Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Hardcore Husky and TSIO Podcast Exclusive: UW Athletics FInancial Forecast for 2017
Comments
-
-
Your circular logic just admitted Taggart is an unproven commodity.oregonblitzkrieg said:
The proven commodity goes all the way to the natty and nothing less. Even better if its a win.PurpleThrobber said:
Oregon's performance under Chip Kelly is irrelevant. He is no longer a variable in their future results.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Oregon's had Chip Kelly, a duckade and several years of being a PAC 12 dynasty and two appearances in the natty within 4 years of each other. UW hasn't proven itself yet.PurpleThrobber said:
You just wrote that with a straight face?!?oregonblitzkrieg said:We'll find out if you guys have a great coach if you have staying power. If you go right back to being the coogs, well then....
Oregon has a career assistant with a slightly better than .500 career record.
Washington just played in the final four with one of the highest winning percentage coaches in the country.
So tell me you're trying to whoosh everyone here?
If he were to come back, that's a different conversation.
But, as you can see, the UW now has the proven commodity. And Oregon has either the next Chip Kelly or the next Ty.
And even @GrandpaSankey can see which is which.
-
Why did Oregon fire its proven commodity then?oregonblitzkrieg said:
The proven commodity goes all the way to the natty and nothing less. Even better if its a win.PurpleThrobber said:
Oregon's performance under Chip Kelly is irrelevant. He is no longer a variable in their future results.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Oregon's had Chip Kelly, a duckade and several years of being a PAC 12 dynasty and two appearances in the natty within 4 years of each other. UW hasn't proven itself yet.PurpleThrobber said:
You just wrote that with a straight face?!?oregonblitzkrieg said:We'll find out if you guys have a great coach if you have staying power. If you go right back to being the coogs, well then....
Oregon has a career assistant with a slightly better than .500 career record.
Washington just played in the final four with one of the highest winning percentage coaches in the country.
So tell me you're trying to whoosh everyone here?
If he were to come back, that's a different conversation.
But, as you can see, the UW now has the proven commodity. And Oregon has either the next Chip Kelly or the next Ty.
And even @GrandpaSankey can see which is which. -
Is this a podcast?
-
I fucking hate you.SpoonieLuv said:Is this a podcast?
-
CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
I fucking hate you.SpoonieLuv said:Is this a podcast?
-
So would you say Oregon more closely identifies with the Buffalo Bills or Minnesota Vikings?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Oregon's had Chip Kelly, a duckade and several years of being a PAC 12 dynasty and two appearances in the natty within 4 years of each other. UW hasn't proven itself yet.PurpleThrobber said:
You just wrote that with a straight face?!?oregonblitzkrieg said:We'll find out if you guys have a great coach if you have staying power. If you go right back to being the coogs, well then....
Oregon has a career assistant with a slightly better than .500 career record.
Washington just played in the final four with one of the highest winning percentage coaches in the country.
So tell me you're trying to whoosh everyone here? -
Dominating like this in year 3 with recruiting going the way it is makes it a relatively safe bet. The next best coach is probabaly at Oregon State, the guy after him just got ass-rammed in Seattle and couldn't buy offense, the guy after him is trying to compete with Troy Williams, and the guys after him work in Pullman or has Ivan molding his players.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Oregon's had Chip Kelly, a duckade and several years of being a PAC 12 dynasty and two appearances in the natty within 4 years of each other. UW hasn't proven itself yet.PurpleThrobber said:
You just wrote that with a straight face?!?oregonblitzkrieg said:We'll find out if you guys have a great coach if you have staying power. If you go right back to being the coogs, well then....
Oregon has a career assistant with a slightly better than .500 career record.
Washington just played in the final four with one of the highest winning percentage coaches in the country.
So tell me you're trying to whoosh everyone here?
If you want to rip on Pete, the way to do it is to point out how absolutely shit tier the rest of the coaching is in the PAC. I mean, in 2016 we still had holes all over the fucking roster, but won the conference rather easily. The holes won't be there going forward. -
I like holes. I like to put things in them.haie said:
Dominating like this in year 3 with recruiting going the way it is makes it a relatively safe bet. The next best coach is probabaly at Oregon State, the guy after him just got ass-rammed in Seattle and couldn't buy offense, the guy after him is trying to compete with Troy Williams, and the guys after him work in Pullman or has Ivan molding his players.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Oregon's had Chip Kelly, a duckade and several years of being a PAC 12 dynasty and two appearances in the natty within 4 years of each other. UW hasn't proven itself yet.PurpleThrobber said:
You just wrote that with a straight face?!?oregonblitzkrieg said:We'll find out if you guys have a great coach if you have staying power. If you go right back to being the coogs, well then....
Oregon has a career assistant with a slightly better than .500 career record.
Washington just played in the final four with one of the highest winning percentage coaches in the country.
So tell me you're trying to whoosh everyone here?
If you want to rip on Pete, the way to do it is to point out how absolutely shit tier the rest of the coaching is in the PAC. I mean, in 2016 we still had holes all over the fucking roster, but won the conference rather easily. The holes won't be there going forward. -
So it's not a podcast? I'm so confusedCokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
I fucking hate you.SpoonieLuv said:Is this a podcast?
