Yuge Mellon post game

YellowSnow

Doesn't think 58 rushes is a sustainable model for winning modern era PAC 12 games. Maybe not every single game. But fuck QB perspective on this topic. No reason not to run 45 plus a game unless the other team proves they can stop it. Only 3 things can happen when you pass and 2 of them aren't good.

MisterEm

CTE is real.

FireCohen

u shut your whore mouth. just run the ball we will win the conference

Swaye

Gwad

Peterman imposing running play quota on smith. Welcome to your souless job John!

jecornel

Spoken like a true hack QB.

whatshouldicareabout

YellowSnow said:

Doesn't think 58 rushes is a sustainable model for winning modern era PAC 12 games. Maybe not every single game. But fuck QB perspective on this topic. No reason not to run 45 plus a game unless the other team proves they can stop it. Only 3 things can happen when you pass and 2 of them aren't good.

You mean like Chip Kelly's offense at Oregon that averaged 300y/g over half a decade? Or like Stanford which went to 4 straight BCS bowls?

DeepSeaZ

He also doesn’t like Browning. So it’s not all bad.

Fire_Marshall_Bill

He's probably right, but it's better than passing 75% of the time like they did every other game.

Doogles

Swaye said:

wood

godawgst

whatshouldicareabout said:

YellowSnow said:

Doesn't think 58 rushes is a sustainable model for winning modern era PAC 12 games. Maybe not every single game. But fuck QB perspective on this topic. No reason not to run 45 plus a game unless the other team proves they can stop it. Only 3 things can happen when you pass and 2 of them aren't good.

You mean like Chip Kelly's offense at Oregon that averaged 300y/g over half a decade? Or like Stanford which went to 4 straight BCS bowls?

Stanford had Andrew Luck and 8 OL/TE's that played on Sundays. The only guy who starts for them on this team blew his knee out against ASU

Chip Kelly had better OL than people give him a credit for, a Heisman winner in Mariotta, skill wr's that all ran like Ross, and an offense system that no one had seen before at the P5 level

Hugh's point was unless you have those types of teams you can't do that in today's cfb over the course of a season in a P5 conference and I would agree with that.

That being said, you can tell he knows there is major issues going on with Jake and the passing game that aren't getting fixed in the next month.

whuggy

whatshouldicareabout said:

YellowSnow said:

Doesn't think 58 rushes is a sustainable model for winning modern era PAC 12 games. Maybe not every single game. But fuck QB perspective on this topic. No reason not to run 45 plus a game unless the other team proves they can stop it. Only 3 things can happen when you pass and 2 of them aren't good.

You mean like Chip Kelly's offense at Oregon that averaged 300y/g over half a decade? Or like Stanford which went to 4 straight BCS bowls?

Careful. Most on here called Chip's offense a gimmick.

FireCohen

whuggy said:

whatshouldicareabout said:

YellowSnow said:

Doesn't think 58 rushes is a sustainable model for winning modern era PAC 12 games. Maybe not every single game. But fuck QB perspective on this topic. No reason not to run 45 plus a game unless the other team proves they can stop it. Only 3 things can happen when you pass and 2 of them aren't good.

You mean like Chip Kelly's offense at Oregon that averaged 300y/g over half a decade? Or like Stanford which went to 4 straight BCS bowls?

Careful. Most on here called Chip's offense a gimmick.

our current offense is a fucking gimmick. Chip was usually was able to put points up on anyone his defenses just could not stop shit

phineas

godawgst said:

whatshouldicareabout said:

YellowSnow said:

Doesn't think 58 rushes is a sustainable model for winning modern era PAC 12 games. Maybe not every single game. But fuck QB perspective on this topic. No reason not to run 45 plus a game unless the other team proves they can stop it. Only 3 things can happen when you pass and 2 of them aren't good.

You mean like Chip Kelly's offense at Oregon that averaged 300y/g over half a decade? Or like Stanford which went to 4 straight BCS bowls?

Stanford had Andrew Luck and 8 OL/TE's that played on Sundays. The only guy who starts for them on this team blew his knee out against ASU

Chip Kelly had better OL than people give him a credit for, a Heisman winner in Mariotta, skill wr's that all ran like Ross, and an offense system that no one had seen before at the P5 level

Hugh's point was unless you have those types of teams you can't do that in today's cfb over the course of a season in a P5 conference and I would agree with that.

That being said, you can tell he knows there is major issues going on with Jake and the passing game that aren't getting fixed in the next month.

So then create those types of teams and recruit those types of players.

PurpleThrobber

godawgst said:

whatshouldicareabout said:

YellowSnow said:

Doesn't think 58 rushes is a sustainable model for winning modern era PAC 12 games. Maybe not every single game. But fuck QB perspective on this topic. No reason not to run 45 plus a game unless the other team proves they can stop it. Only 3 things can happen when you pass and 2 of them aren't good.

You mean like Chip Kelly's offense at Oregon that averaged 300y/g over half a decade? Or like Stanford which went to 4 straight BCS bowls?

Stanford had Andrew Luck and 8 OL/TE's that played on Sundays. The only guy who starts for them on this team blew his knee out against ASU

Chip Kelly had better OL than people give him a credit for, a Heisman winner in Mariotta, skill wr's that all ran like Ross, and an offense system that no one had seen before at the P5 level

Hugh's point was unless you have those types of teams you can't do that in today's cfb over the course of a season in a P5 conference and I would agree with that.

That being said, you can tell he knows there is major issues going on with Jake and the passing game that aren't getting fixed in the next month.

Hugh - post some nudies of Lisa G or STFU.

Gladstone

whuggy said:

whatshouldicareabout said:

YellowSnow said:

Doesn't think 58 rushes is a sustainable model for winning modern era PAC 12 games. Maybe not every single game. But fuck QB perspective on this topic. No reason not to run 45 plus a game unless the other team proves they can stop it. Only 3 things can happen when you pass and 2 of them aren't good.

You mean like Chip Kelly's offense at Oregon that averaged 300y/g over half a decade? Or like Stanford which went to 4 straight BCS bowls?

Careful. Most on here called Chip's offense a gimmick.

Untrue.

dhdawg

godawgst said:

whatshouldicareabout said:

YellowSnow said:

Doesn't think 58 rushes is a sustainable model for winning modern era PAC 12 games. Maybe not every single game. But fuck QB perspective on this topic. No reason not to run 45 plus a game unless the other team proves they can stop it. Only 3 things can happen when you pass and 2 of them aren't good.

You mean like Chip Kelly's offense at Oregon that averaged 300y/g over half a decade? Or like Stanford which went to 4 straight BCS bowls?

Stanford had Andrew Luck and 8 OL/TE's that played on Sundays. The only guy who starts for them on this team blew his knee out against ASU

Chip Kelly had better OL than people give him a credit for, a Heisman winner in Mariotta, skill wr's that all ran like Ross, and an offense system that no one had seen before at the P5 level

Hugh's point was unless you have those types of teams you can't do that in today's cfb over the course of a season in a P5 conference and I would agree with that.

That being said, you can tell he knows there is major issues going on with Jake and the passing game that aren't getting fixed in the next month.

true.... but how much are we really looking for from our offense?

20 points while controlling the clock wins every game left on our schedule. Running the ball 65+% of the time accomplishes that. All we have to do is avoid ASU type games. If we had just used this gameplan against them they would have worn down a lot earlier than the fourth quarter.

allpurpleallgold

godawgst said:

whatshouldicareabout said:

YellowSnow said:

Doesn't think 58 rushes is a sustainable model for winning modern era PAC 12 games. Maybe not every single game. But fuck QB perspective on this topic. No reason not to run 45 plus a game unless the other team proves they can stop it. Only 3 things can happen when you pass and 2 of them aren't good.

You mean like Chip Kelly's offense at Oregon that averaged 300y/g over half a decade? Or like Stanford which went to 4 straight BCS bowls?

Stanford had Andrew Luck and 8 OL/TE's that played on Sundays. The only guy who starts for them on this team blew his knee out against ASU

Chip Kelly had better OL than people give him a credit for, a Heisman winner in Mariotta, skill wr's that all ran like Ross, and an offense system that no one had seen before at the P5 level

Hugh's point was unless you have those types of teams you can't do that in today's cfb over the course of a season in a P5 conference and I would agree with that.

That being said, you can tell he knows there is major issues going on with Jake and the passing game that aren't getting fixed in the next month.

Chip completed the Oregon 35 year plan to lose a national championship game before Mariota.

JECAR

I thought this thread was going to be about huge tits.

It kind of is, in a way. But what cunt would click on this thread...

NorwegianHusky

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

He's probably right, but it's better than passing 75% of the time like they did every other game.

MOTHERFUCKING THIS. I wanted to scream listening to that segment. Say "different era" or "modern game" one more time and I swear I'll do something drastic. If your personnel is suited towards running the ball IDGAF what fucking year it is or what a majority of teams do. The fucking calendar is not gonna tackle anybody and a majority of teams are coached by vainglorious mouth-breathers. Jesus.

I'm not gonna call for death but I will cautiously suggest playing russian roulette with a semi-auto.

AIRWOLF

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

He's probably right, but it's better than passing 75% of the time like they did every other game.

Wild exaggerations are always fun.