Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

So North Korea threatens to sink US aircraft carrier, basically talking shit at 7-11

2

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    USC doesn't struggle against the SEC. Not when they have a coach

    Exactly
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,499 Standard Supporter
    Mosster47 said:

    The Asia Pivot has been an action plan for ages. We would lose 6,000 Soldiers/Airman and would have total victory in 8 days.

    Day 1: The Army buys us 38 minutes to get our F-16's from the 38th to the south of the peninsula. The F-16's in the south head north and start taking out SAM sites. The Strike Eagles from Japan would be there within 90 minutes to wipe out infrastructure. The Strike Eagles from Alaska would be there as soon as they could get a tanker. The F-16's from Aviano would work their way over as well as the A-10's from Spangdahlem. The B-2's and B-52's from Guam and Diego Garcia would be there within 8 hours.

    By day four we would have two carrier groups off the shore skull fucking them and two mobile munitions carriers would be offloading to keep the fire going for a full 14 days 24/7.

    The two installations on the border would be wiped out, but that's all we are losing. Seoul would be wiped out too, but oh well.

    Sounds like an unpublished Clancy manuscript.
  • NeGgaPlEaSeNeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,729
    edited April 2017

    North Korea has been talking shit for forever now. They remind me of this retarded kid we had at high school that was white and would wear size xxxxl ecko clothes and basketball jerseys every day. He went around rapping and talking shit to just about anyone who would walk by. Everyone just let him be because they felt bad for him for being "special".

    I agree man back in the day. But that retarded kid today bought a gun and is carrying and pistal fucking people.
    We all know what happens when the police are called in.
  • AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    edited April 2017

    Mosster47 said:

    The Asia Pivot has been an action plan for ages. We would lose 6,000 Soldiers/Airman and would have total victory in 8 days.

    Day 1: The Army buys us 38 minutes to get our F-16's from the 38th to the south of the peninsula. The F-16's in the south head north and start taking out SAM sites. The Strike Eagles from Japan would be there within 90 minutes to wipe out infrastructure. The Strike Eagles from Alaska would be there as soon as they could get a tanker. The F-16's from Aviano would work their way over as well as the A-10's from Spangdahlem. The B-2's and B-52's from Guam and Diego Garcia would be there within 8 hours.

    By day four we would have two carrier groups off the shore skull fucking them and two mobile munitions carriers would be offloading to keep the fire going for a full 14 days 24/7.

    The two installations on the border would be wiped out, but that's all we are losing. Seoul would be wiped out too, but oh well.

    Sounds like an unpublished Clancy manuscript.
    fucking zoomie wet dream, more like
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    Mosster47 said:

    The Asia Pivot has been an action plan for ages. We would lose 6,000 Soldiers/Airman and would have total victory in 8 days.

    Day 1: The Army buys us 38 minutes to get our F-16's from the 38th to the south of the peninsula. The F-16's in the south head north and start taking out SAM sites. The Strike Eagles from Japan would be there within 90 minutes to wipe out infrastructure. The Strike Eagles from Alaska would be there as soon as they could get a tanker. The F-16's from Aviano would work their way over as well as the A-10's from Spangdahlem. The B-2's and B-52's from Guam and Diego Garcia would be there within 8 hours.

    By day four we would have two carrier groups off the shore skull fucking them and two mobile munitions carriers would be offloading to keep the fire going for a full 14 days 24/7.

    The two installations on the border would be wiped out, but that's all we are losing. Seoul would be wiped out too, but oh well.

    I think the trade off would be like totally worth it as long as we made a forceful political point.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Mosster47 said:

    The Asia Pivot has been an action plan for ages. We would lose 6,000 Soldiers/Airman and would have total victory in 8 days.

    Day 1: The Army buys us 38 minutes to get our F-16's from the 38th to the south of the peninsula. The F-16's in the south head north and start taking out SAM sites. The Strike Eagles from Japan would be there within 90 minutes to wipe out infrastructure. The Strike Eagles from Alaska would be there as soon as they could get a tanker. The F-16's from Aviano would work their way over as well as the A-10's from Spangdahlem. The B-2's and B-52's from Guam and Diego Garcia would be there within 8 hours.

    By day four we would have two carrier groups off the shore skull fucking them and two mobile munitions carriers would be offloading to keep the fire going for a full 14 days 24/7.

    The two installations on the border would be wiped out, but that's all we are losing. Seoul would be wiped out too, but oh well.

    Millions of dead South Korean citizens.

    That's a good look.
  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246

    Mosster47 said:

    The Asia Pivot has been an action plan for ages. We would lose 6,000 Soldiers/Airman and would have total victory in 8 days.

    Day 1: The Army buys us 38 minutes to get our F-16's from the 38th to the south of the peninsula. The F-16's in the south head north and start taking out SAM sites. The Strike Eagles from Japan would be there within 90 minutes to wipe out infrastructure. The Strike Eagles from Alaska would be there as soon as they could get a tanker. The F-16's from Aviano would work their way over as well as the A-10's from Spangdahlem. The B-2's and B-52's from Guam and Diego Garcia would be there within 8 hours.

    By day four we would have two carrier groups off the shore skull fucking them and two mobile munitions carriers would be offloading to keep the fire going for a full 14 days 24/7.

    The two installations on the border would be wiped out, but that's all we are losing. Seoul would be wiped out too, but oh well.

    Millions of dead South Korean citizens.

    That's a good look.
    Sounds like you care.
  • DeepSeaZDeepSeaZ Member Posts: 3,901

    N. Korea and China need to remember that we used to stack fucks like them five feet high and use 'em for sand bags.

    Great movie.
  • NeGgaPlEaSeNeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,729
    BearsWiin said:

    Mosster47 said:

    The Asia Pivot has been an action plan for ages. We would lose 6,000 Soldiers/Airman and would have total victory in 8 days.

    Day 1: The Army buys us 38 minutes to get our F-16's from the 38th to the south of the peninsula. The F-16's in the south head north and start taking out SAM sites. The Strike Eagles from Japan would be there within 90 minutes to wipe out infrastructure. The Strike Eagles from Alaska would be there as soon as they could get a tanker. The F-16's from Aviano would work their way over as well as the A-10's from Spangdahlem. The B-2's and B-52's from Guam and Diego Garcia would be there within 8 hours.

    By day four we would have two carrier groups off the shore skull fucking them and two mobile munitions carriers would be offloading to keep the fire going for a full 14 days 24/7.

    The two installations on the border would be wiped out, but that's all we are losing. Seoul would be wiped out too, but oh well.

    Millions of dead South Korean citizens.

    That's a good look.
    This would suck, because if Samsung gets derstroyed it would likely push up the price of HDTVs and already overpriced shitty Apple iPhones
    Price is already going up. Made in America?
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,183 Standard Supporter
    Mosster47 said:

    The Asia Pivot has been an action plan for ages. We would lose 6,000 Soldiers/Airman and would have total victory in 8 days.

    Day 1: The Army buys us 38 minutes to get our F-16's from the 38th to the south of the peninsula. The F-16's in the south head north and start taking out SAM sites. The Strike Eagles from Japan would be there within 90 minutes to wipe out infrastructure. The Strike Eagles from Alaska would be there as soon as they could get a tanker. The F-16's from Aviano would work their way over as well as the A-10's from Spangdahlem. The B-2's and B-52's from Guam and Diego Garcia would be there within 8 hours.

    By day four we would have two carrier groups off the shore skull fucking them and two mobile munitions carriers would be offloading to keep the fire going for a full 14 days 24/7.

    The two installations on the border would be wiped out, but that's all we are losing. Seoul would be wiped out too, but oh well.

    Taking N. Korea would be a breeze.

    Then all hell's gonna break loose because China man no likey white man touchey border.
    image
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,862 Standard Supporter

    N. Korea and China need to remember that we used to stack fucks like them five feet high and use 'em for sand bags.

    You mean like the road game at unranked Vietnam?
    Never forget Chinchon
    Incheon was our greatest sneak attack ever. Whether is was the Korea game (tie) or Vietnam (loss) we dominated the stats. It's Hard (TM) to get a win in Asian road games w/o using nukes, because the other guys had an endless supply of cannon fodder and the willingness to not give a fuck about using it.
    We are USC. We beat the shit out of the terrible Western Countries, we dominate Europe (aka the Big Ten), but we struggle against Asia (the SEC).
    We only struggle when politicians don't let the military do their jobs.
  • NeGgaPlEaSeNeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,729
    When is the last time we announced Trident (D5) submarine locations? Put it this way. Those things go down for 3 months at a time and no one knows where the fuck they are. I'm sure we already had submarines in the area. Bangor Washington is the Base for the pacific D5 submarines. The fact this White House is saying HEY KIMFS we are sending a submarine that can wipe your country off the map before you can even fuel your missles means this government is going to take a first strike stance.
  • AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    edited April 2017

    When is the last time we announced Trident (D5) submarine locations? Put it this way. Those things go down for 3 months at a time and no one knows where the fuck they are. I'm sure we already had submarines in the area. Bangor Washington is the Base for the pacific D5 submarines. The fact this White House is saying HEY KIMFS we are sending a submarine that can wipe your country off the map before you can even fuel your missles means this government is going to take a first strike stance.

    When is the last time we announced Trident (D5) submarine locations? Put it this way. Those things go down for 3 months at a time and no one knows where the fuck they are. I'm sure we already had submarines in the area. Bangor Washington is the Base for the pacific D5 submarines. The fact this White House is saying HEY KIMFS we are sending a submarine that can wipe your country off the map before you can even fuel your missles means this government is going to take a first strike stance.

    How do our TOTALLY AUCE Trident subs nuke NK artillery positions dug into tunnels in mountainsides 30 km north of Seoul without also nuking Camp Casey and Seoul itself?

    Asking for 12,000 friends and 30,000,000 acquaintances and fuck buddies
  • AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    Sledog said:

    N. Korea and China need to remember that we used to stack fucks like them five feet high and use 'em for sand bags.

    You mean like the road game at unranked Vietnam?
    Never forget Chinchon
    Incheon was our greatest sneak attack ever. Whether is was the Korea game (tie) or Vietnam (loss) we dominated the stats. It's Hard (TM) to get a win in Asian road games w/o using nukes, because the other guys had an endless supply of cannon fodder and the willingness to not give a fuck about using it.
    We are USC. We beat the shit out of the terrible Western Countries, we dominate Europe (aka the Big Ten), but we struggle against Asia (the SEC).
    We only struggle when politicians don't let the military do their jobs.
    Who wasn't letting the US military do their jobs in Iraq from 2003 to 2008?
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,850 Founders Club
    AZDuck said:

    Sledog said:

    N. Korea and China need to remember that we used to stack fucks like them five feet high and use 'em for sand bags.

    You mean like the road game at unranked Vietnam?
    Never forget Chinchon
    Incheon was our greatest sneak attack ever. Whether is was the Korea game (tie) or Vietnam (loss) we dominated the stats. It's Hard (TM) to get a win in Asian road games w/o using nukes, because the other guys had an endless supply of cannon fodder and the willingness to not give a fuck about using it.
    We are USC. We beat the shit out of the terrible Western Countries, we dominate Europe (aka the Big Ten), but we struggle against Asia (the SEC).
    We only struggle when politicians don't let the military do their jobs.
    Who wasn't letting the US military do their jobs in Iraq from 2003 to 2008?
    The CIC is responsible
  • AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    Sledog said:

    N. Korea and China need to remember that we used to stack fucks like them five feet high and use 'em for sand bags.

    You mean like the road game at unranked Vietnam?
    Never forget Chinchon
    Incheon was our greatest sneak attack ever. Whether is was the Korea game (tie) or Vietnam (loss) we dominated the stats. It's Hard (TM) to get a win in Asian road games w/o using nukes, because the other guys had an endless supply of cannon fodder and the willingness to not give a fuck about using it.
    We are USC. We beat the shit out of the terrible Western Countries, we dominate Europe (aka the Big Ten), but we struggle against Asia (the SEC).
    We only struggle when politicians don't let the military do their jobs.
    Who wasn't letting the US military do their jobs in Iraq from 2003 to 2008?

    AZDuck said:

    Sledog said:

    N. Korea and China need to remember that we used to stack fucks like them five feet high and use 'em for sand bags.

    You mean like the road game at unranked Vietnam?
    Never forget Chinchon
    Incheon was our greatest sneak attack ever. Whether is was the Korea game (tie) or Vietnam (loss) we dominated the stats. It's Hard (TM) to get a win in Asian road games w/o using nukes, because the other guys had an endless supply of cannon fodder and the willingness to not give a fuck about using it.
    We are USC. We beat the shit out of the terrible Western Countries, we dominate Europe (aka the Big Ten), but we struggle against Asia (the SEC).
    We only struggle when politicians don't let the military do their jobs.
    Who wasn't letting the US military do their jobs in Iraq from 2003 to 2008?
    The CIC is responsible
    So, Dick Cheney?
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,425 Founders Club
    Sledog said:

    N. Korea and China need to remember that we used to stack fucks like them five feet high and use 'em for sand bags.

    You mean like the road game at unranked Vietnam?
    Never forget Chinchon
    Incheon was our greatest sneak attack ever. Whether is was the Korea game (tie) or Vietnam (loss) we dominated the stats. It's Hard (TM) to get a win in Asian road games w/o using nukes, because the other guys had an endless supply of cannon fodder and the willingness to not give a fuck about using it.
    We are USC. We beat the shit out of the terrible Western Countries, we dominate Europe (aka the Big Ten), but we struggle against Asia (the SEC).
    We only struggle when politicians don't let the military do their jobs.
    Like the time MacArthur assured Truman the Chi-coms wouldn't enter the war as we drove north to the Yalu? And then wanted to start dropping nukes after we got our butts kicked? That would have ended well.
  • NeGgaPlEaSeNeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,729
    edited April 2017
    AZDuck said:

    When is the last time we announced Trident (D5) submarine locations? Put it this way. Those things go down for 3 months at a time and no one knows where the fuck they are. I'm sure we already had submarines in the area. Bangor Washington is the Base for the pacific D5 submarines. The fact this White House is saying HEY KIMFS we are sending a submarine that can wipe your country off the map before you can even fuel your missles means this government is going to take a first strike stance.

    When is the last time we announced Trident (D5) submarine locations? Put it this way. Those things go down for 3 months at a time and no one knows where the fuck they are. I'm sure we already had submarines in the area. Bangor Washington is the Base for the pacific D5 submarines. The fact this White House is saying HEY KIMFS we are sending a submarine that can wipe your country off the map before you can even fuel your missles means this government is going to take a first strike stance.

    How do our TOTALLY AUCE Trident subs nuke NK artillery positions dug into tunnels in mountainsides 30 km north of Seoul without also nuking Camp Casey and Seoul itself?

    Asking for 12,000 friends and 30,000,000 acquaintances and fuck buddies
    Collateral damage? If you don't think this administration wouldn't nuke the shit out North Korea at the first sign of Kim fueling ballistic missiles , then you haven't been paying attention. We have Moab to take care of mountain side tunnels.

    Watch Crimson Tide for a refresher
Sign In or Register to comment.