The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
I presume your Watergate hyperbole is related solely to the post election wiretapping of Manafort?
The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
If you help a dictator plunder millions of dollars from his own country and then launder it back to the US, you should expect to feel some heat from the feds. If you join a presidential campaign in the middle of said investigation into your misdeeds, I'm not sure why that means the investigation should go on pause, but someone definitely should have given Trump a discrete heads up. Maybe they did, who knows what will trickle out next.
komo4buttfucker
So we are disclosing active chinvestigations to the inner-circles of alleged perpetrators now? Makes sense.
You're all over the place on this one. Pick a lane.
The investigation started in 2014, way before Manafort had even met Trump and seems like it was a pretty straightforward money laundering / secret agent case.
Presidential candidates get TS/SCI clearances and later the daily intel briefings, so yes, I think they can be made privy to the fact that their campaign manager is being investigated for laundering a lot of money from a dictator in cahoots with one of our biggest adversaries.
The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
I presume your Watergate hyperbole is related solely to the post election wiretapping of Manafort?
The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
If you help a dictator plunder millions of dollars from his own country and then launder it back to the US, you should expect to feel some heat from the feds. If you join a presidential campaign in the middle of said investigation into your misdeeds, I'm not sure why that means the investigation should go on pause, but someone definitely should have given Trump a discrete heads up. Maybe they did, who knows what will trickle out next.
komo4buttfucker
So we are disclosing active chinvestigations to the inner-circles of alleged perpetrators now? Makes sense.
You're all over the place on this one. Pick a lane.
The investigation started in 2014, way before Manafort had even met Trump and seems like it was a pretty straightforward money laundering / secret agent case.
Presidential candidates get TS/SCI clearances and later the daily intel briefings, so yes, I think they can be made privy to the fact that their campaign manager is being investigated for laundering a lot of money from a dictator in cahoots with one of our biggest adversaries.
komo4buttfucker
Considering @diseasedliverdoog is up-voting your shit, forgive me for not taking your word as gospel....
The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
I presume your Watergate hyperbole is related solely to the post election wiretapping of Manafort?
The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
If you help a dictator plunder millions of dollars from his own country and then launder it back to the US, you should expect to feel some heat from the feds. If you join a presidential campaign in the middle of said investigation into your misdeeds, I'm not sure why that means the investigation should go on pause, but someone definitely should have given Trump a discrete heads up. Maybe they did, who knows what will trickle out next.
komo4buttfucker
So we are disclosing active chinvestigations to the inner-circles of alleged perpetrators now? Makes sense.
You're all over the place on this one. Pick a lane.
The investigation started in 2014, way before Manafort had even met Trump and seems like it was a pretty straightforward money laundering / secret agent case.
Presidential candidates get TS/SCI clearances and later the daily intel briefings, so yes, I think they can be made privy to the fact that their campaign manager is being investigated for laundering a lot of money from a dictator in cahoots with one of our biggest adversaries.
komo4buttfucker
Considering @diseasedliverdoog is up-voting your shit, forgive me for not taking your word as gospel....
The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
I presume your Watergate hyperbole is related solely to the post election wiretapping of Manafort?
The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
If you help a dictator plunder millions of dollars from his own country and then launder it back to the US, you should expect to feel some heat from the feds. If you join a presidential campaign in the middle of said investigation into your misdeeds, I'm not sure why that means the investigation should go on pause, but someone definitely should have given Trump a discrete heads up. Maybe they did, who knows what will trickle out next.
komo4buttfucker
So we are disclosing active chinvestigations to the inner-circles of alleged perpetrators now? Makes sense.
You're all over the place on this one. Pick a lane.
The investigation started in 2014, way before Manafort had even met Trump and seems like it was a pretty straightforward money laundering / secret agent case.
Presidential candidates get TS/SCI clearances and later the daily intel briefings, so yes, I think they can be made privy to the fact that their campaign manager is being investigated for laundering a lot of money from a dictator in cahoots with one of our biggest adversaries.
komo4buttfucker
Considering @diseasedliverdoog is up-voting your shit, forgive me for not taking your word as gospel....
So you're saying you enjoy your ignorance?
You seem to be enjoying the misery of yours.
I've asked to be educated twice now. Fuck you're slow.
The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
I presume your Watergate hyperbole is related solely to the post election wiretapping of Manafort?
The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
If you help a dictator plunder millions of dollars from his own country and then launder it back to the US, you should expect to feel some heat from the feds. If you join a presidential campaign in the middle of said investigation into your misdeeds, I'm not sure why that means the investigation should go on pause, but someone definitely should have given Trump a discrete heads up. Maybe they did, who knows what will trickle out next.
komo4buttfucker
So we are disclosing active chinvestigations to the inner-circles of alleged perpetrators now? Makes sense.
You're all over the place on this one. Pick a lane.
The investigation started in 2014, way before Manafort had even met Trump and seems like it was a pretty straightforward money laundering / secret agent case.
Presidential candidates get TS/SCI clearances and later the daily intel briefings, so yes, I think they can be made privy to the fact that their campaign manager is being investigated for laundering a lot of money from a dictator in cahoots with one of our biggest adversaries.
komo4buttfucker
Considering @diseasedliverdoog is up-voting your shit, forgive me for not taking your word as gospel....
The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
I presume your Watergate hyperbole is related solely to the post election wiretapping of Manafort?
The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
If you help a dictator plunder millions of dollars from his own country and then launder it back to the US, you should expect to feel some heat from the feds. If you join a presidential campaign in the middle of said investigation into your misdeeds, I'm not sure why that means the investigation should go on pause, but someone definitely should have given Trump a discrete heads up. Maybe they did, who knows what will trickle out next.
komo4buttfucker
So we are disclosing active chinvestigations to the inner-circles of alleged perpetrators now? Makes sense.
You're all over the place on this one. Pick a lane.
The investigation started in 2014, way before Manafort had even met Trump and seems like it was a pretty straightforward money laundering / secret agent case.
Presidential candidates get TS/SCI clearances and later the daily intel briefings, so yes, I think they can be made privy to the fact that their campaign manager is being investigated for laundering a lot of money from a dictator in cahoots with one of our biggest adversaries.
komo4buttfucker
Considering @diseasedliverdoog is up-voting your shit, forgive me for not taking your word as gospel....
So you're saying you enjoy your ignorance?
You seem to be enjoying the misery of yours.
I've asked to be educated twice now. Fuck you're slow.
You've been asking to be educated but it hasn't happened? Must be frustrating.
The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
I presume your Watergate hyperbole is related solely to the post election wiretapping of Manafort?
The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
If you help a dictator plunder millions of dollars from his own country and then launder it back to the US, you should expect to feel some heat from the feds. If you join a presidential campaign in the middle of said investigation into your misdeeds, I'm not sure why that means the investigation should go on pause, but someone definitely should have given Trump a discrete heads up. Maybe they did, who knows what will trickle out next.
komo4buttfucker
So we are disclosing active chinvestigations to the inner-circles of alleged perpetrators now? Makes sense.
You're all over the place on this one. Pick a lane.
The investigation started in 2014, way before Manafort had even met Trump and seems like it was a pretty straightforward money laundering / secret agent case.
Presidential candidates get TS/SCI clearances and later the daily intel briefings, so yes, I think they can be made privy to the fact that their campaign manager is being investigated for laundering a lot of money from a dictator in cahoots with one of our biggest adversaries.
komo4buttfucker
Considering @diseasedliverdoog is up-voting your shit, forgive me for not taking your word as gospel....
So you're saying you enjoy your ignorance?
You seem to be enjoying the misery of yours.
I've asked to be educated twice now. Fuck you're slow.
You've been asking to be educated but it hasn't happened? Must be frustrating.
The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
I presume your Watergate hyperbole is related solely to the post election wiretapping of Manafort?
The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
If you help a dictator plunder millions of dollars from his own country and then launder it back to the US, you should expect to feel some heat from the feds. If you join a presidential campaign in the middle of said investigation into your misdeeds, I'm not sure why that means the investigation should go on pause, but someone definitely should have given Trump a discrete heads up. Maybe they did, who knows what will trickle out next.
komo4buttfucker
So we are disclosing active chinvestigations to the inner-circles of alleged perpetrators now? Makes sense.
You're all over the place on this one. Pick a lane.
The investigation started in 2014, way before Manafort had even met Trump and seems like it was a pretty straightforward money laundering / secret agent case.
Presidential candidates get TS/SCI clearances and later the daily intel briefings, so yes, I think they can be made privy to the fact that their campaign manager is being investigated for laundering a lot of money from a dictator in cahoots with one of our biggest adversaries.
komo4buttfucker
Considering @diseasedliverdoog is up-voting your shit, forgive me for not taking your word as gospel....
So you're saying you enjoy your ignorance?
You seem to be enjoying the misery of yours.
I've asked to be educated twice now. Fuck you're slow.
You've been asking to be educated but it hasn't happened? Must be frustrating.
The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
I presume your Watergate hyperbole is related solely to the post election wiretapping of Manafort?
The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
If you help a dictator plunder millions of dollars from his own country and then launder it back to the US, you should expect to feel some heat from the feds. If you join a presidential campaign in the middle of said investigation into your misdeeds, I'm not sure why that means the investigation should go on pause, but someone definitely should have given Trump a discrete heads up. Maybe they did, who knows what will trickle out next.
komo4buttfucker
So we are disclosing active chinvestigations to the inner-circles of alleged perpetrators now? Makes sense.
You're all over the place on this one. Pick a lane.
The investigation started in 2014, way before Manafort had even met Trump and seems like it was a pretty straightforward money laundering / secret agent case.
Presidential candidates get TS/SCI clearances and later the daily intel briefings, so yes, I think they can be made privy to the fact that their campaign manager is being investigated for laundering a lot of money from a dictator in cahoots with one of our biggest adversaries.
komo4buttfucker
Considering @diseasedliverdoog is up-voting your shit, forgive me for not taking your word as gospel....
So you're saying you enjoy your ignorance?
You seem to be enjoying the misery of yours.
I've asked to be educated twice now. Fuck you're slow.
You've been asking to be educated but it hasn't happened? Must be frustrating.
You're really fucking slow.
You've said that twice now. You must have forgot.
Are you naturally Hondo Fucking Stupid or do you work at it?
The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
I presume your Watergate hyperbole is related solely to the post election wiretapping of Manafort?
The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
If you help a dictator plunder millions of dollars from his own country and then launder it back to the US, you should expect to feel some heat from the feds. If you join a presidential campaign in the middle of said investigation into your misdeeds, I'm not sure why that means the investigation should go on pause, but someone definitely should have given Trump a discrete heads up. Maybe they did, who knows what will trickle out next.
komo4buttfucker
So we are disclosing active chinvestigations to the inner-circles of alleged perpetrators now? Makes sense.
You're all over the place on this one. Pick a lane.
The investigation started in 2014, way before Manafort had even met Trump and seems like it was a pretty straightforward money laundering / secret agent case.
Presidential candidates get TS/SCI clearances and later the daily intel briefings, so yes, I think they can be made privy to the fact that their campaign manager is being investigated for laundering a lot of money from a dictator in cahoots with one of our biggest adversaries.
komo4buttfucker
Considering @diseasedliverdoog is up-voting your shit, forgive me for not taking your word as gospel....
So you're saying you enjoy your ignorance?
You seem to be enjoying the misery of yours.
I've asked to be educated twice now. Fuck you're slow.
You've been asking to be educated but it hasn't happened? Must be frustrating.
You're really fucking slow.
You've said that twice now. You must have forgot.
Are you naturally Hondo Fucking Stupid or do you work at it?
All this because you asked for an education and didn't get one? You'll do better next time. Unless it's about anti-Vax. You'll get shredded as usual.
The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
I presume your Watergate hyperbole is related solely to the post election wiretapping of Manafort?
The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
If you help a dictator plunder millions of dollars from his own country and then launder it back to the US, you should expect to feel some heat from the feds. If you join a presidential campaign in the middle of said investigation into your misdeeds, I'm not sure why that means the investigation should go on pause, but someone definitely should have given Trump a discrete heads up. Maybe they did, who knows what will trickle out next.
komo4buttfucker
So we are disclosing active chinvestigations to the inner-circles of alleged perpetrators now? Makes sense.
You're all over the place on this one. Pick a lane.
The investigation started in 2014, way before Manafort had even met Trump and seems like it was a pretty straightforward money laundering / secret agent case.
Presidential candidates get TS/SCI clearances and later the daily intel briefings, so yes, I think they can be made privy to the fact that their campaign manager is being investigated for laundering a lot of money from a dictator in cahoots with one of our biggest adversaries.
komo4buttfucker
Considering @diseasedliverdoog is up-voting your shit, forgive me for not taking your word as gospel....
So you're saying you enjoy your ignorance?
You seem to be enjoying the misery of yours.
I've asked to be educated twice now. Fuck you're slow.
You've been asking to be educated but it hasn't happened? Must be frustrating.
You're really fucking slow.
You've said that twice now. You must have forgot.
Are you naturally Hondo Fucking Stupid or do you work at it?
All this because you asked for an education and didn't get one? You'll do better next time. Unless it's about anti-Vax. You'll get shredded as usual.
The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
I presume your Watergate hyperbole is related solely to the post election wiretapping of Manafort?
The American people deserve to know why a FISA judge allowed a wiretap of a Presidential campaign official and what, if anything, they found. And it sounds like: not much.
We also deserve to know what Obama knew and when he knew it. I'm guessing a surveillance request of this calliber required his approval.
Unseal the documents for the American public, and the world, now.
If you help a dictator plunder millions of dollars from his own country and then launder it back to the US, you should expect to feel some heat from the feds. If you join a presidential campaign in the middle of said investigation into your misdeeds, I'm not sure why that means the investigation should go on pause, but someone definitely should have given Trump a discrete heads up. Maybe they did, who knows what will trickle out next.
komo4buttfucker
So we are disclosing active chinvestigations to the inner-circles of alleged perpetrators now? Makes sense.
You're all over the place on this one. Pick a lane.
The investigation started in 2014, way before Manafort had even met Trump and seems like it was a pretty straightforward money laundering / secret agent case.
Presidential candidates get TS/SCI clearances and later the daily intel briefings, so yes, I think they can be made privy to the fact that their campaign manager is being investigated for laundering a lot of money from a dictator in cahoots with one of our biggest adversaries.
komo4buttfucker
Considering @diseasedliverdoog is up-voting your shit, forgive me for not taking your word as gospel....
So you're saying you enjoy your ignorance?
I enjoy my ignorance
If you like your ignorance, can you keep your ignorance?
- The intelligence community secretly expanded its authority in 2011 so it can monitor innocent U.S. citizens like you and me for doing nothing more than mentioning a target’s name a single time.
- In January 2016, a top secret inspector general report found the NSA violated the very laws designed to prevent abuse.
- In 2016, Obama officials searched through intelligence on U.S. citizens a record 30,000 times, up from 9,500 in 2013.
- Two weeks before the election, at a secret hearing before the FISA court overseeing government surveillance, NSA officials confessed they’d violated privacy safeguards “with much greater frequency” than they’d admitted. The judge accused them of “institutional lack of candor” and said, “this is a very serious Fourth Amendment issue.”
Comments
The investigation started in 2014, way before Manafort had even met Trump and seems like it was a pretty straightforward money laundering / secret agent case.
Presidential candidates get TS/SCI clearances and later the daily intel briefings, so yes, I think they can be made privy to the fact that their campaign manager is being investigated for laundering a lot of money from a dictator in cahoots with one of our biggest adversaries.
Considering @diseasedliverdoog is up-voting your shit, forgive me for not taking your word as gospel....
I've asked to be educated twice now. Fuck you're slow.
thehill.com/opinion/campaign/351495-it-looks-like-obama-did-spy-on-trump-just-as-he-did-to-me
- In January 2016, a top secret inspector general report found the NSA violated the very laws designed to prevent abuse.
- In 2016, Obama officials searched through intelligence on U.S. citizens a record 30,000 times, up from 9,500 in 2013.
- Two weeks before the election, at a secret hearing before the FISA court overseeing government surveillance, NSA officials confessed they’d violated privacy safeguards “with much greater frequency” than they’d admitted. The judge accused them of “institutional lack of candor” and said, “this is a very serious Fourth Amendment issue.”