Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Florida vetting the Chipster as head coach

2»

Comments

  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,885
    Mosster47 said:

    salemcoog said:

    Chip will make FLA respectable. But not a Natty threat. His system is common place now. And Chip only ever had to worry about USC and Stanford during his entire tenure at Oregon. Oh Boise fucking State and Arizona for some reason. The rest of the PAC 12 was horrible. Say what you want about the PAC 12 the last 3 years. But there are twice the amount of teams that could have stepped up and beat his squads on any given Saturday than back then. And even on a down SEC YEAR, He’ll play 4 or 5 teams that can beat FLA.

    Like who? Who in this Pac-12 would beat Chip outside of Shaw and Rich Rod? Shaw is a great coach that plays sound football with giant humans and Arizona's D sees a similar offense everyday so it's easier to defend and they can score because of it.

    UW with no offense? Nope.
    Cal, ever? Nope.
    The 1 win Beavs? Nope.
    Colorado, ever? Nope.
    Utah, ever? Nope.
    Wazzu? Maybe.
    UCLA? Hahahaha!
    ASU? Not even at their best.
    USC? Always a maybe.

    Looks to be same as it ever was.

    The SEC is Bama, Georgia, LSU, and Florida. If you're at one of those you have the talent to beat the other ones.
    UW, WSU, Arizona, Stanford and USC could beat Oregon of yesteryear on a given Saturday.

    And now He will have the same amount of teams that can beat him every year if at FLA.

    @DerekJohnson , Please pin this thread so that in 3 years when He's winning 8 games per year, you'll all know who your daddy was....



    Again.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,267
    salemcoog said:

    Chip will make FLA respectable. But not a Natty threat. His system is common place now. And Chip only ever had to worry about USC and Stanford during his entire tenure at Oregon. Oh Boise fucking State and Arizona for some reason. The rest of the PAC 12 was horrible. Say what you want about the PAC 12 the last 3 years. But there are twice the amount of teams that could have stepped up and beat his squads on any given Saturday than back then. And even on a down SEC YEAR, He’ll play 4 or 5 teams that can beat FLA.

    Dude. This is pretty stupid even for one of our people. Come on Cuog! You're not that clueless. The conference's best defense just got clocked by 30 to a one-legged running back and an average - at best - passing attack.

    Come again Cuog?
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,267
    doogie said:

    Chip’s gonna find out just how hard it is to find athletes willing to travel all the way to Florida just to play football.

    Upvoted for sarcasm. Afraid to chin it on the outside chance that you were serious Clark. You know, because you're usually a dumb fuck.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,267
    salemcoog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    salemcoog said:

    Chip will make FLA respectable. But not a Natty threat. His system is common place now. And Chip only ever had to worry about USC and Stanford during his entire tenure at Oregon. Oh Boise fucking State and Arizona for some reason. The rest of the PAC 12 was horrible. Say what you want about the PAC 12 the last 3 years. But there are twice the amount of teams that could have stepped up and beat his squads on any given Saturday than back then. And even on a down SEC YEAR, He’ll play 4 or 5 teams that can beat FLA.

    Like who? Who in this Pac-12 would beat Chip outside of Shaw and Rich Rod? Shaw is a great coach that plays sound football with giant humans and Arizona's D sees a similar offense everyday so it's easier to defend and they can score because of it.

    UW with no offense? Nope.
    Cal, ever? Nope.
    The 1 win Beavs? Nope.
    Colorado, ever? Nope.
    Utah, ever? Nope.
    Wazzu? Maybe.
    UCLA? Hahahaha!
    ASU? Not even at their best.
    USC? Always a maybe.

    Looks to be same as it ever was.

    The SEC is Bama, Georgia, LSU, and Florida. If you're at one of those you have the talent to beat the other ones.
    UW, WSU, Arizona, Stanford and USC could beat Oregon of yesteryear on a given Saturday.

    And now He will have the same amount of teams that can beat him every year if at FLA.

    @DerekJohnson , Please pin this thread so that in 3 years when He's winning 8 games per year, you'll all know who your daddy was....



    Again.
    If that's happening in 3 years, then you were right about Chip. The part that was full retard was to suggest that the current state of the conference is better than it was during his run.
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,885

    salemcoog said:

    Chip will make FLA respectable. But not a Natty threat. His system is common place now. And Chip only ever had to worry about USC and Stanford during his entire tenure at Oregon. Oh Boise fucking State and Arizona for some reason. The rest of the PAC 12 was horrible. Say what you want about the PAC 12 the last 3 years. But there are twice the amount of teams that could have stepped up and beat his squads on any given Saturday than back then. And even on a down SEC YEAR, He’ll play 4 or 5 teams that can beat FLA.

    Dude. This is pretty stupid even for one of our people. Come on Cuog! You're not that clueless. The conference's best defense just got clocked by 30 to a one-legged running back and an average - at best - passing attack.

    Come again Cuog?
    Go jerk off over your Coons. The somewhat stable adults are talking.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,267
    edited November 2017
    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Chip will make FLA respectable. But not a Natty threat. His system is common place now. And Chip only ever had to worry about USC and Stanford during his entire tenure at Oregon. Oh Boise fucking State and Arizona for some reason. The rest of the PAC 12 was horrible. Say what you want about the PAC 12 the last 3 years. But there are twice the amount of teams that could have stepped up and beat his squads on any given Saturday than back then. And even on a down SEC YEAR, He’ll play 4 or 5 teams that can beat FLA.

    Dude. This is pretty stupid even for one of our people. Come on Cuog! You're not that clueless. The conference's best defense just got clocked by 30 to a one-legged running back and an average - at best - passing attack.

    Come again Cuog?
    Go jerk off over your Coons. The somewhat stable adults are talking.
    You put your tongue in your shitter ... again. Don't get pissed at me about it brother. I didn't make you do it. The rest of the Pac 10 was horrible. Ehl oh Ehl. And what do you think it is right now?

    Did you not hear that ND dismantled SC and that the Trojans lost to Cuog?!?!? That Stanford lost to Whale's Vagina State and barely beat a 1 win Beaver? That the Oregons are entirely shit across the board? That ASU is still ASU, only worse? That Cal is as Cal as Cal ever was? That Mora is still the answer at UCLA? That the conference's #1 most awesome defense in the universe just about gave up two hundy to a one-legged long jumper?

    What fucking planet are you on brother? A trip back to Pull Tab with me might help you with some perspective.

    Road trip with Creepy! Let's go!

    PS: don't poast the raysiss crap online. leave that for beers at the Cuog where it's safe.
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,233



    Dude. This is pretty stupid even for one of our people. Come on Cuog! You're not that clueless. The conference's best defense just got clocked by 30 to a one-legged running back and an average - at best - passing attack.

    Come again Cuog?

    Disagree
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,267
    dflea said:



    Dude. This is pretty stupid even for one of our people. Come on Cuog! You're not that clueless. The conference's best defense just got clocked by 30 to a one-legged running back and an average - at best - passing attack.

    Come again Cuog?

    Disagree
    Don't reactivate him. I need to get him back to Pull Tab to reset his stupid. He actually thinks he's stable and an adult.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,267
    salemcoog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    salemcoog said:

    Chip will make FLA respectable. But not a Natty threat. His system is common place now. And Chip only ever had to worry about USC and Stanford during his entire tenure at Oregon. Oh Boise fucking State and Arizona for some reason. The rest of the PAC 12 was horrible. Say what you want about the PAC 12 the last 3 years. But there are twice the amount of teams that could have stepped up and beat his squads on any given Saturday than back then. And even on a down SEC YEAR, He’ll play 4 or 5 teams that can beat FLA.

    Like who? Who in this Pac-12 would beat Chip outside of Shaw and Rich Rod? Shaw is a great coach that plays sound football with giant humans and Arizona's D sees a similar offense everyday so it's easier to defend and they can score because of it.

    UW with no offense? Nope.
    Cal, ever? Nope.
    The 1 win Beavs? Nope.
    Colorado, ever? Nope.
    Utah, ever? Nope.
    Wazzu? Maybe.
    UCLA? Hahahaha!
    ASU? Not even at their best.
    USC? Always a maybe.

    Looks to be same as it ever was.

    The SEC is Bama, Georgia, LSU, and Florida. If you're at one of those you have the talent to beat the other ones.
    UW, WSU, Arizona, Stanford and USC could beat Oregon of yesteryear on a given Saturday.

    And now He will have the same amount of teams that can beat him every year if at FLA.

    @DerekJohnson , Please pin this thread so that in 3 years when He's winning 8 games per year, you'll all know who your daddy was....



    Again.
    The only team on that list that could beat those Oregon teams is our Cuog. But then again, the Pirate can beat anybody anywhere any day, as we both know.

    Washington just gave up 30 pts. and just about 2 hundy to one-legged Love and milk-toast passing attack. I would triple that against an offense with Mariotta and friends. That Stanford team just about lost to a one-win Beav team and SDSU.

    You're really talking out of your ass.
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,885

    dflea said:



    Dude. This is pretty stupid even for one of our people. Come on Cuog! You're not that clueless. The conference's best defense just got clocked by 30 to a one-legged running back and an average - at best - passing attack.

    Come again Cuog?

    Disagree
    Don't reactivate him. I need to get him back to Pull Tab to reset his stupid. He actually thinks he's stable and an adult.
    Ironically, We almost stopped by there a couple weeks ago after the Stanford game.

    But hard pass to drinks with you creep. You can't stay on task for a single sentence let alone an actual conversation. I imagine you as an absolute shitshow drunk.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,267
    edited November 2017
    salemcoog said:

    dflea said:



    Dude. This is pretty stupid even for one of our people. Come on Cuog! You're not that clueless. The conference's best defense just got clocked by 30 to a one-legged running back and an average - at best - passing attack.

    Come again Cuog?

    Disagree
    Don't reactivate him. I need to get him back to Pull Tab to reset his stupid. He actually thinks he's stable and an adult.
    Ironically, We almost stopped by there a couple weeks ago after the Stanford game.

    But hard pass to drinks with you creep. You can't stay on task for a single sentence let alone an actual conversation. I imagine you as an absolute shitshow drunk.
    You have a good, or at least accurate, imagination.

    And your ass-in-hand comment re staying on task is well taken, even in the context of your 'dumbest poast of the week,' which is saying a lot here. One day, I'm going to turn in my Kewg Kard and start enjoying the mother loving fuck out of watching that shit-show of a school and fan base continue to struggle mightily for just a shred of respect and acceptance.

    And you live in fucking Salem.

    So, fuck off. Drinks with me and mine would be the social accomplishment of your shit life.

    I win. Always.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,240 Standard Supporter

    salemcoog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    salemcoog said:

    Chip will make FLA respectable. But not a Natty threat. His system is common place now. And Chip only ever had to worry about USC and Stanford during his entire tenure at Oregon. Oh Boise fucking State and Arizona for some reason. The rest of the PAC 12 was horrible. Say what you want about the PAC 12 the last 3 years. But there are twice the amount of teams that could have stepped up and beat his squads on any given Saturday than back then. And even on a down SEC YEAR, He’ll play 4 or 5 teams that can beat FLA.

    Like who? Who in this Pac-12 would beat Chip outside of Shaw and Rich Rod? Shaw is a great coach that plays sound football with giant humans and Arizona's D sees a similar offense everyday so it's easier to defend and they can score because of it.

    UW with no offense? Nope.
    Cal, ever? Nope.
    The 1 win Beavs? Nope.
    Colorado, ever? Nope.
    Utah, ever? Nope.
    Wazzu? Maybe.
    UCLA? Hahahaha!
    ASU? Not even at their best.
    USC? Always a maybe.

    Looks to be same as it ever was.

    The SEC is Bama, Georgia, LSU, and Florida. If you're at one of those you have the talent to beat the other ones.
    UW, WSU, Arizona, Stanford and USC could beat Oregon of yesteryear on a given Saturday.

    And now He will have the same amount of teams that can beat him every year if at FLA.

    @DerekJohnson , Please pin this thread so that in 3 years when He's winning 8 games per year, you'll all know who your daddy was....



    Again.
    The only team on that list that could beat those Oregon teams is our Cuog. But then again, the Pirate can beat anybody anywhere any day, as we both know.

    Washington just gave up 30 pts. and just about 2 hundy to one-legged Love and milk-toast passing attack. I would triple that against an offense with Mariotta and friends. That Stanford team just about lost to a one-win Beav team and SDSU.

    You're really talking out of your ass.
    You talking with good Luke or rigor mortis sacked Luke?

    One thing is certain. The Chipster would not be motorboating the Falk sisters' tittays.

    #likesboys
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,975

    salemcoog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    salemcoog said:

    Chip will make FLA respectable. But not a Natty threat. His system is common place now. And Chip only ever had to worry about USC and Stanford during his entire tenure at Oregon. Oh Boise fucking State and Arizona for some reason. The rest of the PAC 12 was horrible. Say what you want about the PAC 12 the last 3 years. But there are twice the amount of teams that could have stepped up and beat his squads on any given Saturday than back then. And even on a down SEC YEAR, He’ll play 4 or 5 teams that can beat FLA.

    Like who? Who in this Pac-12 would beat Chip outside of Shaw and Rich Rod? Shaw is a great coach that plays sound football with giant humans and Arizona's D sees a similar offense everyday so it's easier to defend and they can score because of it.

    UW with no offense? Nope.
    Cal, ever? Nope.
    The 1 win Beavs? Nope.
    Colorado, ever? Nope.
    Utah, ever? Nope.
    Wazzu? Maybe.
    UCLA? Hahahaha!
    ASU? Not even at their best.
    USC? Always a maybe.

    Looks to be same as it ever was.

    The SEC is Bama, Georgia, LSU, and Florida. If you're at one of those you have the talent to beat the other ones.
    UW, WSU, Arizona, Stanford and USC could beat Oregon of yesteryear on a given Saturday.

    And now He will have the same amount of teams that can beat him every year if at FLA.

    @DerekJohnson , Please pin this thread so that in 3 years when He's winning 8 games per year, you'll all know who your daddy was....



    Again.
    The only team on that list that could beat those Oregon teams is our Cuog. But then again, the Pirate can beat anybody anywhere any day, as we both know.

    Washington just gave up 30 pts. and just about 2 hundy to one-legged Love and milk-toast passing attack. I would triple that against an offense with Mariotta and friends. That Stanford team just about lost to a one-win Beav team and SDSU.

    You're really talking out of your ass.
    You talking with good Luke or rigor mortis sacked Luke?

    One thing is certain. The Chipster would not be motorboating the Falk sisters' tittays.

    #likesboys
    Have we confirmed he's gay?

    IMO all signs point to him being a eunuch.
    Mainly his appearance and the fact he hasnt come up in any sex scandals.
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,200 Swaye's Wigwam

    salemcoog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    salemcoog said:

    Chip will make FLA respectable. But not a Natty threat. His system is common place now. And Chip only ever had to worry about USC and Stanford during his entire tenure at Oregon. Oh Boise fucking State and Arizona for some reason. The rest of the PAC 12 was horrible. Say what you want about the PAC 12 the last 3 years. But there are twice the amount of teams that could have stepped up and beat his squads on any given Saturday than back then. And even on a down SEC YEAR, He’ll play 4 or 5 teams that can beat FLA.

    Like who? Who in this Pac-12 would beat Chip outside of Shaw and Rich Rod? Shaw is a great coach that plays sound football with giant humans and Arizona's D sees a similar offense everyday so it's easier to defend and they can score because of it.

    UW with no offense? Nope.
    Cal, ever? Nope.
    The 1 win Beavs? Nope.
    Colorado, ever? Nope.
    Utah, ever? Nope.
    Wazzu? Maybe.
    UCLA? Hahahaha!
    ASU? Not even at their best.
    USC? Always a maybe.

    Looks to be same as it ever was.

    The SEC is Bama, Georgia, LSU, and Florida. If you're at one of those you have the talent to beat the other ones.
    UW, WSU, Arizona, Stanford and USC could beat Oregon of yesteryear on a given Saturday.

    And now He will have the same amount of teams that can beat him every year if at FLA.

    @DerekJohnson , Please pin this thread so that in 3 years when He's winning 8 games per year, you'll all know who your daddy was....



    Again.
    But then again, the Pirate can beat anybody anywhere any day
    Except UW, apparently
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,267

    salemcoog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    salemcoog said:

    Chip will make FLA respectable. But not a Natty threat. His system is common place now. And Chip only ever had to worry about USC and Stanford during his entire tenure at Oregon. Oh Boise fucking State and Arizona for some reason. The rest of the PAC 12 was horrible. Say what you want about the PAC 12 the last 3 years. But there are twice the amount of teams that could have stepped up and beat his squads on any given Saturday than back then. And even on a down SEC YEAR, He’ll play 4 or 5 teams that can beat FLA.

    Like who? Who in this Pac-12 would beat Chip outside of Shaw and Rich Rod? Shaw is a great coach that plays sound football with giant humans and Arizona's D sees a similar offense everyday so it's easier to defend and they can score because of it.

    UW with no offense? Nope.
    Cal, ever? Nope.
    The 1 win Beavs? Nope.
    Colorado, ever? Nope.
    Utah, ever? Nope.
    Wazzu? Maybe.
    UCLA? Hahahaha!
    ASU? Not even at their best.
    USC? Always a maybe.

    Looks to be same as it ever was.

    The SEC is Bama, Georgia, LSU, and Florida. If you're at one of those you have the talent to beat the other ones.
    UW, WSU, Arizona, Stanford and USC could beat Oregon of yesteryear on a given Saturday.

    And now He will have the same amount of teams that can beat him every year if at FLA.

    @DerekJohnson , Please pin this thread so that in 3 years when He's winning 8 games per year, you'll all know who your daddy was....



    Again.
    But then again, the Pirate can beat anybody anywhere any day
    Except UW, apparently
    Ooooo good one.

    Don't you have some blow to sell? In the U district?
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,200 Swaye's Wigwam

    salemcoog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    salemcoog said:

    Chip will make FLA respectable. But not a Natty threat. His system is common place now. And Chip only ever had to worry about USC and Stanford during his entire tenure at Oregon. Oh Boise fucking State and Arizona for some reason. The rest of the PAC 12 was horrible. Say what you want about the PAC 12 the last 3 years. But there are twice the amount of teams that could have stepped up and beat his squads on any given Saturday than back then. And even on a down SEC YEAR, He’ll play 4 or 5 teams that can beat FLA.

    Like who? Who in this Pac-12 would beat Chip outside of Shaw and Rich Rod? Shaw is a great coach that plays sound football with giant humans and Arizona's D sees a similar offense everyday so it's easier to defend and they can score because of it.

    UW with no offense? Nope.
    Cal, ever? Nope.
    The 1 win Beavs? Nope.
    Colorado, ever? Nope.
    Utah, ever? Nope.
    Wazzu? Maybe.
    UCLA? Hahahaha!
    ASU? Not even at their best.
    USC? Always a maybe.

    Looks to be same as it ever was.

    The SEC is Bama, Georgia, LSU, and Florida. If you're at one of those you have the talent to beat the other ones.
    UW, WSU, Arizona, Stanford and USC could beat Oregon of yesteryear on a given Saturday.

    And now He will have the same amount of teams that can beat him every year if at FLA.

    @DerekJohnson , Please pin this thread so that in 3 years when He's winning 8 games per year, you'll all know who your daddy was....



    Again.
    But then again, the Pirate can beat anybody anywhere any day
    Except UW, apparently
    Ooooo good one.

    Don't you have some blow to sell? In the U district?

    I'd sell you 95% baby laxatives and vitamin b12
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,267

    salemcoog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    salemcoog said:

    Chip will make FLA respectable. But not a Natty threat. His system is common place now. And Chip only ever had to worry about USC and Stanford during his entire tenure at Oregon. Oh Boise fucking State and Arizona for some reason. The rest of the PAC 12 was horrible. Say what you want about the PAC 12 the last 3 years. But there are twice the amount of teams that could have stepped up and beat his squads on any given Saturday than back then. And even on a down SEC YEAR, He’ll play 4 or 5 teams that can beat FLA.

    Like who? Who in this Pac-12 would beat Chip outside of Shaw and Rich Rod? Shaw is a great coach that plays sound football with giant humans and Arizona's D sees a similar offense everyday so it's easier to defend and they can score because of it.

    UW with no offense? Nope.
    Cal, ever? Nope.
    The 1 win Beavs? Nope.
    Colorado, ever? Nope.
    Utah, ever? Nope.
    Wazzu? Maybe.
    UCLA? Hahahaha!
    ASU? Not even at their best.
    USC? Always a maybe.

    Looks to be same as it ever was.

    The SEC is Bama, Georgia, LSU, and Florida. If you're at one of those you have the talent to beat the other ones.
    UW, WSU, Arizona, Stanford and USC could beat Oregon of yesteryear on a given Saturday.

    And now He will have the same amount of teams that can beat him every year if at FLA.

    @DerekJohnson , Please pin this thread so that in 3 years when He's winning 8 games per year, you'll all know who your daddy was....



    Again.
    But then again, the Pirate can beat anybody anywhere any day
    Except UW, apparently
    Ooooo good one.

    Don't you have some blow to sell? In the U district?

    I'd sell you 95% baby laxatives and vitamin b12
    Only once.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    salemcoog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    salemcoog said:

    Chip will make FLA respectable. But not a Natty threat. His system is common place now. And Chip only ever had to worry about USC and Stanford during his entire tenure at Oregon. Oh Boise fucking State and Arizona for some reason. The rest of the PAC 12 was horrible. Say what you want about the PAC 12 the last 3 years. But there are twice the amount of teams that could have stepped up and beat his squads on any given Saturday than back then. And even on a down SEC YEAR, He’ll play 4 or 5 teams that can beat FLA.

    Like who? Who in this Pac-12 would beat Chip outside of Shaw and Rich Rod? Shaw is a great coach that plays sound football with giant humans and Arizona's D sees a similar offense everyday so it's easier to defend and they can score because of it.

    UW with no offense? Nope.
    Cal, ever? Nope.
    The 1 win Beavs? Nope.
    Colorado, ever? Nope.
    Utah, ever? Nope.
    Wazzu? Maybe.
    UCLA? Hahahaha!
    ASU? Not even at their best.
    USC? Always a maybe.

    Looks to be same as it ever was.

    The SEC is Bama, Georgia, LSU, and Florida. If you're at one of those you have the talent to beat the other ones.
    UW, WSU, Arizona, Stanford and USC could beat Oregon of yesteryear on a given Saturday.

    And now He will have the same amount of teams that can beat him every year if at FLA.

    @DerekJohnson , Please pin this thread so that in 3 years when He's winning 8 games per year, you'll all know who your daddy was....



    Again.
    But then again, the Pirate can beat anybody anywhere any day
    Except UW, apparently
    Ooooo good one.

    Don't you have some blow to sell? In the U district?
    J?
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072

    salemcoog said:

    Mosster47 said:

    salemcoog said:

    Chip will make FLA respectable. But not a Natty threat. His system is common place now. And Chip only ever had to worry about USC and Stanford during his entire tenure at Oregon. Oh Boise fucking State and Arizona for some reason. The rest of the PAC 12 was horrible. Say what you want about the PAC 12 the last 3 years. But there are twice the amount of teams that could have stepped up and beat his squads on any given Saturday than back then. And even on a down SEC YEAR, He’ll play 4 or 5 teams that can beat FLA.

    Like who? Who in this Pac-12 would beat Chip outside of Shaw and Rich Rod? Shaw is a great coach that plays sound football with giant humans and Arizona's D sees a similar offense everyday so it's easier to defend and they can score because of it.

    UW with no offense? Nope.
    Cal, ever? Nope.
    The 1 win Beavs? Nope.
    Colorado, ever? Nope.
    Utah, ever? Nope.
    Wazzu? Maybe.
    UCLA? Hahahaha!
    ASU? Not even at their best.
    USC? Always a maybe.

    Looks to be same as it ever was.

    The SEC is Bama, Georgia, LSU, and Florida. If you're at one of those you have the talent to beat the other ones.
    UW, WSU, Arizona, Stanford and USC could beat Oregon of yesteryear on a given Saturday.

    And now He will have the same amount of teams that can beat him every year if at FLA.

    @DerekJohnson , Please pin this thread so that in 3 years when He's winning 8 games per year, you'll all know who your daddy was....



    Again.
    The only team on that list that could beat those Oregon teams is our Cuog. But then again, the Pirate can beat anybody anywhere any day, as we both know.

    Washington just gave up 30 pts. and just about 2 hundy to one-legged Love and milk-toast passing attack. I would triple that against an offense with Mariotta and friends. That Stanford team just about lost to a one-win Beav team and SDSU.

    You're really talking out of your ass.
    You talking with good Luke or rigor mortis sacked Luke?

    One thing is certain. The Chipster would not be motorboating the Falk sisters' tittays.

    #likesboys
    Have we confirmed he's gay?

    IMO all signs point to him being a eunuch.
    Mainly his appearance and the fact he hasnt come up in any sex scandals.
    I had heard Boobs went to find out but when he returned, he wouldn’t say a word. Just sat there crossed legged on the floor, rocking back and forth sucking his thumb.
Sign In or Register to comment.