The worst part is not the tournament, it's the fucking voting.
WHY THE FUCK DOES IT MAKE SENSE TO VOTE ON FOUR TEAMS AFTER THE REGULAR SEASON?? It would be WAY easier to vote on 2 teams after the bowls.
But everyone fucking knows having a 6 team tourney with the conference winners and one at large would be an improvement. Have fucking 8 teams with conference winners and 3 fucking vote-in at large teams... but this shit where games don't fucking matter and it's all power ranking votes is fucking retarded.
It makes no sense primarily because it's still a poll system. It's the worst of all worlds... we still have polls essentially deciding and we fucked the bowls, January 1 and the fact that EVERY GAME matters.
I mean, if we lose to USC in the fucking championship game, we will hear that that shit is more diagnostic than Clemson losing to Syracuse or Michigan losing to MSU, USC losing to WSU or what the fuck ever. What kind of fucking sense does that make?!?
Either have it be a playoff (i.e., win your conference and you're in) or just do the bowls and vote for a plus one.
Has there ever been another team this hated by ESPN or the media in general? I'm not sure I've ever seen a team attacked, glossed over and put down the way uw is right now. It seems so obvious as well.
Ehl o ehl.
You don't have the sack to be a Cane. Don't try it.
Comments
You don't have the sack to be a Cane. Don't try it.
I’ve hated ESPN for a couple years now due to their storyline bullshit. Just call the games and don’t add any of your manufactured drama.
And yes, I too have been caught up in the ESPN thing & called them out on Twatter. I’m pretty sure they’re really concerned over that.