You should load up on options in the companies bound to capitalize on the free money grab.
This has been a foregone conclusion for a while, most of them jumped last November. Do you always advise to buy high?
But AZ in his typical struggle mode this weak dug it up again.
I see you aren't paying attention to current events.
I am. On the surface it seems a no brainer to keep the EO in place. But if ya dig a little deeper, this has constricted both the expansion of high speed Internet to many areas and possibly delayed better tech to come online as well. We also have the Federal Trade Commission to address throttling and the opening and closure of the gates for preferred partners. If the FTC will do their job, opening up the field may not be The boogeyman many believe.
You should load up on options in the companies bound to capitalize on the free money grab.
This has been a foregone conclusion for a while, most of them jumped last November. Do you always advise to buy high?
But AZ in his typical struggle mode this weak dug it up again.
I see you aren't paying attention to current events.
I am. On the surface it seems a no brainer to keep the EO in place. But if ya dig a little deeper, this has constricted both the expansion of high speed Internet to many areas and possibly delayed better tech to come online as well. We also have the Federal Trade Commission to address throttling and the opening and closure of the gates for preferred partners. If the FTC will do their job, opening up the field may not be The boogeyman many believe.
I don't understand the issue very well - but to me this will work like cell service which you pay for better faster and unlimited usage. I sure as hell don't want the gov regulating something that really has worked well so far. Again I don't pay attention to all the details and do not think it will impact use low. or I could be totally wrong.
I don't understand the issue very well - but to me this will work like cell service which you pay for better faster and unlimited usage. I sure as hell don't want the gov regulating something that really has worked well so far. Again I don't pay attention to all the details and do not think it will impact use low. or I could be totally wrong.
I don't understand the issue very well - but to me this will work like cell service which you pay for better faster and unlimited usage. I sure as hell don't want the gov regulating something that really has worked well so far. Again I don't pay attention to all the details and do not think it will impact use low. or I could be totally wrong.
I don't understand the issue very well - but to me this will work like cell service which you pay for better faster and unlimited usage. I sure as hell don't want the gov regulating something that really has worked well so far. Again I don't pay attention to all the details and do not think it will impact use low. or I could be totally wrong.
I don't understand the issue very well - but to me this will work like cell service which you pay for better faster and unlimited usage. I sure as hell don't want the gov regulating something that really has worked well so far. Again I don't pay attention to all the details and do not think it will impact use low. or I could be totally wrong.
I don't understand the issue very well - but to me this will work like cell service which you pay for better faster and unlimited usage. I sure as hell don't want the gov regulating something that really has worked well so far. Again I don't pay attention to all the details and do not think it will impact use low. or I could be totally wrong.
You should load up on options in the companies bound to capitalize on the free money grab.
This has been a foregone conclusion for a while, most of them jumped last November. Do you always advise to buy high?
But AZ in his typical struggle mode this weak dug it up again.
I see you aren't paying attention to current events.
I am. On the surface it seems a no brainer to keep the EO in place. But if ya dig a little deeper, this has constricted both the expansion of high speed Internet to many areas and possibly delayed better tech to come online as well. We also have the Federal Trade Commission to address throttling and the opening and closure of the gates for preferred partners. If the FTC will do their job, opening up the field may not be The boogeyman many believe.
But broadband is shared by many users, and providers can’t offer the full multitude of services to all customers at acceptable quality and prices at all times
My fear is this utter bullshit of an argument will work.
You should load up on options in the companies bound to capitalize on the free money grab.
This has been a foregone conclusion for a while, most of them jumped last November. Do you always advise to buy high?
But AZ in his typical struggle mode this weak dug it up again.
I see you aren't paying attention to current events.
I am. On the surface it seems a no brainer to keep the EO in place. But if ya dig a little deeper, this has constricted both the expansion of high speed Internet to many areas and possibly delayed better tech to come online as well. We also have the Federal Trade Commission to address throttling and the opening and closure of the gates for preferred partners. If the FTC will do their job, opening up the field may not be The boogeyman many believe.
1. It wasn't an EO.
2. Title II has been in place since 2015. Nothing has been constricted because ISPs can't rape their customers, certainly not in the past two years.
Whoever you get your information from is retarded.
You should load up on options in the companies bound to capitalize on the free money grab.
This has been a foregone conclusion for a while, most of them jumped last November. Do you always advise to buy high?
But AZ in his typical struggle mode this weak dug it up again.
I see you aren't paying attention to current events.
I am. On the surface it seems a no brainer to keep the EO in place. But if ya dig a little deeper, this has constricted both the expansion of high speed Internet to many areas and possibly delayed better tech to come online as well. We also have the Federal Trade Commission to address throttling and the opening and closure of the gates for preferred partners. If the FTC will do their job, opening up the field may not be The boogeyman many believe.
1. It wasn't an EO.
2. Title II has been in place since 2015. Nothing has been constricted because ISPs can't rape their customers, certainly not in the past two years.
Whoever you get your information from is retarded.
Comments
But still.
http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/who-invented-the-internet
My fear is this utter bullshit of an argument will work.
Fiber. Everywhere.
2. Title II has been in place since 2015. Nothing has been constricted because ISPs can't rape their customers, certainly not in the past two years.
Whoever you get your information from is retarded.