Remind me again why we don't want Gary Pinkel

Auburndawg

http://t.co/FuHXeRURCJ

I don't think he would say yes, but damn.

greenblood

Thanks to Sven, I am not clicking that link.

Mad_Son

http://www.abc17news.com/sports/gary-pinkel-reflects-on-the-late-don-james/-/18452370/22554014/-/15rb9yf/-/index.html

RaceBannon

How many conference championships in how many years?

DerekJohnson

He belongs in Missouri, not here.

Auburndawg

RaceBannon said:

How many conference championships in how many years?

He is the Mike Riley of the South/SW. Here he would've been a rock star.

Oh well.

dnc

Auburndawg said:

RaceBannon said:

How many conference championships in how many years?

He is the Mike Riley of the South/SW. Here he would've been a rock star.

Oh well.

This thread is worthless without @puppylove_sugarsteel

HeretoBeatmyChest

Too old & we burned the bridge with him after 1998.

RaceBannon

Why would he be a rock star here? You mean like Ty was? I take it the answer is zero for what,15 seasons? Why would we want Riley?

ApostleofGrief

give up the hire-the-alum trick already! Shit!!!!

ApostleofGrief

correction: I guess not really an alum, but another relic of the James era.

If you want the next Don James you are going to have to fucking go find him in some backwater like Kent State! Enough of this resurrect the old winners bullshit. That's been tried with Gilby and Lambo (Lambo obviously better at it.)

[Deleted User]

RaceBannon said:

Why would he be a rock star here? You mean like Ty was? I take it the answer is zero for what,15 seasons? Why would we want Riley?

BUT HE DOES MORE WITH LESS!!!!

I also heard on a podcast(the fuck?) that he's better than Carroll.

tracker

Auburndawg said:

http://t.co/FuHXeRURCJ

I don't think he would say yes, but damn.

[Deleted User]

2001 Missouri 4–7 3–5 T–4th (North)
2002 Missouri 5–7 2–6 5th (North)
2003 Missouri 8–5 4–4 3rd (North) L Independence
2004 Missouri 5–6 3–5 T–3rd (North)
2005 Missouri 7–5 4–4 T–2nd (North) W Independence
2006 Missouri 8–5 4–4 T–2nd (North) L Sun
2007 Missouri 12–2 7–1 T–1st (North) W Cotton 5 4
2008 Missouri 10–4 5–3 T–1st (North) W Alamo 16 19
2009 Missouri 8–5 4–4 T–2nd (North) L Texas
2010 Missouri 10–3 6–2 T–1st (North) L Insight 18 18
2011 Missouri 8–5[6] 5–4 5th W Independence
Missouri Tigers (Southeastern Conference) (2012–present)
2012 Missouri 5–7 2–6 5th (East)
2013 Missouri 7–0 3–0
Missouri: 97–61 52–48

This is why we don't want Gary Pinkel.

TierbsHsotBoobs

Replacing a coach with a .500 conference record with a coach who has a .520 conference record is a massive waste of time.

[Deleted User]

Your_Mom said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Replacing a coach with a .500 conference record with a coach who has a .520 conference record is a massive waste of time.

Replacing a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford, with a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford but stumbled into a Pac 12 south title during a down Pac 12 south year is a massive waste of time.

You realize Mora hasn't coached against Oregon right?

Why do you always press so badly on every fucking account that you create?

TierbsHsotBoobs

Your_Mom said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Replacing a coach with a .500 conference record with a coach who has a .520 conference record is a massive waste of time.

Replacing a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford, with a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford but stumbled into a Pac 12 south title during a down Pac 12 south year is a massive waste of time.

When did Jim L. Mora lose to Oregon, LOSER?

Your_Mom

He_Needs_More_Time said:

You realize Mora hasn't coached against Oregon right?

Why do you always press so badly on every fucking account that you create?

So you are predicting a UCLA win on Sat?

How much money you betting on that?

This is the only account I've had here.

TierbsHsotBoobs

Your_Mom said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

You realize Mora hasn't coached against Oregon right?

Why do you always press so badly on every fucking account that you create?

So you are predicting a UCLA win on Sat?

How much money you betting on that?

This is the only account I've had here.

If you post like a LOSER, I assume you are IMALOSER, LOSER.

Your_Mom

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Your_Mom said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Replacing a coach with a .500 conference record with a coach who has a .520 conference record is a massive waste of time.

Replacing a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford, with a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford but stumbled into a Pac 12 south title during a down Pac 12 south year is a massive waste of time.

When did Jim L. Mora lose to Oregon, LOSER?

When did he beat them? We will see Sat how good he is, I'm predicting his relative performance we be similar to his relative performance against Furd.

And no, this isn't IMALOSER.

dhdawg

Your_Mom said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Your_Mom said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Replacing a coach with a .500 conference record with a coach who has a .520 conference record is a massive waste of time.

Replacing a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford, with a coach that can't beat Oregon and Stanford but stumbled into a Pac 12 south title during a down Pac 12 south year is a massive waste of time.

When did Jim L. Mora lose to Oregon, LOSER?

When did he beat them? We will see Sat how good he is, I'm predicting his relative performance we be similar to his relative performance against Furd.

And no, this isn't IMALOSER.

u said can't, if u had said HASN'T that argument would've made sense, now LEAVE