Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Sessions

124

Comments

  • WilburHooksHandsWilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804
    edited March 2017
    dnc said:

    oops
    Unfortunately, this. Legally malleable question.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 111,043 Founders Club

    Sessions: "Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn't have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it."

    Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., asked: "Several of the President-elect’s nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?"

    Sessions responded, in total: "No."
    The full transcript shows he specifically said in regards to the campaign. No serious person thinks he perjured himself. Even the WAPO time line said it's an over reach.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,999 Standard Supporter

    Got it. You accept your inferiority. It's a first step. Good luck!
    You smelt it you dealt it. Don't worry, Cuck. I won't fuck your fat, ugly girlfriend who likes bald guys.
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    You smelt it you dealt it. Don't worry, Cuck. I won't fuck your fat, ugly girlfriend who likes bald guys.
    You are so mad!!!
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    The full transcript shows he specifically said in regards to the campaign. No serious person thinks he perjured himself. Even the WAPO time line said it's an over reach.
    Then why are you so defensive?
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 111,043 Founders Club

    Then why are you so defensive?
    Link?
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    Link?
    Your fucking previous post. Quoting the WA post. It wreaks of desperateness. Trumpanzees are in full on panic responding like this. Even the orangutan himself had to tweet today. Sad!
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 111,043 Founders Club

    Your fucking previous post. Quoting the WA post. It wreaks of desperateness. Trumpanzees are in full on panic responding like this. Even the orangutan himself had to tweet today. Sad!
    Its a 4 page thread that I have two posts in

    Fake post!

    This non issue was resolved yesterday when it collapsed in on itself. Hope this helps
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,999 Standard Supporter

    You are so mad!!!
    No, no, no. Christ. You do it like this: "Why are you so Angry?"

    You can't even fag-poast correctly. C'mon kid. Pick up your game or stay on the bench.
  • BearsWiinBearsWiin Member Posts: 5,043

    The full transcript shows he specifically said in regards to the campaign. No serious person thinks he perjured himself. Even the WAPO time line said it's an over reach.
    It's really hard to make a perjury charge stick. He may have, but there's enough plausible deniability here that, absent concrete intel on what exactly was discussed between Sessions and Kislyak, this probably goes nowhere. The interesting thing will be if concrete intel emerges that does show he perjured himself, then it's a slam dunk. But for that to happen, US intel agencies might have to divulge info on methods and capabilities that they would rather not divulge.
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    Its a 4 page thread that I have two posts in

    Fake post!

    This non issue was resolved yesterday when it collapsed in on itself. Hope this helps

    Its a 4 page thread that I have two posts in

    Fake post!

    This non issue was resolved yesterday when it collapsed in on itself. Hope this helps
    The perjury issue? Likely true it's going nowhere based on the standard of evidence required. Sessions had all the time in the world to explain how and why he met the Russian ambassador. Why didn't he? Fremont was correctly pointing out that the point of the sessions debate is that it was given under oath to congress.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,999 Standard Supporter
    Witnessing @CirrhosisDawg double-tard poast hurts my eyes.
  • WilburHooksHandsWilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804
    This went off the rails quickly.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,827

    This went off the rails quickly.

    New bored motto!
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,999 Standard Supporter

    This went off the rails quickly.

    It's Friday. I'm already drunk. What do you expect?
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    dnc said:

    I never bitched about that regarding Obama and neither Trump nor Sessions are my guy. Oh for three.

    You're fucking clueless as usual.

    If he was asked if he spoke about the campaign to a Russian, and said no, you're gonna have to prove that he spoke about the campaign before you can say he lied. If he lied run his ass, doesn't make a difference to me. As it is all I see is a bunch of bitching about nothing.
    Trump won the election by 3-5 million votes.
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    It's Friday. I'm already drunk. What do you expect?
    No!?
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,276
    doogie said:

    What difference does it make?

    It doesn't.

    But this is the shitty political game that gets played in DC.

    Stop acting like you haven't seen it before from both shitty ass parties.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,999 Standard Supporter
    dflea said:

    It doesn't.

    But this is the shitty political game that gets played in DC.

    Stop acting like you haven't seen it before from both shitty ass parties.
    https://youtu.be/KaUljset52k
    Today in the Senate.
Sign In or Register to comment.