
Utah- Nope
CU- Nope
UA- Nope
ASU- Nope
So once again the PAC 12 hangs it hat on Cal to save the day.
Mariota has to be put in the potential category. The kid has talent, he just doesn't have great weapons on the outside.
You also have Alex Smith, who I would say is below Newton and Eli, but has had about the same on field success as Stafford.
Kordell Stewart is just outside of 20 years as he was drafted in 1995, but he had a decent run in Pittsburgh.
Also, Foles has more Super Bowl titles than both Newton and Stafford. He looked pretty good to me.
Edit: Just looked back at Kordell's history. He had one phenominal year with 21 td passes and 11 rushing tds, other than that he was actually pretty shitty. The Steelers were successful despite Kordell. -
Dumb.salemcoog said:
I agree with Foles but he needs mor tim. Luck as well. I don't agree with Smith. He's held back some decent teams from winning anything. And if we're being technical neither Smith nor Stewart were Pac 10/12 QB's anyway.greenblood said:
I give Luck a pass. He would be considered having potential IF his shoulder gets fixed.salemcoog said:
And let us review the Pac 12 QB's from the last 20 years. There's not many that have accomplished what those guys have in the league.dnc said:FIREMARSHALL, STOp.
Besides Tebow (who was arguably the best CFB player of the past twenty years), post Peyton you still have Newton, Stafford and Eli who sucked so badly they all became #1 picks, and have an MVP and a couple Super Rings to show for themselves.
QB's far from the SEC's strongest pisition of the past 20 years but it's not a wasteland either.
WSU- Nope
UW- Nope
Cal- Rodgers and Goff has potential
Stanford- Nope
OS- Nope
Oregon- Nope... Mariota has had one good playoff game, And his stats suck.
USC- Palmer... maybe
UCLA- Nope
Utah- Nope
CU- Nope
UA- Nope
ASU- Nope
So once again the PAC 12 hangs it hat on Cal to save the day.
Mariota has to be put in the potential category. The kid has talent, he just doesn't have great weapons on the outside.
You also have Alex Smith, who I would say is below Newton and Eli, but has had about the same on field success as Stafford.
Kordell Stewart is just outside of 20 years as he was drafted in 1995, but he had a decent run in Pittsburgh.
Also, Foles has more Super Bowl titles than both Newton and Stafford. He looked pretty good to me.
Edit: Just looked back at Kordell's history. He had one phenominal year with 21 td passes and 11 rushing tds, other than that he was actually pretty shitty. The Steelers were successful despite Kordell.
