On September 16, the U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice appeared on five major interview shows to discuss the attacks. Prior to her appearance, Rice was provided with "talking points" from a CIA memo,[174] which stated:
The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi and subsequently its annex. There are indications that extremists participated in the violent demonstrations.
This assessment may change as additional information is collected and analyzed and as currently available information continues to be evaluated. The investigation is ongoing, and the U.S. government is working with Libyan authorities to bring to justice those responsible for the deaths of U.S. citizens.[175]
Using these talking points as a guide, Rice stated:
Based on the best information we have to date, what our assessment is as of the present is in fact what began spontaneously in Benghazi as a reaction to what had transpired some hours earlier in Cairo where, of course, as you know, there was a violent protest outside of our embassy—sparked by this hateful video. But soon after that spontaneous protest began outside of our consulate in Benghazi, we believe that it looks like extremist elements, individuals, joined in that— in that effort with heavy weapons of the sort that are, unfortunately, readily now available in Libya post-revolution. And that it spun from there into something much, much more violent. We do not—we do not have information at present that leads us to conclude that this was premeditated or preplanned. I think it's clear that there were extremist elements that joined in and escalated the violence. Whether they were al Qaeda affiliates, whether they were Libyan-based extremists or al Qaeda itself I think is one of the things we'll have to determine.[176][177][178][179][180]
So, the CIA wrote talking points and forced her to spew their propaganda on 5 different networks, and even though knowing it to be false, felt powerless to do anything but comply and stay silent?
So when asked a few weeks ago about the finding Trump associates were incidentally caught in surveillance, she says " I know nothing about this. I'm surprised to see reports by Nunes on that account"
But now she's just doing her job. So did she know and just forgot or what. She seems believable.
So when asked a few weeks ago about the finding Trump associates were incidentally caught in surveillance, she says " I know nothing about this. I'm surprised to see reports by Nunes on that account"
But now she's just doing her job. So did she know and just forgot or what. She seems believable.
If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!
I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.
If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.
If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?
Started under GW Bush, Obummer limited the scope of the program, but @NSA_Dawg still has access to metadata, which is tantamount to actually having the data itself. What will be fun is finding out who Trump's people were talking to, and why they were being surveilled.
It will be more fun, since no allegations of criminal conduct have been reported, seeing those that ordered it for no reason and leaked it go to prison.
If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!
I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.
If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.
If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?
Started under GW Bush, Obummer limited the scope of the program, but @NSA_Dawg still has access to metadata, which is tantamount to actually having the data itself. What will be fun is finding out who Trump's people were talking to, and why they were being surveilled.
It will be more fun, since no allegations of criminal conduct have been reported, seeing those that ordered it for no reason and leaked it go to prison.
Some of you need to grow the hell up and learn the difference between unmasking and leaking.
So when asked a few weeks ago about the finding Trump associates were incidentally caught in surveillance, she says " I know nothing about this. I'm surprised to see reports by Nunes on that account"
But now she's just doing her job. So did she know and just forgot or what. She seems believable.
It's pretty fucking embarrassing at this point.
This is where it's at for me. If it wasn't wrong she wouldn't have denied it.
If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!
I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.
If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.
If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?
Started under GW Bush, Obummer limited the scope of the program, but @NSA_Dawg still has access to metadata, which is tantamount to actually having the data itself. What will be fun is finding out who Trump's people were talking to, and why they were being surveilled.
It will be more fun, since no allegations of criminal conduct have been reported, seeing those that ordered it for no reason and leaked it go to prison.
If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!
I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.
If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.
If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?
Started under GW Bush, Obummer limited the scope of the program, but @NSA_Dawg still has access to metadata, which is tantamount to actually having the data itself. What will be fun is finding out who Trump's people were talking to, and why they were being surveilled.
It will be more fun, since no allegations of criminal conduct have been reported, seeing those that ordered it for no reason and leaked it go to prison.
Some of you need to grow the hell up and learn the difference between unmasking and leaking.
Information from the unmasking was leaked. Just so you know that means telling people who aren't cleared about it. I don't think reporters have proper clearance.
If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!
I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.
If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.
If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?
Started under GW Bush, Obummer limited the scope of the program, but @NSA_Dawg still has access to metadata, which is tantamount to actually having the data itself. What will be fun is finding out who Trump's people were talking to, and why they were being surveilled.
It will be more fun, since no allegations of criminal conduct have been reported, seeing those that ordered it for no reason and leaked it go to prison.
Some of you need to grow the hell up and learn the difference between unmasking and leaking.
Information from the unmasking was leaked. Just so you know that means telling people who aren't cleared about it. I don't think reporters have proper clearance.
Understand: There would have been no intelligence need for Susan Rice to ask for identities to be unmasked. If there had been a real need to reveal the identities — an intelligence need based on American interests — the unmasking would have been done by the investigating agencies.
If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!
I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.
If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.
If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?
Started under GW Bush, Obummer limited the scope of the program, but @NSA_Dawg still has access to metadata, which is tantamount to actually having the data itself. What will be fun is finding out who Trump's people were talking to, and why they were being surveilled.
It will be more fun, since no allegations of criminal conduct have been reported, seeing those that ordered it for no reason and leaked it go to prison.
Some of you need to grow the hell up and learn the difference between unmasking and leaking.
Information from the unmasking was leaked. Just so you know that means telling people who aren't cleared about it. I don't think reporters have proper clearance.
Comments
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Benghazi_attack
Try the State Dept (um....gee...wonder if a Susan Rice was involved in that).
Exclusive: Benghazi Talking Points Underwent 12 Revisions, Scrubbed of Terror Reference
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/05/exclusive-benghazi-talking-points-underwent-12-revisions-scrubbed-of-terror-references/
But now she's just doing her job. So did she know and just forgot or what. She seems believable.
It's pretty fucking embarrassing at this point.
Some of you need to learn the difference.
I like my scandals to have perky nips and good oral skills.
Leaking with masked names doesn't do much
Not like these fucking Plus-size models and shit this days. Fuck that shit - you're fat!!!
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/446415/susan-rice-unmasking-trump-campaign-members-obama-administration-fbi-cia-nsa