Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
If you could change one loss from UW football history into a win?
Comments
-
puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Asu 96'...well that was easy. Lambo vs Cooper. Lambo would have got his rose bowl trophy.
Oregon In '95. Lambo would have got his 2nd rose bowl trophy.
-
tl;dr edit: A voted natty is > playing in an actual championship game with the possibility of earning the trophy on the field.chuck said:
Speaks volumes about your inability to grasp the jist of the thread.oregonblitzkrieg said:The omission of 2016 Bama speaks volumes.
I'll help a little. 1990 UCLA is the most mentioned game here. 1984 USC is pretty prominent too. What about those losses is different than the one you mentioned? The quality of the opponent (hint: UW was better)? The fact that UW went on to win the games following those losses (hint: there's no reason to assume or even believe UW would have beaten Clemson after Alabama)?
That help? Hindsight tells us that if UW beats SC in 1984 and the final #1 ranking was in the bag. We don't even need hindsight for 1990. We knew the day that it happened that the NC was pissed away. Somehow sneak past Alabama last season and a better team would have been waiting. -
You come to this website to talk shit and then prove you're Race/Boobs/DNC fanboy by the manner in which you post.. They're funny with their simplistic style because of the intelligence, nuance, subtlety and irony behind it. You think you're funny and good at this because you're simple and stupid. See the difference?oregonblitzkrieg said:
tl;dr edit: A voted natty is > playing in an actual championship game with the possibility of earning the trophy on the field.chuck said:
Speaks volumes about your inability to grasp the jist of the thread.oregonblitzkrieg said:The omission of 2016 Bama speaks volumes.
I'll help a little. 1990 UCLA is the most mentioned game here. 1984 USC is pretty prominent too. What about those losses is different than the one you mentioned? The quality of the opponent (hint: UW was better)? The fact that UW went on to win the games following those losses (hint: there's no reason to assume or even believe UW would have beaten Clemson after Alabama)?
That help? Hindsight tells us that if UW beats SC in 1984 and the final #1 ranking was in the bag. We don't even need hindsight for 1990. We knew the day that it happened that the NC was pissed away. Somehow sneak past Alabama last season and a better team would have been waiting. -
@TierbsHsotBoobs true?!?!chuck said:
You come to this website to talk shit and then prove you're Race/Boobs/DNC fanboy by the manner in which you post.. They're funny with their simplistic style because of the intelligence, nuance, subtlety and irony behind it. You think you're funny and good at this because you're simple and stupid. See the difference?oregonblitzkrieg said:
tl;dr edit: A voted natty is > playing in an actual championship game with the possibility of earning the trophy on the field.chuck said:
Speaks volumes about your inability to grasp the jist of the thread.oregonblitzkrieg said:The omission of 2016 Bama speaks volumes.
I'll help a little. 1990 UCLA is the most mentioned game here. 1984 USC is pretty prominent too. What about those losses is different than the one you mentioned? The quality of the opponent (hint: UW was better)? The fact that UW went on to win the games following those losses (hint: there's no reason to assume or even believe UW would have beaten Clemson after Alabama)?
That help? Hindsight tells us that if UW beats SC in 1984 and the final #1 ranking was in the bag. We don't even need hindsight for 1990. We knew the day that it happened that the NC was pissed away. Somehow sneak past Alabama last season and a better team would have been waiting. -
Any loss to Colorado is tough to get over.PurpleBaze said:
They countered the Huskies defense with quick slants. Tommy Maddox was their QB and was a true freshman.Gladstone said:
The 1990 UCLA Bruins football team represented University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) in the 1990 college football season. The team was coached by Terry Donahue and finished the season with a 5–6–0 record in 6th place in the conference.[1]Dennis_DeYoung said:If you were alive then and didn't say 1990 UCLA you should be killed by Lambright's bare hands.
That was a fucking brutal loss. The USC '84 game was bad, but at the time it wasn't abundantly clear it was costing us a Natty.
UCLA 1990 was the worst feeling I've ever had as a sports fan.
How the fuck? I found the game on YouTube and at the risk of wrist slitting will watch it later today.
They had one long run for a TD up the middle, because the Huskies sent Tommie Smith on a blitz and the middle of the field was left open. That was early in the game.
Late in the game, the Huskies rallied, but any chance of a win was pissed away by a late 4th quarter INT thrown by Brunell.
It really sucked to watch that loss in person and, at that time, I don't think I had gotten over the shit loss to Colorado that September. -
Sounds like you're a Race/Boobs/DNC fanboy.chuck said:
You come to this website to talk shit and then prove you're Race/Boobs/DNC fanboy by the manner in which you post.. They're funny with their simplistic style because of the intelligence, nuance, subtlety and irony behind it. You think you're funny and good at this because you're simple and stupid. See the difference?oregonblitzkrieg said:
tl;dr edit: A voted natty is > playing in an actual championship game with the possibility of earning the trophy on the field.chuck said:
Speaks volumes about your inability to grasp the jist of the thread.oregonblitzkrieg said:The omission of 2016 Bama speaks volumes.
I'll help a little. 1990 UCLA is the most mentioned game here. 1984 USC is pretty prominent too. What about those losses is different than the one you mentioned? The quality of the opponent (hint: UW was better)? The fact that UW went on to win the games following those losses (hint: there's no reason to assume or even believe UW would have beaten Clemson after Alabama)?
That help? Hindsight tells us that if UW beats SC in 1984 and the final #1 ranking was in the bag. We don't even need hindsight for 1990. We knew the day that it happened that the NC was pissed away. Somehow sneak past Alabama last season and a better team would have been waiting. -
Especially when you lose the fucking natty game, dumb fuck. . . .oregonblitzkrieg said:
tl;dr edit: A voted natty is > playing in an actual championship game with the possibility of earning the trophy on the field.chuck said:
Speaks volumes about your inability to grasp the jist of the thread.oregonblitzkrieg said:The omission of 2016 Bama speaks volumes.
I'll help a little. 1990 UCLA is the most mentioned game here. 1984 USC is pretty prominent too. What about those losses is different than the one you mentioned? The quality of the opponent (hint: UW was better)? The fact that UW went on to win the games following those losses (hint: there's no reason to assume or even believe UW would have beaten Clemson after Alabama)?
That help? Hindsight tells us that if UW beats SC in 1984 and the final #1 ranking was in the bag. We don't even need hindsight for 1990. We knew the day that it happened that the NC was pissed away. Somehow sneak past Alabama last season and a better team would have been waiting.
The 0regon fan base is the dumbest bunch of dumbfucks on the planet. Playing for the NC means FUCKING NOTHING. NO FUCKING PARTICIPATION TROPIHIES ya FUCKING MORON.
Now ACTUALLY winning an NC. Its a FUCKING shame your fucking worthless fucking school has never won an NC in football.
-
I sense the anger, jealousy and frustration in this poast, and I want to drink your tears.EwaDawg said:
Especially when you lose the fucking natty game, dumb fuck. . . .oregonblitzkrieg said:
tl;dr edit: A voted natty is > playing in an actual championship game with the possibility of earning the trophy on the field.chuck said:
Speaks volumes about your inability to grasp the jist of the thread.oregonblitzkrieg said:The omission of 2016 Bama speaks volumes.
I'll help a little. 1990 UCLA is the most mentioned game here. 1984 USC is pretty prominent too. What about those losses is different than the one you mentioned? The quality of the opponent (hint: UW was better)? The fact that UW went on to win the games following those losses (hint: there's no reason to assume or even believe UW would have beaten Clemson after Alabama)?
That help? Hindsight tells us that if UW beats SC in 1984 and the final #1 ranking was in the bag. We don't even need hindsight for 1990. We knew the day that it happened that the NC was pissed away. Somehow sneak past Alabama last season and a better team would have been waiting.
The 0regon fan base is the dumbest bunch of dumbfucks on the planet. Playing for the NC means FUCKING NOTHING. NO FUCKING PARTICIPATION TROPIHIES ya FUCKING MORON.
Now ACTUALLY winning an NC. Its a FUCKING shame your fucking worthless fucking school has never won an NC in football. -
Ouch. Dude. Wow.EwaDawg said:
Especially when you lose the fucking natty game, dumb fuck. . . .oregonblitzkrieg said:
tl;dr edit: A voted natty is > playing in an actual championship game with the possibility of earning the trophy on the field.chuck said:
Speaks volumes about your inability to grasp the jist of the thread.oregonblitzkrieg said:The omission of 2016 Bama speaks volumes.
I'll help a little. 1990 UCLA is the most mentioned game here. 1984 USC is pretty prominent too. What about those losses is different than the one you mentioned? The quality of the opponent (hint: UW was better)? The fact that UW went on to win the games following those losses (hint: there's no reason to assume or even believe UW would have beaten Clemson after Alabama)?
That help? Hindsight tells us that if UW beats SC in 1984 and the final #1 ranking was in the bag. We don't even need hindsight for 1990. We knew the day that it happened that the NC was pissed away. Somehow sneak past Alabama last season and a better team would have been waiting.
The 0regon fan base is the dumbest bunch of dumbfucks on the planet. Playing for the NC means FUCKING NOTHING. NO FUCKING PARTICIPATION TROPIHIES ya FUCKING MORON.
Now ACTUALLY winning an NC. Its a FUCKING shame your fucking worthless fucking school has never won an NC in football. -
I *heart* chuckHIVchuck said:
You come to this website to talk shit and then prove you're Race/Boobs/DNC fanboy by the manner in which you post.. They're funny with their simplistic style because of the intelligence, nuance, subtlety and irony behind it. You think you're funny and good at this because you're simple and stupid. See the difference?oregonblitzkrieg said:
tl;dr edit: A voted natty is > playing in an actual championship game with the possibility of earning the trophy on the field.chuck said:
Speaks volumes about your inability to grasp the jist of the thread.oregonblitzkrieg said:The omission of 2016 Bama speaks volumes.
I'll help a little. 1990 UCLA is the most mentioned game here. 1984 USC is pretty prominent too. What about those losses is different than the one you mentioned? The quality of the opponent (hint: UW was better)? The fact that UW went on to win the games following those losses (hint: there's no reason to assume or even believe UW would have beaten Clemson after Alabama)?
That help? Hindsight tells us that if UW beats SC in 1984 and the final #1 ranking was in the bag. We don't even need hindsight for 1990. We knew the day that it happened that the NC was pissed away. Somehow sneak past Alabama last season and a better team would have been waiting.
