Florida vetting the Chipster as head coach
Comments
-
You have a good, or at least accurate, imagination.salemcoog said:
Ironically, We almost stopped by there a couple weeks ago after the Stanford game.creepycoug said:
Don't reactivate him. I need to get him back to Pull Tab to reset his stupid. He actually thinks he's stable and an adult.dflea said:
Disagreecreepycoug said:
Dude. This is pretty stupid even for one of our people. Come on Cuog! You're not that clueless. The conference's best defense just got clocked by 30 to a one-legged running back and an average - at best - passing attack.
Come again Cuog?
But hard pass to drinks with you creep. You can't stay on task for a single sentence let alone an actual conversation. I imagine you as an absolute shitshow drunk.
And your ass-in-hand comment re staying on task is well taken, even in the context of your 'dumbest poast of the week,' which is saying a lot here. One day, I'm going to turn in my Kewg Kard and start enjoying the mother loving fuck out of watching that shit-show of a school and fan base continue to struggle mightily for just a shred of respect and acceptance.
And you live in fucking Salem.
So, fuck off. Drinks with me and mine would be the social accomplishment of your shit life.
I win. Always. -
-
You talking with good Luke or rigor mortis sacked Luke?creepycoug said:
The only team on that list that could beat those Oregon teams is our Cuog. But then again, the Pirate can beat anybody anywhere any day, as we both know.salemcoog said:
UW, WSU, Arizona, Stanford and USC could beat Oregon of yesteryear on a given Saturday.Mosster47 said:
Like who? Who in this Pac-12 would beat Chip outside of Shaw and Rich Rod? Shaw is a great coach that plays sound football with giant humans and Arizona's D sees a similar offense everyday so it's easier to defend and they can score because of it.salemcoog said:Chip will make FLA respectable. But not a Natty threat. His system is common place now. And Chip only ever had to worry about USC and Stanford during his entire tenure at Oregon. Oh Boise fucking State and Arizona for some reason. The rest of the PAC 12 was horrible. Say what you want about the PAC 12 the last 3 years. But there are twice the amount of teams that could have stepped up and beat his squads on any given Saturday than back then. And even on a down SEC YEAR, He’ll play 4 or 5 teams that can beat FLA.
UW with no offense? Nope.
Cal, ever? Nope.
The 1 win Beavs? Nope.
Colorado, ever? Nope.
Utah, ever? Nope.
Wazzu? Maybe.
UCLA? Hahahaha!
ASU? Not even at their best.
USC? Always a maybe.
Looks to be same as it ever was.
The SEC is Bama, Georgia, LSU, and Florida. If you're at one of those you have the talent to beat the other ones.
And now He will have the same amount of teams that can beat him every year if at FLA.
@DerekJohnson , Please pin this thread so that in 3 years when He's winning 8 games per year, you'll all know who your daddy was....
Again.
Washington just gave up 30 pts. and just about 2 hundy to one-legged Love and milk-toast passing attack. I would triple that against an offense with Mariotta and friends. That Stanford team just about lost to a one-win Beav team and SDSU.
You're really talking out of your ass.
One thing is certain. The Chipster would not be motorboating the Falk sisters' tittays.
#likesboys -
Have we confirmed he's gay?PurpleThrobber said:
You talking with good Luke or rigor mortis sacked Luke?creepycoug said:
The only team on that list that could beat those Oregon teams is our Cuog. But then again, the Pirate can beat anybody anywhere any day, as we both know.salemcoog said:
UW, WSU, Arizona, Stanford and USC could beat Oregon of yesteryear on a given Saturday.Mosster47 said:
Like who? Who in this Pac-12 would beat Chip outside of Shaw and Rich Rod? Shaw is a great coach that plays sound football with giant humans and Arizona's D sees a similar offense everyday so it's easier to defend and they can score because of it.salemcoog said:Chip will make FLA respectable. But not a Natty threat. His system is common place now. And Chip only ever had to worry about USC and Stanford during his entire tenure at Oregon. Oh Boise fucking State and Arizona for some reason. The rest of the PAC 12 was horrible. Say what you want about the PAC 12 the last 3 years. But there are twice the amount of teams that could have stepped up and beat his squads on any given Saturday than back then. And even on a down SEC YEAR, He’ll play 4 or 5 teams that can beat FLA.
UW with no offense? Nope.
Cal, ever? Nope.
The 1 win Beavs? Nope.
Colorado, ever? Nope.
Utah, ever? Nope.
Wazzu? Maybe.
UCLA? Hahahaha!
ASU? Not even at their best.
USC? Always a maybe.
Looks to be same as it ever was.
The SEC is Bama, Georgia, LSU, and Florida. If you're at one of those you have the talent to beat the other ones.
And now He will have the same amount of teams that can beat him every year if at FLA.
@DerekJohnson , Please pin this thread so that in 3 years when He's winning 8 games per year, you'll all know who your daddy was....
Again.
Washington just gave up 30 pts. and just about 2 hundy to one-legged Love and milk-toast passing attack. I would triple that against an offense with Mariotta and friends. That Stanford team just about lost to a one-win Beav team and SDSU.
You're really talking out of your ass.
One thing is certain. The Chipster would not be motorboating the Falk sisters' tittays.
#likesboys
IMO all signs point to him being a eunuch.
Mainly his appearance and the fact he hasnt come up in any sex scandals. -
Except UW, apparentlycreepycoug said:
But then again, the Pirate can beat anybody anywhere any daysalemcoog said:
UW, WSU, Arizona, Stanford and USC could beat Oregon of yesteryear on a given Saturday.Mosster47 said:
Like who? Who in this Pac-12 would beat Chip outside of Shaw and Rich Rod? Shaw is a great coach that plays sound football with giant humans and Arizona's D sees a similar offense everyday so it's easier to defend and they can score because of it.salemcoog said:Chip will make FLA respectable. But not a Natty threat. His system is common place now. And Chip only ever had to worry about USC and Stanford during his entire tenure at Oregon. Oh Boise fucking State and Arizona for some reason. The rest of the PAC 12 was horrible. Say what you want about the PAC 12 the last 3 years. But there are twice the amount of teams that could have stepped up and beat his squads on any given Saturday than back then. And even on a down SEC YEAR, He’ll play 4 or 5 teams that can beat FLA.
UW with no offense? Nope.
Cal, ever? Nope.
The 1 win Beavs? Nope.
Colorado, ever? Nope.
Utah, ever? Nope.
Wazzu? Maybe.
UCLA? Hahahaha!
ASU? Not even at their best.
USC? Always a maybe.
Looks to be same as it ever was.
The SEC is Bama, Georgia, LSU, and Florida. If you're at one of those you have the talent to beat the other ones.
And now He will have the same amount of teams that can beat him every year if at FLA.
@DerekJohnson , Please pin this thread so that in 3 years when He's winning 8 games per year, you'll all know who your daddy was....
Again.
-
Ooooo good one.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Except UW, apparentlycreepycoug said:
But then again, the Pirate can beat anybody anywhere any daysalemcoog said:
UW, WSU, Arizona, Stanford and USC could beat Oregon of yesteryear on a given Saturday.Mosster47 said:
Like who? Who in this Pac-12 would beat Chip outside of Shaw and Rich Rod? Shaw is a great coach that plays sound football with giant humans and Arizona's D sees a similar offense everyday so it's easier to defend and they can score because of it.salemcoog said:Chip will make FLA respectable. But not a Natty threat. His system is common place now. And Chip only ever had to worry about USC and Stanford during his entire tenure at Oregon. Oh Boise fucking State and Arizona for some reason. The rest of the PAC 12 was horrible. Say what you want about the PAC 12 the last 3 years. But there are twice the amount of teams that could have stepped up and beat his squads on any given Saturday than back then. And even on a down SEC YEAR, He’ll play 4 or 5 teams that can beat FLA.
UW with no offense? Nope.
Cal, ever? Nope.
The 1 win Beavs? Nope.
Colorado, ever? Nope.
Utah, ever? Nope.
Wazzu? Maybe.
UCLA? Hahahaha!
ASU? Not even at their best.
USC? Always a maybe.
Looks to be same as it ever was.
The SEC is Bama, Georgia, LSU, and Florida. If you're at one of those you have the talent to beat the other ones.
And now He will have the same amount of teams that can beat him every year if at FLA.
@DerekJohnson , Please pin this thread so that in 3 years when He's winning 8 games per year, you'll all know who your daddy was....
Again.
Don't you have some blow to sell? In the U district? -
creepycoug said:
Ooooo good one.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Except UW, apparentlycreepycoug said:
But then again, the Pirate can beat anybody anywhere any daysalemcoog said:
UW, WSU, Arizona, Stanford and USC could beat Oregon of yesteryear on a given Saturday.Mosster47 said:
Like who? Who in this Pac-12 would beat Chip outside of Shaw and Rich Rod? Shaw is a great coach that plays sound football with giant humans and Arizona's D sees a similar offense everyday so it's easier to defend and they can score because of it.salemcoog said:Chip will make FLA respectable. But not a Natty threat. His system is common place now. And Chip only ever had to worry about USC and Stanford during his entire tenure at Oregon. Oh Boise fucking State and Arizona for some reason. The rest of the PAC 12 was horrible. Say what you want about the PAC 12 the last 3 years. But there are twice the amount of teams that could have stepped up and beat his squads on any given Saturday than back then. And even on a down SEC YEAR, He’ll play 4 or 5 teams that can beat FLA.
UW with no offense? Nope.
Cal, ever? Nope.
The 1 win Beavs? Nope.
Colorado, ever? Nope.
Utah, ever? Nope.
Wazzu? Maybe.
UCLA? Hahahaha!
ASU? Not even at their best.
USC? Always a maybe.
Looks to be same as it ever was.
The SEC is Bama, Georgia, LSU, and Florida. If you're at one of those you have the talent to beat the other ones.
And now He will have the same amount of teams that can beat him every year if at FLA.
@DerekJohnson , Please pin this thread so that in 3 years when He's winning 8 games per year, you'll all know who your daddy was....
Again.
Don't you have some blow to sell? In the U district?
I'd sell you 95% baby laxatives and vitamin b12 -
Only once.PostGameOrangeSlices said:creepycoug said:
Ooooo good one.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Except UW, apparentlycreepycoug said:
But then again, the Pirate can beat anybody anywhere any daysalemcoog said:
UW, WSU, Arizona, Stanford and USC could beat Oregon of yesteryear on a given Saturday.Mosster47 said:
Like who? Who in this Pac-12 would beat Chip outside of Shaw and Rich Rod? Shaw is a great coach that plays sound football with giant humans and Arizona's D sees a similar offense everyday so it's easier to defend and they can score because of it.salemcoog said:Chip will make FLA respectable. But not a Natty threat. His system is common place now. And Chip only ever had to worry about USC and Stanford during his entire tenure at Oregon. Oh Boise fucking State and Arizona for some reason. The rest of the PAC 12 was horrible. Say what you want about the PAC 12 the last 3 years. But there are twice the amount of teams that could have stepped up and beat his squads on any given Saturday than back then. And even on a down SEC YEAR, He’ll play 4 or 5 teams that can beat FLA.
UW with no offense? Nope.
Cal, ever? Nope.
The 1 win Beavs? Nope.
Colorado, ever? Nope.
Utah, ever? Nope.
Wazzu? Maybe.
UCLA? Hahahaha!
ASU? Not even at their best.
USC? Always a maybe.
Looks to be same as it ever was.
The SEC is Bama, Georgia, LSU, and Florida. If you're at one of those you have the talent to beat the other ones.
And now He will have the same amount of teams that can beat him every year if at FLA.
@DerekJohnson , Please pin this thread so that in 3 years when He's winning 8 games per year, you'll all know who your daddy was....
Again.
Don't you have some blow to sell? In the U district?
I'd sell you 95% baby laxatives and vitamin b12 -
J?creepycoug said:
Ooooo good one.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Except UW, apparentlycreepycoug said:
But then again, the Pirate can beat anybody anywhere any daysalemcoog said:
UW, WSU, Arizona, Stanford and USC could beat Oregon of yesteryear on a given Saturday.Mosster47 said:
Like who? Who in this Pac-12 would beat Chip outside of Shaw and Rich Rod? Shaw is a great coach that plays sound football with giant humans and Arizona's D sees a similar offense everyday so it's easier to defend and they can score because of it.salemcoog said:Chip will make FLA respectable. But not a Natty threat. His system is common place now. And Chip only ever had to worry about USC and Stanford during his entire tenure at Oregon. Oh Boise fucking State and Arizona for some reason. The rest of the PAC 12 was horrible. Say what you want about the PAC 12 the last 3 years. But there are twice the amount of teams that could have stepped up and beat his squads on any given Saturday than back then. And even on a down SEC YEAR, He’ll play 4 or 5 teams that can beat FLA.
UW with no offense? Nope.
Cal, ever? Nope.
The 1 win Beavs? Nope.
Colorado, ever? Nope.
Utah, ever? Nope.
Wazzu? Maybe.
UCLA? Hahahaha!
ASU? Not even at their best.
USC? Always a maybe.
Looks to be same as it ever was.
The SEC is Bama, Georgia, LSU, and Florida. If you're at one of those you have the talent to beat the other ones.
And now He will have the same amount of teams that can beat him every year if at FLA.
@DerekJohnson , Please pin this thread so that in 3 years when He's winning 8 games per year, you'll all know who your daddy was....
Again.
Don't you have some blow to sell? In the U district? -
I had heard Boobs went to find out but when he returned, he wouldn’t say a word. Just sat there crossed legged on the floor, rocking back and forth sucking his thumb.Pitchfork51 said:
Have we confirmed he's gay?PurpleThrobber said:
You talking with good Luke or rigor mortis sacked Luke?creepycoug said:
The only team on that list that could beat those Oregon teams is our Cuog. But then again, the Pirate can beat anybody anywhere any day, as we both know.salemcoog said:
UW, WSU, Arizona, Stanford and USC could beat Oregon of yesteryear on a given Saturday.Mosster47 said:
Like who? Who in this Pac-12 would beat Chip outside of Shaw and Rich Rod? Shaw is a great coach that plays sound football with giant humans and Arizona's D sees a similar offense everyday so it's easier to defend and they can score because of it.salemcoog said:Chip will make FLA respectable. But not a Natty threat. His system is common place now. And Chip only ever had to worry about USC and Stanford during his entire tenure at Oregon. Oh Boise fucking State and Arizona for some reason. The rest of the PAC 12 was horrible. Say what you want about the PAC 12 the last 3 years. But there are twice the amount of teams that could have stepped up and beat his squads on any given Saturday than back then. And even on a down SEC YEAR, He’ll play 4 or 5 teams that can beat FLA.
UW with no offense? Nope.
Cal, ever? Nope.
The 1 win Beavs? Nope.
Colorado, ever? Nope.
Utah, ever? Nope.
Wazzu? Maybe.
UCLA? Hahahaha!
ASU? Not even at their best.
USC? Always a maybe.
Looks to be same as it ever was.
The SEC is Bama, Georgia, LSU, and Florida. If you're at one of those you have the talent to beat the other ones.
And now He will have the same amount of teams that can beat him every year if at FLA.
@DerekJohnson , Please pin this thread so that in 3 years when He's winning 8 games per year, you'll all know who your daddy was....
Again.
Washington just gave up 30 pts. and just about 2 hundy to one-legged Love and milk-toast passing attack. I would triple that against an offense with Mariotta and friends. That Stanford team just about lost to a one-win Beav team and SDSU.
You're really talking out of your ass.
One thing is certain. The Chipster would not be motorboating the Falk sisters' tittays.
#likesboys
IMO all signs point to him being a eunuch.
Mainly his appearance and the fact he hasnt come up in any sex scandals.