World Health Organization: US cleanest air in G7

PurpleJ

Pitchfork51 said:

Is the environment shrinking or enlarging tittays?

I vote the throbber to chinvestigate.

We need it to get colder. Ice age anyone?

2001400ex

AZDuck said:

Southerndawg said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

doogie said:

I could have just linked on the WHO report directly but I decided to use the Breitbart link instead just the trigger you

I'm not saying it isn't true, I'm saying it isn't relevant. Not polluting shit that gives you cancer is great, but what does that have to do with C02 emissions?

It's a helluva lot more relevant that what you're concerned with. Particulate matter is real pollution that causes real problems and deserves our? serious attention. CO2 is not a pollutant. It is a trace gas, required for life as we know it on this planet. Concentrations vary by time of day and location but on average it makes up a "whopping" 0.040% of the atmosphere. Of that trace amount, human activities contribute approximately 3% of the total 0.040%, or approximately 0.0012%. "Anthropogenic" CO2 is neither a pollutant, nor a real concern.

So all those climatologists and weather guys are just full of shit then. Got it.

Southern prefers to believe politicians and political pundits over actual scientists.

2001400ex

PurpleJ said:

Pitchfork51 said:

Is the environment shrinking or enlarging tittays?

I vote the throbber to chinvestigate.

We need it to get colder. Ice age anyone?

Ass too small.

Kaepsknee

AZDuck said:

Southerndawg said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

doogie said:

I could have just linked on the WHO report directly but I decided to use the Breitbart link instead just the trigger you

I'm not saying it isn't true, I'm saying it isn't relevant. Not polluting shit that gives you cancer is great, but what does that have to do with C02 emissions?

It's a helluva lot more relevant that what you're concerned with. Particulate matter is real pollution that causes real problems and deserves our? serious attention. CO2 is not a pollutant. It is a trace gas, required for life as we know it on this planet. Concentrations vary by time of day and location but on average it makes up a "whopping" 0.040% of the atmosphere. Of that trace amount, human activities contribute approximately 3% of the total 0.040%, or approximately 0.0012%. "Anthropogenic" CO2 is neither a pollutant, nor a real concern.

So all those climatologists and weather guys are just full of shit then. Got it.

Grants don't approve themselves.

Kaepsknee

2001400ex said:

AZDuck said:

Southerndawg said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

doogie said:

I could have just linked on the WHO report directly but I decided to use the Breitbart link instead just the trigger you

I'm not saying it isn't true, I'm saying it isn't relevant. Not polluting shit that gives you cancer is great, but what does that have to do with C02 emissions?

It's a helluva lot more relevant that what you're concerned with. Particulate matter is real pollution that causes real problems and deserves our? serious attention. CO2 is not a pollutant. It is a trace gas, required for life as we know it on this planet. Concentrations vary by time of day and location but on average it makes up a "whopping" 0.040% of the atmosphere. Of that trace amount, human activities contribute approximately 3% of the total 0.040%, or approximately 0.0012%. "Anthropogenic" CO2 is neither a pollutant, nor a real concern.

So all those climatologists and weather guys are just full of shit then. Got it.

Southern prefers to believe politicians and political pundits over actual scientists.

When you have Hondo.....

UWhuskytskeet

salemcoog said:

AZDuck said:

Southerndawg said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

doogie said:

I could have just linked on the WHO report directly but I decided to use the Breitbart link instead just the trigger you

I'm not saying it isn't true, I'm saying it isn't relevant. Not polluting shit that gives you cancer is great, but what does that have to do with C02 emissions?

It's a helluva lot more relevant that what you're concerned with. Particulate matter is real pollution that causes real problems and deserves our? serious attention. CO2 is not a pollutant. It is a trace gas, required for life as we know it on this planet. Concentrations vary by time of day and location but on average it makes up a "whopping" 0.040% of the atmosphere. Of that trace amount, human activities contribute approximately 3% of the total 0.040%, or approximately 0.0012%. "Anthropogenic" CO2 is neither a pollutant, nor a real concern.

So all those climatologists and weather guys are just full of shit then. Got it.

Grants don't approve themselves.

Did you get that from Facebook too?

CuntWaffle

2001400ex said:

AZDuck said:

Southerndawg said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

doogie said:

I could have just linked on the WHO report directly but I decided to use the Breitbart link instead just the trigger you

I'm not saying it isn't true, I'm saying it isn't relevant. Not polluting shit that gives you cancer is great, but what does that have to do with C02 emissions?

It's a helluva lot more relevant that what you're concerned with. Particulate matter is real pollution that causes real problems and deserves our? serious attention. CO2 is not a pollutant. It is a trace gas, required for life as we know it on this planet. Concentrations vary by time of day and location but on average it makes up a "whopping" 0.040% of the atmosphere. Of that trace amount, human activities contribute approximately 3% of the total 0.040%, or approximately 0.0012%. "Anthropogenic" CO2 is neither a pollutant, nor a real concern.

So all those climatologists and weather guys are just full of shit then. Got it.

Southern prefers to believe politicians and political pundits over actual scientists.

Lol right because scientists don't have some sort of agenda either.

2001400ex

CuntWaffle said:

2001400ex said:

AZDuck said:

Southerndawg said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

doogie said:

I could have just linked on the WHO report directly but I decided to use the Breitbart link instead just the trigger you

I'm not saying it isn't true, I'm saying it isn't relevant. Not polluting shit that gives you cancer is great, but what does that have to do with C02 emissions?

It's a helluva lot more relevant that what you're concerned with. Particulate matter is real pollution that causes real problems and deserves our? serious attention. CO2 is not a pollutant. It is a trace gas, required for life as we know it on this planet. Concentrations vary by time of day and location but on average it makes up a "whopping" 0.040% of the atmosphere. Of that trace amount, human activities contribute approximately 3% of the total 0.040%, or approximately 0.0012%. "Anthropogenic" CO2 is neither a pollutant, nor a real concern.

So all those climatologists and weather guys are just full of shit then. Got it.

Southern prefers to believe politicians and political pundits over actual scientists.

Lol right because scientists don't have some sort of agenda either.

Scientists have peer reviewed articles and accountability when they lie about shit. Politicians and political pundits make money off lying about shit and no one cares when they do.

CuntWaffle

2001400ex said:

CuntWaffle said:

2001400ex said:

AZDuck said:

Southerndawg said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

doogie said:

I could have just linked on the WHO report directly but I decided to use the Breitbart link instead just the trigger you

I'm not saying it isn't true, I'm saying it isn't relevant. Not polluting shit that gives you cancer is great, but what does that have to do with C02 emissions?

It's a helluva lot more relevant that what you're concerned with. Particulate matter is real pollution that causes real problems and deserves our? serious attention. CO2 is not a pollutant. It is a trace gas, required for life as we know it on this planet. Concentrations vary by time of day and location but on average it makes up a "whopping" 0.040% of the atmosphere. Of that trace amount, human activities contribute approximately 3% of the total 0.040%, or approximately 0.0012%. "Anthropogenic" CO2 is neither a pollutant, nor a real concern.

So all those climatologists and weather guys are just full of shit then. Got it.

Southern prefers to believe politicians and political pundits over actual scientists.

Lol right because scientists don't have some sort of agenda either.

Scientists have peer reviewed articles and accountability when they lie about shit. Politicians and political pundits make money off lying about shit and no one cares when they do.

Good Lord you are so fucking stupid.

UWhuskytskeet

CuntWaffle said:

2001400ex said:

CuntWaffle said:

2001400ex said:

AZDuck said:

Southerndawg said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

doogie said:

I could have just linked on the WHO report directly but I decided to use the Breitbart link instead just the trigger you

I'm not saying it isn't true, I'm saying it isn't relevant. Not polluting shit that gives you cancer is great, but what does that have to do with C02 emissions?

It's a helluva lot more relevant that what you're concerned with. Particulate matter is real pollution that causes real problems and deserves our? serious attention. CO2 is not a pollutant. It is a trace gas, required for life as we know it on this planet. Concentrations vary by time of day and location but on average it makes up a "whopping" 0.040% of the atmosphere. Of that trace amount, human activities contribute approximately 3% of the total 0.040%, or approximately 0.0012%. "Anthropogenic" CO2 is neither a pollutant, nor a real concern.

So all those climatologists and weather guys are just full of shit then. Got it.

Southern prefers to believe politicians and political pundits over actual scientists.

Lol right because scientists don't have some sort of agenda either.

Scientists have peer reviewed articles and accountability when they lie about shit. Politicians and political pundits make money off lying about shit and no one cares when they do.

Good Lord you are so fucking stupid.

Great rebuttal as always.