I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned
Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?
Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
I didn't mention the government
Then it's not banning.
Private people can ban.
If you mean, threaten to remove their financial support to companies that advertise on a TV personality that is peddling 3rd-rate conspiracy theories that the network on which said TV personality appears has retracted, well, that kinda sounds like sour grapes to me.
Sounds like you want to ban voices you don't agree with, Kim
I'm sure Sean can get his message out - he's made enough money over the years, and he has name recognition, and lemming-like followers (apparently) who support him even when he is overwhelmingly wrong... so I'm not too worried about him.
I can't help it if one group's boycott agitation is successful where another one fails. It's the free market, baby, whattaryougonnado? I mean, I suppose FOX can stand by their man, come what may.
I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned
Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?
Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
I didn't mention the government
Then it's not banning.
Private people can ban.
If you mean, threaten to remove their financial support to companies that advertise on a TV personality that is peddling 3rd-rate conspiracy theories that the network on which said TV personality appears has retracted, well, that kinda sounds like sour grapes to me.
Sounds like you want to ban voices you don't agree with, Kim
Says the guy cheering on a politician that stifles voices with a body slam.
Actually I called the reporter a pussy but let's not quibble.
Pretty sure if Hannity got body slammed the reaction would be different here
I always appreciate a good body slam. It could be Hannity or a nerdy lib reporter. Doesn't matter I will laugh either way. You can enjoy the body slam while still thinking the body slammer was acting out of line.
I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned
Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?
Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
I didn't mention the government
Then it's not banning.
Private people can ban.
If you mean, threaten to remove their financial support to companies that advertise on a TV personality that is peddling 3rd-rate conspiracy theories that the network on which said TV personality appears has retracted, well, that kinda sounds like sour grapes to me.
Sounds like you want to ban voices you don't agree with, Kim
I'm sure Sean can get his message out - he's made enough money over the years, and he has name recognition, and lemming-like followers (apparently) who support him even when he is overwhelmingly wrong... so I'm not too worried about him.
I can't help it if one group's boycott agitation is successful where another one fails. It's the free market, baby, whattaryougonnado? I mean, I suppose FOX can stand by their man, come what may.
I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned
Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?
Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
I didn't mention the government
Then it's not banning.
Private people can ban.
If you mean, threaten to remove their financial support to companies that advertise on a TV personality that is peddling 3rd-rate conspiracy theories that the network on which said TV personality appears has retracted, well, that kinda sounds like sour grapes to me.
Sounds like you want to ban voices you don't agree with, Kim
I'm sure Sean can get his message out - he's made enough money over the years, and he has name recognition, and lemming-like followers (apparently) who support him even when he is overwhelmingly wrong... so I'm not too worried about him.
I can't help it if one group's boycott agitation is successful where another one fails. It's the free market, baby, whattaryougonnado? I mean, I suppose FOX can stand by their man, come what may.
I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned
Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?
Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
I didn't mention the government
Then it's not banning.
Private people can ban.
If you mean, threaten to remove their financial support to companies that advertise on a TV personality that is peddling 3rd-rate conspiracy theories that the network on which said TV personality appears has retracted, well, that kinda sounds like sour grapes to me.
Sounds like you want to ban voices you don't agree with, Kim
I'm sure Sean can get his message out - he's made enough money over the years, and he has name recognition, and lemming-like followers (apparently) who support him even when he is overwhelmingly wrong... so I'm not too worried about him.
I can't help it if one group's boycott agitation is successful where another one fails. It's the free market, baby, whattaryougonnado? I mean, I suppose FOX can stand by their man, come what may.
"Rod Wheeler, the private investigator cited by Fox News for its retracted report claiming former DNC staffer Seth Rich was murdered for leaking emails to WikiLeaks, has now sued the network, claiming they: 1) Fabricated quotes from him to make the false connection; 2) Sent an article draft to the White House for review; and 3) Took orders directly from Trump to establish a connection between the DNC and Rich’s murder “to help lift the cloud of the Russia investigation.”
I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned
Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?
Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
I didn't mention the government
Then it's not banning.
Private people can ban.
If you mean, threaten to remove their financial support to companies that advertise on a TV personality that is peddling 3rd-rate conspiracy theories that the network on which said TV personality appears has retracted, well, that kinda sounds like sour grapes to me.
Sounds like you want to ban voices you don't agree with, Kim
I'm sure Sean can get his message out - he's made enough money over the years, and he has name recognition, and lemming-like followers (apparently) who support him even when he is overwhelmingly wrong... so I'm not too worried about him.
I can't help it if one group's boycott agitation is successful where another one fails. It's the free market, baby, whattaryougonnado? I mean, I suppose FOX can stand by their man, come what may.
"Rod Wheeler, the private investigator cited by Fox News for its retracted report claiming former DNC staffer Seth Rich was murdered for leaking emails to WikiLeaks, has now sued the network, claiming they: 1) Fabricated quotes from him to make the false connection; 2) Sent an article draft to the White House for review; and 3) Took orders directly from Trump to establish a connection between the DNC and Rich’s murder “to help lift the cloud of the Russia investigation.”
I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned
Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?
Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
I didn't mention the government
Then it's not banning.
Private people can ban.
If you mean, threaten to remove their financial support to companies that advertise on a TV personality that is peddling 3rd-rate conspiracy theories that the network on which said TV personality appears has retracted, well, that kinda sounds like sour grapes to me.
Sounds like you want to ban voices you don't agree with, Kim
I'm sure Sean can get his message out - he's made enough money over the years, and he has name recognition, and lemming-like followers (apparently) who support him even when he is overwhelmingly wrong... so I'm not too worried about him.
I can't help it if one group's boycott agitation is successful where another one fails. It's the free market, baby, whattaryougonnado? I mean, I suppose FOX can stand by their man, come what may.
Successful? Hannity probably increased his audience.
Boycotts are tuff to pull off unless the company is a bunch of pussies. I don't think My Pillow cares if some retard wants a boycott.
And his radio show is not Fox and has a bigger audience.
Maddow would piss all over herself with her giant dong to have one fifth of the ratings CONS get
The market should have removed her months ago. The best news for MSNBC is that FAUX News is going leftier and losing viewers.
Other than the fact that Maddow finished this past quarter as the No. 1 show across all of cable news in the all-important A25-54 demographic this analysis is spot on! I'm sure that market prediction of them cutting her loose is gonna become a reality any time now.
I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned
Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?
Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
I didn't mention the government
Then it's not banning.
Private people can ban.
If you mean, threaten to remove their financial support to companies that advertise on a TV personality that is peddling 3rd-rate conspiracy theories that the network on which said TV personality appears has retracted, well, that kinda sounds like sour grapes to me.
Sounds like you want to ban voices you don't agree with, Kim
I'm sure Sean can get his message out - he's made enough money over the years, and he has name recognition, and lemming-like followers (apparently) who support him even when he is overwhelmingly wrong... so I'm not too worried about him.
I can't help it if one group's boycott agitation is successful where another one fails. It's the free market, baby, whattaryougonnado? I mean, I suppose FOX can stand by their man, come what may.
Successful? Hannity probably increased his audience.
Boycotts are tuff to pull off unless the company is a bunch of pussies. I don't think My Pillow cares if some retard wants a boycott.
And his radio show is not Fox and has a bigger audience.
Maddow would piss all over herself with her giant dong to have one fifth of the ratings CONS get
The market should have removed her months ago. The best news for MSNBC is that FAUX News is going leftier and losing viewers.
Other than the fact that Maddow finished this past quarter as the No. 1 show across all of cable news in the all-important A25-54 demographic this analysis is spot on! I'm sure that market prediction of them cutting her loose is gonna become a reality any time now.
Other than the fact that Rush still has 20 times her audience you'd have a great point. As we see here the Clinton losers are still butt hurt and watching that shit every night looking for more tax return bombshells.
I think that voices we don't agree with should be banned
Grow the hell up and learn the difference between bannoning stupid voices and mocking them.
So the effort to boycott and get him off the air is mocking ?
Got it. I want Maddow on the air. Her work on the Trump tax return was groundbreaking
It's not government action. This is the free market at work, fren.
I didn't mention the government
Then it's not banning.
Private people can ban.
If you mean, threaten to remove their financial support to companies that advertise on a TV personality that is peddling 3rd-rate conspiracy theories that the network on which said TV personality appears has retracted, well, that kinda sounds like sour grapes to me.
Sounds like you want to ban voices you don't agree with, Kim
I'm sure Sean can get his message out - he's made enough money over the years, and he has name recognition, and lemming-like followers (apparently) who support him even when he is overwhelmingly wrong... so I'm not too worried about him.
I can't help it if one group's boycott agitation is successful where another one fails. It's the free market, baby, whattaryougonnado? I mean, I suppose FOX can stand by their man, come what may.
Successful? Hannity probably increased his audience.
Boycotts are tuff to pull off unless the company is a bunch of pussies. I don't think My Pillow cares if some retard wants a boycott.
And his radio show is not Fox and has a bigger audience.
Maddow would piss all over herself with her giant dong to have one fifth of the ratings CONS get
The market should have removed her months ago. The best news for MSNBC is that FAUX News is going leftier and losing viewers.
Other than the fact that Maddow finished this past quarter as the No. 1 show across all of cable news in the all-important A25-54 demographic this analysis is spot on! I'm sure that market prediction of them cutting her loose is gonna become a reality any time now.
Other than the fact that Rush still has 20 times her audience you'd have a great point. As we see here the Clinton losers are still butt hurt and watching that shit every night looking for more tax return bombshells.
Comments
Boycotts are tuff to pull off unless the company is a bunch of pussies. I don't think My Pillow cares if some retard wants a boycott.
And his radio show is not Fox and has a bigger audience.
Maddow would piss all over herself with her giant dong to have one fifth of the ratings CONS get
The market should have removed her months ago. The best news for MSNBC is that FAUX News is going leftier and losing viewers.
If that's what they need to believe.........
That dude looks like he touches 8 year olds
First time for everything I guess
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3904057-Wheeler-Filed-Complaint.html
I turned off cable news when Trump got the nod.