How much are you willing to see YOUR taxes rise to be a sanctuary city?
Comments
-
Blah blah b l ah. There is no precedent for states ignoring federal law. The feds cam penalize with the power of the purse like they do daily in all areas of law.
-
Never go full democrat.RaceBannon said:Blah blah b l ah. There is no precedent for states ignoring federal law. The feds cam penalize with the power of the purse like they do daily in all areas of law.
-
Eric Holder couldn't eat a sandwich.
-
Sounds like you want all the potheads to go to federal prison.RaceBannon said:Blah blah b l ah. There is no precedent for states ignoring federal law. The feds cam penalize with the power of the purse like they do daily in all areas of law.
-
-
Wait what? Medical and recreational marijuana there?RaceBannon said:Blah blah b l ah. There is no precedent for states ignoring federal law. The feds cam penalize with the power of the purse like they do daily in all areas of law.
-
Typical Yankee propaganda!!1!RaceBannon said:There is nothing new about the Federal gubmint using money to coerce states. At all.
The states have to follow federal law.
-
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/07/sanctuary-cities-public-safety-kate-steinle-san-franciscoTequilla said:
It's the why is it so hard to just enforce the laws that we have part that boggles my mind ... it shouldn't be that difficult.PurpleThrobber said:FUUUUUUCK.
They should pay me if they want to do that shit.
Fuck this 'sanctuary city' bullshit. Either we are a nation of laws or we aren't. Fuck these little pockets of "well, we don't like that so we are willingly going to disobey".
*except for edibles. I like edibles.
Because it actually makes the community less safe?
Police aren't going to get anyone to cooperate if they are viewed as a local deportation force.
there's a reason these dreaded sanctuary counties exist even in red states. they actually serve a purpose besides protecting illegals -
M13 members love to help the cops but won't now
-
Why not? Cities, counties and States can openly conspire to evade federal immigration laws and welfare fraud, right?AlCzervik said:
Moving the goalposts as always. The executive branch cannot simply circumvent Congress and make up new conditions for federal grants. Trying to do this by executive order is unconstitutional. Period.RaceBannon said:Equal protection under the law is the law of the land. Democrats in Alabama can't decide they want Jim Crow back and Democrats in California can't pick and choose which laws they enforce.
States rights is a cover for racists, same as it ever was. A REAL liberal would know that.
Obama threatened funds over trans bathrooms. Deal with it faggots
https://washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/01/26/constitutional-problems-with-trumps-executive-order-on-sanctuary-cities/?utm_term=.8c0a931843bf -
For a guy that carries a copy of the Constitution around in his pocket you know remarkably little about its contents. Derp.doogie said:
Why not? Cities, counties and States can openly conspire to evade federal immigration laws and welfare fraud, right?AlCzervik said:
Moving the goalposts as always. The executive branch cannot simply circumvent Congress and make up new conditions for federal grants. Trying to do this by executive order is unconstitutional. Period.RaceBannon said:Equal protection under the law is the law of the land. Democrats in Alabama can't decide they want Jim Crow back and Democrats in California can't pick and choose which laws they enforce.
States rights is a cover for racists, same as it ever was. A REAL liberal would know that.
Obama threatened funds over trans bathrooms. Deal with it faggots
https://washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/01/26/constitutional-problems-with-trumps-executive-order-on-sanctuary-cities/?utm_term=.8c0a931843bf -
IronicAlCzervik said:
For a guy that carries a copy of the Constitution around in his pocket you know remarkably little about its contents. Derp.doogie said:
Why not? Cities, counties and States can openly conspire to evade federal immigration laws and welfare fraud, right?AlCzervik said:
Moving the goalposts as always. The executive branch cannot simply circumvent Congress and make up new conditions for federal grants. Trying to do this by executive order is unconstitutional. Period.RaceBannon said:Equal protection under the law is the law of the land. Democrats in Alabama can't decide they want Jim Crow back and Democrats in California can't pick and choose which laws they enforce.
States rights is a cover for racists, same as it ever was. A REAL liberal would know that.
Obama threatened funds over trans bathrooms. Deal with it faggots
https://washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/01/26/constitutional-problems-with-trumps-executive-order-on-sanctuary-cities/?utm_term=.8c0a931843bf -
@RaceBannon , a Q:
You make some hay out of the fact that the liberal islamofags on this bored didn't say anything when Obummer drafted his regulations allowing trans kids to go to bathrooms of their identified gender, as if that somehow justifies not caring about Trump's actions here.
So is the whole thing about a principle of some sort or just punching hippies?
Kinda seems like you would rather punch a hippie than be right. -
Yeah, don't make the crooks mad. If you do, you'll really be sorry!dhdawg said:
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/07/sanctuary-cities-public-safety-kate-steinle-san-franciscoTequilla said:
It's the why is it so hard to just enforce the laws that we have part that boggles my mind ... it shouldn't be that difficult.PurpleThrobber said:FUUUUUUCK.
They should pay me if they want to do that shit.
Fuck this 'sanctuary city' bullshit. Either we are a nation of laws or we aren't. Fuck these little pockets of "well, we don't like that so we are willingly going to disobey".
*except for edibles. I like edibles.
Because it actually makes the community less safe?
Police aren't going to get anyone to cooperate if they are viewed as a local deportation force.
there's a reason these dreaded sanctuary counties exist even in red states. they actually serve a purpose besides protecting illegals -
You are in so far over your head in this thread ...RaceBannon said:
IronicAlCzervik said:
For a guy that carries a copy of the Constitution around in his pocket you know remarkably little about its contents. Derp.doogie said:
Why not? Cities, counties and States can openly conspire to evade federal immigration laws and welfare fraud, right?AlCzervik said:
Moving the goalposts as always. The executive branch cannot simply circumvent Congress and make up new conditions for federal grants. Trying to do this by executive order is unconstitutional. Period.RaceBannon said:Equal protection under the law is the law of the land. Democrats in Alabama can't decide they want Jim Crow back and Democrats in California can't pick and choose which laws they enforce.
States rights is a cover for racists, same as it ever was. A REAL liberal would know that.
Obama threatened funds over trans bathrooms. Deal with it faggots
https://washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/01/26/constitutional-problems-with-trumps-executive-order-on-sanctuary-cities/?utm_term=.8c0a931843bf
Embarrassing. -
I'm against principles of some sort but for punching hippiesAZDuck said:@RaceBannon , a Q:
You make some hay out of the fact that the liberal islamofags on this bored didn't say anything when Obummer drafted his regulations allowing trans kids to go to bathrooms of their identified gender, as if that somehow justifies not caring about Trump's actions here.
So is the whole thing about a principle of some sort or just punching hippies?
Kinda seems like you would rather punch a hippie than be right. -
States and cities don't get to decide which fed laws they enforce and Trump is well within his powers to use the purse to enforce federal law. its that simple. So was Obama. I was pointing out that he used it.AZDuck said:@RaceBannon , a Q:
You make some hay out of the fact that the liberal islamofags on this bored didn't say anything when Obummer drafted his regulations allowing trans kids to go to bathrooms of their identified gender, as if that somehow justifies not caring about Trump's actions here.
So is the whole thing about a principle of some sort or just punching hippies?
Kinda seems like you would rather punch a hippie than be right. -
We'll save 27 billion. Federal money has strings attached. Nothing new.
-
27 billion from what?Sledog said:We'll save 27 billion. Federal money has strings attached. Nothing new.
