I could have just linked on the WHO report directly but I decided to use the Breitbart link instead just the trigger you
I'm not saying it isn't true, I'm saying it isn't relevant. Not polluting shit that gives you cancer is great, but what does that have to do with C02 emissions?
It's a helluva lot more relevant that what you're concerned with. Particulate matter is real pollution that causes real problems and deserves our? serious attention. CO2 is not a pollutant. It is a trace gas, required for life as we know it on this planet. Concentrations vary by time of day and location but on average it makes up a "whopping" 0.040% of the atmosphere. Of that trace amount, human activities contribute approximately 3% of the total 0.040%, or approximately 0.0012%. "Anthropogenic" CO2 is neither a pollutant, nor a real concern.
So all those climatologists and weather guys are just full of shit then. Got it.
Southern prefers to believe politicians and political pundits over actual scientists.
Lol right because scientists don't have some sort of agenda either.
Scientists have peer reviewed articles and accountability when they lie about shit. Politicians and political pundits make money off lying about shit and no one cares when they do.
Good Lord you are so fucking stupid.
Yet you think politicians don't have a vested monetary interest in keeping stupid people ignorant to the climate.
You don't get it, Republicans may be unilateral across the world in their denial of climate change, but ignore that and their campaign contributions, it's the climate scientists that are evil and corrupt.
WE'VE GOT TO DO SOMETHING!!!!!!!!
Noone is denying that there is climate change. The question conservatives have is, So what? None of the doomsday predictions such as sea level rise or the SE being pummeled by Cat 12 Hurricanes every year have proven true. Other than alkaline levels in the Sea, I'm not sure what the problem is. And I'm not sure anyone can tie that to climate change even 81%.
I like clean air and clean water. Can I keep them?
Nobody has more cash than the government, much of it laundered through academia. But still we'll just pretend that science is about consensus and that there is one and there is an actual workable solution.
Low info leftard voters demand it
Science is about improving our collective knowledge and making things better for humanity.
Naturally, Troomps hate science.
Nice sound bite but that's not what science is about at all. It's about discovery and developing understanding.
Anthropogenic global warming is not so much a science as it is a religion preached by political activists, politicians and "researchers" tapping into near boundless streams of funding aimed at supporting the religion and it's political causes. AGW faithful describe skeptics as "climate change deniers" and have a simple faith test, "do you believe in climate change?", wherein they're really asking whether or not you believe humans are causing the planet to heat uncontrollably. It's nonsense.
The climate is always changing, the "science is settled" on that point, but that is where the so called "consensus" ends. The planet has been much hotter and much cooler than it is currently and has been both with much higher levels of atmospheric CO2. Global temperature variations are driven by a number things including variations in solar radiation, orbital path, ocean temperatures, atmospheric water vapor, volcanic activity, etc. Scientists agree on these things, but they don't agree on the significance of human activity.
That's not true. There is a consensus that humans are at least partly responsible.
The stupid thing is. Even if all the world scientists are wrong on global warming, the worst case scenario is we have cleaner air. Seriously. That's why I don't get why the regressives are so passionate about denying climate change.
Because it's not worth losing another half trillion dollars in pork for "green energy" startups, that's why. And we have clean air almost everywhere in this great Country of ours. except where the Progressives are that make policy.
I could have just linked on the WHO report directly but I decided to use the Breitbart link instead just the trigger you
I'm not saying it isn't true, I'm saying it isn't relevant. Not polluting shit that gives you cancer is great, but what does that have to do with C02 emissions?
It's a helluva lot more relevant that what you're concerned with. Particulate matter is real pollution that causes real problems and deserves our? serious attention. CO2 is not a pollutant. It is a trace gas, required for life as we know it on this planet. Concentrations vary by time of day and location but on average it makes up a "whopping" 0.040% of the atmosphere. Of that trace amount, human activities contribute approximately 3% of the total 0.040%, or approximately 0.0012%. "Anthropogenic" CO2 is neither a pollutant, nor a real concern.
So all those climatologists and weather guys are just full of shit then. Got it.
Southern prefers to believe politicians and political pundits over actual scientists.
Lol right because scientists don't have some sort of agenda either.
Scientists have peer reviewed articles and accountability when they lie about shit. Politicians and political pundits make money off lying about shit and no one cares when they do.
Good Lord you are so fucking stupid.
Yet you think politicians don't have a vested monetary interest in keeping stupid people ignorant to the climate.
You don't get it, Republicans may be unilateral across the world in their denial of climate change, but ignore that and their campaign contributions, it's the climate scientists that are evil and corrupt.
WE'VE GOT TO DO SOMETHING!!!!!!!!
Noone is denying that there is climate change. The question conservatives have is, So what? None of the doomsday predictions such as sea level rise or the SE being pummeled by Cat 12 Hurricanes every year have proven true. Other than alkaline levels in the Sea, I'm not sure what the problem is. And I'm not sure anyone can tie that to climate change even 81%.
I like clean air and clean water. Can I keep them?
Do you like driving your car? Do you like your Apple products made in stinking dirty China?
Do you like Gladiator movies?
America leads the way in clean energy and manufacturing to meet the needs of 300 million people who are hooked on a great way of life. Companies will continue to innovate to meet market demands for both product and cleanliness. Accords and taxes and all the fucking whining are just bull shit.
I have no problem with holding people and companies accountable for their mark on the earth. I do have an issue with people that use that as another Stalin money grab.
Nobody has more cash than the government, much of it laundered through academia. But still we'll just pretend that science is about consensus and that there is one and there is an actual workable solution.
Low info leftard voters demand it
Science is about improving our collective knowledge and making things better for humanity.
Naturally, Troomps hate science.
Nice sound bite but that's not what science is about at all. It's about discovery and developing understanding.
Anthropogenic global warming is not so much a science as it is a religion preached by political activists, politicians and "researchers" tapping into near boundless streams of funding aimed at supporting the religion and it's political causes. AGW faithful describe skeptics as "climate change deniers" and have a simple faith test, "do you believe in climate change?", wherein they're really asking whether or not you believe humans are causing the planet to heat uncontrollably. It's nonsense.
The climate is always changing, the "science is settled" on that point, but that is where the so called "consensus" ends. The planet has been much hotter and much cooler than it is currently and has been both with much higher levels of atmospheric CO2. Global temperature variations are driven by a number things including variations in solar radiation, orbital path, ocean temperatures, atmospheric water vapor, volcanic activity, etc. Scientists agree on these things, but they don't agree on the significance of human activity.
Except you conveniently forget to mentioning the post industrial revolution spike in CO2 which is the smoking gun for human impact. It is a pretty clear cause and effect and comes from the same ice core data that your basing your argument on.
Except it's not a smoking gun, nor a clear cause and effect. Correlation does not equal causation. The planet has been in a natural warming cycle since the end of the last little ice age, and there is evidence to suggest that CO2 rises are more a function of natural warming than the other way around.
Nobody has more cash than the government, much of it laundered through academia. But still we'll just pretend that science is about consensus and that there is one and there is an actual workable solution.
Low info leftard voters demand it
Science is about improving our collective knowledge and making things better for humanity.
Naturally, Troomps hate science.
Nice sound bite but that's not what science is about at all. It's about discovery and developing understanding.
Anthropogenic global warming is not so much a science as it is a religion preached by political activists, politicians and "researchers" tapping into near boundless streams of funding aimed at supporting the religion and it's political causes. AGW faithful describe skeptics as "climate change deniers" and have a simple faith test, "do you believe in climate change?", wherein they're really asking whether or not you believe humans are causing the planet to heat uncontrollably. It's nonsense.
The climate is always changing, the "science is settled" on that point, but that is where the so called "consensus" ends. The planet has been much hotter and much cooler than it is currently and has been both with much higher levels of atmospheric CO2. Global temperature variations are driven by a number things including variations in solar radiation, orbital path, ocean temperatures, atmospheric water vapor, volcanic activity, etc. Scientists agree on these things, but they don't agree on the significance of human activity.
Except you conveniently forget to mentioning the post industrial revolution spike in CO2 which is the smoking gun for human impact. It is a pretty clear cause and effect and comes from the same ice core data that your basing your argument on.
Except it's not a smoking gun, nor a clear cause and effect. Correlation does not equal causation. The planet has been in a natural warming cycle since the end of the last little ice age, and there is evidence to suggest that CO2 rises are more a function of natural warming than the other way around.
Is this actual scientific evidence or shit tier blogosphere evidence?
Nobody has more cash than the government, much of it laundered through academia. But still we'll just pretend that science is about consensus and that there is one and there is an actual workable solution.
Low info leftard voters demand it
Science is about improving our collective knowledge and making things better for humanity.
Naturally, Troomps hate science.
Nice sound bite but that's not what science is about at all. It's about discovery and developing understanding.
Anthropogenic global warming is not so much a science as it is a religion preached by political activists, politicians and "researchers" tapping into near boundless streams of funding aimed at supporting the religion and it's political causes. AGW faithful describe skeptics as "climate change deniers" and have a simple faith test, "do you believe in climate change?", wherein they're really asking whether or not you believe humans are causing the planet to heat uncontrollably. It's nonsense.
The climate is always changing, the "science is settled" on that point, but that is where the so called "consensus" ends. The planet has been much hotter and much cooler than it is currently and has been both with much higher levels of atmospheric CO2. Global temperature variations are driven by a number things including variations in solar radiation, orbital path, ocean temperatures, atmospheric water vapor, volcanic activity, etc. Scientists agree on these things, but they don't agree on the significance of human activity.
That's not true. There is a consensus that humans are at least partly responsible.
The stupid thing is. Even if all the world scientists are wrong on global warming, the worst case scenario is we have cleaner air. Seriously. That's why I don't get why the regressives are so passionate about denying climate change.
Because it's not worth losing another half trillion dollars in pork for "green energy" startups, that's why. And we have clean air almost everywhere in this great Country of ours. except where the Progressives are that make policy.
Another half trillion? When did we? spend the first half trillion?
Clean energy is coming regardless of global warming. I'm not sure if you've heard, but fossil fuels are finite.
Nobody has more cash than the government, much of it laundered through academia. But still we'll just pretend that science is about consensus and that there is one and there is an actual workable solution.
Low info leftard voters demand it
Science is about improving our collective knowledge and making things better for humanity.
Naturally, Troomps hate science.
Nice sound bite but that's not what science is about at all. It's about discovery and developing understanding.
Anthropogenic global warming is not so much a science as it is a religion preached by political activists, politicians and "researchers" tapping into near boundless streams of funding aimed at supporting the religion and it's political causes. AGW faithful describe skeptics as "climate change deniers" and have a simple faith test, "do you believe in climate change?", wherein they're really asking whether or not you believe humans are causing the planet to heat uncontrollably. It's nonsense.
The climate is always changing, the "science is settled" on that point, but that is where the so called "consensus" ends. The planet has been much hotter and much cooler than it is currently and has been both with much higher levels of atmospheric CO2. Global temperature variations are driven by a number things including variations in solar radiation, orbital path, ocean temperatures, atmospheric water vapor, volcanic activity, etc. Scientists agree on these things, but they don't agree on the significance of human activity.
That's not true. There is a consensus that humans are at least partly responsible.
The stupid thing is. Even if all the world scientists are wrong on global warming, the worst case scenario is we have cleaner air. Seriously. That's why I don't get why the regressives are so passionate about denying climate change.
Because it's not worth losing another half trillion dollars in pork for "green energy" startups, that's why. And we have clean air almost everywhere in this great Country of ours. except where the Progressives are that make policy.
Another half trillion? When did we? spend the first half trillion?
Clean energy is coming regardless of global warming. I'm not sure if you've heard, but fossil fuels are finite.
I'm not going to work your Google for you. 60 Minutes did quite a story on it 3 or 4 years ago and the only company that didn't go banko or get snapped up by a Chinese business for half a penny on the dollar is Tesla.
Nobody has more cash than the government, much of it laundered through academia. But still we'll just pretend that science is about consensus and that there is one and there is an actual workable solution.
Low info leftard voters demand it
Science is about improving our collective knowledge and making things better for humanity.
Naturally, Troomps hate science.
Nice sound bite but that's not what science is about at all. It's about discovery and developing understanding.
Anthropogenic global warming is not so much a science as it is a religion preached by political activists, politicians and "researchers" tapping into near boundless streams of funding aimed at supporting the religion and it's political causes. AGW faithful describe skeptics as "climate change deniers" and have a simple faith test, "do you believe in climate change?", wherein they're really asking whether or not you believe humans are causing the planet to heat uncontrollably. It's nonsense.
The climate is always changing, the "science is settled" on that point, but that is where the so called "consensus" ends. The planet has been much hotter and much cooler than it is currently and has been both with much higher levels of atmospheric CO2. Global temperature variations are driven by a number things including variations in solar radiation, orbital path, ocean temperatures, atmospheric water vapor, volcanic activity, etc. Scientists agree on these things, but they don't agree on the significance of human activity.
Except you conveniently forget to mentioning the post industrial revolution spike in CO2 which is the smoking gun for human impact. It is a pretty clear cause and effect and comes from the same ice core data that your basing your argument on.
Except it's not a smoking gun, nor a clear cause and effect. Correlation does not equal causation. The planet has been in a natural warming cycle since the end of the last little ice age, and there is evidence to suggest that CO2 rises are more a function of natural warming than the other way around.
Is this actual scientific evidence or shit tier blogosphere evidence?
Nobody has more cash than the government, much of it laundered through academia. But still we'll just pretend that science is about consensus and that there is one and there is an actual workable solution.
Low info leftard voters demand it
Science is about improving our collective knowledge and making things better for humanity.
Naturally, Troomps hate science.
Nice sound bite but that's not what science is about at all. It's about discovery and developing understanding.
Anthropogenic global warming is not so much a science as it is a religion preached by political activists, politicians and "researchers" tapping into near boundless streams of funding aimed at supporting the religion and it's political causes. AGW faithful describe skeptics as "climate change deniers" and have a simple faith test, "do you believe in climate change?", wherein they're really asking whether or not you believe humans are causing the planet to heat uncontrollably. It's nonsense.
The climate is always changing, the "science is settled" on that point, but that is where the so called "consensus" ends. The planet has been much hotter and much cooler than it is currently and has been both with much higher levels of atmospheric CO2. Global temperature variations are driven by a number things including variations in solar radiation, orbital path, ocean temperatures, atmospheric water vapor, volcanic activity, etc. Scientists agree on these things, but they don't agree on the significance of human activity.
That's not true. There is a consensus that humans are at least partly responsible.
The stupid thing is. Even if all the world scientists are wrong on global warming, the worst case scenario is we have cleaner air. Seriously. That's why I don't get why the regressives are so passionate about denying climate change.
Because it's not worth losing another half trillion dollars in pork for "green energy" startups, that's why. And we have clean air almost everywhere in this great Country of ours. except where the Progressives are that make policy.
Another half trillion? When did we? spend the first half trillion?
Clean energy is coming regardless of global warming. I'm not sure if you've heard, but fossil fuels are finite.
I'm not going to work your Google for you. 60 Minutes did quite a story on it 3 or 4 years ago and the only company that didn't go banko or get snapped up by a Chinese business for half a penny on the dollar is Tesla.
Nobody has more cash than the government, much of it laundered through academia. But still we'll just pretend that science is about consensus and that there is one and there is an actual workable solution.
Low info leftard voters demand it
Science is about improving our collective knowledge and making things better for humanity.
Naturally, Troomps hate science.
Nice sound bite but that's not what science is about at all. It's about discovery and developing understanding.
Anthropogenic global warming is not so much a science as it is a religion preached by political activists, politicians and "researchers" tapping into near boundless streams of funding aimed at supporting the religion and it's political causes. AGW faithful describe skeptics as "climate change deniers" and have a simple faith test, "do you believe in climate change?", wherein they're really asking whether or not you believe humans are causing the planet to heat uncontrollably. It's nonsense.
The climate is always changing, the "science is settled" on that point, but that is where the so called "consensus" ends. The planet has been much hotter and much cooler than it is currently and has been both with much higher levels of atmospheric CO2. Global temperature variations are driven by a number things including variations in solar radiation, orbital path, ocean temperatures, atmospheric water vapor, volcanic activity, etc. Scientists agree on these things, but they don't agree on the significance of human activity.
Except you conveniently forget to mentioning the post industrial revolution spike in CO2 which is the smoking gun for human impact. It is a pretty clear cause and effect and comes from the same ice core data that your basing your argument on.
Except it's not a smoking gun, nor a clear cause and effect. Correlation does not equal causation. The planet has been in a natural warming cycle since the end of the last little ice age, and there is evidence to suggest that CO2 rises are more a function of natural warming than the other way around.
Is this actual scientific evidence or shit tier blogosphere evidence?
I could have just linked on the WHO report directly but I decided to use the Breitbart link instead just the trigger you
I'm not saying it isn't true, I'm saying it isn't relevant. Not polluting shit that gives you cancer is great, but what does that have to do with C02 emissions?
It's a helluva lot more relevant that what you're concerned with. Particulate matter is real pollution that causes real problems and deserves our? serious attention. CO2 is not a pollutant. It is a trace gas, required for life as we know it on this planet. Concentrations vary by time of day and location but on average it makes up a "whopping" 0.040% of the atmosphere. Of that trace amount, human activities contribute approximately 3% of the total 0.040%, or approximately 0.0012%. "Anthropogenic" CO2 is neither a pollutant, nor a real concern.
So all those climatologists and weather guys are just full of shit then. Got it.
Southern prefers to believe politicians and political pundits over actual scientists.
Lol right because scientists don't have some sort of agenda either.
Scientists have peer reviewed articles and accountability when they lie about shit. Politicians and political pundits make money off lying about shit and no one cares when they do.
Good Lord you are so fucking stupid.
Yet you think politicians don't have a vested monetary interest in keeping stupid people ignorant to the climate.
You don't get it, Republicans may be unilateral across the world in their denial of climate change, but ignore that and their campaign contributions, it's the climate scientists that are evil and corrupt.
WE'VE GOT TO DO SOMETHING!!!!!!!!
Noone is denying that there is climate change. The question conservatives have is, So what? None of the doomsday predictions such as sea level rise or the SE being pummeled by Cat 12 Hurricanes every year have proven true. Other than alkaline levels in the Sea, I'm not sure what the problem is. And I'm not sure anyone can tie that to climate change even 81%.
I like clean air and clean water. Can I keep them?
Do you like driving your car? Do you like your Apple products made in stinking dirty China?
Do you like Gladiator movies?
America leads the way in clean energy and manufacturing to meet the needs of 300 million people who are hooked on a great way of life. Companies will continue to innovate to meet market demands for both product and cleanliness. Accords and taxes and all the fucking whining are just bull shit.
I have no problem with holding people and companies accountable for their mark on the earth. I do have an issue with people that use that as another Stalin money grab.
This. And for the record, I'm all in when it comes to keeping the environment as free as possible of real pollutants.
Nobody has more cash than the government, much of it laundered through academia. But still we'll just pretend that science is about consensus and that there is one and there is an actual workable solution.
Low info leftard voters demand it
Science is about improving our collective knowledge and making things better for humanity.
Naturally, Troomps hate science.
Nice sound bite but that's not what science is about at all. It's about discovery and developing understanding.
Anthropogenic global warming is not so much a science as it is a religion preached by political activists, politicians and "researchers" tapping into near boundless streams of funding aimed at supporting the religion and it's political causes. AGW faithful describe skeptics as "climate change deniers" and have a simple faith test, "do you believe in climate change?", wherein they're really asking whether or not you believe humans are causing the planet to heat uncontrollably. It's nonsense.
The climate is always changing, the "science is settled" on that point, but that is where the so called "consensus" ends. The planet has been much hotter and much cooler than it is currently and has been both with much higher levels of atmospheric CO2. Global temperature variations are driven by a number things including variations in solar radiation, orbital path, ocean temperatures, atmospheric water vapor, volcanic activity, etc. Scientists agree on these things, but they don't agree on the significance of human activity.
That's not true. There is a consensus that humans are at least partly responsible.
The stupid thing is. Even if all the world scientists are wrong on global warming, the worst case scenario is we have cleaner air. Seriously. That's why I don't get why the regressives are so passionate about denying climate change.
Because it's not worth losing another half trillion dollars in pork for "green energy" startups, that's why. And we have clean air almost everywhere in this great Country of ours. except where the Progressives are that make policy.
Another half trillion? When did we? spend the first half trillion?
Clean energy is coming regardless of global warming. I'm not sure if you've heard, but fossil fuels are finite.
If its coming it doesn't need tax dollars. Money finds money
Peak oil freaks are already about 20 years off of their prediction of when we run out. Just another fear job.
We find more oil everyday and gas is so plentiful you can hardly avoid it.
Nobody has more cash than the government, much of it laundered through academia. But still we'll just pretend that science is about consensus and that there is one and there is an actual workable solution.
Low info leftard voters demand it
Science is about improving our collective knowledge and making things better for humanity.
Naturally, Troomps hate science.
Nice sound bite but that's not what science is about at all. It's about discovery and developing understanding.
Anthropogenic global warming is not so much a science as it is a religion preached by political activists, politicians and "researchers" tapping into near boundless streams of funding aimed at supporting the religion and it's political causes. AGW faithful describe skeptics as "climate change deniers" and have a simple faith test, "do you believe in climate change?", wherein they're really asking whether or not you believe humans are causing the planet to heat uncontrollably. It's nonsense.
The climate is always changing, the "science is settled" on that point, but that is where the so called "consensus" ends. The planet has been much hotter and much cooler than it is currently and has been both with much higher levels of atmospheric CO2. Global temperature variations are driven by a number things including variations in solar radiation, orbital path, ocean temperatures, atmospheric water vapor, volcanic activity, etc. Scientists agree on these things, but they don't agree on the significance of human activity.
That's not true. There is a consensus that humans are at least partly responsible.
The stupid thing is. Even if all the world scientists are wrong on global warming, the worst case scenario is we have cleaner air. Seriously. That's why I don't get why the regressives are so passionate about denying climate change.
Because it's not worth losing another half trillion dollars in pork for "green energy" startups, that's why. And we have clean air almost everywhere in this great Country of ours. except where the Progressives are that make policy.
Another half trillion? When did we? spend the first half trillion?
Clean energy is coming regardless of global warming. I'm not sure if you've heard, but fossil fuels are finite.
If its coming it doesn't need tax dollars. Money finds money
Peak oil freaks are already about 20 years off of their prediction of when we run out. Just another fear job.
We find more oil everyday and gas is so plentiful you can hardly avoid it.
Comments
Do you like Gladiator movies?
America leads the way in clean energy and manufacturing to meet the needs of 300 million people who are hooked on a great way of life. Companies will continue to innovate to meet market demands for both product and cleanliness. Accords and taxes and all the fucking whining are just bull shit.
I have no problem with holding people and companies accountable for their mark on the earth. I do have an issue with people that use that as another Stalin money grab.
Clean energy is coming regardless of global warming. I'm not sure if you've heard, but fossil fuels are finite.
Peak oil freaks are already about 20 years off of their prediction of when we run out. Just another fear job.
We find more oil everyday and gas is so plentiful you can hardly avoid it.