Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Kim's Behavior will be a tell....

As soon as Sark is probably dead in the water, expect a certain skinny jeans wearing, football clutching faggot to abandon his support of Sark and reverse his stance. Remember, he gets his cues from above. If Woodward lets word leak out that Sark's future is in serious question, Kimmy will start to shift his stance as will his junior lieutenant, Eklund.
«13

Comments

  • Auburndawg
    Auburndawg Member Posts: 362
    I think its alread begun. They are certainly not defending him
  • DingaLing
    DingaLing Member Posts: 66

    As soon as Sark is probably dead in the water, expect a certain skinny jeans wearing, football clutching faggot to abandon his support of Sark and reverse his stance. Remember, he gets his cues from above. If Woodward lets word leak out that Sark's future is in serious question, Kimmy will start to shift his stance as will his junior lieutenant, Eklund.

    True.

    Small problem.

    Sark is not nor will be dead in the water this year, nor next with the enhanced preseason schedule of drecks. Maybe end of year 7, but probably not.

    But you knew this already.

  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 69,771 Founders Club
    I just don't see Sark going anywhere for quite awhile. He'll get 7-8 wins and
    DingaLing said:

    As soon as Sark is probably dead in the water, expect a certain skinny jeans wearing, football clutching faggot to abandon his support of Sark and reverse his stance. Remember, he gets his cues from above. If Woodward lets word leak out that Sark's future is in serious question, Kimmy will start to shift his stance as will his junior lieutenant, Eklund.

    True.

    Small problem.

    Sark is not nor will be dead in the water this year, nor next with the enhanced preseason schedule of drecks. Maybe end of year 7, but probably not.

    But you knew this already.

    There's still time for Woodward to soften the Year 7 schedule further
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    Derek, thats just being facetious. You don't raise millions to renovate the stadium and get a blank check for assistant coaches to tolerate mediocrity. This was expected to be a 9+ win year.

    To be fair, I think you can make an argument that at 7-8 wins that its 50-50.

    However, Woodward is a politician. He's going to follow public opinion. If the boosters and the fans are on the same page and want Sark out, no way he goes against that.
  • fivehundredmileDAWG
    fivehundredmileDAWG Member Posts: 1,212
    According to EktardFS No way Sark gets fired even for 6-6.

    He is really dumb.
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,917
    If football is, at all, important to the athletic department (and I'm inclined to think that it is considering the massive stadium renovation), then they'll know they won't fill that place with 7-8 regular season wins a year. Fans in this state are of the bandwagon variety, we are not classy like Nebraska who attend no matter what the state of the program.

    If Softy wasn't talking out his ass and is serious that big name boosters are pounding on the door of Woodward about the state of the program, then there's hope he'll make the right call.