Is the Jordan brand in consideration? May help considering kids can't enough Jordan shit at their disposal this coming from someone with 3 teens.
I always wondered why the "Jumpman" brand was on the Michigan jerseys and not on the ducks? They had to have considered that when deciding how to best pander to teens.
let's assume that ... doesn't that make my point? You get 200 points on the SAT for getting out of bed and getting to the test center on time ... you are aware of how the distribution works on those tests, right?
let's assume that ... doesn't that make my point? You get 200 points on the SAT for getting out of bed and getting to the test center on time ... you are aware of how the distribution works on those tests, right?
let's assume that ... doesn't that make my point? You get 200 points on the SAT for getting out of bed and getting to the test center on time ... you are aware of how the distribution works on those tests, right?
Are you asking me how having the correct facts affects your argument?
let's assume that ... doesn't that make my point? You get 200 points on the SAT for getting out of bed and getting to the test center on time ... you are aware of how the distribution works on those tests, right?
Are you asking me how having the correct facts affects your argument?
1. I don't think we know that your version constitute the correct facts. I've looked at the common data set. While your version is possible, so is mine; there's nothing in UW's CDS that would tell us.
2. No, I'm not actually asking. It's a rhetorical question. If it was one guy, then that's a point. If two guys have a 200, then that's a stronger point. If two guys have a 200 and another guy has a 1.2, then that's even more compelling. That is to say, if three people got in with exceedingly low stats, then it would stand to reason that the school does bend. Even if the guy with the 1.2 knocked the SAT or ACT out of the park, which is unlikely, UW, like most state flagships, puts a lot of admissions emphasis on GPA.
My main question still stands: if a guy can get in with a 200, then I'm just wondering why it's so hard to transfer in from JUCO with the coach supporting your admission. I get the PE credits. The rest, as I said, is not something I've studied.
let's assume that ... doesn't that make my point? You get 200 points on the SAT for getting out of bed and getting to the test center on time ... you are aware of how the distribution works on those tests, right?
Are you asking me how having the correct facts affects your argument?
1. I don't think we know that your version constitute the correct facts. I've looked at the common data set. While your version is possible, so is mine; there's nothing in UW's CDS that would tell us.
2. No, I'm not actually asking. It's a rhetorical question. If it was one guy, then that's a point. If two guys have a 200, then that's a stronger point. If two guys have a 200 and another guy has a 1.2, then that's even more compelling. That is to say, if three people got in with exceedingly low stats, then it would stand to reason that the school does bend. Even if the guy with the 1.2 knocked the SAT or ACT out of the park, which is unlikely, UW, like most state flagships, puts a lot of admissions emphasis on GPA.
My main question still stands: if a guy can get in with a 200, then I'm just wondering why it's so hard to transfer in from JUCO with the coach supporting your admission. I get the PE credits. The rest, as I said, is not something I've studied.
NCAA minimus standards. Its a sliding scale so if you have lower GPA then you need higher test scores.1.2 or 200 would be below minimum for either so it isn't an athlete and there must have been a crazy story there- both kid's parents died and supported himself through high school? Had diarrhea during second part of SAT after acing first part? I don't know there are a lot of kids admitted those are the outliers.
The issue qualifying from JUCO isn't gpa/test scores it is having enough transferrable credits.
And the issue for grad transfers is something else entirely.
This has all been covered by others but I know you don't read anything other than your own shitposts and whatever sucker replies you manage to hook so I am not surprised.
let's assume that ... doesn't that make my point? You get 200 points on the SAT for getting out of bed and getting to the test center on time ... you are aware of how the distribution works on those tests, right?
Are you asking me how having the correct facts affects your argument?
1. I don't think we know that your version constitute the correct facts. I've looked at the common data set. While your version is possible, so is mine; there's nothing in UW's CDS that would tell us.
2. No, I'm not actually asking. It's a rhetorical question. If it was one guy, then that's a point. If two guys have a 200, then that's a stronger point. If two guys have a 200 and another guy has a 1.2, then that's even more compelling. That is to say, if three people got in with exceedingly low stats, then it would stand to reason that the school does bend. Even if the guy with the 1.2 knocked the SAT or ACT out of the park, which is unlikely, UW, like most state flagships, puts a lot of admissions emphasis on GPA.
My main question still stands: if a guy can get in with a 200, then I'm just wondering why it's so hard to transfer in from JUCO with the coach supporting your admission. I get the PE credits. The rest, as I said, is not something I've studied.
NCAA minimus standards. Its a sliding scale so if you have lower GPA then you need higher test scores.1.2 or 200 would be below minimum for either so it isn't an athlete and there must have been a crazy story there- both kid's parents died and supported himself through high school? Had diarrhea during second part of SAT after acing first part? I don't know there are a lot of kids admitted those are the outliers.
The issue qualifying from JUCO isn't gpa/test scores it is having enough transferrable credits.
And the issue for grad transfers is something else entirely.
This has all been covered by others but I know you don't read anything other than your own shitposts and whatever sucker replies you manage to hook so I am not surprised.
So, you're saying I'm a bad poaster? Hurts my feelings bro.
Comments
2. No, I'm not actually asking. It's a rhetorical question. If it was one guy, then that's a point. If two guys have a 200, then that's a stronger point. If two guys have a 200 and another guy has a 1.2, then that's even more compelling. That is to say, if three people got in with exceedingly low stats, then it would stand to reason that the school does bend. Even if the guy with the 1.2 knocked the SAT or ACT out of the park, which is unlikely, UW, like most state flagships, puts a lot of admissions emphasis on GPA.
My main question still stands: if a guy can get in with a 200, then I'm just wondering why it's so hard to transfer in from JUCO with the coach supporting your admission. I get the PE credits. The rest, as I said, is not something I've studied.
The issue qualifying from JUCO isn't gpa/test scores it is having enough transferrable credits.
And the issue for grad transfers is something else entirely.
This has all been covered by others but I know you don't read anything other than your own shitposts and whatever sucker replies you manage to hook so I am not surprised.