Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
World Health Organization: US cleanest air in G7
Comments
-
Yet you think politicians don't have a vested monetary interest in keeping stupid people ignorant to the climate.CuntWaffle said:
Good Lord you are so fucking stupid.2001400ex said:
Scientists have peer reviewed articles and accountability when they lie about shit. Politicians and political pundits make money off lying about shit and no one cares when they do.CuntWaffle said:
Lol right because scientists don't have some sort of agenda either.2001400ex said:
Southern prefers to believe politicians and political pundits over actual scientists.AZDuck said:
So all those climatologists and weather guys are just full of shit then. Got it.Southerndawg said:
It's a helluva lot more relevant that what you're concerned with. Particulate matter is real pollution that causes real problems and deserves our? serious attention. CO2 is not a pollutant. It is a trace gas, required for life as we know it on this planet. Concentrations vary by time of day and location but on average it makes up a "whopping" 0.040% of the atmosphere. Of that trace amount, human activities contribute approximately 3% of the total 0.040%, or approximately 0.0012%. "Anthropogenic" CO2 is neither a pollutant, nor a real concern.UWhuskytskeet said:
I'm not saying it isn't true, I'm saying it isn't relevant. Not polluting shit that gives you cancer is great, but what does that have to do with C02 emissions?doogie said:I could have just linked on the WHO report directly but I decided to use the Breitbart link instead just the trigger you
-
You don't get it, Republicans may be unilateral across the world in their denial of climate change, but ignore that and their campaign contributions, it's the climate scientists that are evil and corrupt.2001400ex said:
Yet you think politicians don't have a vested monetary interest in keeping stupid people ignorant to the climate.CuntWaffle said:
Good Lord you are so fucking stupid.2001400ex said:
Scientists have peer reviewed articles and accountability when they lie about shit. Politicians and political pundits make money off lying about shit and no one cares when they do.CuntWaffle said:
Lol right because scientists don't have some sort of agenda either.2001400ex said:
Southern prefers to believe politicians and political pundits over actual scientists.AZDuck said:
So all those climatologists and weather guys are just full of shit then. Got it.Southerndawg said:
It's a helluva lot more relevant that what you're concerned with. Particulate matter is real pollution that causes real problems and deserves our? serious attention. CO2 is not a pollutant. It is a trace gas, required for life as we know it on this planet. Concentrations vary by time of day and location but on average it makes up a "whopping" 0.040% of the atmosphere. Of that trace amount, human activities contribute approximately 3% of the total 0.040%, or approximately 0.0012%. "Anthropogenic" CO2 is neither a pollutant, nor a real concern.UWhuskytskeet said:
I'm not saying it isn't true, I'm saying it isn't relevant. Not polluting shit that gives you cancer is great, but what does that have to do with C02 emissions?doogie said:I could have just linked on the WHO report directly but I decided to use the Breitbart link instead just the trigger you
-
Fuck I'm stupid.UWhuskytskeet said:
You don't get it, Republicans may be unilateral across the world in their denial of climate change, but ignore that and their campaign contributions, it's the climate scientists that are evil and corrupt.2001400ex said:
Yet you think politicians don't have a vested monetary interest in keeping stupid people ignorant to the climate.CuntWaffle said:
Good Lord you are so fucking stupid.2001400ex said:
Scientists have peer reviewed articles and accountability when they lie about shit. Politicians and political pundits make money off lying about shit and no one cares when they do.CuntWaffle said:
Lol right because scientists don't have some sort of agenda either.2001400ex said:
Southern prefers to believe politicians and political pundits over actual scientists.AZDuck said:
So all those climatologists and weather guys are just full of shit then. Got it.Southerndawg said:
It's a helluva lot more relevant that what you're concerned with. Particulate matter is real pollution that causes real problems and deserves our? serious attention. CO2 is not a pollutant. It is a trace gas, required for life as we know it on this planet. Concentrations vary by time of day and location but on average it makes up a "whopping" 0.040% of the atmosphere. Of that trace amount, human activities contribute approximately 3% of the total 0.040%, or approximately 0.0012%. "Anthropogenic" CO2 is neither a pollutant, nor a real concern.UWhuskytskeet said:
I'm not saying it isn't true, I'm saying it isn't relevant. Not polluting shit that gives you cancer is great, but what does that have to do with C02 emissions?doogie said:I could have just linked on the WHO report directly but I decided to use the Breitbart link instead just the trigger you
-
Nobody has more cash than the government, much of it laundered through academia. But still we'll just pretend that science is about consensus and that there is one and there is an actual workable solution.
Low info leftard voters demand it -
Science is about improving our collective knowledge and making things better for humanity.RaceBannon said:Nobody has more cash than the government, much of it laundered through academia. But still we'll just pretend that science is about consensus and that there is one and there is an actual workable solution.
Low info leftard voters demand it
Naturally, Troomps hate science. -
I love science. That's why I know that anyone hinging an argument on consensus is fucking stupid.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Science is about improving our collective knowledge and making things better for humanity.RaceBannon said:Nobody has more cash than the government, much of it laundered through academia. But still we'll just pretend that science is about consensus and that there is one and there is an actual workable solution.
Low info leftard voters demand it
Naturally, Troomps hate science.
I also know that calling for trillions of dollars to be spent with no return measurable by any science is even more fucking stupid -
I agree regarding consensus. We should always be challenging assumptions with advanced research.RaceBannon said:
I love science. That's why I know that anyone hinging an argument on consensus is fucking stupid.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Science is about improving our collective knowledge and making things better for humanity.RaceBannon said:Nobody has more cash than the government, much of it laundered through academia. But still we'll just pretend that science is about consensus and that there is one and there is an actual workable solution.
Low info leftard voters demand it
Naturally, Troomps hate science.
I also know that calling for trillions of dollars to be spent with no return measurable by any science is even more fucking stupid
I'm not sure how voluntarily spending on money on reducing carbon output is inherently bad though. There's probably a lot of scientific and economic advancement that could come from this. -
At UCSB I lived with Material Science PhD students for a few years, and those guys soul purpose was to find a way to make solar energy efficient enough to actually sell. They fudge the Science a lot to get grant money. True story.2001400ex said:
Scientists have peer reviewed articles and accountability when they lie about shit. Politicians and political pundits make money off lying about shit and no one cares when they do.CuntWaffle said:
Lol right because scientists don't have some sort of agenda either.2001400ex said:
Southern prefers to believe politicians and political pundits over actual scientists.AZDuck said:
So all those climatologists and weather guys are just full of shit then. Got it.Southerndawg said:
It's a helluva lot more relevant that what you're concerned with. Particulate matter is real pollution that causes real problems and deserves our? serious attention. CO2 is not a pollutant. It is a trace gas, required for life as we know it on this planet. Concentrations vary by time of day and location but on average it makes up a "whopping" 0.040% of the atmosphere. Of that trace amount, human activities contribute approximately 3% of the total 0.040%, or approximately 0.0012%. "Anthropogenic" CO2 is neither a pollutant, nor a real concern.UWhuskytskeet said:
I'm not saying it isn't true, I'm saying it isn't relevant. Not polluting shit that gives you cancer is great, but what does that have to do with C02 emissions?doogie said:I could have just linked on the WHO report directly but I decided to use the Breitbart link instead just the trigger you
-
Voluntary is great and nothing Trump has done will stop thatTierbsHsotBoobs said:
I agree regarding consensus. We should always be challenging assumptions with advanced research.RaceBannon said:
I love science. That's why I know that anyone hinging an argument on consensus is fucking stupid.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Science is about improving our collective knowledge and making things better for humanity.RaceBannon said:Nobody has more cash than the government, much of it laundered through academia. But still we'll just pretend that science is about consensus and that there is one and there is an actual workable solution.
Low info leftard voters demand it
Naturally, Troomps hate science.
I also know that calling for trillions of dollars to be spent with no return measurable by any science is even more fucking stupid
I'm not sure how voluntarily spending on money on reducing carbon output is inherently bad though. There's probably a lot of scientific and economic advancement that could come from this.
But that doesn't get votes from the base - hondofs -
Lol that shit is photoshoppedPurpleJ said:
We need it to get colder. Ice age anyone?Pitchfork51 said:Is the environment shrinking or enlarging tittays?
I vote the throbber to chinvestigate.
