Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

UW is a "fraud" according to

124678

Comments

  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,436
    Mosster47 said:

    You guys are an 8 or 9 win team this year at best which is why preseason rankings are dumb.

    Last year you got pushed around by Bama and USC. Bama I get, USC not so much. Your D was beyond stacked last year but the O was a liability. This year is a decent defense with the offense still being a liability. Next year both will be a liability.

    It was a great one year run. The Seattle Times piece in 12 years will be great.

    This poast had potential, but you need to pay attention to your prose. Two "greats" in the last two lines kinda screwed it up. If you'd used "epic" or something, it would have been better.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,436
    dflea said:

    If you don't want to be called a fucking fraud, then don't play like one.

    finally a poaster with ballz. Take note turdy and ballz. This is how you take it like a man and not a whiny drippy chunt.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,436
    BallzDeep said:

    @creepycoug WSU hasn't beaten UW in five years. All of those five straight losses were ass whoopings. And yet you're here talking shit. LMAO.

    You keep talking shit about my kewgs and I'm going to hunt you down.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,911 Founders Club

    UW is far from a fraud. When both starting corners weren't hurt this defense was as good as anyone in the country....maybe the best. The main problem is under center. Put McSorley in there and this team is undefeated and #3 in the cuntry. Oh, and the PacChamp vs USC is epic. UW wins by 10.

    With Browning, well, you're looking at it...a holiday bowl team.

    Bryant ain't terrible but at 5'7" he gets picked by the tall receivers. Cost us some pts against Stanford for sure.
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,168

    UW deserves it. They have now choked in 4 big games. Even James had his losses to UCLA that bedeviled the Dawgs in the 80's and 90's, but unlike James, Peterson hasn't yet won "the big game" and gotten over the hump of getting his players to execute at a high level against the toughest teams. Last year, it was SC and Alabama, this year it's a fired up ASU and a workman-like, fairly solid Stanford team with a better game plan.

    The Dawgs are good, not great. To be great, you have to win the big, important games and they haven't done that yet.

    So 2017 ASU and Stanford count as big games, but 2016 Stanford, Utah, WSU, and Colorado do not? That's some fucking retarded spin.

    There's no question that the 2017 iteration of UW has done absolutely nothing impressive other than blow the doors off of some middle rung Pac-12 programs (and even if we were 10-0 right now it would still be true). But this sudden rewrite of history that tries to pretend that we didn't beat anyone worth a damn in 2016 as well, is total nonsense.
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    This was a one loss squad.
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246

    Mosster47 said:

    You guys are an 8 or 9 win team this year at best which is why preseason rankings are dumb.

    Last year you got pushed around by Bama and USC. Bama I get, USC not so much. Your D was beyond stacked last year but the O was a liability. This year is a decent defense with the offense still being a liability. Next year both will be a liability.

    It was a great one year run. The Seattle Times piece in 12 years will be great.

    This poast had potential, but you need to pay attention to your prose. Two "greats" in the last two lines kinda screwed it up. If you'd used "epic" or something, it would have been better.
    Nothing about UW football has been epic for a long long time.
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133

    UW is far from a fraud. When both starting corners weren't hurt this defense was as good as anyone in the country....maybe the best. The main problem is under center. Put McSorley in there and this team is undefeated and #3 in the cuntry. Oh, and the PacChamp vs USC is epic. UW wins by 10.

    With Browning, well, you're looking at it...a holiday bowl team.

    Bryant ain't terrible but at 5'7" he gets picked by the tall receivers. Cost us some pts against Stanford for sure.
    Bryant is my favorite corner. What he lacks in height he makes up for in rrun support, bubble screens...anything behind the LOS