Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Mueller Gets Another Scalp

124

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Gosh darn it people like me

    Wanna cyber?
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Sledog said:

    RedRocket said:

    So the theory on the get Trump side is that the elected president asked his NSA guy to talk to a foreign government which is legal and then told him to lie to the FBI about it?

    And to prove that dubious legal claim Mueller will use a convicted perjurer.

    Ok.

    The story is that Trump asked Flynn to talk to foreign government when he was a still a presidential candidate. If Trump was still a candidate then it opens him up to collusion charges but there's a lot of grey area about what does and does not constitute collusion. The implication is that Flynn entering a plea deal indicates there is some hard evidence of collusion. It could just be Flynn trying to save his ass though and the info that he's giving up isn't anything that would bring down Trump. Maybe it brings down Kushner. Maybe no one. IWIWBI.
    It was after the ejection was over.

    Odd as I recall Obama had a big middle East meet and greet during his first run? Guess he went but never talked to anyone? Double standard much?
    Odd? Lol! Yes you are.
    Please regale us with your recollections. racist ignorant old fool.
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,942
    Is calling someone racist an insult?
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Is calling someone racist an insult?

    Not on this bored
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,771 Standard Supporter
    edited December 2017

    Is calling someone racist an insult?

    Not coming from a liberal. Anyone kicking their ass in an argument is a racist.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,771 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    RedRocket said:

    So the theory on the get Trump side is that the elected president asked his NSA guy to talk to a foreign government which is legal and then told him to lie to the FBI about it?

    And to prove that dubious legal claim Mueller will use a convicted perjurer.

    Ok.

    The story is that Trump asked Flynn to talk to foreign government when he was a still a presidential candidate. If Trump was still a candidate then it opens him up to collusion charges but there's a lot of grey area about what does and does not constitute collusion. The implication is that Flynn entering a plea deal indicates there is some hard evidence of collusion. It could just be Flynn trying to save his ass though and the info that he's giving up isn't anything that would bring down Trump. Maybe it brings down Kushner. Maybe no one. IWIWBI.
    It was after the ejection was over.

    Odd as I recall Obama had a big middle East meet and greet during his first run? Guess he went but never talked to anyone? Double standard much?
    Odd? Lol! Yes you are.
    Please regale us with your recollections. racist ignorant old fool.
    Who's the fool?

    http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/18/obama.trip/index.html
  • Dude61Dude61 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,253 Swaye's Wigwam

    Sledog said:

    RedRocket said:

    So the theory on the get Trump side is that the elected president asked his NSA guy to talk to a foreign government which is legal and then told him to lie to the FBI about it?

    And to prove that dubious legal claim Mueller will use a convicted perjurer.

    Ok.

    The story is that Trump asked Flynn to talk to foreign government when he was a still a presidential candidate. If Trump was still a candidate then it opens him up to collusion charges but there's a lot of grey area about what does and does not constitute collusion. The implication is that Flynn entering a plea deal indicates there is some hard evidence of collusion. It could just be Flynn trying to save his ass though and the info that he's giving up isn't anything that would bring down Trump. Maybe it brings down Kushner. Maybe no one. IWIWBI.
    It was after the ejection was over.

    Odd as I recall Obama had a big middle East meet and greet during his first run? Guess he went but never talked to anyone? Double standard much?
    Odd? Lol! Yes you are.
    Please regale us with your recollections. racist ignorant old fool.
    "CHICAGO - President-elect Obama spoke to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev yesterday as he made another round of phone calls with counterparts in other nations."

    November 9, 2008


    http://archive.boston.com/news/politics/2008/articles/2008/11/09/obama_chats_with_medvedev_on_phone/
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    RedRocket said:

    So the theory on the get Trump side is that the elected president asked his NSA guy to talk to a foreign government which is legal and then told him to lie to the FBI about it?

    And to prove that dubious legal claim Mueller will use a convicted perjurer.

    Ok.

    The story is that Trump asked Flynn to talk to foreign government when he was a still a presidential candidate. If Trump was still a candidate then it opens him up to collusion charges but there's a lot of grey area about what does and does not constitute collusion. The implication is that Flynn entering a plea deal indicates there is some hard evidence of collusion. It could just be Flynn trying to save his ass though and the info that he's giving up isn't anything that would bring down Trump. Maybe it brings down Kushner. Maybe no one. IWIWBI.
    It was after the ejection was over.

    Odd as I recall Obama had a big middle East meet and greet during his first run? Guess he went but never talked to anyone? Double standard much?
    Odd? Lol! Yes you are.
    Please regale us with your recollections. racist ignorant old fool.
    Who's the fool?

    http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/18/obama.trip/index.html
    Who’s the fool? For Christ’s sake, and for once and for all — you are.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,771 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    RedRocket said:

    So the theory on the get Trump side is that the elected president asked his NSA guy to talk to a foreign government which is legal and then told him to lie to the FBI about it?

    And to prove that dubious legal claim Mueller will use a convicted perjurer.

    Ok.

    The story is that Trump asked Flynn to talk to foreign government when he was a still a presidential candidate. If Trump was still a candidate then it opens him up to collusion charges but there's a lot of grey area about what does and does not constitute collusion. The implication is that Flynn entering a plea deal indicates there is some hard evidence of collusion. It could just be Flynn trying to save his ass though and the info that he's giving up isn't anything that would bring down Trump. Maybe it brings down Kushner. Maybe no one. IWIWBI.
    It was after the ejection was over.

    Odd as I recall Obama had a big middle East meet and greet during his first run? Guess he went but never talked to anyone? Double standard much?
    Odd? Lol! Yes you are.
    Please regale us with your recollections. racist ignorant old fool.
    Who's the fool?

    http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/18/obama.trip/index.html
    Who’s the fool? For Christ’s sake, and for once and for all — you are.
    I see you are the proverbial box of rocks.
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    My bad sledog. it’s irresponsible to call someone an imbecile while @Dude61 is alive. That’s a stalemate.
  • Dude61Dude61 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,253 Swaye's Wigwam

    My bad sledog. it’s irresponsible to call someone an imbecile while @Dude61 is alive. That’s a stalemate.

    Your ignorance is impressive.
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Dude61 said:

    My bad sledog. it’s irresponsible to call someone an imbecile while @Dude61 is alive. That’s a stalemate.

    Your ignorance is impressive.
    Zarate-Steinle

    Or

    Zimmerman-Martin

    You haven’t weighed in yet with your imbecilic racist incoherence.
    Thoughts?

  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Dude61 said:

    My bad sledog. it’s irresponsible to call someone an imbecile while @Dude61 is alive. That’s a stalemate.

    Your ignorance is impressive.
    Let’s hear you out about justice, rule of law, and juries.
    Or are you a fucking pussy?
  • Dude61Dude61 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,253 Swaye's Wigwam

    Dude61 said:

    My bad sledog. it’s irresponsible to call someone an imbecile while @Dude61 is alive. That’s a stalemate.

    Your ignorance is impressive.
    Let’s hear you out about justice, rule of law, and juries.
    Or are you a fucking pussy?
    That's not the topic of this thread. What else you got in the tank as it relates to this thread?
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Dude61 said:

    Dude61 said:

    My bad sledog. it’s irresponsible to call someone an imbecile while @Dude61 is alive. That’s a stalemate.

    Your ignorance is impressive.
    Let’s hear you out about justice, rule of law, and juries.
    Or are you a fucking pussy?
    That's not the topic of this thread. What else you got in the tank as it relates to this thread?
    You do recall your previous post said “your ignorance is impressive?”

    What was the topic of this thread?

    Right now it’s that @Dude61 is a fucking moron. Feel free to weigh in.
  • pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,892 Founders Club

    Dude61 said:

    Dude61 said:

    My bad sledog. it’s irresponsible to call someone an imbecile while @Dude61 is alive. That’s a stalemate.

    Your ignorance is impressive.
    Let’s hear you out about justice, rule of law, and juries.
    Or are you a fucking pussy?
    That's not the topic of this thread. What else you got in the tank as it relates to this thread?
    You do recall your previous post said “your ignorance is impressive?”

    What was the topic of this thread?

    Right now it’s that @Dude61 is a fucking moron. Feel free to weigh in.
    Coming from you, that is a high-compliment. D61 should feel honored.


    image
  • Dude61Dude61 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,253 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited December 2017

    Dude61 said:

    Dude61 said:

    My bad sledog. it’s irresponsible to call someone an imbecile while @Dude61 is alive. That’s a stalemate.

    Your ignorance is impressive.
    Let’s hear you out about justice, rule of law, and juries.
    Or are you a fucking pussy?
    That's not the topic of this thread. What else you got in the tank as it relates to this thread?
    You do recall your previous post said “your ignorance is impressive?”

    What was the topic of this thread?

    Right now it’s that @Dude61 is a fucking moron. Feel free to weigh in.
    So ya got nothing.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Dude61 said:



    Sledog said:

    RedRocket said:

    So the theory on the get Trump side is that the elected president asked his NSA guy to talk to a foreign government which is legal and then told him to lie to the FBI about it?

    And to prove that dubious legal claim Mueller will use a convicted perjurer.

    Ok.

    The story is that Trump asked Flynn to talk to foreign government when he was a still a presidential candidate. If Trump was still a candidate then it opens him up to collusion charges but there's a lot of grey area about what does and does not constitute collusion. The implication is that Flynn entering a plea deal indicates there is some hard evidence of collusion. It could just be Flynn trying to save his ass though and the info that he's giving up isn't anything that would bring down Trump. Maybe it brings down Kushner. Maybe no one. IWIWBI.
    It was after the ejection was over.

    Odd as I recall Obama had a big middle East meet and greet during his first run? Guess he went but never talked to anyone? Double standard much?
    Odd? Lol! Yes you are.
    Please regale us with your recollections. racist ignorant old fool.
    "CHICAGO - President-elect Obama spoke to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev yesterday as he made another round of phone calls with counterparts in other nations."

    November 9, 2008


    http://archive.boston.com/news/politics/2008/articles/2008/11/09/obama_chats_with_medvedev_on_phone/
    Did Obama lie about that conversation under oath?
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    Like I said, process crime.

    Fake process running around wasting everyone’s time, money, energy, resources.

    All because Hillary was a shitty candidate who snatched defeat from the jaws of victory and got her feelings hurt.
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072

    Wow...transition officials (after Trump's been elected) telling Flynn to initiate contact with Russians somehow proves Trump conspired with the Russians to win the election?

    That's some shit-show logic...

    LIPO. Mueller ain't fucking around. If he's going to give Flynn a reduced sentence you can bet Flynn is singing like a bird to the investigation.
    sure.
Sign In or Register to comment.