This Is Beginning To Look Suspicious

AZDuck

https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/848997180157427712

AZDuck

AZDuck said:

https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/848997180157427712

also... the Arab in the twat above looks like the Middle Eastern terrorist version of

CirrhosisDawg

AZDuck said:

https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/848997180157427712

"No puppet, no puppet...you're the puppet!"

An Obese Orangutan
Oct. 19, 2016

UWhuskytskeet

Erik Prince is Betsy DeVos' brother btw.

DRAIN THE SWAMP!!!

Intersectional_Dawg

It makes sense that you'd get a war criminal to be your liaison to another war criminal.

doogie

krighst

DugtheDoog

Private military contractors meet with foreign diplomats in an unofficial capacity under every regime. Blackwater was doing the same shit under Obubba.

Yawn.

HoustonHusky

Huh? Some private citizen who wasn't part of Trump's campaign met with some Russian guy after Trump was elected and its now a conspiracy. After 8 months of spinning this yarn this is the best they can come up with?

And this is from the same group that published an essay from someone named...I don't know...Susan Rice...a couple weeks ago on lying?

Wonder if that Susan Rice is in the news today...lets check the front page of the WP:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/

RaceBannon

I love the smell of desperation in the morning.

I'm sue the smoking gun on Russian collusion is somewhere in the unmasked eavesdropping on a political opponent

AZDuck

Officials said Zayed and his brother, the UAE’s national security adviser, coordinated the Seychelles meeting with Russian government officials with the goal of establishing an unofficial back channel between Trump and Putin.

Officials said Zayed wanted to be helpful to both leaders, who had talked about working more closely together, a policy objective long advocated by the crown prince. The UAE, which sees Iran as one of its main enemies, also shared the Trump team’s interest in finding ways to drive a wedge between Moscow and Tehran.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/blackwater-founder-held-secret-seychelles-meeting-to-establish-trump-putin-back-channel/2017/04/03/95908a08-1648-11e7-ada0-1489b735b3a3_story.html?utm_term=.88f20b311c2b

doogie

So, Team Obama is pissed Trump is gonna withdraw all the support they received over the past 8 years and they're pissed?

2001400ex

doogie said:

So, Team Obama is pissed Trump is gonna withdraw all the support they received over the past 8 years and they're pissed?

Your loyalty is duly noted.

dhdawg

I had assumed that devos simply nought her way into the cabinet with donations.

Maybe there were indeed other reasons...
I remember reading about a trump server the FBI is investigating for communication with a bank in cypress that was also somehow connected to dick devos.
We'll see. But these guys are greedy pricks. Including trump. Hard to imagine it's all circumstantial

doogie

Simpleton thinking

HoustonHusky

dhdawg said:

Hard to imagine it's all circumstantial

It is amusing how little evidence is needed from Liberals to convict Trump in their minds on nonexistent Russian links after 9 months of leaks from the Obama administration.

Yet catch Susan Rice actually lying about unmasking people in secret intelligence that was eventually leaked, and those same person's threshold for required "proof" of wrongdoing suddenly goes up 100x.

Comedy.

2001400ex

HoustonHusky said:

dhdawg said:

Hard to imagine it's all circumstantial

It is amusing how little evidence is needed from Liberals to convict Trump in their minds on nonexistent Russian links after 9 months of leaks from the Obama administration.

Yet catch Susan Rice actually lying about unmasking people in secret intelligence that was eventually leaked, and those same person's threshold for required "proof" of wrongdoing suddenly goes up 100x.

Comedy.

Funnier still, you read accusations of leaks from Susan rice and you believe that with no evidence. I'm still waiting for the wiretapping evidence.

doogie

NY Times reported they have verified proof. Suddenly that has become meaningless to you?

dhdawg

HoustonHusky said:

dhdawg said:

Hard to imagine it's all circumstantial

It is amusing how little evidence is needed from Liberals to convict Trump in their minds on nonexistent Russian links after 9 months of leaks from the Obama administration.

Yet catch Susan Rice actually lying about unmasking people in secret intelligence that was eventually leaked, and those same person's threshold for required "proof" of wrongdoing suddenly goes up 100x.

Comedy.

I'm sure you were one of the few who didn't immediately think benghazi was the worst thing ever.

Of course we need more proof. And we may never have it. But based on what we know I think a financial agreement is in place. Or maybe money laundering of some sort

2001400ex

dhdawg said:

HoustonHusky said:

dhdawg said:

Hard to imagine it's all circumstantial

It is amusing how little evidence is needed from Liberals to convict Trump in their minds on nonexistent Russian links after 9 months of leaks from the Obama administration.

Yet catch Susan Rice actually lying about unmasking people in secret intelligence that was eventually leaked, and those same person's threshold for required "proof" of wrongdoing suddenly goes up 100x.

Comedy.

I'm sure you were one of the few who didn't immediately think benghazi was the worst thing ever.

Of course we need more proof. And we may never have it. But based on what we know I think a financial agreement is in place. Or maybe money laundering of some sort

I'm hearing the hammer is going to drop any day on Benghazi.

HoustonHusky

2001400ex said:

HoustonHusky said:

dhdawg said:

Hard to imagine it's all circumstantial

It is amusing how little evidence is needed from Liberals to convict Trump in their minds on nonexistent Russian links after 9 months of leaks from the Obama administration.

Yet catch Susan Rice actually lying about unmasking people in secret intelligence that was eventually leaked, and those same person's threshold for required "proof" of wrongdoing suddenly goes up 100x.

Comedy.

Funnier still, you read accusations of leaks from Susan rice and you believe that with no evidence. I'm still waiting for the wiretapping evidence.

No evidence? There were leaks of classified material. No one except maybe HondoFS disputes that.

She was at least one of (WSJ saying there was at least one other) that is now documented in computer logs to have unmasked officials in intelligence reports. She may or may not be the one that leaked it to the press, but the reports in which she unmasked people got leaked which at least puts her on the radar. You know, of an actual crime.

Meanwhile, the "best" evidence of Russian "connections" after 8 months of leaks and speculations of nutjobs like you is a fake report out of Ukraine on Manefort and some guy who doesn't work for Trump and runs a business meeting some Russian guy after the election.

Unless, of course, you want to consider Russia paying Bill Clinton millions and donating to the Clinton Foundation as interfering with the US election and policy...

HoustonHusky

dhdawg said:

HoustonHusky said:

dhdawg said:

Hard to imagine it's all circumstantial

It is amusing how little evidence is needed from Liberals to convict Trump in their minds on nonexistent Russian links after 9 months of leaks from the Obama administration.

Yet catch Susan Rice actually lying about unmasking people in secret intelligence that was eventually leaked, and those same person's threshold for required "proof" of wrongdoing suddenly goes up 100x.

Comedy.

I'm sure you were one of the few who didn't immediately think benghazi was the worst thing ever.

Of course we need more proof. And we may never have it. But based on what we know I think a financial agreement is in place. Or maybe money laundering of some sort

Not the worst thing ever? It wasn't WW3, but it was bad. And it was a result of shitty policy on many fronts.

Just as bad, however, was lying about it and telling lemmings like you it was a YouTube video and not terrorists doing it because there was an election in a few weeks and they didn't want the bad press.

And "more proof"? Try "any proof" to start with...the only one documented as having taken millions from Russia were the Clintons. Everyone seems to forget that little nugget.