Kim's Behavior will be a tell....

HeretoBeatmyChest

As soon as Sark is probably dead in the water, expect a certain skinny jeans wearing, football clutching faggot to abandon his support of Sark and reverse his stance. Remember, he gets his cues from above. If Woodward lets word leak out that Sark's future is in serious question, Kimmy will start to shift his stance as will his junior lieutenant, Eklund.

[Deleted User]

Yes I was thinking the same way. Once you see Doogman staff to turn on Sark and Softy start to openly question him instead of beating around the bush.

That means Sark is dead. As of right now they aren't sure why Kim was pretty silent yesterday besides bragging how "cancer won" . Softy is now saying shit like "I'm going to let it play out" while before he would have just blasted you for saying Sark should go.

Eklund is still being an arrogant prick because he's possibly the most retarded person of the three man lemon party.

Auburndawg

I think its alread begun. They are certainly not defending him

DingaLing

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

As soon as Sark is probably dead in the water, expect a certain skinny jeans wearing, football clutching faggot to abandon his support of Sark and reverse his stance. Remember, he gets his cues from above. If Woodward lets word leak out that Sark's future is in serious question, Kimmy will start to shift his stance as will his junior lieutenant, Eklund.

True.

Small problem.

Sark is not nor will be dead in the water this year, nor next with the enhanced preseason schedule of drecks. Maybe end of year 7, but probably not.

But you knew this already.

DerekJohnson

I just don't see Sark going anywhere for quite awhile. He'll get 7-8 wins and

DingaLing said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

As soon as Sark is probably dead in the water, expect a certain skinny jeans wearing, football clutching faggot to abandon his support of Sark and reverse his stance. Remember, he gets his cues from above. If Woodward lets word leak out that Sark's future is in serious question, Kimmy will start to shift his stance as will his junior lieutenant, Eklund.

True.

Small problem.

Sark is not nor will be dead in the water this year, nor next with the enhanced preseason schedule of drecks. Maybe end of year 7, but probably not.

But you knew this already.

There's still time for Woodward to soften the Year 7 schedule further

Dick_B

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

As soon as Sark is probably dead in the water, expect a certain skinny jeans wearing, football clutching faggot to abandon his support of Sark and reverse his stance. Remember, he gets his cues from above. If Woodward lets word leak out that Sark's future is in serious question, Kimmy will start to shift his stance as will his junior lieutenant, Eklund.

The fact that they are letting the coaching change talk go on is a tell in itself. They are still putting on a show of defending Sark, because they aren't sure which way the wind blows, but they have heard something.

Some of the biggest Sark defenders have turned on him. It's just the retards that still can't see it. S14AFS hasn't been on all weekend, for example.

HeretoBeatmyChest

Derek, thats just being facetious. You don't raise millions to renovate the stadium and get a blank check for assistant coaches to tolerate mediocrity. This was expected to be a 9+ win year.

To be fair, I think you can make an argument that at 7-8 wins that its 50-50.

However, Woodward is a politician. He's going to follow public opinion. If the boosters and the fans are on the same page and want Sark out, no way he goes against that.

fivehundredmileDAWG

According to EktardFS No way Sark gets fired even for 6-6.

He is really dumb.

MelloDawg

If football is, at all, important to the athletic department (and I'm inclined to think that it is considering the massive stadium renovation), then they'll know they won't fill that place with 7-8 regular season wins a year. Fans in this state are of the bandwagon variety, we are not classy like Nebraska who attend no matter what the state of the program.

If Softy wasn't talking out his ass and is serious that big name boosters are pounding on the door of Woodward about the state of the program, then there's hope he'll make the right call.

RaceBannon

Nobody was harder on Sark than Kim

PurpleJ

RaceBannon said:

Nobody was harder on for Sark than Kim

Fixed.

DingaLing

fivehundredmileDAWG said:

According to EktardFS No way Sark gets fired even for 6-6.

He is really dumb.

True, he s dumb.

But not for saying this.

What part of the last 10 years makes you think Sark is gone this year?

No. Way. In .hell.

Still stunned by the optimistic views about sarks firing. Is this really HHB?

Fuck

topdawgnc

WhiskeyDawg

monroecougdad said:

I'll know Sark is about to be door.ass.out when Woodward and/or Young gives Sark the dreaded "vote of confidence.

I'll know Sark is done when Dave Samak writes a tough worded op-ed how Sark needs to be fired......the day AFTER he is fired.

#dayafterwillinghamwasfired

fivehundredmileDAWG

DingaLing said:

fivehundredmileDAWG said:

According to EktardFS No way Sark gets fired even for 6-6.

He is really dumb.

True, he s dumb.

But not for saying this.

What part of the last 10 years makes you think Sark is gone this year?

No. Way. In .hell.

Still stunned by the optimistic views about sarks firing. Is this really HHB?

Fuck

So let me get this straight... Woodward is going keep Sark when he goes 3-6 in conference?

Even Woodtard isn't that stupid... He knows where his bread is buttered.. And knows he's gone when it happens again...

Fuck

[Deleted User]

DingaLing said:

fivehundredmileDAWG said:

According to EktardFS No way Sark gets fired even for 6-6.

He is really dumb.

True, he s dumb.

But not for saying this.

What part of the last 10 years makes you think Sark is gone this year?

No. Way. In .hell.

Still stunned by the optimistic views about sarks firing. Is this really HHB?

Fuck

People are confusing what should happen vs what will happen.

I think at 6-6 with a home loss to wsu meaning we ended the year losing three in a row he's gone.

However at 7-5 I think he comes back for "one last shot".

The UW athletic department is being ran by fucktards so when they make the wrong move don't be surprised.

AtomicDawg

In think he goes 4-5 but ya. I agree.

topdawgnc

DingaLing said:

fivehundredmileDAWG said:

According to EktardFS No way Sark gets fired even for 6-6.

He is really dumb.

True, he s dumb.

But not for saying this.

What part of the last 10 years makes you think Sark is gone this year?

No. Way. In .hell.

Still stunned by the optimistic views about sarks firing. Is this really HHB?

Fuck

As long as there are butts in the seats, records don't matter.

Records are the excuse, not the reason.

fivehundredmileDAWG

The difference between 6-6 and 7-5 will be AC ... And I fear that we will win.

6-6 gets him fired. It has too. Unless Woodtard wants early retirement.

7-5 and he makes it.

TierbsHsotBoobs

fivehundredmileDAWG said:

The difference between 6-6 and 7-5 will be AC ... And I fear that we will win.

6-6 gets him fired. It has too. Unless Woodtard wants early retirement.

7-5 and he makes it.

I've said from day one of the 2013 season that was over before it ever began that 7-5 keeps Sark around, but it causes problems too.

Sark has two years left on his deal. If you're going to keep him, you almost have to throw another year or two on that deal...but Woodward can't justify that now.

I *almost* want to see 7-5, even though I would totally prefer 4-8.

[Deleted User]

I think the Apple Cup Sark will be coaching for his job. At 6-6 with a home loss to the Cougs with three straight losses to end the season and losing 6 of your final 8 games I don't see how he survives.

I know Sark normally always beats middling teams at home. However, I think the players are going to lay down and die for Sark so he will get his fucking ass fired.