Bernie getting fucked over was a good thing. Did we really want a Communist as President?
If the democrats nominated him and he won, then yes. We let folks vote on this shit.
The democrats fucked themselves over. I think it's funny. The communist might have won, there are many dumb fucks who would have voted for him who have no concept of what communism really is, who think he would just give them a bunch of free shit that no one would have to pay for, while their freedom slowly got sucked away, which happens in every case without exception under communists.
The irony.
Oh pardon me. I forgot, he's a 'social democrat' or 'democratic socialist.'
Bernie getting fucked over was a good thing. Did we really want a Communist as President?
If the democrats nominated him and he won, then yes. We let folks vote on this shit.
The democrats fucked themselves over. I think it's funny. The communist might have won, there are many dumb fucks who would have voted for him who have no concept of what communism really is, who think he would just give them a bunch of free shit that no one would have to pay for, while their freedom slowly got sucked away, which happens in every case without exception under communists.
The irony.
Oh pardon me. I forgot, he's a 'social democrat' or 'democratic socialist.'
No you were right Bernie literally planned on nationalizing every single business in the country.
It's basically the only yard to play in, that's the problem. That company has way too much control over the flow of information. And they've been cracking down on free speech for a long time now. The founders couldn't have foresaw the internet. We need a constitutional amendment to protect free speech and the free flow of information online.
It's basically the only yard to play in, that's the problem. That company has way too much control over the flow of information. And they've been cracking down on free speech for a long time now. The founders couldn't have foresaw the internet. We need a constitutional amendment to protect free speech and the free flow of information online.
But how do we determine when a company is too dominant in its field? You're making the same argument for regulation and breaking up monopolies that prevailed with the Bell System, or that I think should be applied to "too big to fail" banks, Goldman Sachs, many public utilities and the oil companies.
For example, your guy Trump isn't pro "net neutrality" at all. That's a big deal, as you rightly point out.
I believe public goods should be regulated, but I also believe that a market system should be made as free as possible to function within the boundaries that provide the greatest good for the greatest number. Forever and ever, amen.
If Trump is against a free internet I would be the first to tell him to fuck off. Just like his good ole boy prig AG Sessions who wants to ban weed. He can go fuck himself too.
If Trump is against a free internet I would be the first to tell him to fuck off. Just like his good ole boy prig AG Sessions who wants to ban weed. He can go fuck himself too.
Comments
For example, your guy Trump isn't pro "net neutrality" at all. That's a big deal, as you rightly point out.
I believe public goods should be regulated, but I also believe that a market system should be made as free as possible to function within the boundaries that provide the greatest good for the greatest number. Forever and ever, amen.