Trump Disavows Racists Over and Over Again - While Media Says Exactly the Opposite.

doogie

Short for (militant) anti-fascists.

Middle-class champagne socialist/communist/anarchist white boys who don't like nationalists or fascists. They consider themselves to be rebelling against the establishment, whilst upholding all of its ultra-politically correct views.

Antifa only dislike racism when its carried out by whites, and do not have the bottle to stand up against anti-white racism; leading to many people on the right to refer to them as 'traitors'. I'd rather just call them morons.

Most are teenagers and university students who grow out of the fad when they start paying taxes.

Antifa is stupid.

TurdBomber

AZDuck said:

doogie said:

Now you have a problem with lawful assembly approved by a Federal Judge?

@AZDuck: Just say what the cases say, instead of assigning homework. Bully.

Stalin! The blockquotes are fucked up again.

TurdBomber

And, little known fact, they grow Antifa SJWs like weeds at the Evergreen State College.

AZDuck

There is no freedom of assembly for an armed mob. (Fed courts)

There is no freedom of assembly if the ostensible purpose of the assembly is to incite violence or a breach of the peace. (Supreme Court)

Very old precedent in common law, going back literally 800 years. (Blackstone's Commentaries)

doogie

So, your confirming what Antifa did was illegal. Thanks!

Explains why their leader was arrested on felony charges, doesn't it?

TierbsHsotBoobs

doogie said:

It's also fucked up to have alt-left racist views.

seems to me all this FREESPEECH talk depends on who is hearing the message After words have been spoken

doogie said:

So, your confirming what Antifa did was illegal. Thanks!

Explains why their leader was arrested on felony charges, doesn't it?

They fucking suck.

How many people did they kill by way of terrorism last weekend?

HoustonHusky

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

doogie said:

It's also fucked up to have alt-left racist views.

seems to me all this FREESPEECH talk depends on who is hearing the message After words have been spoken

doogie said:

So, your confirming what Antifa did was illegal. Thanks!

Explains why their leader was arrested on felony charges, doesn't it?

They fucking suck.

How many people did they kill by way of terrorism last weekend?

One.

http://6abc.com/police-man-killed-by-neighbor-after-dispute/2286340/

They are all nuts.

HoustonHusky

I take that back. They are not all just nutjobs. A few were entrepreneurial nutjobs.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-16/why-was-crowd-hire-company-recruiting-25-hour-political-activists-charlotte-last-wee

Pitchfork51

The left has a wet dream over getting rid of free speech.

Hate speech is violence. Which means violence is appropriate countermeasure.

All speech they don't agree with is hate speech.

I still take comfort knowing I never actually see any of these shitheads in real life.

RaceBannon

Pitchfork51 said:

The left has a wet dream over getting rid of free speech.

Hate speech is violence. Which means violence is appropriate countermeasure.

All speech they don't agree with is hate speech.

I still take comfort knowing I never actually see any of these shitheads in real life.

That's because they have jobs.

Sledog

AZDuck said:

There is no freedom of assembly for an armed mob. (Fed courts)

There is no freedom of assembly if the ostensible purpose of the assembly is to incite violence or a breach of the peace. (Supreme Court)

Very old precedent in common law, going back literally 800 years. (Blackstone's Commentaries)

I'm glad you agree the militant left who came armed to commit violence and assemble without a permit are at fault.

TierbsHsotBoobs

Sledog said:

AZDuck said:

There is no freedom of assembly for an armed mob. (Fed courts)

There is no freedom of assembly if the ostensible purpose of the assembly is to incite violence or a breach of the peace. (Supreme Court)

Very old precedent in common law, going back literally 800 years. (Blackstone's Commentaries)

I'm glad you agree the militant left who came armed to commit violence and assemble without a permit are at fault.

The left had permits, but still:
http://www.nbc29.com/story/36099395/city-of-charlottesville-grants-two-permits-for-counterprotests-of-unite-the-right

Sledog

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Sledog said:

AZDuck said:

There is no freedom of assembly for an armed mob. (Fed courts)

There is no freedom of assembly if the ostensible purpose of the assembly is to incite violence or a breach of the peace. (Supreme Court)

Very old precedent in common law, going back literally 800 years. (Blackstone's Commentaries)

I'm glad you agree the militant left who came armed to commit violence and assemble without a permit are at fault.

The left had permits, but still:
http://www.nbc29.com/story/36099395/city-of-charlottesville-grants-two-permits-for-counterprotests-of-unite-the-right

Wrong groups and that's the wrong park. All the bad stuff was at Emancipation Park.

TierbsHsotBoobs

Sledog said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Sledog said:

AZDuck said:

There is no freedom of assembly for an armed mob. (Fed courts)

There is no freedom of assembly if the ostensible purpose of the assembly is to incite violence or a breach of the peace. (Supreme Court)

Very old precedent in common law, going back literally 800 years. (Blackstone's Commentaries)

I'm glad you agree the militant left who came armed to commit violence and assemble without a permit are at fault.

The left had permits, but still:
http://www.nbc29.com/story/36099395/city-of-charlottesville-grants-two-permits-for-counterprotests-of-unite-the-right

Wrong groups and that's the wrong park. All the bad stuff was at Emancipation Park.

Charlottesville Park Superiority Guy heard from.

TurdBomber

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Sledog said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Sledog said:

AZDuck said:

There is no freedom of assembly for an armed mob. (Fed courts)

There is no freedom of assembly if the ostensible purpose of the assembly is to incite violence or a breach of the peace. (Supreme Court)

Very old precedent in common law, going back literally 800 years. (Blackstone's Commentaries)

I'm glad you agree the militant left who came armed to commit violence and assemble without a permit are at fault.

The left had permits, but still:
http://www.nbc29.com/story/36099395/city-of-charlottesville-grants-two-permits-for-counterprotests-of-unite-the-right

Wrong groups and that's the wrong park. All the bad stuff was at Emancipation Park.

Charlottesville Park Superiority Guy heard from.

It's a bad day when Sledog takes you down, Boobs.

Pitchfork51

TurdBuffer said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Sledog said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Sledog said:

AZDuck said:

There is no freedom of assembly for an armed mob. (Fed courts)

There is no freedom of assembly if the ostensible purpose of the assembly is to incite violence or a breach of the peace. (Supreme Court)

Very old precedent in common law, going back literally 800 years. (Blackstone's Commentaries)

I'm glad you agree the militant left who came armed to commit violence and assemble without a permit are at fault.

The left had permits, but still:
http://www.nbc29.com/story/36099395/city-of-charlottesville-grants-two-permits-for-counterprotests-of-unite-the-right

Wrong groups and that's the wrong park. All the bad stuff was at Emancipation Park.

Charlottesville Park Superiority Guy heard from.

It's a bad day when you have less than 100 posts, Boobs.