Doesn't think 58 rushes is a sustainable model for winning modern era PAC 12 games. Maybe not every single game. But fuck QB perspective on this topic. No reason not to run 45 plus a game unless the other team proves they can stop it. Only 3 things can happen when you pass and 2 of them aren't good.
You mean like Chip Kelly's offense at Oregon that averaged 300y/g over half a decade? Or like Stanford which went to 4 straight BCS bowls?
Stanford had Andrew Luck and 8 OL/TE's that played on Sundays. The only guy who starts for them on this team blew his knee out against ASU
Chip Kelly had better OL than people give him a credit for, a Heisman winner in Mariotta, skill wr's that all ran like Ross, and an offense system that no one had seen before at the P5 level
Hugh's point was unless you have those types of teams you can't do that in today's cfb over the course of a season in a P5 conference and I would agree with that.
That being said, you can tell he knows there is major issues going on with Jake and the passing game that aren't getting fixed in the next month.
Some valid points here and I'm not saying that UW could stand to win a game against a legit CFP contender type team without being able to pass the ball a lot more effectively, so don't twist. But keep in mind that UW's 2017 Defense is giving up considerably fewer points in conference play than any of those Stanford or Oregon teams did in conference play. Goal #1 is win the conference, and if our receivers suck and our QB is playing like poo, we need to run the ball down the throats of shitty Pac defenses and play good defense. Passing game can be fixed in 2018 through the various aforementioned factors.
The game shifts. The spread originally came because it gave less talented teams a way to compete. The big boys weren’t used to the field being spread out and having to defend in space.
Now, if you run it right at teams, it’s easy to find success. Teams practice against the spread, recruit for it, and are too soft to man up and shut down the run for an entire game.
The game shifts. The spread originally came because it gave less talented teams a way to compete. The big boys weren’t used to the field being spread out and having to defend in space.
Now, if you run it right at teams, it’s easy to find success. Teams practice against the spread, recruit for it, and are too soft to man up and shut down the run for an entire game.
The game shifts. The spread originally came because it gave less talented teams a way to compete. The big boys weren’t used to the field being spread out and having to defend in space.
Now, if you run it right at teams, it’s easy to find success. Teams practice against the spread, recruit for it, and are too soft to man up and shut down the run for an entire game.
The game shifts. The spread originally came because it gave less talented teams a way to compete. The big boys weren’t used to the field being spread out and having to defend in space.
Now, if you run it right at teams, it’s easy to find success. Teams practice against the spread, recruit for it, and are too soft to man up and shut down the run for an entire game.
Asians are fucking smart.
There's some truth to this- e.g., the top of their Bell Curve in IQ tests is higher than that of white peoples.
I miss RoadDawg being on the air; maybe Coker and DDY have him call in as a special guest.
The game shifts. The spread originally came because it gave less talented teams a way to compete. The big boys weren’t used to the field being spread out and having to defend in space.
Now, if you run it right at teams, it’s easy to find success. Teams practice against the spread, recruit for it, and are too soft to man up and shut down the run for an entire game.
Asians are fucking smart.
There's some truth to this- e.g., the top of their Bell Curve in IQ tests is higher than that of white peoples.
I miss RoadDawg being on the air; maybe Coker and DDY have him call in as a special guest.
Bama is obviously the prime example. Over the past decade you barely remember who the Bammer QBs were, but you can name almost all their RBs off the top of your head.
Every once in awhile you get a QB like Deshaun Watson who is just has “it” that doesn’t mean you need to lean on the run game as much. Even then, Clemson had a stable of great running backs too.
So if you dont have a QB who can win then you just need to pound the ball on the ground and have a QB that doesn’t fuck that shit in the ass with a stout defense.
The game shifts. The spread originally came because it gave less talented teams a way to compete. The big boys weren’t used to the field being spread out and having to defend in space.
Now, if you run it right at teams, it’s easy to find success. Teams practice against the spread, recruit for it, and are too soft to man up and shut down the run for an entire game.
Asians are fucking smart.
There's some truth to this- e.g., the top of their Bell Curve in IQ tests is higher than that of white peoples.
I miss RoadDawg being on the air; maybe Coker and DDY have him call in as a special guest.
And break the chemistry of DDY's rants and Coker barely audibly nodding in agreement?????
Bama is obviously the prime example. Over the past decade you barely remember who the Bammer QBs were, but you can name almost all their RBs off the top of your head.
Every once in awhile you get a QB like Deshaun Watson who is just has “it” that doesn’t mean you need to lean on the run game as much. Even then, Clemson had a stable of great running backs too.
So if you dont have a QB who can win then you just need to pound the ball on the ground and have a QB that doesn’t fuck that shit in the ass with a stout defense.
Watson threw 70 passes in the game Clemson lost last year. It doesn’t matter who the QB is, that is too many. They lost because their defense had a bad day and Watson threw a few picks.
Passing non stop is not sustainable in college football where every game matters. QB’s have bad days, the weather gets cold, turnovers happen more when throwing the ball. More passing attempts means more hits on your QB.
Most pass heavy teams are soft on defense too.
The teams that run the ball best typically win the PAC 12. USC, Oregon, Stanford, and UW. On the national level, Alabama. Saban and Urban Meyer teams always run the ball well.
The game is still simple. Win up front and be the tougher, more physical team. A great QB like Watson or Mariota can sometimes mitigate that, but those guys are rare.
Comments
So there's that.
Now, if you run it right at teams, it’s easy to find success. Teams practice against the spread, recruit for it, and are too soft to man up and shut down the run for an entire game.
I miss RoadDawg being on the air; maybe Coker and DDY have him call in as a special guest.
Every once in awhile you get a QB like Deshaun Watson who is just has “it” that doesn’t mean you need to lean on the run game as much. Even then, Clemson had a stable of great running backs too.
So if you dont have a QB who can win then you just need to pound the ball on the ground and have a QB that doesn’t fuck that shit in the ass with a stout defense.
I believe it still applies to "modern" shit ball.
I didn't think so.
Passing non stop is not sustainable in college football where every game matters. QB’s have bad days, the weather gets cold, turnovers happen more when throwing the ball. More passing attempts means more hits on your QB.
Most pass heavy teams are soft on defense too.
The teams that run the ball best typically win the PAC 12. USC, Oregon, Stanford, and UW. On the national level, Alabama. Saban and Urban Meyer teams always run the ball well.
The game is still simple. Win up front and be the tougher, more physical team. A great QB like Watson or Mariota can sometimes mitigate that, but those guys are rare.