Back in the early 90s, we would solve the problem the same way, except we would just stack the numbers.
32 +37 _______ 69
We were instructed to add 2 + 7 on the right row first, and then put a 9 below the line. Then we'd add 3 + 3 on the left row, and put a 6 in front of it. It was a simple way to solve the problem, and it taught the same concept of:
30 + 30 = 60 7+2 = 9 60+ 9 = 69
Wow I did not know there was even a different method.
Then again in the 70s the butthole was a fancy feast.
Don’t feel bad. I have a Bachelor of Science Degree in Electronics Engineering which included extensive study in differential equations and other higher math applications. Even I cannot explain the Common Core mathematics approach, nor get the answer correct. In the real world, simplification is valued over complication. Therefore,
427 –316 111
The answer is solved in under 5 seconds – 111. The process used is ridiculous and would result in termination if used.
Agreed.
I've got years of advanced maff for the BS and an MS in stats/fisheries. I can proofread, show another way to solve it, and check answers with my kids. That is it now, with the "show your work" grade system. They get penalized using other ways to solve - even correctly.
3rd grade teacher actually tried to scold me for teaching a method that worked for my older boy. He showed his work on a test and she flipped out in an email. I told her he got it right, didn't he? Crickets....
Common core is not helping kids...especially future STEM kids.
Back in the early 90s, we would solve the problem the same way, except we would just stack the numbers.
32 +37 _______ 69
We were instructed to add 2 + 7 on the right row first, and then put a 9 below the line. Then we'd add 3 + 3 on the left row, and put a 6 in front of it. It was a simple way to solve the problem, and it taught the same concept of:
30 + 30 = 60 7+2 = 9 60+ 9 = 69
In the 70's and 80's we used a fucking calculator.
Back in the early 90s, we would solve the problem the same way, except we would just stack the numbers.
32 +37 _______ 69
We were instructed to add 2 + 7 on the right row first, and then put a 9 below the line. Then we'd add 3 + 3 on the left row, and put a 6 in front of it. It was a simple way to solve the problem, and it taught the same concept of:
30 + 30 = 60 7+2 = 9 60+ 9 = 69
In the 70's and 80's we used a fucking calculator.
"Why can't we just use a calculator to solve these problems?"
"You're not learning anything by having a machine do the work."
"We're learning how to have the machine do the work."
Back in the early 90s, we would solve the problem the same way, except we would just stack the numbers.
32 +37 _______ 69
We were instructed to add 2 + 7 on the right row first, and then put a 9 below the line. Then we'd add 3 + 3 on the left row, and put a 6 in front of it. It was a simple way to solve the problem, and it taught the same concept of:
30 + 30 = 60 7+2 = 9 60+ 9 = 69
In the 70's and 80's we used a fucking calculator.
In the 2010's we let our math teacher do it for us. #WeAreEvolving
Back in the early 90s, we would solve the problem the same way, except we would just stack the numbers.
32 +37 _______ 69
We were instructed to add 2 + 7 on the right row first, and then put a 9 below the line. Then we'd add 3 + 3 on the left row, and put a 6 in front of it. It was a simple way to solve the problem, and it taught the same concept of:
30 + 30 = 60 7+2 = 9 60+ 9 = 69
In the 70's and 80's we used a fucking calculator.
In the 2010's we let our math teacher do it for us. #WeAreEvolving
In the 2010s the (girls) butthole was a fancy feast.
Back in the early 90s, we would solve the problem the same way, except we would just stack the numbers.
32 +37 _______ 69
We were instructed to add 2 + 7 on the right row first, and then put a 9 below the line. Then we'd add 3 + 3 on the left row, and put a 6 in front of it. It was a simple way to solve the problem, and it taught the same concept of:
30 + 30 = 60 7+2 = 9 60+ 9 = 69
In the 70's and 80's we used a fucking calculator.
In the 2010's we let our math teacher do it for us. #WeAreEvolving
In the 2010s the (girls) butthole was a fancy feast.
Fuck this thread. Instead of talking about UODuckGirl's copper pemmy, we are poasting pictures of TI calculators and talking about Common Core.
petersenfuckguysridiculousfuckingshit.gif
This bored was watching Seinfield with their butt buddies reciting the lines from the show, while Pup was out getting beaver with the cool kids. What do you expect?
Comments
300
90
10
400 is your answer
You can do it in your head all day long. Learned in the 60's man
It's how rainmain can do it with any set of numbers
Then again in the 70s the butthole was a fancy feast.
I've got years of advanced maff for the BS and an MS in stats/fisheries. I can proofread, show another way to solve it, and check answers with my kids. That is it now, with the "show your work" grade system. They get penalized using other ways to solve - even correctly.
3rd grade teacher actually tried to scold me for teaching a method that worked for my older boy. He showed his work on a test and she flipped out in an email. I told her he got it right, didn't he? Crickets....
Common core is not helping kids...especially future STEM kids.
In the 70's and 80's we used a fucking calculator.
"You're not learning anything by having a machine do the work."
"We're learning how to have the machine do the work."
"Out in the hall, right now!"
You give a 5 dollar bill for a 3.95 order and it goes
a nickle makes 4 and here's a dollar for five
Now the confused sod looks at the register screen in panic and hands you a wad of cash even though it clearly says to give you 1.05 back
Get your shit together virgin.
petersenfuckguysridiculousfuckingshit.gif
Actual math teacher, in Minsk, Belarus. FUCK YEAH!
I actually don't unless I am in between hacked debit cards