You (along with the Powerline guy) confusing nominal and real GDP rates? Nominal get even higher with all that inflation...
As I originally posted Obama conveniently assumed ~4.5% (err...4.6% according to your table) real GDP growth rates regularly in his budgets and the HondoFSs of the world didn't scream and there is literally zero mention of it in any of the media's description of his budgets. Trump proposes a 3% real GDP growth that doesn't even occur for several years and the same people scream bloody murder.
You (along with the Powerline guy) confusing nominal and real GDP rates? Nominal get even higher with all that inflation...
As I originally posted Obama conveniently assumed ~4.5% (err...4.6% according to your table) real GDP growth rates regularly in his budgets and the HondoFSs of the world didn't scream and there is literally zero mention of it in any of the media's description of his budgets. Trump proposes a 3% real GDP growth that doesn't even occur for several years and the same people scream bloody murder.
Makes sense...
I'm not confusing it, almost everyone that reports on growth rates uses real, unless you are trying to obfuscate a point.
The reason no one objected to Obama's assumptions is that they were directly in line with the CBO projections. Trump's are 50% higher.
You (along with the Powerline guy) confusing nominal and real GDP rates? Nominal get even higher with all that inflation...
As I originally posted Obama conveniently assumed ~4.5% (err...4.6% according to your table) real GDP growth rates regularly in his budgets and the HondoFSs of the world didn't scream and there is literally zero mention of it in any of the media's description of his budgets. Trump proposes a 3% real GDP growth that doesn't even occur for several years and the same people scream bloody murder.
Makes sense...
I'm not confusing it, almost everyone that reports on growth rates uses real, unless you are trying to obfuscate a point.
The reason no one objected to Obama's assumptions is that they were directly in line with the CBO projections. Trump's are 50% higher.
More proof the CBO is as useless as Ty on the sidelines
You (along with the Powerline guy) confusing nominal and real GDP rates? Nominal get even higher with all that inflation...
As I originally posted Obama conveniently assumed ~4.5% (err...4.6% according to your table) real GDP growth rates regularly in his budgets and the HondoFSs of the world didn't scream and there is literally zero mention of it in any of the media's description of his budgets. Trump proposes a 3% real GDP growth that doesn't even occur for several years and the same people scream bloody murder.
Makes sense...
I'm not confusing it, almost everyone that reports on growth rates uses real, unless you are trying to obfuscate a point.
The reason no one objected to Obama's assumptions is that they were directly in line with the CBO projections. Trump's are 50% higher.
More proof the CBO is as useless as Ty on the sidelines
Comments
https://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2015/09/28/donald-trump-says-tax-plan-could-lift-gdp-growth-to-6/
Yes
Saved you the trouble of answering
Do you know how many Obama sent up that were DOA are you just going to keep being a cliche?
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2015/03/by-its-own-criteria-the-obama-administration-is-an-economic-failure.php
I remember all your threads you started calling him crazy for it...
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BUDGET-2010-SUMMARY/pdf/BUDGET-2010-SUMMARY.pdf
Go to Page 30.
Where is he getting 6%?
As I originally posted Obama conveniently assumed ~4.5% (err...4.6% according to your table) real GDP growth rates regularly in his budgets and the HondoFSs of the world didn't scream and there is literally zero mention of it in any of the media's description of his budgets. Trump proposes a 3% real GDP growth that doesn't even occur for several years and the same people scream bloody murder.
Makes sense...
The reason no one objected to Obama's assumptions is that they were directly in line with the CBO projections. Trump's are 50% higher.