Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Hate Monopolies? Then You Should be Pissed About the Abolition of Net Neutrality

13»

Comments

  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    CuntWaffle said:

    People will have to start masturbating the old fashioned way... having sex.

    No one here for sure
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,560
    edited November 2017
    Yeah... I’m for Comcast and AT&T to be included in eminent domain.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,347 Founders Club
    dflea said:

    phineas said:

    This is all a mute point when the meteor hits

    What in the fuck is taking that thing so long?
    Meteor neutrality regulation.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    salemcoog said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    doogie said:

    You should load up on options in the companies bound to capitalize on the free money grab.

    This has been a foregone conclusion for a while, most of them jumped last November. Do you always advise to buy high?
    But AZ in his typical struggle mode this weak dug it up again.
    I see you aren't paying attention to current events.
    I am. On the surface it seems a no brainer to keep the EO in place. But if ya dig a little deeper, this has constricted both the expansion of high speed Internet to many areas and possibly delayed better tech to come online as well. We also have the Federal Trade Commission to address throttling and the opening and closure of the gates for preferred partners. If the FTC will do their job, opening up the field may not be The boogeyman many believe.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    salemcoog said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    salemcoog said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    doogie said:

    You should load up on options in the companies bound to capitalize on the free money grab.

    This has been a foregone conclusion for a while, most of them jumped last November. Do you always advise to buy high?
    But AZ in his typical struggle mode this weak dug it up again.
    I see you aren't paying attention to current events.
    I am. On the surface it seems a no brainer to keep the EO in place. But if ya dig a little deeper, this has constricted both the expansion of high speed Internet to many areas and possibly delayed better tech to come online as well. We also have the Federal Trade Commission to address throttling and the opening and closure of the gates for preferred partners. If the FTC will do their job, opening up the field may not be The boogeyman many believe.
    Can I get a KOMO 4?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LebamDawg
    LebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,792 Swaye's Wigwam
    I don't understand the issue very well - but to me this will work like cell service which you pay for better faster and unlimited usage. I sure as hell don't want the gov regulating something that really has worked well so far. Again I don't pay attention to all the details and do not think it will impact use low. or I could be totally wrong.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    LebamDawg said:

    I don't understand the issue very well - but to me this will work like cell service which you pay for better faster and unlimited usage. I sure as hell don't want the gov regulating something that really has worked well so far. Again I don't pay attention to all the details and do not think it will impact use low. or I could be totally wrong.

    The US government invented the Internet.

    But still.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    LebamDawg said:

    I don't understand the issue very well - but to me this will work like cell service which you pay for better faster and unlimited usage. I sure as hell don't want the gov regulating something that really has worked well so far. Again I don't pay attention to all the details and do not think it will impact use low. or I could be totally wrong.

    The US government invented the Internet.

    But still.
    They love it, and set it free.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    LebamDawg said:

    I don't understand the issue very well - but to me this will work like cell service which you pay for better faster and unlimited usage. I sure as hell don't want the gov regulating something that really has worked well so far. Again I don't pay attention to all the details and do not think it will impact use low. or I could be totally wrong.

    The US government invented the Internet.

    But still.
    Al Gore says fuck off.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LebamDawg
    LebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,792 Swaye's Wigwam
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    LebamDawg said:

    I don't understand the issue very well - but to me this will work like cell service which you pay for better faster and unlimited usage. I sure as hell don't want the gov regulating something that really has worked well so far. Again I don't pay attention to all the details and do not think it will impact use low. or I could be totally wrong.

    The US government invented the Internet.

    But still.
    technically the internet was in development and the gov threw $$$$$ into -
    http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/who-invented-the-internet
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Gwad
    Gwad Member Posts: 2,855
    This thread is a piece ajit
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    LebamDawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    LebamDawg said:

    I don't understand the issue very well - but to me this will work like cell service which you pay for better faster and unlimited usage. I sure as hell don't want the gov regulating something that really has worked well so far. Again I don't pay attention to all the details and do not think it will impact use low. or I could be totally wrong.

    The US government invented the Internet.

    But still.
    technically the internet was in development and the gov threw $$$$$ into -
    http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/who-invented-the-internet
    Read your link. The Department of Defense is part of the US gov't.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,347 Founders Club
    salemcoog said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    salemcoog said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    doogie said:

    You should load up on options in the companies bound to capitalize on the free money grab.

    This has been a foregone conclusion for a while, most of them jumped last November. Do you always advise to buy high?
    But AZ in his typical struggle mode this weak dug it up again.
    I see you aren't paying attention to current events.
    I am. On the surface it seems a no brainer to keep the EO in place. But if ya dig a little deeper, this has constricted both the expansion of high speed Internet to many areas and possibly delayed better tech to come online as well. We also have the Federal Trade Commission to address throttling and the opening and closure of the gates for preferred partners. If the FTC will do their job, opening up the field may not be The boogeyman many believe.
    Bingo
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,476 Founders Club
    HoustonHusky said:

    AZDuck said:

    hardy har har

    Sorry if I'm skeptical of a British comedian and a wannabe Detroit real estate mogul on public policy.

    There are a lot of diverse opinions on it out there, including this one. Wu's comment should scare everyone.

    http://www.nationalreview.com/article/436807/net-neutrality-government-control
    But broadband is shared by many users, and providers can’t offer the full multitude of services to all customers at acceptable quality and prices at all times


    My fear is this utter bullshit of an argument will work.


    Fiber. Everywhere.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    UWhuskytskeet said:

    salemcoog said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    salemcoog said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    doogie said:

    You should load up on options in the companies bound to capitalize on the free money grab.

    This has been a foregone conclusion for a while, most of them jumped last November. Do you always advise to buy high?
    But AZ in his typical struggle mode this weak dug it up again.
    I see you aren't paying attention to current events.
    I am. On the surface it seems a no brainer to keep the EO in place. But if ya dig a little deeper, this has constricted both the expansion of high speed Internet to many areas and possibly delayed better tech to come online as well. We also have the Federal Trade Commission to address throttling and the opening and closure of the gates for preferred partners. If the FTC will do their job, opening up the field may not be The boogeyman many believe.
    1. It wasn't an EO.

    2. Title II has been in place since 2015. Nothing has been constricted because ISPs can't rape their customers, certainly not in the past two years.

    Whoever you get your information from is retarded.
    Don't blame his source.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter