IT's OK MR chronically triggered by one word, until we beat UW, you're better. But I don't get the WSU has played shittier teams so far comment. Because it's not true.
They mean that WSU hasn't played the meat of their schedule yet, same as UW. Of course you haven't played shittier teams.
Beating USC at home is quality meat IMO.
Stop and get on board with the narrative. If UW wins or loses against USC, USC is still great. If WSU beats USC, they are a bottom feeder of College Football.
IT's OK MR chronically triggered by one word, until we beat UW, you're better. But I don't get the WSU has played shittier teams so far comment. Because it's not true.
They mean that WSU hasn't played the meat of their schedule yet, same as UW. Of course you haven't played shittier teams.
Beating USC at home is quality meat IMO.
Stop and get on board with the narrative. If UW wins or loses against USC, USC is still great. If WSU beats USC, they are a bottom feeder of College Football.
IT's OK MR chronically triggered by one word, until we beat UW, you're better. But I don't get the WSU has played shittier teams so far comment. Because it's not true.
They mean that WSU hasn't played the meat of their schedule yet, same as UW. Of course you haven't played shittier teams.
Beating USC at home is quality meat IMO.
Stop and get on board with the narrative. If UW wins or loses against USC, USC is still great. If WSU beats USC, they are a bottom feeder of College Football.
If you think SC is the same team as last year you belong at cougcenter. Look at every one of their games this year, especially against Cal and Wherever-the-fuck Michigan, and tell me it's the same team that goes up and beats a playoff team in their own stadium with that defense bearing down on you. Their win against Stanford, who then lost to SDSU, would be your only supporting evidence.
Their rb busts an 80 yard run on you and doesn't touch the ball after that.
IT's OK MR chronically triggered by one word, until we beat UW, you're better. But I don't get the WSU has played shittier teams so far comment. Because it's not true.
They mean that WSU hasn't played the meat of their schedule yet, same as UW. Of course you haven't played shittier teams.
Beating USC at home is quality meat IMO.
Stop and get on board with the narrative. If UW wins or loses against USC, USC is still great. If WSU beats USC, they are a bottom feeder of College Football.
Hi. We've been saying USC sucks all year.
Maybe YOU have. But the doog quotient on these boreds is through the Roof!
IT's OK MR chronically triggered by one word, until we beat UW, you're better. But I don't get the WSU has played shittier teams so far comment. Because it's not true.
They mean that WSU hasn't played the meat of their schedule yet, same as UW. Of course you haven't played shittier teams.
Beating USC at home is quality meat IMO.
Stop and get on board with the narrative. If UW wins or loses against USC, USC is still great. If WSU beats USC, they are a bottom feeder of College Football.
If you think SC is the same team as last year you belong at cougcenter. Look at every one of their games this year, especially against Cal and Wherever-the-fuck Michigan, and tell me it's the same team that goes up and beats a playoff team in their own stadium with that defense bearing down on you. Their win against Stanford, who then lost to SDSU, would be your only supporting evidence.
Their rb busts an 80 yard run on you and doesn't touch the ball after that.
Cuogs gonna Cupg
I saw that. Nice try.
But first: Your? QB ABSOLUTELY SHIT THE BED, and was tackled by his shoe laces and the turf as often as by an SC D lineman. It had less to do with SC's greatness and more to do with Washington choking.
Playoff team? Playoff? Did you say "Playoff?" Face it: the doog narrative for so long with Oregon (which most years was a stretch) actually applied to the Pac last year. You? were a playoff team like Race's wife was admitted to Washington: grades/test scores 2%; affirmative action 98%.
Come on. There is no doogier doogy doog move than the "they were good when we beat 'em and suck when you do" line. Even when it's true, like probably this year, it's been so abused by this cohort of dip shits over the last 25 years that it's just off-limits to you? guys now. Can't use it.
IT's OK MR chronically triggered by one word, until we beat UW, you're better. But I don't get the WSU has played shittier teams so far comment. Because it's not true.
They mean that WSU hasn't played the meat of their schedule yet, same as UW. Of course you haven't played shittier teams.
Beating USC at home is quality meat IMO.
Stop and get on board with the narrative. If UW wins or loses against USC, USC is still great. If WSU beats USC, they are a bottom feeder of College Football.
If you think SC is the same team as last year you belong at cougcenter. Look at every one of their games this year, especially against Cal and Wherever-the-fuck Michigan, and tell me it's the same team that goes up and beats a playoff team in their own stadium with that defense bearing down on you. Their win against Stanford, who then lost to SDSU, would be your only supporting evidence.
Their rb busts an 80 yard run on you and doesn't touch the ball after that.
Cuogs gonna Cupg
I saw that. Nice try.
But first: Your? QB ABSOLUTELY SHIT THE BED, and was tackled by his shoe laces and the turf as often as by an SC D lineman. It had less to do with SC's greatness and more to do with Washington choking.
Playoff team? Playoff? Did you say "Playoff?" Face it: the doog narrative for so long with Oregon (which most years was a stretch) actually applied to the Pac last year. You? were a playoff team like Race's wife was admitted to Washington: grades/test scores 2%; affirmative action 98%.
Come on. There is no doogier doogy doog move than the "they were good when we beat 'em and suck when you do" line. Even when it's true, like probably this year, it's been so abused by this cohort of dip shits over the last 25 years that it's just off-limits to you? guys now. Can't use it.
IT's OK MR chronically triggered by one word, until we beat UW, you're better. But I don't get the WSU has played shittier teams so far comment. Because it's not true.
They mean that WSU hasn't played the meat of their schedule yet, same as UW. Of course you haven't played shittier teams.
Beating USC at home is quality meat IMO.
Stop and get on board with the narrative. If UW wins or loses against USC, USC is still great. If WSU beats USC, they are a bottom feeder of College Football.
Hi. We've been saying USC sucks all year.
Maybe YOU have. But the doog quotient on these boreds is through the Roof!
Boobs is a huge fucking doog too, even though he's not a husky. He's packed up his belongs and life savings and went all in on UW bandwagon.
IT's OK MR chronically triggered by one word, until we beat UW, you're better. But I don't get the WSU has played shittier teams so far comment. Because it's not true.
They mean that WSU hasn't played the meat of their schedule yet, same as UW. Of course you haven't played shittier teams.
Beating USC at home is quality meat IMO.
Stop and get on board with the narrative. If UW wins or loses against USC, USC is still great. If WSU beats USC, they are a bottom feeder of College Football.
If you think SC is the same team as last year you belong at cougcenter. Look at every one of their games this year, especially against Cal and Wherever-the-fuck Michigan, and tell me it's the same team that goes up and beats a playoff team in their own stadium with that defense bearing down on you. Their win against Stanford, who then lost to SDSU, would be your only supporting evidence.
Their rb busts an 80 yard run on you and doesn't touch the ball after that.
Cuogs gonna Cupg
I saw that. Nice try.
But first: Your? QB ABSOLUTELY SHIT THE BED, and was tackled by his shoe laces and the turf as often as by an SC D lineman. It had less to do with SC's greatness and more to do with Washington choking.
Playoff team? Playoff? Did you say "Playoff?" Face it: the doog narrative for so long with Oregon (which most years was a stretch) actually applied to the Pac last year. You? were a playoff team like Race's wife was admitted to Washington: grades/test scores 2%; affirmative action 98%.
Come on. There is no doogier doogy doog move than the "they were good when we beat 'em and suck when you do" line. Even when it's true, like probably this year, it's been so abused by this cohort of dip shits over the last 25 years that it's just off-limits to you? guys now. Can't use it.
Comments
tee hee hee
Their rb busts an 80 yard run on you and doesn't touch the ball after that.
Cuogs gonna Cupg
But first: Your? QB ABSOLUTELY SHIT THE BED, and was tackled by his shoe laces and the turf as often as by an SC D lineman. It had less to do with SC's greatness and more to do with Washington choking.
Playoff team? Playoff? Did you say "Playoff?" Face it: the doog narrative for so long with Oregon (which most years was a stretch) actually applied to the Pac last year. You? were a playoff team like Race's wife was admitted to Washington: grades/test scores 2%; affirmative action 98%.
Come on. There is no doogier doogy doog move than the "they were good when we beat 'em and suck when you do" line. Even when it's true, like probably this year, it's been so abused by this cohort of dip shits over the last 25 years that it's just off-limits to you? guys now. Can't use it.
Kewgs by 24; cook it.