Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
This Is Beginning To Look Suspicious
Comments
-
Your loyalty is duly noted.doogie said:So, Team Obama is pissed Trump is gonna withdraw all the support they received over the past 8 years and they're pissed?
-
I had assumed that devos simply nought her way into the cabinet with donations.
Maybe there were indeed other reasons...
I remember reading about a trump server the FBI is investigating for communication with a bank in cypress that was also somehow connected to dick devos.
We'll see. But these guys are greedy pricks. Including trump. Hard to imagine it's all circumstantial -
Simpleton thinking
-
It is amusing how little evidence is needed from Liberals to convict Trump in their minds on nonexistent Russian links after 9 months of leaks from the Obama administration.dhdawg said:Hard to imagine it's all circumstantial
Yet catch Susan Rice actually lying about unmasking people in secret intelligence that was eventually leaked, and those same person's threshold for required "proof" of wrongdoing suddenly goes up 100x.
Comedy.
-
Funnier still, you read accusations of leaks from Susan rice and you believe that with no evidence. I'm still waiting for the wiretapping evidence.HoustonHusky said:
It is amusing how little evidence is needed from Liberals to convict Trump in their minds on nonexistent Russian links after 9 months of leaks from the Obama administration.dhdawg said:Hard to imagine it's all circumstantial
Yet catch Susan Rice actually lying about unmasking people in secret intelligence that was eventually leaked, and those same person's threshold for required "proof" of wrongdoing suddenly goes up 100x.
Comedy. -
NY Times reported they have verified proof. Suddenly that has become meaningless to you?
-
I'm sure you were one of the few who didn't immediately think benghazi was the worst thing ever.HoustonHusky said:
It is amusing how little evidence is needed from Liberals to convict Trump in their minds on nonexistent Russian links after 9 months of leaks from the Obama administration.dhdawg said:Hard to imagine it's all circumstantial
Yet catch Susan Rice actually lying about unmasking people in secret intelligence that was eventually leaked, and those same person's threshold for required "proof" of wrongdoing suddenly goes up 100x.
Comedy.
Of course we need more proof. And we may never have it. But based on what we know I think a financial agreement is in place. Or maybe money laundering of some sort -
I'm hearing the hammer is going to drop any day on Benghazi.dhdawg said:
I'm sure you were one of the few who didn't immediately think benghazi was the worst thing ever.HoustonHusky said:
It is amusing how little evidence is needed from Liberals to convict Trump in their minds on nonexistent Russian links after 9 months of leaks from the Obama administration.dhdawg said:Hard to imagine it's all circumstantial
Yet catch Susan Rice actually lying about unmasking people in secret intelligence that was eventually leaked, and those same person's threshold for required "proof" of wrongdoing suddenly goes up 100x.
Comedy.
Of course we need more proof. And we may never have it. But based on what we know I think a financial agreement is in place. Or maybe money laundering of some sort -
No evidence? There were leaks of classified material. No one except maybe HondoFS disputes that.2001400ex said:
Funnier still, you read accusations of leaks from Susan rice and you believe that with no evidence. I'm still waiting for the wiretapping evidence.HoustonHusky said:
It is amusing how little evidence is needed from Liberals to convict Trump in their minds on nonexistent Russian links after 9 months of leaks from the Obama administration.dhdawg said:Hard to imagine it's all circumstantial
Yet catch Susan Rice actually lying about unmasking people in secret intelligence that was eventually leaked, and those same person's threshold for required "proof" of wrongdoing suddenly goes up 100x.
Comedy.
She was at least one of (WSJ saying there was at least one other) that is now documented in computer logs to have unmasked officials in intelligence reports. She may or may not be the one that leaked it to the press, but the reports in which she unmasked people got leaked which at least puts her on the radar. You know, of an actual crime.
Meanwhile, the "best" evidence of Russian "connections" after 8 months of leaks and speculations of nutjobs like you is a fake report out of Ukraine on Manefort and some guy who doesn't work for Trump and runs a business meeting some Russian guy after the election.
Unless, of course, you want to consider Russia paying Bill Clinton millions and donating to the Clinton Foundation as interfering with the US election and policy... -
Not the worst thing ever? It wasn't WW3, but it was bad. And it was a result of shitty policy on many fronts.dhdawg said:
I'm sure you were one of the few who didn't immediately think benghazi was the worst thing ever.HoustonHusky said:
It is amusing how little evidence is needed from Liberals to convict Trump in their minds on nonexistent Russian links after 9 months of leaks from the Obama administration.dhdawg said:Hard to imagine it's all circumstantial
Yet catch Susan Rice actually lying about unmasking people in secret intelligence that was eventually leaked, and those same person's threshold for required "proof" of wrongdoing suddenly goes up 100x.
Comedy.
Of course we need more proof. And we may never have it. But based on what we know I think a financial agreement is in place. Or maybe money laundering of some sort
Just as bad, however, was lying about it and telling lemmings like you it was a YouTube video and not terrorists doing it because there was an election in a few weeks and they didn't want the bad press.
And "more proof"? Try "any proof" to start with...the only one documented as having taken millions from Russia were the Clintons. Everyone seems to forget that little nugget.
