Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

More Susan Rice News that apparently is not "News"

24567

Comments

  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,785 Standard Supporter
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!

    I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.

    If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.

    If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    It was legal but the law is wrong. Surveillance has been out of control for years and I would have more sympathy for trump if he showed any interest in reigning it in
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,468
    edited April 2017
    Sledog said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!

    I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.

    If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.

    If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?
    http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/promise/180/end-warrantless-wiretaps/

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_(2001–07)

    Started under GW Bush, Obummer limited the scope of the program, but @NSA_Dawg still has access to metadata, which is tantamount to actually having the data itself. What will be fun is finding out who Trump's people were talking to, and why they were being surveilled.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,785 Standard Supporter
    edited April 2017
    AZDuck said:

    Sledog said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!

    I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.

    If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.

    If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?
    http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/promise/180/end-warrantless-wiretaps/

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_(2001–07)

    Started under GW Bush, Obummer limited the scope of the program, but @NSA_Dawg still has access to metadata, which is tantamount to actually having the data itself. What will be fun is finding out who Trump's people were talking to, and why they were being surveilled.
    It will be more fun, since no allegations of criminal conduct have been reported, seeing those that ordered it for no reason and leaked it go to prison.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,021
    This thread is classic Trump Derangement Syndrome from AZDuck...quoting Media Matters for starters.

    And then saying via the joke that is CNN (i.e. that says its illegal to view Wikileaks and the Susan Rice revelations are now a conspiracy they won't cover) that even through sources pointed at Susan Rice (Obama's NSA) and sources said the intelligence had nothing to do with Russia (wait...what?) then it doesn't matter because there is no "evidence that Obama has authorized the wiretapping of Trump Tower". This, from the same guy who in a different thread said that some guy not in Trumps campaign meeting some Russian after the election was over means that "things are starting to look suspicious".

    I apologize in advance if you don't see the humor those leaps of logic...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,785 Standard Supporter
    HoustonHusky said:

    This thread is classic Trump Derangement Syndrome from AZDuck...quoting Media Matters for starters.

    And then saying via the joke that is CNN (i.e. that says its illegal to view Wikileaks and the Susan Rice revelations are now a conspiracy they won't cover) that even through sources pointed at Susan Rice (Obama's NSA) and sources said the intelligence had nothing to do with Russia (wait...what?) then it doesn't matter because there is no "evidence that Obama has authorized the wiretapping of Trump Tower". This, from the same guy who in a different thread said that some guy not in Trumps campaign meeting some Russian after the election was over means that "things are starting to look suspicious".

    I apologize in advance if you don't see the humor those leaps of logic...

    Liberal leaps are always humorous.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Sledog said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!

    I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.

    If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.

    If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?
    We don't have 4th amendment rights anymore.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,468
    edited April 2017
    This thread is classic Trump Derangement Syndrome from AZDuck...quoting Media Matters for starters.

    And then saying via the joke that is CNN (i.e. that says its illegal to view Wikileaks and the Susan Rice revelations are now a conspiracy they won't cover) that even through sources pointed at Susan Rice (Obama's NSA) and sources said the intelligence had nothing to do with Russia (wait...what?) then it doesn't matter because there is no "evidence that Obama has authorized the wiretapping of Trump Tower". This, from the same guy who in a different thread said that some guy not in Trumps campaign meeting some Russian after the election was over means that "things are starting to look suspicious".

    I apologize in advance if you don't see the humor those leaps of logic...


    Liberal leaps are always humorous.
    You mean the brother of Trump's education secretary? The guy who gave a quarter-million dollars to pro-Trump superpacs? Yeah, I'm sure nobody in the campaign ever talked to him. Nosiree.

    Say what you will about Media Matters, but that is just a cut-and-paste from an interview with a guy who used to be a director of the CIA, and nowhere does it ever posit that a pedophile ring was being run from a pizza parlor in Washington DC.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,051 Founders Club
    The only payoffs we have proof from Russia is to Podesta and his brother
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter