Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

OFFICIAL Huskies-Cardinal Game Thread Sponsored by Mark Emmert

16566687071140

Comments

  • jhfstyle24
    jhfstyle24 Member Posts: 3,256
    The pass rush looks like it's running through quicksand. Just nothing there. Also not helping that Molden got burnt and Bryant is getting burnt.
  • Doog_de_Jour
    Doog_de_Jour Member Posts: 8,042 Standard Supporter
  • EsophagealFeces
    EsophagealFeces Member Posts: 13,326

    That was a great first half. Anyone else who wouldn't take Stanford taking the ball first going in 14-10 is fucking retarded.

    Love is done. Stanford is only getting field goals the rest of the game.

    9-1 bitches #kingsofthenorth

    This is all true unless until Downsocks throws a pick six
  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    AEB said:

    Mad_Son said:

    The thing is,...babuskah

    it's not that he has done terrible tonight.,

    he has not beeen nisamdm
    perfect but he has
    made som bad choices. like we need to run power but we don't ... that sort of thing.., not all rushes are reacteadetcc

    created equal

    On that 4th and 1, if Gaskin puts his head down and runs forward after he bounces off Harris, it’s first and goal. Instead he stops, which is terrible on a short yardage play. That’s not on SmithFS. And I love Gaskin. We’ve had 3 possessions.
    so I think its 'a not so much fundamentally that one playu, although but just a general philospoht
  • jhfstyle24
    jhfstyle24 Member Posts: 3,256
    AEB said:

    Mad_Son said:

    The thing is,...babuskah

    it's not that he has done terrible tonight.,

    he has not beeen nisamdm
    perfect but he has
    made som bad choices. like we need to run power but we don't ... that sort of thing.., not all rushes are reacteadetcc

    created equal

    On that 4th and 1, if Gaskin puts his head down and runs forward after he bounces off Harris, it’s first and goal. Instead he stops, which is terrible on a short yardage play. That’s not on SmithFS. And I love Gaskin. We’ve had 3 possessions.
    All that being said, Jake Browning still sucks.
  • tvoie
    tvoie Member Posts: 996
    Sadly, Browning's arm looks worse every game.
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500
    Mad_Son said:

    That was a great first half. No


    Anyone else who wouldn't take Stanford taking the ball first going in 14-10 is fucking retarded.... maybe that's fine but we can do way better

    Love is done. Stanford is only getting field goals the rest of the game... probably

    9-1 bitches #kingsofthenorth FACT

    Dont be the "we should win every game 63-3" guy
  • EsophagealFeces
    EsophagealFeces Member Posts: 13,326
    Fuck I wish we had a real QB
  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    Mad_Son said:

    AEB said:

    Mad_Son said:

    The thing is,...babuskah

    it's not that he has done terrible tonight.,

    he has not beeen nisamdm
    perfect but he has
    made som bad choices. like we need to run power but we don't ... that sort of thing.., not all rushes are reacteadetcc

    created equal

    On that 4th and 1, if Gaskin puts his head down and runs forward after he bounces off Harris, it’s first and goal. Instead he stops, which is terrible on a short yardage play. That’s not on SmithFS. And I love Gaskin. We’ve had 3 possessions.
    so I think its 'a not so much fundamentally that one playu, although but just a general philospoht
    Like I mean we can wear then, down. FGaskin does some brialiant thinhgs by noboucnibg out and obviously that didn to at all pay off on the one play Im'm sure we're both htinking of, but I mean its the genearlsystematic how we run things, not just that one.
  • dannarc
    dannarc Member Posts: 2,743
    We win games in the 3rd and 4th. Love is toast, Wedington got rocked. We are hitting hard, we will wear them down and dominate