Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

2 QB's in 2018?

135

Comments

  • UDubHusky23UDubHusky23 Member Posts: 889
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    AlCzervik said:

    Holy shit, yeah 8 Crystal Balls for him to UW today... Hmmmmm

    It's up to 10 now.
    Yankoff is the better, more advanced QB. It's as simple as that and I have thought that since I first saw his Hudl. He can run too. The running ability is what it makes it a no brainer imo.

    Yankoff has produced monster games against Folsom and Camas. Sirmon has mostly shit the bed facing great competition.

    Being able to make all the throws is one thing. Yankoff can as well, plus he's more accurate and a much better runner.

    Some were mocked for saying they were unimpressed when they saw Sirmon in person. There was obviously "some" legitimacy to those complaints. That doesn't mean Sirmon isn't a big time prospect.

    This is a huge get. It's a very cuttthroat, championship move by Petersen. I doubt it would have happened unless there was no doubt Yankoff is better. It took big balls to make this move.
  • UDubHusky23UDubHusky23 Member Posts: 889

    AlCzervik said:

    Holy shit, yeah 8 Crystal Balls for him to UW today... Hmmmmm

    It's up to 10 now.
    Yankoff is the better, more advanced QB. It's as simple as that and I have thought that since I first saw his Hudl. He can run too. The running ability is what it makes it a no brainer imo.

    Yankoff has produced monster games against Folsom and Camas. Sirmon has mostly shit the bed facing great competition.

    Being able to make all the throws is one thing. Yankoff can as well, plus he's more accurate and a much better runner.

    Some were mocked for saying they were unimpressed when they saw Sirmon in person. There was obviously "some" legitimacy to those complaints. That doesn't mean Sirmon isn't a big time prospect.

    This is a huge get. It's a very cuttthroat, championship move by Petersen. I doubt it would have happened unless there was no doubt Yankoff is better. It took big balls to make this move.
    Are you sure Coach Pete is dropping Sirmon? I know Coach Pete has always said if your committed to us than the coaching staff won't go after another for your position.. this would be directly going against his recruiting philosophy.... basically everything he hates about recruiting he would be doing to Sirmon a hometown kid.....
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123

    AlCzervik said:

    Holy shit, yeah 8 Crystal Balls for him to UW today... Hmmmmm

    It's up to 10 now.
    Yankoff is the better, more advanced QB. It's as simple as that and I have thought that since I first saw his Hudl. He can run too. The running ability is what it makes it a no brainer imo.

    Yankoff has produced monster games against Folsom and Camas. Sirmon has mostly shit the bed facing great competition.

    Being able to make all the throws is one thing. Yankoff can as well, plus he's more accurate and a much better runner.

    Some were mocked for saying they were unimpressed when they saw Sirmon in person. There was obviously "some" legitimacy to those complaints. That doesn't mean Sirmon isn't a big time prospect.

    This is a huge get. It's a very cuttthroat, championship move by Petersen. I doubt it would have happened unless there was no doubt Yankoff is better. It took big balls to make this move.
    Are you sure Coach Pete is dropping Sirmon? I know Coach Pete has always said if your committed to us than the coaching staff won't go after another for your position.. this would be directly going against his recruiting philosophy.... basically everything he hates about recruiting he would be doing to Sirmon a hometown kid.....
    That is the surprising part about all of this. I'm pretty sure this is happening.

    Recruiting "experts" are all predicting Yankoff to UW. Sirmon puts out an omnimous tweet about God having a plan. These two were never going to the same school to compete. Why would they? They are both blue chip prospects with tons of offers.

    Things seem to be changing. Strausser was let go. That seemed unfathomable awhile back.

    I said while back I don't think Petersen coaches UW for the 10-15 years many do. He's making a sprint towards a championship.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,745
    Probably means Jackson is out too I would guess
  • UDubHusky23UDubHusky23 Member Posts: 889

    AlCzervik said:

    Holy shit, yeah 8 Crystal Balls for him to UW today... Hmmmmm

    It's up to 10 now.
    Yankoff is the better, more advanced QB. It's as simple as that and I have thought that since I first saw his Hudl. He can run too. The running ability is what it makes it a no brainer imo.

    Yankoff has produced monster games against Folsom and Camas. Sirmon has mostly shit the bed facing great competition.

    Being able to make all the throws is one thing. Yankoff can as well, plus he's more accurate and a much better runner.

    Some were mocked for saying they were unimpressed when they saw Sirmon in person. There was obviously "some" legitimacy to those complaints. That doesn't mean Sirmon isn't a big time prospect.

    This is a huge get. It's a very cuttthroat, championship move by Petersen. I doubt it would have happened unless there was no doubt Yankoff is better. It took big balls to make this move.
    Are you sure Coach Pete is dropping Sirmon? I know Coach Pete has always said if your committed to us than the coaching staff won't go after another for your position.. this would be directly going against his recruiting philosophy.... basically everything he hates about recruiting he would be doing to Sirmon a hometown kid.....
    That is the surprising part about all of this. I'm pretty sure this is happening.

    Recruiting "experts" are all predicting Yankoff to UW. Sirmon puts out an omnimous tweet about God having a plan. These two were never going to the same school to compete. Why would they? They are both blue chip prospects with tons of offers.

    Things seem to be changing. Strausser was let go. That seemed unfathomable awhile back.

    I said while back I don't think Petersen coaches UW for the 10-15 years many do. He's making a sprint towards a championship.
    I just find it hard to believe Petersen would do that to Sirmon and this is everything he hates/loathes about recruiting. Is this what the recruit experts are saying?
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123

    AlCzervik said:

    Holy shit, yeah 8 Crystal Balls for him to UW today... Hmmmmm

    It's up to 10 now.
    Yankoff is the better, more advanced QB. It's as simple as that and I have thought that since I first saw his Hudl. He can run too. The running ability is what it makes it a no brainer imo.

    Yankoff has produced monster games against Folsom and Camas. Sirmon has mostly shit the bed facing great competition.

    Being able to make all the throws is one thing. Yankoff can as well, plus he's more accurate and a much better runner.

    Some were mocked for saying they were unimpressed when they saw Sirmon in person. There was obviously "some" legitimacy to those complaints. That doesn't mean Sirmon isn't a big time prospect.

    This is a huge get. It's a very cuttthroat, championship move by Petersen. I doubt it would have happened unless there was no doubt Yankoff is better. It took big balls to make this move.
    Are you sure Coach Pete is dropping Sirmon? I know Coach Pete has always said if your committed to us than the coaching staff won't go after another for your position.. this would be directly going against his recruiting philosophy.... basically everything he hates about recruiting he would be doing to Sirmon a hometown kid.....
    That is the surprising part about all of this. I'm pretty sure this is happening.

    Recruiting "experts" are all predicting Yankoff to UW. Sirmon puts out an omnimous tweet about God having a plan. These two were never going to the same school to compete. Why would they? They are both blue chip prospects with tons of offers.

    Things seem to be changing. Strausser was let go. That seemed unfathomable awhile back.

    I said while back I don't think Petersen coaches UW for the 10-15 years many do. He's making a sprint towards a championship.
    I just find it hard to believe Petersen would do that to Sirmon and this is everything he hates/loathes about recruiting. Is this what the recruit experts are saying?
    It's however you want to look at it. Pete takes Yankoff's commitment and Sirmon isn't coming.

    There is a way for Pete to drop Sirmon without actually dropping him.

    I have no idea what any recruiting folk are saying.
  • UDubHusky23UDubHusky23 Member Posts: 889
    @RoadDawg55 yeah i just don't see Pete doing that to Sirmon. This might be naive of me but he would be doing to Sirmon what he expects all his recruits not to do... credibility would take a hit imho.
  • AtomicDawgAtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,092 Standard Supporter
    edited March 2017

    dnc said:

    My theory - Sirmon committed to UW, promised not to take trips. Now Sirmon wants to trip (Louisville?). Pete said "go for it" and offered Yankoff.

    Pete would take both but knows Sirmon will sell the couch.

    So in thinking all this shit through, one of the things Pete doesn't like is when kids accept and publicize offers from other schools after they commit ( Wedington and Ty Jones did this last year ), and Sirmon has done this ever since he committed to UW.

    All of this is so fascinating. Love it.
    personally i think we should take two if they both want to come but that is likely wishful. Probably was going to start visiting schools and they were cold blooded about it.

    I have seen Sirmon play a couple of times and physically the dude has a cannon. Not sure how ready he is between the ears or as a playmaker.

    Have not seen much of Yankoff but i love the no-bs moves like this. Can't act that way unless you have a backup plan which it appears they do.
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    if this was really a response to sirmon talking about taking visits I love it
  • AtomicDawgAtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,092 Standard Supporter
    edited March 2017
    Is it possible that Lubick prefers this guy over Sirmon and they trust his evaluation more than babushka? I have no clue just a thought.
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    Is it possible that Lubick prefers this guy over Sirmon and they trust his evaluation more than babushka? I have no clue just a thought.

    I thought that when I saw a Baylor offer on this kid.
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,861

    I want both.

    Whoever wins the competition is going to be a great QB.
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    juhsoon said:

    dhdawg said:

    since we're back in the mode of reading into every 17 year old's tweets sirmon RT'd this
    Also, from the rivals article:
    With the Huskies holding two commitments, Sirmon made it clear he is going no where: "I will compete no matter where I go."
    I'll believe it when it happens. Every coach in the country is now in Sirmon's ear. Long way to go. It can't feel good that the coaches are bringing in another guy in the same class.
  • AtomicDawgAtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,092 Standard Supporter

    juhsoon said:

    dhdawg said:

    since we're back in the mode of reading into every 17 year old's tweets sirmon RT'd this
    Also, from the rivals article:
    With the Huskies holding two commitments, Sirmon made it clear he is going no where: "I will compete no matter where I go."
    I'll believe it when it happens. Every coach in the country is now in Sirmon's ear. Long way to go. It can't feel good that the coaches are bringing in another guy in the same class.

    agree. he is going to have a lot people in his ear telling him what to do and it likely does not point to #mydogs
Sign In or Register to comment.