If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!
I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.
If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.
If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?
Started under GW Bush, Obummer limited the scope of the program, but @NSA_Dawg still has access to metadata, which is tantamount to actually having the data itself. What will be fun is finding out who Trump's people were talking to, and why they were being surveilled.
It will be more fun, since no allegations of criminal conduct have been reported, seeing those that ordered it for no reason and leaked it go to prison.
Some of you need to grow the hell up and learn the difference between unmasking and leaking.
Information from the unmasking was leaked. Just so you know that means telling people who aren't cleared about it. I don't think reporters have proper clearance.
The national-security adviser is not an investigator. She is a White House staffer. The president’s staff is a consumer of intelligence, not a generator or collector of it. If Susan Rice was unmasking Americans, it was not to fulfill an intelligence need based on American interests; it was to fulfill a political desire based on Democratic-party interests
The national-security adviser is not an investigator. She is a White House staffer. The president’s staff is a consumer of intelligence, not a generator or collector of it. If Susan Rice was unmasking Americans, it was not to fulfill an intelligence need based on American interests; it was to fulfill a political desire based on Democratic-party interests
The national-security adviser is not an investigator. She is a White House staffer. The president’s staff is a consumer of intelligence, not a generator or collector of it. If Susan Rice was unmasking Americans, it was not to fulfill an intelligence need based on American interests; it was to fulfill a political desire based on Democratic-party interests
If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!
I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.
If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.
If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?
Started under GW Bush, Obummer limited the scope of the program, but @NSA_Dawg still has access to metadata, which is tantamount to actually having the data itself. What will be fun is finding out who Trump's people were talking to, and why they were being surveilled.
It will be more fun, since no allegations of criminal conduct have been reported, seeing those that ordered it for no reason and leaked it go to prison.
Some of you need to grow the hell up and learn the difference between unmasking and leaking.
Information from the unmasking was leaked. Just so you know that means telling people who aren't cleared about it. I don't think reporters have proper clearance.
There was a leak that's why she denies leaking the information. Of course Susan Rice would never lie. She denied any knowledge of "unmasking" 12 days prior on PBS.
If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!
I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.
If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.
If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?
Started under GW Bush, Obummer limited the scope of the program, but @NSA_Dawg still has access to metadata, which is tantamount to actually having the data itself. What will be fun is finding out who Trump's people were talking to, and why they were being surveilled.
It will be more fun, since no allegations of criminal conduct have been reported, seeing those that ordered it for no reason and leaked it go to prison.
Some of you need to grow the hell up and learn the difference between unmasking and leaking.
Information from the unmasking was leaked. Just so you know that means telling people who aren't cleared about it. I don't think reporters have proper clearance.
There was a leak that's why she denies leaking the information. Of course Susan Rice would never lie. She denied any knowledge of "unmasking" 12 days prior on PBS.
That is cute...the resident moron thinks VOX is unbiased news, Eli Lake didn't sit on the story until it leaked out and then still tried to cover for her, and nothing bad could have happened because Susan Rice said so.
Comments
Thanks for proving my point.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/446415/susan-rice-unmasking-trump-campaign-members-obama-administration-fbi-cia-nsa
She makes the pathological liar seem honest
The boys in Trump's administration that fed info to Nunes are in the same position that Susan Rice was in before.
*just to show that I'm not racist and have black friends.