Who was worse: Sark or Lambo?
Comments
-
Let's not forget those purple helmets, either...
-
Official notice that this is going into the rotation. You're a fucking poet man.Gladstone said:Fat alcoholic Armenian frat hamster
-
Lambo never had to face a ranked Oregon state.
-
Gilbyham was by far the worserist of the worst corches Washington ever had.Gladstone said:Fat alcoholic Armenian frat hamster vs wifebeating douche and one of the idiots who shat all over what DJ built. Both were flagrantly mediocre and had legions of doogs defend them until the end.
-
Upvoted for frat hamster.Gladstone said:Fat alcoholic Armenian frat hamster vs wifebeating douche and one of the idiots who shat all over what DJ built. Both were flagrantly mediocre and had legions of doogs defend them until the end.
-
I never said he was good. These are the two options..... Although I could keep up the Lambo Doogisms all day.Dennis_DeYoung said:
If I had to pick I would pick Lambo because at least we'd still be WASHINGTON dammit.HuskyJW said:IDK...Lambo was put in a helluva spot. What are you supposed to do when your boss quits and they ask you to take over? He did what he could I think.
Sark was openly interviewing for the USC job in the UW locker room in pregame.
But for fuck's sakes, defending Lambo is the doogliest of the doogly.
What the fuck is wrong with you? He sucked.
He beat Nick Saban -
It's fitting to lump Gilbyham into one.creepycoug said:
Gilbyham was by far the worserist of the worst corches Washington ever had.Gladstone said:Fat alcoholic Armenian frat hamster vs wifebeating douche and one of the idiots who shat all over what DJ built. Both were flagrantly mediocre and had legions of doogs defend them until the end.
Ty was easier to hate due to his poorly devised, fake persona and the irrational support given to him. Gilby was just as bad at game planning, game day coaching, recruiting etc and just needed more time to get his 0-12. I don't know if he was worse than Ty, but I'm pretty sure he wasn't better. -
I love these threads
-
no shit willingham and gilby were worse, no one would argue otherwise
there are compelling arguments around which of sark or lambo are shittier though
sark inherited the nadir and by giving just any effort at all got lots of goodwill, even if by year 3 it was clear he was, at the very best, a middling p12 coach. doogs still drooled over themselves to defend him "you act like 0-12 never happened" etc etc
lambo inherited the apex and had lots of good will by virtue of the sanctions, even if his recruiting and in-game decision making made it abundantly clear he wasn't the man for the job. many fought tooth-and-nail to keep him around, espousing garbage like "he inherited DJ's sanctions" or " he did what he could" and other nonsense minutiae.
also trying to figure out if haie flagged me because it's clearly lambo, clearly sark, or clearly a shit thread. -
You know the answer to this.Gladstone said:. also trying to figure out if haie flagged me because it's clearly lambo, clearly sark, or clearly a shit thread.
