Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

This is inconvenient

«1

Comments

  • Options
    TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary
    Chinconvenient but also chinteresting
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 31,276
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes
    edited November 2017
    Guns ain't that hard to make. Look up the Khyber Pass gun makers. Funthat the purple wanting drugs legal because you can't stop them want guns illegal because laws work....
  • Options
    doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    What he did was not legal.

    I agree that all of the laws this shooter broke should remain in effect.
  • Options
    dncdnc Member Posts: 56,614
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes

    You can make you're own bombs too (just what I'm hearing @NSA_Dawg) so they should be legal? I need bombs to protect my family. Only way to stop a bad guy with a bomb is a good guy with an even bigger bomb.

    This is how I feel reading this poast











    image
  • Options
    Fenderbender123Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,887
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    edited November 2017
    The point is that if the law isn't going to deter anyone who is planning on killing people from obtaining weapons, then we are only preventing good, law-abiding citizens from obtaining them.
  • Options
    AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Answer

    The point is that if the law isn't going to deter anyone who is planning on killing people from obtaining weapons, then we are only preventing good, law-abiding citizens from obtaining them.

    that's kind of a dumb poont. also contradicted by evidence freely available in every other country on the planet
  • Options
    Fenderbender123Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,887
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    AZDuck said:

    The point is that if the law isn't going to deter anyone who is planning on killing people from obtaining weapons, then we are only preventing good, law-abiding citizens from obtaining them.

    that's kind of a dumb poont. also contradicted by evidence freely available in every other country on the planet
    But people do still obtain weapons and kill other people with them. They might replace guns with knives, but people still kill other people.
  • Options
    AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Answer

    AZDuck said:

    The point is that if the law isn't going to deter anyone who is planning on killing people from obtaining weapons, then we are only preventing good, law-abiding citizens from obtaining them.

    that's kind of a dumb poont. also contradicted by evidence freely available in every other country on the planet
    But people do still obtain weapons and kill other people with them. They might replace guns with knives, but people still kill other people.
    Sure. The same day as Sandy Hook some lunatic attacked a primary school in China with a kniife. Stabbed 23 people, mostly elementary school kids. Zero fatalities.

    Compare/contrast.

  • Options
    Fenderbender123Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,887
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    AZDuck said:

    AZDuck said:

    The point is that if the law isn't going to deter anyone who is planning on killing people from obtaining weapons, then we are only preventing good, law-abiding citizens from obtaining them.

    that's kind of a dumb poont. also contradicted by evidence freely available in every other country on the planet
    But people do still obtain weapons and kill other people with them. They might replace guns with knives, but people still kill other people.
    Sure. The same day as Sandy Hook some lunatic attacked a primary school in China with a kniife. Stabbed 23 people, mostly elementary school kids. Zero fatalities.

    Compare/contrast.

    And I could point out shootings where people were shot and didn't die, and stabbings where people were stabbed and did die.
  • Options
    AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Answer

    AZDuck said:

    AZDuck said:

    The point is that if the law isn't going to deter anyone who is planning on killing people from obtaining weapons, then we are only preventing good, law-abiding citizens from obtaining them.

    that's kind of a dumb poont. also contradicted by evidence freely available in every other country on the planet
    But people do still obtain weapons and kill other people with them. They might replace guns with knives, but people still kill other people.
    Sure. The same day as Sandy Hook some lunatic attacked a primary school in China with a kniife. Stabbed 23 people, mostly elementary school kids. Zero fatalities.

    Compare/contrast.

    And I could point out shootings where people were shot and didn't die, and stabbings where people were stabbed and did die.
    You might be being obtuse if you can't recognize that a gun is many, many times more deadly than a knife.

    imageimage
  • Options
    GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,481
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    AZDuck said:

    AZDuck said:

    AZDuck said:

    The point is that if the law isn't going to deter anyone who is planning on killing people from obtaining weapons, then we are only preventing good, law-abiding citizens from obtaining them.

    that's kind of a dumb poont. also contradicted by evidence freely available in every other country on the planet
    But people do still obtain weapons and kill other people with them. They might replace guns with knives, but people still kill other people.
    Sure. The same day as Sandy Hook some lunatic attacked a primary school in China with a kniife. Stabbed 23 people, mostly elementary school kids. Zero fatalities.

    Compare/contrast.

    And I could point out shootings where people were shot and didn't die, and stabbings where people were stabbed and did die.
    You might be being obtuse if you can't recognize that a gun is many, many times more deadly than a knife.

    imageimage
    @IsandlwanaVetDuck, truueeee???!
  • Options
    Fenderbender123Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,887
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    edited November 2017
    AZDuck said:

    You might be being obtuse if you can't recognize that a gun is many, many times more deadly than a knife.


    Guns and knives are different. They kill people in different ways. The objects themselves are shaped and weigh differently. One is much louder. One is less expensive. And remember, a knife is just one weapon a person could replace a gun with.
  • Options
    dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,221
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes

    AZDuck said:

    AZDuck said:

    The point is that if the law isn't going to deter anyone who is planning on killing people from obtaining weapons, then we are only preventing good, law-abiding citizens from obtaining them.

    that's kind of a dumb poont. also contradicted by evidence freely available in every other country on the planet
    But people do still obtain weapons and kill other people with them. They might replace guns with knives, but people still kill other people.
    Sure. The same day as Sandy Hook some lunatic attacked a primary school in China with a kniife. Stabbed 23 people, mostly elementary school kids. Zero fatalities.

    Compare/contrast.

    And I could point out shootings where people were shot and didn't die, and stabbings where people were stabbed and did die.
    Go ahead.
  • Options
    dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,221
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes

    AZDuck said:

    You might be being obtuse if you can't recognize that a gun is many, many times more deadly than a knife.


    Guns and knives are different. They kill people in different ways. The objects themselves are shaped and weigh differently. One is much louder. One is less expensive. And remember, a knife is just one weapon a person could replace a gun with.
    Nobody with a knife has ever killed 58 people from a hotel room 100 yards away.

    You've heard about assholes that bring knives to a gun fight, right?
  • Options
    Fenderbender123Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,887
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    dflea said:

    AZDuck said:

    AZDuck said:

    The point is that if the law isn't going to deter anyone who is planning on killing people from obtaining weapons, then we are only preventing good, law-abiding citizens from obtaining them.

    that's kind of a dumb poont. also contradicted by evidence freely available in every other country on the planet
    But people do still obtain weapons and kill other people with them. They might replace guns with knives, but people still kill other people.
    Sure. The same day as Sandy Hook some lunatic attacked a primary school in China with a kniife. Stabbed 23 people, mostly elementary school kids. Zero fatalities.

    Compare/contrast.

    And I could point out shootings where people were shot and didn't die, and stabbings where people were stabbed and did die.
    Go ahead.
    http://lmgtfy.com/?q=gunshot+survivors

    http://lmgtfy.com/?q=stabbing+murders
  • Options
    dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,221
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes

    dflea said:

    AZDuck said:

    AZDuck said:

    The point is that if the law isn't going to deter anyone who is planning on killing people from obtaining weapons, then we are only preventing good, law-abiding citizens from obtaining them.

    that's kind of a dumb poont. also contradicted by evidence freely available in every other country on the planet
    But people do still obtain weapons and kill other people with them. They might replace guns with knives, but people still kill other people.
    Sure. The same day as Sandy Hook some lunatic attacked a primary school in China with a kniife. Stabbed 23 people, mostly elementary school kids. Zero fatalities.

    Compare/contrast.

    And I could point out shootings where people were shot and didn't die, and stabbings where people were stabbed and did die.
    Go ahead.
    http://lmgtfy.com/?q=gunshot+survivors

    http://lmgtfy.com/?q=stabbing+murders
    Awesome. Bring your knife to a gun fight, and tell us how it works out.
  • Options
    Fenderbender123Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,887
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    Somehow this turned into a discussion about whether or not knives are a good self-defense weapon against guns...?
Sign In or Register to comment.