Hate Monopolies? Then You Should be Pissed About the Abolition of Net Neutrality
Comments
-
No one here for sureCuntWaffle said:People will have to start masturbating the old fashioned way... having sex.
-
Yeah... I’m for Comcast and AT&T to be included in eminent domain.
-
I am. On the surface it seems a no brainer to keep the EO in place. But if ya dig a little deeper, this has constricted both the expansion of high speed Internet to many areas and possibly delayed better tech to come online as well. We also have the Federal Trade Commission to address throttling and the opening and closure of the gates for preferred partners. If the FTC will do their job, opening up the field may not be The boogeyman many believe.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I see you aren't paying attention to current events.salemcoog said:
But AZ in his typical struggle mode this weak dug it up again.UWhuskytskeet said:
This has been a foregone conclusion for a while, most of them jumped last November. Do you always advise to buy high?doogie said:You should load up on options in the companies bound to capitalize on the free money grab.
-
Can I get a KOMO 4?salemcoog said:
I am. On the surface it seems a no brainer to keep the EO in place. But if ya dig a little deeper, this has constricted both the expansion of high speed Internet to many areas and possibly delayed better tech to come online as well. We also have the Federal Trade Commission to address throttling and the opening and closure of the gates for preferred partners. If the FTC will do their job, opening up the field may not be The boogeyman many believe.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I see you aren't paying attention to current events.salemcoog said:
But AZ in his typical struggle mode this weak dug it up again.UWhuskytskeet said:
This has been a foregone conclusion for a while, most of them jumped last November. Do you always advise to buy high?doogie said:You should load up on options in the companies bound to capitalize on the free money grab.
-
I don't understand the issue very well - but to me this will work like cell service which you pay for better faster and unlimited usage. I sure as hell don't want the gov regulating something that really has worked well so far. Again I don't pay attention to all the details and do not think it will impact use low. or I could be totally wrong.
-
The US government invented the Internet.LebamDawg said:I don't understand the issue very well - but to me this will work like cell service which you pay for better faster and unlimited usage. I sure as hell don't want the gov regulating something that really has worked well so far. Again I don't pay attention to all the details and do not think it will impact use low. or I could be totally wrong.
But still. -
They love it, and set it free.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The US government invented the Internet.LebamDawg said:I don't understand the issue very well - but to me this will work like cell service which you pay for better faster and unlimited usage. I sure as hell don't want the gov regulating something that really has worked well so far. Again I don't pay attention to all the details and do not think it will impact use low. or I could be totally wrong.
But still. -
Al Gore says fuck off.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The US government invented the Internet.LebamDawg said:I don't understand the issue very well - but to me this will work like cell service which you pay for better faster and unlimited usage. I sure as hell don't want the gov regulating something that really has worked well so far. Again I don't pay attention to all the details and do not think it will impact use low. or I could be totally wrong.
But still. -
technically the internet was in development and the gov threw $$$$$ into -TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The US government invented the Internet.LebamDawg said:I don't understand the issue very well - but to me this will work like cell service which you pay for better faster and unlimited usage. I sure as hell don't want the gov regulating something that really has worked well so far. Again I don't pay attention to all the details and do not think it will impact use low. or I could be totally wrong.
But still.
http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/who-invented-the-internet -
This thread is a piece ajit
-
Read your link. The Department of Defense is part of the US gov't.LebamDawg said:
technically the internet was in development and the gov threw $$$$$ into -TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The US government invented the Internet.LebamDawg said:I don't understand the issue very well - but to me this will work like cell service which you pay for better faster and unlimited usage. I sure as hell don't want the gov regulating something that really has worked well so far. Again I don't pay attention to all the details and do not think it will impact use low. or I could be totally wrong.
But still.
http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/who-invented-the-internet -
Bingosalemcoog said:
I am. On the surface it seems a no brainer to keep the EO in place. But if ya dig a little deeper, this has constricted both the expansion of high speed Internet to many areas and possibly delayed better tech to come online as well. We also have the Federal Trade Commission to address throttling and the opening and closure of the gates for preferred partners. If the FTC will do their job, opening up the field may not be The boogeyman many believe.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I see you aren't paying attention to current events.salemcoog said:
But AZ in his typical struggle mode this weak dug it up again.UWhuskytskeet said:
This has been a foregone conclusion for a while, most of them jumped last November. Do you always advise to buy high?doogie said:You should load up on options in the companies bound to capitalize on the free money grab.
-
But broadband is shared by many users, and providers can’t offer the full multitude of services to all customers at acceptable quality and prices at all timesHoustonHusky said:
Sorry if I'm skeptical of a British comedian and a wannabe Detroit real estate mogul on public policy.AZDuck said:hardy har har
There are a lot of diverse opinions on it out there, including this one. Wu's comment should scare everyone.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/436807/net-neutrality-government-control
My fear is this utter bullshit of an argument will work.
Fiber. Everywhere. -
1. It wasn't an EO.salemcoog said:
I am. On the surface it seems a no brainer to keep the EO in place. But if ya dig a little deeper, this has constricted both the expansion of high speed Internet to many areas and possibly delayed better tech to come online as well. We also have the Federal Trade Commission to address throttling and the opening and closure of the gates for preferred partners. If the FTC will do their job, opening up the field may not be The boogeyman many believe.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I see you aren't paying attention to current events.salemcoog said:
But AZ in his typical struggle mode this weak dug it up again.UWhuskytskeet said:
This has been a foregone conclusion for a while, most of them jumped last November. Do you always advise to buy high?doogie said:You should load up on options in the companies bound to capitalize on the free money grab.
2. Title II has been in place since 2015. Nothing has been constricted because ISPs can't rape their customers, certainly not in the past two years.
Whoever you get your information from is retarded. -
Don't blame his source.UWhuskytskeet said:
1. It wasn't an EO.salemcoog said:
I am. On the surface it seems a no brainer to keep the EO in place. But if ya dig a little deeper, this has constricted both the expansion of high speed Internet to many areas and possibly delayed better tech to come online as well. We also have the Federal Trade Commission to address throttling and the opening and closure of the gates for preferred partners. If the FTC will do their job, opening up the field may not be The boogeyman many believe.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I see you aren't paying attention to current events.salemcoog said:
But AZ in his typical struggle mode this weak dug it up again.UWhuskytskeet said:
This has been a foregone conclusion for a while, most of them jumped last November. Do you always advise to buy high?doogie said:You should load up on options in the companies bound to capitalize on the free money grab.
2. Title II has been in place since 2015. Nothing has been constricted because ISPs can't rape their customers, certainly not in the past two years.
Whoever you get your information from is retarded.