Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Sessions
Comments
-
RaceBannon said:
Its a 4 page thread that I have two posts inCirrhosisDawg said:
Your fucking previous post. Quoting the WA post. It wreaks of desperateness. Trumpanzees are in full on panic responding like this. Even the orangutan himself had to tweet today. Sad!RaceBannon said:
Link?CirrhosisDawg said:
Then why are you so defensive?RaceBannon said:
The full transcript shows he specifically said in regards to the campaign. No serious person thinks he perjured himself. Even the WAPO time line said it's an over reach.ThomasFremont said:
Sessions: "Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn't have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it."RaceBannon said:
Except he didn't but stillThomasFremont said:JFC, meeting with the Russians isn't the issue.
Lying about it under oath is.
Some of you need to learn the difference.
Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., asked: "Several of the President-elect’s nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?"
Sessions responded, in total: "No."
Fake post!
This non issue was resolved yesterday when it collapsed in on itself. Hope this helps
The perjury issue? Likely true it's going nowhere based on the standard of evidence required. Sessions had all the time in the world to explain how and why he met the Russian ambassador. Why didn't he? Fremont was correctly pointing out that the point of the sessions debate is that it was given under oath to congress.RaceBannon said:
Its a 4 page thread that I have two posts inCirrhosisDawg said:
Your fucking previous post. Quoting the WA post. It wreaks of desperateness. Trumpanzees are in full on panic responding like this. Even the orangutan himself had to tweet today. Sad!RaceBannon said:
Link?CirrhosisDawg said:
Then why are you so defensive?RaceBannon said:
The full transcript shows he specifically said in regards to the campaign. No serious person thinks he perjured himself. Even the WAPO time line said it's an over reach.ThomasFremont said:
Sessions: "Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn't have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it."RaceBannon said:
Except he didn't but stillThomasFremont said:JFC, meeting with the Russians isn't the issue.
Lying about it under oath is.
Some of you need to learn the difference.
Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., asked: "Several of the President-elect’s nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?"
Sessions responded, in total: "No."
Fake post!
This non issue was resolved yesterday when it collapsed in on itself. Hope this helps -
Witnessing @CirrhosisDawg double-tard poast hurts my eyes.
-
This went off the rails quickly.
-
New bored motto!WilburHooksHands said:This went off the rails quickly.
-
It's Friday. I'm already drunk. What do you expect?WilburHooksHands said:This went off the rails quickly.
-
Trump won the election by 3-5 million votes.dnc said:
I never bitched about that regarding Obama and neither Trump nor Sessions are my guy. Oh for three.2001400ex said:
I remember the bitching saying Obama lied about saving $2,500 in medical insurance. Which was a campaign promise. Where was the burden of proof there?dnc said:
Because the timeframe "about the 2016 election" frames the discussion. The burden of proof is not that he talked to a Russian, it's that he talked to a Russian about the election. Until that's established, he hasn't perjured anything.2001400ex said:
Who do you not read this: "Either before or after election day."dnc said:
oopsThomasFremont said:
Sessions: "Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn't have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it."RaceBannon said:
Except he didn't but stillThomasFremont said:JFC, meeting with the Russians isn't the issue.
Lying about it under oath is.
Some of you need to learn the difference.
Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., asked: "Several of the President-elect’s nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?"
Sessions responded, in total: " No"
Maybe the dems should axe better questions.
See what I'm getting at? Just because he's your guy, doesn't mean you should stick up for him and follow what your masters say. He lied. Period.
You're fucking clueless as usual.
If he was asked if he spoke about the campaign to a Russian, and said no, you're gonna have to prove that he spoke about the campaign before you can say he lied. If he lied run his ass, doesn't make a difference to me. As it is all I see is a bunch of bitching about nothing. -
No!?TurdBuffer said:
It's Friday. I'm already drunk. What do you expect?WilburHooksHands said:This went off the rails quickly.
-
It doesn't.doogie said:What difference does it make?
But this is the shitty political game that gets played in DC.
Stop acting like you haven't seen it before from both shitty ass parties. -
dflea said:
It doesn't.doogie said:What difference does it make?
But this is the shitty political game that gets played in DC.
Stop acting like you haven't seen it before from both shitty ass parties.
https://youtu.be/KaUljset52k
Today in the Senate. -
The move to Friday drinking really improved the content.
