Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

TSiO Episode #42: We Lost to Stanford; Why Nothing has Changed With Us

1234568»

Comments

  • WilburHooksHands
    WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804

    By the way - I was referencing guys who were playing in the Stanford game.

    Which is important since injuries happen.

    That’s why getting one good player every third year is NOT GOOD ENOUGH.

    We need Trey Adams EVERY FUCKING YEAR.

    And we can get it if we have good recruiters. We’ll never get Bama’s players, but we can get a Trey Adams level player at T every fucking year.

    So - to sum - in the Stanford game, on O - guys who are guaranteed starters at MIA...

    I don’t see one. Gaskin and Pettis are probably equal to what they’ve got. Gaskin is the best shot.

    On defense: Gaines, Vea and Rapp.

    The end.

    Oh Im Dennis I like to ignore the third phase of the game. Pettis would start on Special Teams IDIOT. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754

    By the way - I was referencing guys who were playing in the Stanford game.

    Which is important since injuries happen.

    That’s why getting one good player every third year is NOT GOOD ENOUGH.

    We need Trey Adams EVERY FUCKING YEAR.

    And we can get it if we have good recruiters. We’ll never get Bama’s players, but we can get a Trey Adams level player at T every fucking year.

    So - to sum - in the Stanford game, on O - guys who are guaranteed starters at MIA...

    I don’t see one. Gaskin and Pettis are probably equal to what they’ve got. Gaskin is the best shot.

    On defense: Gaines, Vea and Rapp.

    The end.

    Oh Im Dennis I like to ignore the third phase of the game. Pettis would start on Special Teams IDIOT. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
    DIAFF
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    bump

    bonorpoper gotz to go