Why not just go the way of Sven and create a new handle?
Is it really restricting free speech if you can create a website or blog and express your opinions and link them to a comments page?
It's not like people are taken out back and given the old yeller treatment. You're still free to express your opinions on the internet platform.
Am I restricting me ex's rights to free speech by defriending her? Does she have a case that I'm violating her 1st amendment rights by denying her the ability to comment on my post about doing blow off a hookers ass while doing 90 on I5?
Why not just go the way of Sven and create a new handle?
Is it really restricting free speech if you can create a website or blog and express your opinions and link them to a comments page?
It's not like people are taken out back and given the old yeller treatment. You're still free to express your opinions on the internet platform.
Am I restricting me ex's rights to free speech by defriending her? Does she have a case that I'm violating her 1st amendment rights by denying her the ability to comment on my post about doing blow off a hookers ass while doing 90 on I5?
I don't know why you axe me these question.
I don't agree with the fag prof about the free speech bullshit. But everything Trump says as Trump is official. If he wants to poast as @WhartonDude66_LOLZ he can and should
Why not just go the way of Sven and create a new handle?
Is it really restricting free speech if you can create a website or blog and express your opinions and link them to a comments page?
It's not like people are taken out back and given the old yeller treatment. You're still free to express your opinions on the internet platform.
Am I restricting me ex's rights to free speech by defriending her? Does she have a case that I'm violating her 1st amendment rights by denying her the ability to comment on my post about doing blow off a hookers ass while doing 90 on I5?
I don't know why you axe me these question.
I don't agree with the fag prof about the free speech bullshit. But everything Trump says as Trump is official. If he wants to poast as @WhartonDude66_LOLZ he can and should
I don't know man I'm an alcoholic, but is it violating my 1st amendment rights if Cnn doesn't allow me to comment on their articles?
One of my favorite hungover pastimes is perusing the comments section of national publications. Some don't allow it. If Trump hit the disable comments button on his Twitter account is he still infringing on people's rights?
Why not just go the way of Sven and create a new handle?
Is it really restricting free speech if you can create a website or blog and express your opinions and link them to a comments page?
It's not like people are taken out back and given the old yeller treatment. You're still free to express your opinions on the internet platform.
Am I restricting me ex's rights to free speech by defriending her? Does she have a case that I'm violating her 1st amendment rights by denying her the ability to comment on my post about doing blow off a hookers ass while doing 90 on I5?
I don't know why you axe me these question.
I don't agree with the fag prof about the free speech bullshit. But everything Trump says as Trump is official. If he wants to poast as @WhartonDude66_LOLZ he can and should
I don't know man I'm an alcoholic, but is it violating my 1st amendment rights if Cnn doesn't allow me to comment on their articles?
One of my favorite hungover pastimes is perusing the comments section of national publications. Some don't allow it. If Trump hit the disable comments button on his Twitter account is he still infringing on people's rights?
Assuming trump blocked someone on twitter? I think it would be hilarious if he set up a bot that just went through and blocked every anti trumper there is. Tons of butthurt it would be.
Assuming trump blocked someone on twitter? I think it would be hilarious if he set up a bot that just went through and blocked every anti trumper there is. Tons of butthurt it would be.
Why not just go the way of Sven and create a new handle?
Is it really restricting free speech if you can create a website or blog and express your opinions and link them to a comments page?
It's not like people are taken out back and given the old yeller treatment. You're still free to express your opinions on the internet platform.
Am I restricting me ex's rights to free speech by defriending her? Does she have a case that I'm violating her 1st amendment rights by denying her the ability to comment on my post about doing blow off a hookers ass while doing 90 on I5?
I don't know why you axe me these question.
I don't agree with the fag prof about the free speech bullshit. But everything Trump says as Trump is official. If he wants to poast as @WhartonDude66_LOLZ he can and should
I don't know man I'm an alcoholic, but is it violating my 1st amendment rights if Cnn doesn't allow me to comment on their articles?
One of my favorite hungover pastimes is perusing the comments section of national publications. Some don't allow it. If Trump hit the disable comments button on his Twitter account is he still infringing on people's rights?
Why not just go the way of Sven and create a new handle?
Is it really restricting free speech if you can create a website or blog and express your opinions and link them to a comments page?
It's not like people are taken out back and given the old yeller treatment. You're still free to express your opinions on the internet platform.
Am I restricting me ex's rights to free speech by defriending her? Does she have a case that I'm violating her 1st amendment rights by denying her the ability to comment on my post about doing blow off a hookers ass while doing 90 on I5?
I'm just glad that after Obama's lack of knowledge of the Constitution, you elected a true constitutional scholar.
Freedom of speech does not assume an inalienable right to an audience. It seems a better argument—only slightly—would be under some "redress of grievances" issue.
Further evidence that people, chincluding the president and @ReedStrong7, take Twitter way too seriously.
Why not just go the way of Sven and create a new handle?
Is it really restricting free speech if you can create a website or blog and express your opinions and link them to a comments page?
It's not like people are taken out back and given the old yeller treatment. You're still free to express your opinions on the internet platform.
Am I restricting me ex's rights to free speech by defriending her? Does she have a case that I'm violating her 1st amendment rights by denying her the ability to comment on my post about doing blow off a hookers ass while doing 90 on I5?
I'm just glad that after Obama's lack of knowledge of the Constitution, you elected a true constitutional scholar.
"The President has put in place an organization with the kind of database that no one has ever seen before in life," Representative Maxine Waters told Roland Martin on Monday. "That's going to be very, very powerful," Waters said. "That database will have information about everything on every individual on ways that it's never been done before and whoever runs for President on the Democratic ticket has to deal with that. They're going to go down with that database and the concerns of those people because they can't get around it. And he's [President Obama] been very smart. It's very powerful what he's leaving in place." Read more at https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49a_1360284775#DtskkbdOcHPizHEZ.99
Why not just go the way of Sven and create a new handle?
Is it really restricting free speech if you can create a website or blog and express your opinions and link them to a comments page?
It's not like people are taken out back and given the old yeller treatment. You're still free to express your opinions on the internet platform.
Am I restricting me ex's rights to free speech by defriending her? Does she have a case that I'm violating her 1st amendment rights by denying her the ability to comment on my post about doing blow off a hookers ass while doing 90 on I5?
I'm just glad that after Obama's lack of knowledge of the Constitution, you elected a true constitutional scholar.
"The President has put in place an organization with the kind of database that no one has ever seen before in life," Representative Maxine Waters told Roland Martin on Monday. "That's going to be very, very powerful," Waters said. "That database will have information about everything on every individual on ways that it's never been done before and whoever runs for President on the Democratic ticket has to deal with that. They're going to go down with that database and the concerns of those people because they can't get around it. And he's [President Obama] been very smart. It's very powerful what he's leaving in place." Read more at https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49a_1360284775#DtskkbdOcHPizHEZ.99
Comments
Such a first amendment scholar J
Can we ban Ann Coulter from speaking at Berkeley but not ban SuxDix3000 from retweeting Kathy Griffin's pic of Trumps bloody head to Trump?
Fortunately there's an app to reduce confusion
https://www.wired.com/2017/06/trump-press-sec-twitter-bot/
Is it really restricting free speech if you can create a website or blog and express your opinions and link them to a comments page?
It's not like people are taken out back and given the old yeller treatment. You're still free to express your opinions on the internet platform.
Am I restricting me ex's rights to free speech by defriending her? Does she have a case that I'm violating her 1st amendment rights by denying her the ability to comment on my post about doing blow off a hookers ass while doing 90 on I5?
I don't agree with the fag prof about the free speech bullshit. But everything Trump says as Trump is official. If he wants to poast as @WhartonDude66_LOLZ he can and should
One of my favorite hungover pastimes is perusing the comments section of national publications. Some don't allow it. If Trump hit the disable comments button on his Twitter account is he still infringing on people's rights?
Freedom of speech does not assume an inalienable right to an audience. It seems a better argument—only slightly—would be under some "redress of grievances" issue.
Further evidence that people, chincluding the president and @ReedStrong7, take Twitter way too seriously.
https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49a_1360284775
"The President has put in place an
organization with the kind of database that no one has ever seen before
in life," Representative Maxine Waters told Roland Martin on Monday.
"That's going to be very, very powerful," Waters said. "That database
will have information about everything on every individual on ways that
it's never been done before and whoever runs for President on the
Democratic ticket has to deal with that. They're going to go down with
that database and the concerns of those people because they can't get
around it. And he's [President Obama] been very smart. It's very
powerful what he's leaving in place."
Read more at https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49a_1360284775#DtskkbdOcHPizHEZ.99