Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

What a nice change of pace it is

13567

Comments

  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    Yep, absolutely. I think the "loser" label is really going to shake things up in the Moozlum world. ISIS, I'm sure, is really second-guessing their mission in the wake of that speech.

    Loser
    *thud*
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,865 Founders Club

    Loser is about the strongest insult Trump has. He's a quarter brain in that regard

    Fixed. You give him too much credit.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,414

    Yep, absolutely. I think the "loser" label is really going to shake things up in the Moozlum world. ISIS, I'm sure, is really second-guessing their mission in the wake of that speech.

    Loser
    OUCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,066 Founders Club

    Yep, absolutely. I think the "loser" label is really going to shake things up in the Moozlum world. ISIS, I'm sure, is really second-guessing their mission in the wake of that speech.

    Loser
    *thud*
    Loser
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    Who is the biglyist funder of radical islamic terrorism?

    Iran?

    Saudi Arabia?

    Staff?
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    Yep, absolutely. I think the "loser" label is really going to shake things up in the Moozlum world. ISIS, I'm sure, is really second-guessing their mission in the wake of that speech.

    Loser
    *thud*
    Loser
    *thud*
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,358 Founders Club

    Dude61 said:

    The Politics of Islam has far more in common with the Progressive Left than you realize. It is why they are so sympathetic to each other.

    No they have nothing in common politically. The issue with the progressive left vis-a-vis Islamic culture is their apologist attitude towards it. Either stand up for western liberal values or don't; don't given them a pass for the sake of diversity or post colonial guilt bullshit.
    That's one issue, I totally agree. However, progressivism is not rooted in classical western liberalism, and it's fair to say that progressive attitudes towards strong centralized government are akin to those Islam harbors towards strong theocracies. Both believe the masses need "help" in making decisions on their own and share a belief in control of the masses by a few in power. I agree with you, this is not why they're sympathetic to one another, but it's true nonetheless.
    I am sure you and I would find plenty of areas of agreement in criticizing the progressive left and overreach by the federal government, but I would argue that there's nothing necessary incompatible between strong central government and classical western liberal principles. How many times in the history of the Republic did the federal government have to defend life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness from tyrannies of the majority at the state and local level? Hell, our own Constitution came about as a result of to weak of a centralized government.
    Classical western liberal principles are based on limited government, with a recognition that some is necessary for the very purposes you mention. Progressives go far beyond the limited government model of classical liberalism and in fact have a disdain for the constitution as it limits what they can do.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    Dude61 said:

    The Politics of Islam has far more in common with the Progressive Left than you realize. It is why they are so sympathetic to each other.

    No they have nothing in common politically. The issue with the progressive left vis-a-vis Islamic culture is their apologist attitude towards it. Either stand up for western liberal values or don't; don't given them a pass for the sake of diversity or post colonial guilt bullshit.
    That's one issue, I totally agree. However, progressivism is not rooted in classical western liberalism, and it's fair to say that progressive attitudes towards strong centralized government are akin to those Islam harbors towards strong theocracies. Both believe the masses need "help" in making decisions on their own and share a belief in control of the masses by a few in power. I agree with you, this is not why they're sympathetic to one another, but it's true nonetheless.
    I am sure you and I would find plenty of areas of agreement in criticizing the progressive left and overreach by the federal government, but I would argue that there's nothing necessary incompatible between strong central government and classical western liberal principles. How many times in the history of the Republic did the federal government have to defend life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness from tyrannies of the majority at the state and local level? Hell, our own Constitution came about as a result of to weak of a centralized government.
    Classical western liberal principles are based on limited government, with a recognition that some is necessary for the very purposes you mention. Progressives go far beyond the limited government model of classical liberalism and in fact have a disdain for the constitution as it limits what they can do.
    image